XRP Ledger Gets AI Agent Payments Through Virtuals And t54

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-03-21Обновлено 2026-03-21

Введение

Virtuals Protocol and t54 have integrated "agent commerce" into the XRP Ledger, enabling AI agents to autonomously transact using XRP and RLUSD. The system combines Virtuals' Agent Commerce Protocol (ACP) for commercial workflows—including escrowed jobs, evaluator-based verification, and programmable settlement—with t54's x402 facilitator, which handles payment verification and settlement without traditional API keys or custodial wallets. This infrastructure allows AI agents to programmatically pay for services via standard web requests, leveraging the HTTP 402 payment standard. The collaboration, supported by RippleX, aims to create a native financial environment for autonomous agents, addressing needs like verifiable identity and real-time risk assessment.

Virtuals Protocol and t54 have announced that they are bringing “agent commerce” to the XRP Ledger, a move that would let AI agents transact natively using escrowed jobs, evaluator-based verification and programmable settlement.

The announcement was delivered through coordinated posts from Virtuals, t54 and RippleX rather than a visible standalone press release. Virtuals wrote via X:

“Virtuals is powering agent commerce on XRPL. $95B+ in cumulative transaction volume. 75+ regulatory licenses across global markets. The ledger built from day one for payments is now extending into agent commerce. Together with t54, Virtuals is bringing the commerce infrastructure for agents to transact natively on the XRPL.”

While RippleX only commented: “Agent Commerce is Coming,” t54 added: “Agent commerce is coming to the XRPL. With Virtuals, agents can transact autonomously: escrowed jobs, verification through evaluators, and programmable settlement. Using t54’s x402 facilitator, agents can already natively pay in XRP and RLUSD.”

AI Agents Can Now Pay In XRP And RLUSD

Under the hood, the architecture appears to split cleanly across two layers. Virtuals brings the commerce logic through its Agent Commerce Protocol, or ACP. t54 brings the payment rail through its x402 facilitator, which its documentation describes as infrastructure that “verifies and settles presigned payment transactions” so an API can charge per request “without API keys, custodial wallets, or custom payment glue.” In the same documentation set, t54 shows support for XRP payments and IOU-style assets, including RLUSD.

That matters because x402 is not just a product name inside this announcement. Coinbase describes x402 as an open payment protocol built around the dormant HTTP 402 “Payment Required” status code, designed to let APIs, websites and autonomous agents pay programmatically for access over standard web requests.

In practice, this means an agent can hit a paid endpoint, receive payment requirements, sign a transaction, and have the facilitator submit and settle it on-ledger without the old account-and-session model that most API monetization still relies on.

Virtuals’ role is to give those payments a commercial workflow instead of a raw transfer. In its whitepaper, the protocol describes ACP as a framework for “secure, transparent, and verifiable commerce between autonomous AI agents.”

The mechanics line up closely with RippleX’s summary on X: buyer and provider agents can create jobs, lock payment into smart-contract escrow, route approval through either the buyer or an optional evaluator, and release funds only after successful evaluation.

t54 has been making a broader institutional case for this market since its February seed round, which included strategic participation from Ripple and Virtuals Ventures. At the time, founder Chandler Fang said existing finance rails were built around human actors and now need “agent-native financial primitives” such as verifiable identity, real-time risk assessment and programmable accountability.

At press time, XRP traded at $1.44.

XRP must rise above the 0.618 Fib, 1-week chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main announcement made by Virtuals Protocol and t54 regarding the XRP Ledger?

AVirtuals Protocol and t54 are bringing 'agent commerce' to the XRP Ledger, enabling AI agents to transact natively using escrowed jobs, evaluator-based verification, and programmable settlement.

QWhich two key technologies are involved in this new agent commerce infrastructure on XRPL?

AVirtuals provides the commerce logic through its Agent Commerce Protocol (ACP), and t54 provides the payment rail through its x402 facilitator.

QWhat cryptocurrencies can AI agents use to pay natively via the t54 x402 facilitator?

AAI agents can natively pay in XRP and RLUSD using the t54 x402 facilitator.

QWhat is the purpose of the x402 payment protocol as described by Coinbase?

ACoinbase describes x402 as an open payment protocol built around the HTTP 402 'Payment Required' status code, designed to allow APIs, websites, and autonomous agents to pay programmatically for access over standard web requests without traditional account-and-session models.

QWhat was Ripple's involvement in t54's February seed round?

ARipple, along with Virtuals Ventures, participated strategically in t54's seed round in February.

