Everyone Hates Cryptocurrency, and We Only Have Ourselves to Blame

marsbit2026-01-22 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-22 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Cryptocurrency faces a widespread credibility crisis, shifting from mainstream skepticism to outright厌恶. The author argues the industry has only itself to blame, using a crude metaphor of a failed orgy to illustrate the repeated, humiliating cycles of participation. Key reasons for the loss of trust and interest include: the aging demographic of crypto advocates; the prevalence of scams and irreversible financial losses; the rise of political meme coins (like TRUMP) as a sign of extraction over value; and more compelling narratives in AI and robotics. The author notes that crypto is no longer the most interesting or profitable game, with traditional markets outperforming. The culture is seen as toxic, degenerate, and driven by zero-sum PvP (player vs. player) dynamics where insiders hunt each other rather than building real value. Technical communities are disgusted by the lack of substantive progress beyond better wallets or cheaper gambling. Yield opportunities in DeFi have compressed, and trust in all entities—from founders to exchanges—is eroded. The piece concludes that the "lights are on, and the party is over," with crypto losing its narrative of optimistic innovation.

Author: katexbt.hl

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: If Evanss6's article was about finding a way out within a rational investment framework, then katexbt's long post is a "circle self-examination" that tears apart respectability. He starts with a spicy (even somewhat vulgar) metaphor, pointing directly at the real feelings of current crypto participants: awkward, ashamed, and repeating ineffective mistakes.

As we enter 2026, the crypto industry is facing an unprecedented credibility crisis. Kate points out that the outside world's sentiment towards cryptocurrency has shifted from "confrontation" to "aversion," while the circle has fallen into a "PVP" quagmire of mutual hunting. When AI, robotics, and space technology offer more real and interesting narratives, cryptocurrency is going further and further down a dead end with ATMs.

Main text as follows:

Tom and John were curious about a new thing called "group activities," so they organized a gathering with about a dozen friends, both men and women, but with more women.

It was their first time, so it was understandable that they were nervous. They decided to turn off the lights before starting—it would be easier, and there would be less performance anxiety.

When the time came, everyone took off their clothes and started.

Thump! Thump! Thump!

A faint cry came from the darkness.

"Is everyone okay?" Tom asked, turning on the light.

"It's fine! Let's continue!" John said.

The lights went out again. Thump! Thump! Thump!

The lights came on again.

John shouted: "Guys, can you please focus? This is already the second time I accidentally 'serviced' Tom!"

If you think the above story is just clickbait to trick you into reading further, you are wrong—this is exactly the real feeling most people have when participating in cryptocurrency:

  • Group activities = shiny new thing (cryptocurrency)
  • Turning off the lights = a slight sense of shame, but not enough to hinder the final decision
  • Repeated attempts expecting different results = insanity
  • Tom 'servicing' John = the same result, but with more steps, and when you end this journey, you feel more humiliated.

Over the past two years, negative sentiment (even mean hostility) towards cryptocurrency enthusiasts has been growing in almost all camps.

Yes, cryptocurrency has always been hated, but in the past, there were always supporters and staunch defenders who would say, "Wait and see, this time is different"—and indeed, every 4 years, these views were confirmed.

Each wave of new "normies" and non-believers was absorbed into Bitcoin or various other popular Ponzi schemes:

  • 2017: ICOs and shitcoins.
  • 2020: DeFi, smart contracts, NFTs, Ethereum/BSC/L1 trading, and of course LUNA and Celsius.
  • 2023/24: Memecoins, Trenches.

Just by looking at the format and length of these words above, you can feel that most of the substantive action stayed in 2020. And this is exactly why people don't like us now.

Just think about it, here are a few reasons why people are hostile to cryptocurrency, in no particular order:

1. It's an Old Man's Game

Those who started promoting Bitcoin in their early 20s are now in the "certified uncle" stage. As a 40-year-old man, pasting contract addresses (CA) in group chats full of kids with some sense of superiority is really not heroic, even if you are indeed harvesting them to make money.

The younger generation seems to care more about physical collectibles, vibes, nostalgia, and memories. They want to yearn, not earn.

2. Crypto's Bad Reputation

Even if they want to make money, the reasons I list below make it seem almost impossible: Cryptocurrency is not fun, even if you are tech-savvy, a momentary lapse of reason—a click, an authorization signature—can cause irreparable permanent damage to your net worth.

  • You got a little drunk and clicked on an airdrop ad on X, and your wallet was drained?
  • You downloaded a pirated PS 6 months ago and forgot to delete it, a keylogger stole your private key?
  • Tough luck, no refunds.

Even if you keep your device clean, you might get caught up in the Ledger data leak or Celsius's real-name information exposure, and your identity will forever be associated with "internet ghost coin gambling." Not to mention if you show off a little wealth, you might face kidnapping, torture, or just be disliked by those around you.

Caption: Look, I'm having so much fun here (sarcasm)

3. Crypto's Bad Reputation - The Presidential ATM

With the introduction of tokens like TRUMP, MELANIA, and WLF, the Overton window shifted. The funny thing is, these coins all fell; they became the death knell for the previous "AI + Solana" frenzy.

