# Pivot İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "Pivot" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

Digital Asset Management Companies Aim to Leverage AI Boom Amid Disappearing Crypto Premiums

Struggling digital asset management (DAT) companies are pivoting to artificial intelligence to attract investor interest, as the model of trading at a premium to their cryptocurrency holdings collapses. According to a Bloomberg report, at least a dozen DAT firms have refocused on AI-related projects amid falling token prices and declining market values, with early results proving disappointing. Examples include significant stock drops for companies like K Wave Media (-71%) and Alphaton Capital (-33%) after their rebranding efforts. The decline of the crypto treasury premium model, where companies issued stock to buy crypto hoping for a premium valuation, has led to a median 43% stock drop for tracked US and Canadian firms this year. As cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum fell from their peaks, companies are now exploring data centers, space ventures, and small nuclear reactors. This AI shift mirrors past corporate trends chasing popular themes. Bitcoin miners may have a more viable path due to adaptable power contracts, land, and data centers for high-performance computing, as seen with Coreweave's successful transition to cloud computing. Other miners like Hut 8 have also attracted investors after pivoting to AI. However, for financial firms without comparable infrastructure, a mere name change may be insufficient, leading observers to suggest the era of DAT companies as known is likely over.

cryptonews.ru14 saat önce

Digital Asset Management Companies Aim to Leverage AI Boom Amid Disappearing Crypto Premiums

cryptonews.ru14 saat önce

Bought Bitcoin at $117,000, Sold at $62,000 in Tears: This Company’s Faith Only Lasted a Year

Wall Street's once-hot trend of corporate "Bitcoin hoarding" has hit a painful reality check. Empery Digital, formerly an electric motorcycle company, pivoted to Bitcoin in July 2025, accumulating over 4,000 BTC at an average cost of approximately $117,600 each. As Bitcoin's price plummeted, the company faced massive paper losses exceeding its total market value by early 2026, triggering internal conflict with a major shareholder demanding a sale. In a stark reversal from its earlier refusal to sell, Empery Digital recently sold 1,400 BTC at an average price of $62,000, locking in a significant loss of roughly $77 million on just those coins. The proceeds were used to pay down $10 million in debt, prepare for legal fees related to shareholder lawsuits, and, most notably, fund a new strategic shift: a $65 million investment for a 25% stake in an AI data center facility. This move completes a cycle of chasing market trends—from electric vehicles to Bitcoin treasury and now to AI infrastructure. Empery's case exposes the leveraged nature of the corporate "treasury model," where buying Bitcoin with borrowed money works only while prices rise. Once the asset fell below its cost basis, the company was forced to sell at a loss to service debt and pivot to the next opportunity. The company's remaining assets are 1,514 BTC and its ambitions in AI, demonstrating that its stated "long-term belief" in Bitcoin had a clear price tag: a 50% discount.

marsbit07/21 01:25

Bought Bitcoin at $117,000, Sold at $62,000 in Tears: This Company’s Faith Only Lasted a Year

marsbit07/21 01:25

Base Abandons Social Direction, Founder Admits Strategic Failure

Base, the Ethereum Layer-2 network often called the "L2 King," has formally ended its three-year "exploration era," with co-founder Jesse Pollak admitting its strategic focus on social applications was a mistake. In a recent statement, Pollak acknowledged that bets on social platforms like Farcaster and Zora, creator coins, and mini-apps failed to drive mainstream crypto adoption, leaving Base behind competitors in areas like perpetual contracts and payment solutions. He confirmed that Base's flagship app will now be managed by Cobie, a community leader, under Coinbase's oversight. Pollak's review highlighted Base's past struggles: leadership overemphasized a "creator economy" with limited real earnings for creators, development often followed trends set by Solana or BNB Chain, and a significant portion of on-chain activity was reportedly inflated. The vision of using social media to onboard billions to crypto clashed with the dominance of established Web2 platforms. Moving forward, Base will pivot to three core areas, as outlined by both Pollak and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong: **trading** (including tokenized stocks and memecoins), **payments** (leveraging global stablecoins), and **AI Agent services** (preparing for a machine-driven economy using crypto as native currency). This shift is seen as a return to crypto's fundamental strengths—finance and transactions. The strategic change coincides with personnel shifts at Coinbase, including the departure of executives like the Chief Legal Officer. Notably, Pollak himself has returned to hands-on coding. Furthermore, Coinbase reports that over 95% of its code is now AI-generated or assisted, with AI agents already performing work equivalent to about 1,200 employees—a trend expected to grow significantly, signaling how AI is reshaping the company's own operations as Base prepares to serve a future AI Agent economy.

Odaily星球日报07/16 07:59

Base Abandons Social Direction, Founder Admits Strategic Failure

Odaily星球日报07/16 07:59

ZORA Plunges 95%, Coinbase Finally Admits Creator Coins Failed

On July 13th, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong publicly declared the failure of Base network's year-long "content coins" strategy. Initially launched in 2025 via the Zora platform and integrated into Coinbase's wallet as a core feature, the model aimed to turn every social media post into a tradeable token. Each post or creator account would generate 1 billion ERC-20 tokens, with creators receiving an initial allocation. The concept briefly propelled Base to become the largest L2 by new token issuance. However, the model proved unsustainable. These tokens, explicitly not granting ownership or revenue shares, primarily functioned as speculative assets dependent on new buyers. While activity surged in mid-2025—with millions of tokens minted and billions in trading volume—it failed to build lasting user engagement or value. High-profile token launches, including one by Base's official account, experienced extreme volatility, often crashing shortly after spikes. The supporting infrastructure token, ZORA, plummeted approximately 95% from its August 2025 peak, losing nearly $520 million in market capitalization. Armstrong acknowledged the misstep, stating "it didn't work" and that Base had shifted focus earlier in the year toward its core competencies of trading and stablecoin payments. This pivot follows internal criticism that the content coin experiment consumed excessive resources, harmed other Base projects, and ultimately resulted in significant financial losses for participating users.

Foresight News07/14 03:46

ZORA Plunges 95%, Coinbase Finally Admits Creator Coins Failed

Foresight News07/14 03:46

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin and Now AI: Cango's "What Not to Do" Strategy Cango, a Chinese auto finance platform that went public on the NYSE in 2018, is undergoing its third major transformation. After selling its entire auto business in 2024, it pivoted to become a large-scale Bitcoin miner, acquiring 50 exahash of mining rigs from Bitmain. However, its true goal was never Bitcoin, but owning and controlling energy infrastructure. Now, Cango is pivoting again. While most listed Bitcoin miners are leasing power to giant hyperscalers for AI training clusters, Cango is taking the opposite path. It has launched an AI inference subsidiary called EcoHash, focusing not on training but on distributed inference. The company's strategy hinges on the insight that over 70% of mining industry power is controlled by small, independent sites (10-50 MW), which are too small for hyperscalers but ideal for low-latency AI inference. Cango aims to partner with these small operators, providing the AI technology, customers, and financing through its EcoLink software layer, which can distribute workloads across sites for reliability. Cango maintains a hybrid model, running roughly 31.7 EH/s of Bitcoin mining for cash flow while aggressively cleaning its balance sheet—slashing long-term debt by 94.5% to $30.6 million and raising $75 million for its AI venture. Its first AI deployment will be at a 50 MW site in Georgia. The strategy faces skepticism, given the high costs of converting mining sites and the potential for an AI bubble. However, Cango's leadership believes discipline around "what not to do"—avoiding direct competition with hyperscalers in training—positions it to capture the long-tail demand for distributed AI inference power.

Foresight News07/11 07:56

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

Foresight News07/11 07:56

Does Switching Chains to Re-entrepreneur Really "Change One's Destiny"?

Amid a recent wave of blockchain migrations, several established projects, including Sophon, Moonbeam, and Secret Network, are moving to new ecosystems like Base and Arbitrum. Unlike past migrations driven by hype or security, these moves are often accompanied by strategic pivots, such as shifting focus to consumer applications, AI, or privacy-AI integration, effectively representing a "re-startup" attempt. However, the crypto community has reacted cautiously. Following Secret Network's announcement of its planned migration to Arbitrum, its token price plummeted over 30% in 24 hours. While migrating to more cost-efficient, higher-traffic, or technologically suitable chains can be a pragmatic choice, history shows that such moves rarely guarantee success. Examples like the y00ts NFT project, which moved from Solana to Polygon and then to Ethereum, or Synthetix’s retreat from a multi-chain strategy, illustrate the challenges and often underwhelming results. The current market environment, characterized by greater user rationality and the partial validation of past narratives, makes a successful "pivot via migration" even more difficult. Simultaneously, destination chains themselves face challenges in demonstrating sustainable user adoption beyond merely attracting migrating projects. Ultimately, the competition is shifting from which chain can onboard the most projects to which can genuinely foster real-world application and retain users.

链捕手07/10 10:07

Does Switching Chains to Re-entrepreneur Really "Change One's Destiny"?

链捕手07/10 10:07

IP Token Plunges 98%, Is DATA Rebranding the Last-Ditch Effort? Analyzing Story Protocol's Transformation

IP Token Plummets 98%, Is DATA Rebranding a Last Gamble? Analyzing Story Protocol's Pivot **Summary** Story Protocol, having seen its IP token fall approximately 98% from its all-time high, announced a major pivot on June 25, rebranding as the DATA Foundation. The project will shift its focus from IP to AI training data infrastructure, with a corresponding token change from IP to DATA. While the announcement triggered a brief price bounce, the token soon fell back near its lows. This analysis argues that such a fundamental rebrand is not typically a bullish signal, but rather an admission that the original strategy failed. Historically, rebrands fail when not backed by genuine improvements in product, user adoption, or liquidity, as seen in cases like MultiversX (Elrond) and Golem. Merely chasing a new narrative without execution is insufficient. Conversely, successful pivots are defined by on-chain evidence of growth. The transformation of ETHLend into Aave is the prime example, where a surge in Total Value Locked (TVL) and users preceded and drove long-term value. Projects like Polygon and Kaia, despite price declines, show underlying operational strength. Story’s pivot, announced just two weeks after its token hit a record low, risks being perceived as a last-ditch marketing effort. Leadership changes—with founder Seung Yoon Lee moving to an advisory role—further close the chapter on the original vision. For the DATA rebrand to succeed, it must demonstrably improve the token's relative strength against the market, boost on-chain liquidity/volume, and generate real user growth and settlement revenue from its new AI data narrative. Without such tangible results, Story will likely join the list of failed rebrands.

Foresight News07/10 07:47

IP Token Plunges 98%, Is DATA Rebranding the Last-Ditch Effort? Analyzing Story Protocol's Transformation

Foresight News07/10 07:47

The Fall of Zapper: An Act of God or a Human Error?

The Fall of Zapper: A Post-Mortem of a DeFi Pioneer In July 2026, Zapper, a once-dominant DeFi portfolio tracker, announced its shutdown. Born in 2020 from a merger, Zapper capitalized on the DeFi Summer boom, reaching 2 million monthly users and processing over $13B in transactions, backed by $16.5M in funding from investors like Framework Ventures and Coinbase Ventures. Its core "Zap" feature simplified complex multi-step DeFi operations. Despite its early success, Zapper failed to build a sustainable business model. Revenue from DEX aggregation was minimal due to fierce competition, while maintaining its multi-chain data infrastructure was costly. Furthermore, the DeFi landscape shifted: capital consolidated around top protocols, reducing the need for complex portfolio tracking across numerous platforms. Zapper's user base and core demand eroded. The company attempted multiple pivots, including an NFT-based points system, a social app (Chainchat), and plans for a ZAP token protocol. However, these initiatives—often focused on creating new, speculative C端需求 rather than solving existing pain points—ultimately failed. Critics argue Zapper remained trapped in a "blockchain purist" mindset, prioritizing costly, non-revenue-generating features over its competitive DEX aggregator. Unlike competitor DeBank, which successfully pivoted to its Rabby Wallet, Zapper lacked a diversified revenue stream. Its closure highlights the peril for tooling projects that fail to adapt to market shifts and monetize effectively, serving as a cautionary tale for the industry.

Foresight News07/10 02:11

The Fall of Zapper: An Act of God or a Human Error?

Foresight News07/10 02:11

活动图片