Behind NEAR's Doubling: Three Major Trends Fueling Its Price Surge

链捕手2026-05-26 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-26 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

NEAR's price has recently doubled, driven by three key catalysts. First, its strong AI narrative: co-founder Illia Polosukhin co-authored the foundational Transformer paper, and NEAR has integrated AI into its super-app, positioning it as decentralized AI infrastructure. Second, it has evolved into a privacy-focused chain, launching features like Confidential Payments to enable private cross-chain transfers, balancing privacy with usability for institutional and DeFi users. Third, its tokenomics are bolstered by a buyback mechanism: with full circulation achieved and inflation halved, fees from the NEAR Intents layer are used to repurchase NEAR tokens, reducing sell pressure. Combined with a recovering TVL exceeding $80 million, these factors are fueling NEAR's current market outperformance.

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

On May 25, the price of NEAR, the native token of the NEAR protocol, stands at $2.37. Since early May, NEAR has surged from a low of $1.24 to a high of $2.5, with its market capitalization returning above $3 billion. While mainstream crypto assets like Bitcoin have been fluctuating, NEAR has charted its own independent upward trajectory, emerging as one of the brightest performing tokens alongside others like ZEC, ONDO, and HYPE. What are the underlying reasons for this breakout?

The AI Narrative

NEAR co-founder Illia Polosukhin is a seasoned professional in the AI field. Illia is one of the eight co-authors of the seminal Transformer paper, alongside others like Ashish Vaswani and Noam Shazeer from Google Brain / Google Research. This paper introduced the Transformer architecture, which relies entirely on attention mechanisms, significantly improving parallel training efficiency and model scale. It is the foundational framework for all major contemporary large models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

NEAR has made AI a core strategy from its early days. In February of this year, NEAR officially launched the Near.com super-app, integrating cross-chain swaps, privacy tools, and smart contract management into one platform with built-in AI capabilities, supporting autonomous agent application scenarios. In November 2023, Illia also formally assumed the role of NEAR Foundation CEO, focusing the strategy primarily around the AI narrative.

In May, Nvidia's earnings report spurred a broader recovery in the AI sector, with NEAR being viewed as a representative of decentralized AI infrastructure, alongside tokens like TAO.

On May 22, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes, in an article, grouped NEAR with HYPE and ZEC in a call for attention, directly igniting market sentiment.

Privacy-Focused Blockchain

Blockchain has long faced the privacy dilemma where 'transparency equals publicity.' The sharp rise of privacy coins like ZEC and XMR has refocused the industry's attention on the privacy sector, leading various protocols, including public blockchains, to start incorporating privacy features.

NEAR was founded in 2018. Its initial core positioning was not AI, but scalability. Its earliest progress primarily revolved around continuously optimizing sharding technology, making it one of the hot 'Ethereum killer' public blockchains at the time.

Because of this, NEAR's public sale on CoinList once crashed the latter's website. During the 2020-2021 bull cycle, NEAR soared from $0.5 to a peak of $20.59, becoming one of the most watched star tokens that year.

However, fast-forwarding to this cycle, the vast majority of older tokens and new VC-backed tokens have been shunned by the market. Therefore, even in this bull cycle, NEAR only reached a high of around $9 in 2024 before declining steadily, hitting a low of $0.84 in 2026.

With the official launch of NEAR Intents, privacy requirements have become critically important. Intents are core to cross-chain transactions, allowing users to execute actions simply by expressing intent. However, large on-chain transactions are vulnerable to MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) attacks when public, a significant drawback for institutions, large holders, and ordinary DeFi users alike.

The NEAR team began planning privacy as a crucial complement to Intents. In late May this year, the NEAR Intents team launched Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents features, supporting private cross-chain transfers for assets like ETH, BTC, SOL, and USDC across 35+ chains. The sender, amount, and path are all hidden, with only the result visible on the target chain, utilizing a private shard + TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) bridge at the underlying layer.

NEAR also opened a privacy mode, where user balances, transfers, and transaction activities are private by default. Whether for ordinary users, enterprise users, or AI agents executing complex strategies, this prevents data leakage. The Confidential Treasuries (Trezu) launched around the same time further supports private multi-signature wallets, payroll, and cross-chain payments, having already processed $68 million in confidential transactions.

Compared to pure privacy coins like Zcash, NEAR's balance between privacy, usability, and cross-chain functionality is more practical, directly addressing enterprise-level demand and driving a recovery in TVL and developer activity.

NEAR Intents Fee Buyback

In October 2025, NEAR completed the unlocking of its final batch of initial supply, bringing its circulating supply close to 100%.

NEAR designed a dual mechanism of inflation + burning from its mainnet's early days: a maximum annual inflation of 5% (permanently halved to 2.5% via an upgrade in October 2025), with 90% going to validators as rewards and 10% entering the protocol treasury. Entering 2026, the project has no major unlock events or linear unlocks remaining, only the regular epoch reward emissions (approximately 5.4 million NEAR released in the last 30 days, about 0.4% of total supply).

In addition, the fee revenue generated by NEAR Intents is used to directly buy back NEAR tokens on the market, also creating significant buying pressure.

NEAR's intent-driven cross-chain transaction layer on the protocol allows users to simply express their desired outcome (e.g., swapping BTC for SOL), and it provides the optimal execution path, supporting multiple chains without the need for bridging/wrapped assets and featuring low fees.

NEAR Intents previously had two fee components: protocol fees and distribution fees (shared with third-party integrators). However, protocol fees now entirely go into the buyback path. The repurchased NEAR isn't necessarily burned immediately; instead, after being bought back, it is staked, locked, or removed from liquidity. It still counts towards the total supply but reduces circulating supply pressure while also earning staking rewards.

According to the latest data from defiLlama, the TVL of NEAR Intents has exceeded $80 million, with its daily generated fees fluctuating around $100,000, translating to a monthly buyback amount of approximately $3 million.

At the end of this month, its core development team, Near One, also announced the latest technical progress. The team plans to release dynamic resharding by the end of Q2 2026 to significantly enhance scalability. Additionally, the team will introduce NEAR's post-quantum secure signature scheme and perform upgrades in June this year, improving its resistance to quantum computing.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat are the three main catalysts driving NEAR's recent price surge according to the article?

AThe three main catalysts are: 1) AI Narrative, due to co-founder Illia Polosukhin's AI background and NEAR's strategic focus. 2) Privacy Public Chain, through features like Confidential Payments and Intents. 3) NEAR Intents fee buybacks, which reduce circulating supply.

QWho is Illia Polosukhin and what is his significance in the AI field?

AIllia Polosukhin is a co-founder of NEAR. He is one of the eight co-authors of the seminal Transformer paper, which introduced the Transformer architecture that forms the foundation of modern large language models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

QWhat specific privacy features did NEAR Intents launch in May, and what problem do they solve?

AIn May, NEAR Intents launched Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents features. They solve the privacy problem for cross-chain transfers by hiding the sender, amount, and transaction path across 35+ chains, protecting users from MEV attacks and data leaks during large or complex transactions.

QHow does the NEAR Intents fee buyback mechanism work and what is its impact?

AFees generated by the NEAR Intents protocol are used to buy back NEAR tokens from the market. These bought-back tokens are then staked, locked, or removed from liquidity. This reduces selling pressure on the circulating supply and creates consistent buy-side demand, with current monthly buybacks estimated around $3 million.

QWhat are the key upcoming technical upgrades mentioned for NEAR in the article?

AThe key upcoming upgrades are: 1) Dynamic Resharding, to be released at the end of Q2 2026, which will significantly improve scalability. 2) A post-quantum secure signature scheme, planned for introduction and upgrade in June of this year, to enhance its resistance to quantum computing attacks.

İlgili Okumalar

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit6 dk önce

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit6 dk önce

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit13 dk önce

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit13 dk önce

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手16 dk önce

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手16 dk önce

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手32 dk önce

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手32 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片