Похожее

Humanity Loses $31 Million in Attack, Token Price Plummets 90% Due to a Single Private Key

On June 9th, the digital identity project Humanity Protocol suffered a major security breach resulting in over $31 million in losses. According to on-chain analyst Specter, hundreds of wallets holding the project's H token were drained. The attack was confirmed by founder Terence Kwok to be caused by the compromise of a foundation member's private key. As a precaution, users are advised to avoid interacting with Humanity's cross-chain bridge or liquidity pools. The incident caused the H token price to crash over 90%, from around $0.70 to a low of $0.052, wiping its market cap from $2 billion to approximately $35.7 million. The attacker allegedly minted 100 million new H tokens and is selling them for BNB. This breach adds to existing controversies surrounding Humanity Protocol. Founded in 2024, it aimed to verify human users via palm-print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs. However, a leaked conversation in 2025 revealed that only about 1 million of its 9 million claimed Human IDs had completed biometric verification, suggesting 88% might be bots. Furthermore, the project has faced allegations of being a repackaged product from a Chinese access control vendor, raising privacy and authenticity concerns. Founder Terence Kwok's previous venture, Tink Labs, a hotel smartphone startup that raised $170 million, failed and entered bankruptcy in 2020 after burning through its funding. The current attack highlights the persistent critical issue of private key management in crypto. Unlike smart contract exploits, a private key compromise bypasses all on-chain security mechanisms. With no user compensation plan announced yet, this $31 million breach may be a final blow to the project's credibility, already weakened by previous controversies and a heavily depreciated token.

marsbit11 мин. назад

Humanity Loses $31 Million in Attack, Token Price Plummets 90% Due to a Single Private Key

marsbit11 мин. назад

MicroStrategy Will Not Die in This Downturn: Reflexivity, STRC Anchoring Back to Par, and the Self-Rescue Logic of "Sell Stock, Not Bitcoin"

This article analyzes the recent sharp decline in Bitcoin and MicroStrategy (MSTR), framing it as a targeted "reflexivity" attack. The trigger was MSTR using its cash reserves to buy back convertible notes, raising market concerns about a liquidity crisis. The playbook follows George Soros's principle: market expectations can shape reality. Fears that MSTR might be forced to sell BTC caused panic selling, lowering BTC's price and worsening MSTR's financial ratios, thus reinforcing the negative narrative. The author argues that MSTR's Structured Convertible (STRC), while falling in price, is a floating-rate security that will eventually return to par value (100). The price drop reflects the market demanding a higher yield due to perceived risk, but as a floating-rate instrument, its coupon can adjust, naturally pulling the price back to par over time. This is crucial for MSTR's continued ability to raise funds. The core thesis is that MSTR's best move to counter the attack is to **issue new equity (sell shares)**, not sell its Bitcoin holdings. While selling BTC would solve the immediate cash crunch, it would destroy the company's core investment thesis and premium. It would dilute the BTC per share, likely erase the market premium over its net asset value (mNAV > 1), and worsen its debt-to-asset ratio. Issuing shares while mNAV is high (e.g., 1.25x) allows MSTR to raise cash for reserves without harming shareholder value or the "perpetual accumulation" narrative. It improves the debt ratio and reassures STRC holders, breaking the negative reflexivity cycle. In conclusion, while MSTR could survive this episode even by selling BTC, doing so would fundamentally alter its investment proposition and weaken it for future cycles. The optimal, value-preserving strategy is to sell equity to rebuild reserves and maintain the long-term growth flywheel.

marsbit11 мин. назад

MicroStrategy Will Not Die in This Downturn: Reflexivity, STRC Anchoring Back to Par, and the Self-Rescue Logic of "Sell Stock, Not Bitcoin"

marsbit11 мин. назад

Humanity Loses $31 Million, a Private Key Causes Token Price to Plunge 90%

On June 9th, the digital identity project Humanity Protocol suffered a major security breach resulting in over $31 million stolen from hundreds of wallets holding its H token. The attack was caused by the compromise of a private key belonging to a foundation member, leading the team to advise users against interacting with its bridge or liquidity pools. Following the incident, the price of the H token plummeted by over 90%, from around $0.70 to a low of $0.052, wiping out a significant portion of its market capitalization. The attacker allegedly minted 100 million new H tokens and began selling them for BNB. Humanity Protocol, founded in 2024, aimed to verify human users through palm-print biometrics and zero-knowledge proofs on Polygon CDK. Despite raising $50 million across two funding rounds and achieving a unicorn valuation, the project faced prior controversies. Shortly after its June 2025 token launch, reports emerged that only about 1 million of its 9 million registered IDs had completed biometric verification, suggesting 88% might be bots. Furthermore, allegations surfaced that the project might be a rebranded "shell" of a Chinese access control company, raising concerns about data privacy and authenticity. The project's founder, Terence Kwok, has a controversial business history. His previous venture, Tink Labs, burned through $170 million in funding before collapsing in 2020. The breach highlights the persistent critical risk of private key management in crypto. With no user compensation plan detailed in the initial response, the incident deals a severe blow to trust in a project already struggling with credibility issues.

