# V4 İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "V4" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

The DeepSeek You've Been Waiting For Has Long Changed

The article discusses the delayed release of DeepSeek V4, a highly anticipated AI model in China, and explores the reasons behind its slowed development. Initially a leader in the global AI race, DeepSeek has fallen behind competitors like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, which release major updates every few months. A key factor is DeepSeek's shift in focus due to national strategic priorities. In early 2025, the Chinese government encouraged the company to use Huawei’s Ascend processors instead of NVIDIA’s GPUs, aligning with broader efforts to achieve technological self-reliance. DeepSeek attempted to train its models on Huawei’s Ascend 910C chips but faced technical challenges, including instability and communication issues during distributed training. As a result, the company continued using NVIDIA hardware for training while only using Ascend chips for inference. In 2026, DeepSeek prioritized adapting V4 to Huawei’s new Ascend 950PR and Cambricon chips, aiming for a full migration from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s CANN framework. This adaptation process, particularly ensuring precision alignment across hardware, consumed significant time and resources, slowing down model iteration. The delay also reflects DeepSeek’s evolving role from a purely market-driven entity to a "national mission-oriented" company. This shift has come at a cost: the model now lags behind competitors in areas like code generation and multimodal capabilities, and the company has faced talent drain, with key researchers leaving for better-paying opportunities at larger tech firms. Despite these challenges, V4’s release is seen as a potential milestone for China’s AI industry, demonstrating that advanced models can run on domestic hardware ecosystems. While it may not be a groundbreaking model in terms of performance, its success could validate China’s broader strategy for AI independence.

marsbit2 gün önce 10:32

The DeepSeek You've Been Waiting For Has Long Changed

marsbit2 gün önce 10:32

The V5 That Never Came: Uniswap Stuck in an Innovation Dilemma

ChainCatcher author Gu Yu analyzes Uniswap's perceived slowdown in innovation. Despite its history of rapid iteration—from V1 in 2018 to V4 in 2023—the protocol has not announced a new version since. V4 introduced Hooks, a programmable plugin system allowing custom functions like dynamic fees and MEV protection, but its mainnet launch was delayed to January 2025 due to security audits. V4’s TVL peaked at $1.2 billion but has since fallen to $650 million, only 40% of V3’s TVL. Uniswap expanded to new blockchains and API partnerships but faced challenges with newer initiatives: its appchain, Unichain, saw TVL drop from $900 million to $36 million, and its token auction product (CCA) entered a crowded market. High-profile departures and a 74% drop in UNI token price over the past year reflect operational and growth struggles. A proposal to enable fee mechanisms and burn tokens briefly boosted UNI’s price, but Uniswap’s annualized revenue remains behind competitors like PancakeSwap and Aave. The article concludes that Uniswap’s situation mirrors broader DeFi stagnation but notes its strong security record and leading position in decentralized trading. The future of V5 and its role in driving the next DeFi wave remain uncertain.

marsbit04/11 04:13

The V5 That Never Came: Uniswap Stuck in an Innovation Dilemma

marsbit04/11 04:13

Aave Mired in a Crisis of Confidence: Service Providers Exit En Masse, Failures in Technology, Governance, and Risk Control

Aave, a leading DeFi lending protocol, is facing a severe internal crisis marked by the departure of key service providers, raising concerns about its governance, security, and future direction. The crisis began when Chaos Labs, the protocol's long-time risk management provider, terminated its relationship with Aave. The firm cited financial losses, the exit of other major contributors, and fundamental disagreements over the risk architecture of the upcoming Aave V4. Aave Labs declined Chaos Labs' demands for a significant fee increase and exclusive control over key functions like risk management and oracle services. This exit followed the departure of two other critical partners. BGD Labs, the primary technical contributor to Aave V3, accused Aave Labs of forcing an aggressive transition to V4 by limiting V3 development and devaluing its work. Subsequently, the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI), a major governance service provider, announced its planned exit, criticizing Aave Labs for centralizing power and controlling a large portion of voting tokens. The conflict highlights a central paradox within DAOs: the tension between founder-led vision and decentralized governance, and between long-term protocol health and short-term capital interests. Aave Labs is pushing for a more integrated and efficient "Aave Will Win" model with V4, arguing it is necessary for competing at an institutional level. However, critics warn this centralization comes at the cost of the protocol's decentralized credibility and increases systemic risk. The immediate impacts include a potential security downgrade, a loss of institutional knowledge, and damaged community trust. While Aave Labs views this as a painful but necessary transition, the market is watching cautiously as the protocol navigates this period of significant internal turmoil.

marsbit04/10 10:14

Aave Mired in a Crisis of Confidence: Service Providers Exit En Masse, Failures in Technology, Governance, and Risk Control

marsbit04/10 10:14

$10 mln in AAVE inflows signal a potential breakout – What’s next for price?

After weeks of weak sentiment and price stagnation, Aave V4 has attracted over $10 million in deposits, signaling fresh capital inflow and potential price expansion. Despite trading in a $90-$130 range for a month, indicators suggest a shift: the Stochastic RSI is rebounding from oversold levels, spot market demand is strengthening, and whales are accumulating positions in derivatives markets. This alignment of fundamental growth, capital inflow, and technical strength hints at a possible bullish reversal. A decisive break above resistance could confirm a broader market repricing, driven by rising protocol usage and sustained buyer interest.

ambcrypto04/09 17:03

$10 mln in AAVE inflows signal a potential breakout – What’s next for price?

ambcrypto04/09 17:03

Chaos Labs Exits, Who Will Take Over Aave's Risk?

Chaos Labs, the core risk management provider for Aave V2 and V3 markets, has announced its decision to terminate its partnership with Aave. Despite Aave Labs increasing the budget to $5 million to retain them, Chaos Labs chose to leave due to fundamental disagreements on how risk should be managed. Key reasons for the departure include: the loss of core Aave contributors increasing operational risk, the expanded scope and complexity introduced by Aave V4 (which requires rebuilding risk infrastructure from scratch), and the fact that Chaos Labs operated at a financial loss even with increased budgets. They estimate that proper risk management for both V3 and V4 should cost at least $8 million annually (≈5.6% of protocol revenue), closer to traditional banking standards, rather than the previous 2%. Chaos Labs emphasized that Aave’s reputation and institutional adoption rely heavily on its risk management track record. They also highlighted unquantified costs like legal liability and operational security risks. The exit occurs as Aave plans its V4 upgrade and expands into institutional markets. Chaos Labs warns that migrating to V4 while maintaining V3 will double, not halve, the workload, and that accumulated operational experience cannot be easily transferred. The decision reflects a principled stance: Chaos Labs only attaches its name to work that meets its high-risk standards, even at significant financial sacrifice.

marsbit04/07 03:36

Chaos Labs Exits, Who Will Take Over Aave's Risk?

marsbit04/07 03:36

Deciphering Aave V4: A Transformation from Product to "Bank"

On March 30, Aave V4 officially launched on the mainnet, introducing a major architectural redesign centered around a unified liquidity model called "Hub and Spoke." The core change replaces isolated lending markets with a centralized liquidity pool (Hub) per chain or L2, which manages global liquidity, credit limits, and system constraints. Different Hubs (Core, Prime, Plus) cater to varying risk profiles and user needs. Spokes function as independent markets with custom parameters, allowing borrowers to access assets from the shared pool under specific rules. V4 improves capital efficiency by introducing risk-based interest rates—where borrowers using volatile collateral pay higher rates—and a refined liquidation mechanism that only restores positions to a target health factor. Additionally, idle liquidity in Hubs can be automatically deployed to governance-approved yield strategies, boosting returns for suppliers and DAO revenue. While the update doesn’t radically change the lending experience for users with high-quality collateral, it transforms Aave from a product into a bank-like financial infrastructure. This sets the stage for future expansions into services like structured products, credit facilities, and investment banking operations.

marsbit03/31 09:06

Deciphering Aave V4: A Transformation from Product to "Bank"

marsbit03/31 09:06

Aave Spends $1.5M on 345-Day Audit to Strengthen V4 Security

Aave Labs has invested $1.5 million in an extensive 345-day audit program for its upcoming V4 upgrade, making it one of the most comprehensive security reviews in DeFi. The audit involved multiple security firms, including ChainSecurity, Trail of Bits, Blackthorn, and Certora, as well as a public contest hosted on Sherlock. Over 900 researchers participated and submitted more than 950 findings. No critical or high-severity vulnerabilities were discovered, reinforcing confidence in Aave’s hub-and-spoke architecture. The new security framework integrates formal verification, layered manual and automated testing, continuous monitoring, bug bounties, and AI tools to detect unusual attack paths from the earliest development phase.

TheNewsCrypto03/06 08:30

Aave Spends $1.5M on 345-Day Audit to Strengthen V4 Security

TheNewsCrypto03/06 08:30

Aave struggles as BGD Labs plans April exit amid governance crisis

BGD Labs, a major service provider for the Aave DAO, announced it will exit by early April, citing concerns over Aave Labs' aggressive push toward centralized control. The team criticized Aave Labs for disregarding existing contributors' expertise and leveraging its influence over brand rights and voting power. BGD Labs, which built much of Aave V3, accused Aave Labs of promoting its own V4 upgrade by criticizing the current version. In response, Aave Labs founder Stani Kulechov assured the community that maintenance would continue and expressed support for retaining BGD under a new security arrangement. The ongoing governance crisis, including previous disputes over revenue sharing and a $50 million funding demand from Aave Labs, has unsettled investors. AAVE’s price dropped 8% following the news, reflecting market uncertainty.

ambcrypto02/21 10:01

Aave struggles as BGD Labs plans April exit amid governance crisis

ambcrypto02/21 10:01

Aave DAO Wins, But the Game Is Not Over Yet

Aave DAO has achieved a significant governance victory after months of community pressure, as Aave Labs has proposed transferring 100% of Aave-branded product revenue to the DAO treasury, committing to V4 as the future technical core, and establishing a foundation to hold brand IP. However, the proposal raises several concerns. The definition of "100% revenue" remains under Aave Labs' discretion, lacking independent audits or DAO-approved caps on deductions. The requested funding—$42.5M in stablecoins and 75K AAVE tokens—represents a large, concentrated allocation from the DAO treasury. Additionally, the proposal bundles multiple decisions (revenue sharing, V4 adoption, foundation creation, and funding) into a single vote, limiting granular community input. There are also concerns about governance influence, as the AAVE token transfer could shift voting power without full disclosure of existing holdings. While the direction is positive, the author recommends splitting the proposal, ensuring foundation independence, mandating wallet disclosures, and implementing independent revenue verification before any funds are transferred.

marsbit02/13 03:17

Aave DAO Wins, But the Game Is Not Over Yet

marsbit02/13 03:17

Aave Founder Responds To Governance Tension With Strategic Plan – Details

Aave founder Stani Kulechov has introduced a strategic plan to address governance tensions and drive long-term growth, following a recent DAO vote where a proposal to transfer full control of the protocol’s brand and front-end assets to the community was overwhelmingly rejected. Kulechov emphasized the need to expand beyond crypto-native lending into real-world assets (RWAs) and institutional markets, targeting a $500 trillion asset base and onboarding millions of users. The upcoming Aave V4 will feature a flexible architecture to support new lending models and asset classes safely. He argued that consumer products should be developed by autonomous teams rather than directly by the DAO to ensure agility, while committing to share off-protocol revenue with token holders and establish clearer branding and revenue alignment.

bitcoinist01/04 11:16

Aave Founder Responds To Governance Tension With Strategic Plan – Details

bitcoinist01/04 11:16

活动图片

Trading Strategies

Regulatory Policy