Caption: Thanks, Obama (meme)

The issue is not whether this marks the top, but who did it and what the consequences are. Considering that the TRUMP coin was launched two days before the official inauguration, and other tokens were made by people "associated but technically not him," good luck seeking a refund.

Even before this scene, "Extraction" was the name of the game. We often say that cryptocurrency is a zero-sum game—for me to make $50, there must be one person or a group of people losing a total of $50. Many people were burned in 2021/22, becoming exit liquidity for those savvy "on-chain predators," and then they came back in 2023 with a vengeance—starting to participate in the predation themselves.

This is the problem: There is no pure interest here anymore.

Now there are no new speculators willing to be "predated" because in 2021/2022, participating in this "party" was at least positive expected value (+EV), fun, and vibrant. But now, people have better places to go.

4. Crypto Is No Longer the Most Interesting Game

  • AI
  • Vibe Coding (building apps alone in hours, not leading teams for weeks)
  • Robotics

All these areas are much more interesting than cryptocurrency because we can clearly see the impact they bring. The stories in these areas are not just "you'll get rich because it goes up." If there is a bubble now, it's in AI, not crypto.

This means opportunities are elsewhere, not in cryptocurrency.

As "a friend on my TG" said, his origin story (and many others):

The logic here is: if you enter with pure intentions, trying to create value and tokenize, you will eventually encounter a truckload of fools complaining about the price (and the price is designed to fall because tokenomics mainly benefits the team).

So people simply choose the straightforward way—they design systems (presented as various flavors of Ponzi schemes depending on skill level) with the initial intention of taking money. This way is more direct and efficient.

5. Price Is the Best Advertisement, but the Ads Now Are Terrible

So far, these advertisements have performed very poorly. Since Solana (SOL) went up 10x and Hyperliquid (HYPE) went up 5x, the returns in the crypto market have been微不足道 compared to what you see in the stock market.

The legendary crypto trader GCR once lamented:

"When the macro environment is in risk-on mode, it is wise to bet on the fastest horse, and currently that horse is cryptocurrency." (Something like that, I can't find the screenshot).

But guess what? The Dow Jones hit a new all-time high, the Nikkei also hit a new all-time high, gold and silver—you guessed it, also hit new all-time highs. And cryptocurrency? Stagnant. This is different from anything we've seen before, and this is exactly what annoys many people.

The price of assets (their valuation) is also completely disconnected from the function of these assets. Does the "world computer" really need a $360 billion market cap? Is it really worth twice as much as Intel?

That's a company that has been making processors for nearly half a century. If Ethereum (ETH) were $400, would network security still be guaranteed? Most likely yes.

6. Normies Are Disgusted by Our "Culture"

One thing different from 2021 today is that no one is drinking the "Kool-Aid" anymore, no one believes that you can become rich, famous, or successful just by being in the crypto industry. If that were true, you would see more success stories, not people constantly losing money or even encountering violence (like having fingers chopped off).

On the contrary, when a person with social capital sees a crypto project or someone mentions it to them, they might play along for a while, probably a few hours, because in this day and age, entering and exiting with a bag of money only takes that long. On this website (X/Twitter), everything is pseudonymous or anonymous, which means the potential consequences are also minimal—almost non-existent.

We've been trying this "creator coin" garbage for almost three years now, and aside from a very few barely working cases, almost every version has become "Extraction Central." In economics, we call this "Adverse Selection":

  1. Real creators don't want a group of disgusting,卑微 like beetles speculators bothering them all day.
  2. Scammers will indulge in it for two hours, make money, and then laugh at how degenerate we are.
  3. Most high-net-worth individuals (HNWI) simply don't care, because the disadvantages far outweigh the benefits.
  4. Gamblers (indeed very degenerate) will gamble themselves into bankruptcy and then complain in their information cocoons.

Wow, the Zora creator economy powered by Base and Solana capital markets is so cool, I love it so much, I want to get all my friends to join as soon as possible! (Note: Author's sarcasm here)

7. Tech People Are Also Disgusted by This Culture—Because the Crypto Industry Has No Substance

Five years ago, I would go to Hacker News to see how anti-crypto they were, or see how sour the comments on Gematsu were, but in the end, those people often became the highest bag holders. But now, I feel like they don't even actively express hatred as much as before—they are just彻底 disgusted and hope it all ends quickly.

They want it to end because, whether founders or thinkers, no matter what their stance on cryptocurrency is, the only significant use cases they see are "zero-sum money games" and "scams." Except for a very few life-changing airdrops (like Jito, Hyperliquid, or some already dead infrastructure projects), the vast majority of so-called "opportunities" are landmines.

From my perspective:

  • Although technically feasible, Web3 wallet connection (Wallet connect) has not been implemented in any well-known Web2 applications.
  • The real-life adoption of stablecoins is actually not that amazing; instead, as mentioned before, it increases government regulation and operational security (Opsec) risks.
  • For savvy investors, other markets have better returns.
  • Valuations for new projects are crazy across the board, no matter the price, and we now have over 8 years of strong data to confirm this (underperformance).
  • Even projects like Privy, which have been called the biggest winners in the past 4 years due to their broad appeal, have not driven any applications that can be called "success stories" for the crypto industry.

If, as a collective, you were given a full 10 years to build something, and the best you could come up with is "a better wallet," "a better blockchain explorer," or "a simpler way to gamble with lower fees"—can you blame people for thinking cryptocurrency has little value and is a failed experiment?

8. Yield Compression

Since I entered the industry in 2020, the thing that attracted me and kept me investing money has been DeFi protocols. The return on USD (in the traditional field) is at most 3-4%, and banks require all kinds of KYC/AML (anti-money laundering) proof for basic operations. In countries like Japan or China, it's even hard to get such returns.

DeFi offered a new way to earn yield, which was more or less (usually less, lol) safe, especially considering potential airdrops, the returns could be very substantial. But as the African-American community often says, the hit rate of "hitting a lick in the bando" has dropped significantly.

This is not because of AI advancement or people suddenly becoming smarter, but because of the imbalance in the ratio: new entrants willing to endure this crap and its risks / seasoned players who know the rules of the game ...... this ratio is dropping sharply.

If you want to know more, you can翻翻 @rami_poker's past随笔, it's all been written about.

I also dare to bet that Pendle has exacerbated this situation to some extent. Although it is very genius, the innovation of YT (yield tokens) opened the door for unethical teams to accelerate this speculative fraud at the expense of those who think they are smart but are actually mediocre (like me, lol).

The compression of yield corresponds to my previous point: a疯狂轮动的 hot money ball is not so hot anymore, now it looks like leftovers. From personal experience, only 3 people in my circle are DeFi fans and really care about it:

  1. One who always hates it and wants to quit because he feels too old to play these烂事了.
  2. Another from Singapore, who cares a lot about it, but he is only 20 and can pivot to anything at any time.
  3. The last one is me—I have pivoted to writing on X for a living because I don't have time to do due diligence on whether someone will directly hard rug, steal my yield, or just waste my time while juggling work, travel, and managing life.

9. We Don't Trust Anyone Anymore

All the "metas" seem to be accelerating, and any particular narrative faces greater resistance to spread and diffusion. We also no longer trust companies or centralized exchanges (CEXes)......

  • We don't trust CZ and Binance.
  • We don't trust Coinbase, Brian, or the Base/Zora folks.
  • We absolutely do not trust Ledger.
  • We especially don't trust those "tourist" founders—if you've been in the circle for ten years before coming out to issue a token, what were you doing all these ten years?

10. Infighting Within the Circle

Since the end of 2022, the term "PVP market" has become ubiquitous. It used to refer to the game of on-chain metrics, but now, this "hatred" has spread inside cryptocurrency.

  • Posthumous whipping on Crypto Yelp: Everyone is tearing each other apart on social platforms. Although the出发点 is good, it's already too late.
  • Rising by "spitting": Many accounts have gained followers quickly recently, with the only "value output" being posting two lines of witty remarks or screenshots mocking other CT (Crypto Twitter) big Vs or projects.
  • Misogynistic and unpleasant community atmosphere: A group of people who think they are cool搞准入 in their respective "cesspools" (NFT or token communities). When the community market cap drops 90% a year later, they start疯狂 biting each other.

Imagine how disgusting it will be when you have to tell your descendants that your achievement in your 20s and 30s was this crap.

Whether love or hate, it was this "ignorant optimism" that once supported the prices of our altcoins. But now, the lights are on, and the party should be over.

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, why has the general public's attitude towards cryptocurrency shifted from opposition to disgust?

AThe public's attitude has shifted because the crypto space is now seen as an 'extraction game' with no genuine interest, filled with scams and zero-sum PVP dynamics, while other fields like AI and robotics offer more tangible and exciting narratives.

QWhat does the author mean by the metaphor of 'turning off the lights' in the context of cryptocurrency participation?

AThe metaphor of 'turning off the lights' represents the slight sense of embarrassment or shame associated with participating in cryptocurrency, which initially makes it easier to engage but ultimately leads to repeated failures and humiliation.

QHow does the author explain the phenomenon of 'yield compression' in DeFi and its impact on new entrants?

AYield compression refers to the declining returns in DeFi due to an imbalance between the number of new entrants willing to tolerate risks and the number of experienced players who understand the game, making it less attractive and more like 'scraps' rather than lucrative opportunities.

QWhat is the author's view on why 'creator coins' and similar crypto initiatives have largely failed?

AThe author attributes the failure of creator coins to 'adverse selection,' where genuine creators avoid the space due to annoying speculators, while scammers exploit it briefly for profit, and high-net-worth individuals ignore it due to the high risks and low benefits.

QWhy does the author believe that cryptocurrency is no longer the 'most interesting game' compared to other technologies?

AThe author believes AI, vibe coding, and robotics are more interesting because they offer clear, tangible impacts and narratives beyond mere financial speculation, whereas crypto is stuck in a loop of zero-sum extraction and lacks substantive innovation.

İlgili Okumalar

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit31 dk önce

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit31 dk önce

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit38 dk önce

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit38 dk önce

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手41 dk önce

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手41 dk önce

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手57 dk önce

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手57 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片