Foresight News33 мин. назад

Humanity Loses $31 Million, a Private Key Causes Token Price to Plunge 90%

Foresight News33 мин. назад

How to Conduct Deep Research Using Claude's Dynamic Workflows

The article "How to Use Claude's Dynamic Workflows for Deep Research" discusses overcoming the pitfalls of technical research, where both humans and AI can get overwhelmed by information, leading to vague conclusions. It introduces Claude Code's new "Dynamic Workflows" feature, which automatically designs and executes task-specific workflows before starting a task, unlike simpler "planning modes." This approach incorporates validation, result convergence, and adversarial verification from the outset. The core of Dynamic Workflows is six predefined scheduling patterns that address how to decompose tasks and synthesize results: 1. **Classify-and-Act (Routing):** An agent classifies the task and routes it to the most suitable specialist agent for execution. It's precise and efficient but struggles with ambiguous tasks. 2. **Fan-out & Merge:** The task is split into parallel, independent subtasks whose results are later merged. It's fast and isolates contexts but is more expensive and challenging to synthesize. 3. **Adversarial Verification:** Multiple "challenger" agents critique a worker agent's conclusion, requiring majority approval. This counters confirmation bias and self-assessment errors but relies on verifiable facts. 4. **Generate & Filter:** Multiple agents generate many candidate solutions, which are then filtered against a rubric to output only the best. It fosters diversity but depends heavily on the filter's quality. 5. **Tournament:** Multiple agents compete on the same task, with pairwise comparisons eliminating contestants over rounds to select the best. This offers stable relative judgment but is complex. 6. **Loop:** An agent iteratively attempts a task, learning from errors and adjusting until a stop condition is met. It handles tasks with unknown scope but risks infinite loops without proper design. The author compares their own custom deep-research system, which involved multi-agent analysis and deduplication but lacked goal-oriented convergence, to Claude's built-in workflow. The official workflow adds critical layers: initial problem decomposition, credibility assessment of sources, cross-agent voting to delete weak conclusions (not just averaging), and output tightly focused on the user's original goals and actionable recommendations. This structurally addresses common AI issues like goal drift, premature stopping, context pollution, and output bias. In summary, Dynamic Workflows represent a shift from smarter single conversations to a structured research process, compressing what used to require many dialogues into 3-4 interactions, albeit at higher token cost. The author notes remaining challenges for their specific domain (blockchain research): the need for fact-based verification over official documentation, depth in truly novel interdisciplinary thinking, the practical validation of proposed solutions, and tailoring information density to the audience.

marsbit43 мин. назад

How to Conduct Deep Research Using Claude's Dynamic Workflows

marsbit43 мин. назад

When LPs Teach Me Investment with Doubao: A Self-Narrative of a Private Equity GP Switching Careers

When LPs Use Doubao to Teach Investing: A Transition Story of a Private Equity GP AI is making life increasingly difficult for small private equity fund managers, as a former GP of an offshore dollar fund reveals. The fund, managing tens of millions in US stocks, outperformed the Nasdaq but struggled with fundraising. Its traditional Cayman SPC/BVI structure failed to attract major Asian LPs, who now prefer Hong Kong LPF or Singapore VCC frameworks. The rise of AI-powered quantitative strategies has further squeezed the space for funds like his, which relied on subjective, discretionary investing. AI tools have leveled the information playing field, empowering LPs—often high-net-worth individuals, entrepreneurs, or family offices—to analyze investments themselves using chatbots like Doubao. This has eroded trust in GPs' expertise, leading to more frequent challenges over investment decisions and even withdrawals, especially during market rallies when retail investors sometimes outperform funds. Friction arises not necessarily from AI's capabilities but from how LPs use it. Many rely on conversational AI for validation rather than rigorous analysis, sometimes receiving misleading or hallucinated advice. While AI democratizes research, effective investing still requires discerning real insight from plausible-sounding output. Ultimately, AI is unlikely to fully replace GPs. Asset management remains a trust-based service. However, the industry must adapt. The future may see "human私募" (private equity) learning from AI and focusing more on providing value beyond pure analysis—perhaps by mastering the emotional intelligence and trust-building that machines cannot replicate.

Odaily星球日报1 ч. назад

When LPs Teach Me Investment with Doubao: A Self-Narrative of a Private Equity GP Switching Careers

Odaily星球日报1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow