SlowMist Flags Snap Store Attack Targeting Crypto Seed Phrases

TheNewsCrypto2026-01-21 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-21 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Blockchain security firm SlowMist has identified a new Linux-based threat targeting cryptocurrency users through the Snap Store. Attackers hijack trusted publisher accounts by exploiting expired domains, then push malicious updates to popular wallet apps like Exodus, Ledger Live, and Trust Wallet. These fake apps prompt users to enter their recovery phrases, which are then stolen, enabling attackers to drain funds. This supply-chain attack exploits user trust in official update channels, making it highly effective. SlowMist warns users to verify publishers and avoid entering seed phrases on unfamiliar platforms, highlighting a growing trend of infrastructure-focused attacks in crypto security.

Blockchain security firm SlowMist has flagged a new Linux-based threat that targets crypto recovery phrases by exploiting trusted apps distributed through the Snap Store. The company warned that attackers are hijacking long-standing Snap Store publisher accounts and pushing malicious wallet updates through official distribution channels, putting long-time Linux users at risk.

In a post on X, SlowMist chief information security officer 23pds said attackers are abusing expired domains linked to legitimate Snap Store publishers. After regaining control of those domains, the attackers reset account credentials, take over trusted developer accounts, and publish malware disguised as wallet software updates. This tactic gives the attack a dangerous advantage: users often trust updates from established publishers and install them without suspicion.

Once the malicious apps land on a victim’s system, they prompt users to enter crypto wallet recovery phrases. The malware then exfiltrates those phrases, allowing attackers to drain wallets quickly, often before the victim realizes anything went wrong.

Attackers hijack Snap Store publishers using expired domains

The Snap Store is the official app store for Linux, used for the distribution of software that is packaged as “snaps.” It is considered a trusted source by many users, just like the App Store or Microsoft Store, as it provides verified publishers, easy updates, and a centralized distribution.

SlowMist said attackers are targeting publisher accounts tied to domains that have expired. Once a domain expires, criminals can re-register it and gain access to domain-linked email addresses. From there, they can initiate password resets and seize control of Snap Store developer accounts.

This method enables attackers to compromise publishers with active users and existing download histories. Rather than depending on victims to download the malicious new apps, they inject the malware into the regular updates. This supply chain tactic increases the success rate because users are more likely to accept updates and not check all the changes.

SlowMist has identified at least two domains associated with the compromised publisher accounts: “storewise[.]tech” and “vagueentertainment[.]com.” Once the attackers hijacked the accounts, they allegedly used the apps to impersonate popular crypto wallet brands.

Fake wallet apps mimic trusted brands

According to SlowMist, the affected Snap Store apps are clones of popular wallet applications like Exodus, Ledger Live, and Trust Wallet. Attackers use user interfaces that closely resemble legitimate applications, which increases credibility and reduces suspicion.

These apps, after being installed or updated, will ask the user to input their wallet recovery phrase with the intention of wallet setup, sync, or account verification. After the user has provided the wallet recovery phrase, the attacker can use this phrase to restore the wallet and drain its funds without needing any further access to the victim’s device.

This approach remains very effective because seed phrases provide full control of the assets. Even the strongest passwords and device security cannot protect funds once hackers possess the recovery phrase.

Supply-chain hacks grow more damaging

The incident at the Snap Store is part of a larger trend in crypto security, where attackers are moving from exploiting protocols to compromising infrastructure. Instead of attacking smart contracts directly, criminals increasingly target trusted software distribution systems, update channels, and third-party service providers.

CertiK data shared with the media house in December showed crypto hack losses reached $3.3 billion in 2025, even though the number of incidents declined. According to CertiK, the losses were more concentrated in fewer but more serious supply chain events, with $1.45 billion in losses being attributed to only two major incidents.

This trend indicates that attackers are optimizing for scale and impact. With the improvement of DeFi security at the smart contract level, attackers target the weakest links, apps, publishers, and update infrastructure, where trust is the biggest vulnerability.

What users should watch next?

For Linux users who keep crypto, the wallet software download and update processes must be done with extra care. Users need to verify the identity of the publishers, check the official download sources, and avoid entering recovery phrases on unfamiliar platforms. Security teams may also need to monitor Snap Store listings more closely, especially when there are sudden changes in the ownership of publishers.

The takeaway from the SlowMist alert is clear: the greatest danger now often comes from trusted sources, not the obvious phishing scams.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Tom Lee Warns Crypto Markets Could Face Painful Correction in 2026

TagsBlockchaincrypto securitylinuxSmart ContractSupply chain

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the new threat flagged by SlowMist that targets crypto recovery phrases?

ASlowMist has flagged a new Linux-based threat that targets crypto recovery phrases by exploiting trusted apps distributed through the Snap Store. Attackers hijack long-standing publisher accounts and push malicious wallet updates.

QHow do attackers gain control of trusted Snap Store publisher accounts?

AAttackers abuse expired domains linked to legitimate publishers. They re-register the expired domains, gain access to domain-linked email addresses, reset account credentials, and take over the trusted developer accounts.

QWhich popular crypto wallet brands are being impersonated by the malicious apps in this attack?

AThe malicious apps are clones that impersonate popular crypto wallet brands like Exodus, Ledger Live, and Trust Wallet.

QWhy are supply-chain attacks like the one on the Snap Store becoming more damaging according to the article?

ASupply-chain attacks are becoming more damaging because attackers are targeting trusted software distribution systems and update channels, leading to fewer but more serious incidents with concentrated losses, as seen in the $1.45 billion attributed to just two major events in 2025.

QWhat precautions should Linux users take to protect themselves from such threats?

ALinux users should verify the identity of publishers, check official download sources, avoid entering recovery phrases on unfamiliar platforms, and monitor Snap Store listings for sudden changes in publisher ownership.

İlgili Okumalar

Anthropic's IPO Launch: Commercial Miracle or Valuation Bubble?

Anthropic has confidentially filed for an IPO, led by Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, potentially going public by October. Following its latest $650 billion funding round, its pre-IPO valuation stands at $965 billion, with projections reaching up to $2 trillion at listing, which would make it the highest-valued private company ever. The article, written by Fu Sheng, addresses skepticism that this represents an AI bubble akin to the 2000 dot-com crash. It argues the current situation differs fundamentally. Unlike the internet bubble era, which relied on speculative narratives with little revenue, Anthropic's valuation is backed by unprecedented, measurable financial performance. Key data points include: * **Revenue Growth:** ARR skyrocketed from $10 billion in early 2025 to $470 billion by May 2026, targeting $100 billion by year-end—a growth curve unmatched in business history. * **Profitability:** It achieved operating profitability in Q2 2026 with an estimated $5.6 billion profit. * **Efficiency:** With ~3,000 employees and ~$470 billion ARR, its revenue per employee exceeds $10 million. Products like Claude Code, launched less than a year ago, already generate $25 billion in annualized revenue. * **Enterprise Adoption:** It boasts a strong enterprise client base, with 8 of the Fortune 10 and over 1,000 large firms spending over $1 million annually on Claude. The valuation is framed using a traditional SaaS model (e.g., a 10x Price-to-Sales multiple on $100 billion revenue). The author contends the core question for analysts has shifted from "How big could this be?" to "How much is it earning and will earn next quarter?" The discussion extends beyond Anthropic to a broader paradigm shift: the transition from a "carbon-based" to a "silicon-based" economy. Companies are increasingly prioritizing investment in compute and AI capabilities over human resources, as these directly scale productivity and competitive advantage. Anthropic's IPO is thus positioned not just as a corporate milestone, but as a price anchor for this new economic era.

链捕手28 dk önce

Anthropic's IPO Launch: Commercial Miracle or Valuation Bubble?

链捕手28 dk önce

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit3 saat önce

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit3 saat önce

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit3 saat önce

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片