Wintermute: Sharp Decline in Crypto Volatility, Retail Capital Fleeing En Masse to US Stocks

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-02-27Обновлено 2026-02-27

Введение

Wintermute, a crypto OTC trader, analyzes the ongoing shift in retail capital flows from the crypto market to U.S. equities. Historically, retail speculation drove crypto bull markets, but recent data shows a sharp reversal: retail investors are now pouring into stocks at record rates, while crypto and equities have transitioned from moving in sync to behaving like substitutes. Key data reveals a significant divergence starting late 2024. When retail activity in stocks surges, crypto liquidity suffers. This is partly due to compressed realized volatility in crypto—its core appeal for speculators—as markets mature, institutional tools like ETFs expand, and the asset class grows in size. Meanwhile, U.S. equities offer competitive volatility and perceived analytical edges through AI tools, making them more attractive. Additionally, seamless on-and-off ramps between crypto and stock trading apps enable easy capital rotation. Retail investors now treat crypto as just one option in a broader speculative toolkit, rather than the primary destination. This shift demands a new multi-asset investment framework for crypto participants, incorporating equity market signals to gauge retail risk appetite and timing.

Author:Wintermute

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide:This article is written by a Wintermute OTC trader, providing an in-depth analysis of the root causes behind the current outflow of retail capital from the crypto market. Historically, crypto bull markets have often been driven by retail speculation, but the latest data indicates that retail investors are flooding into US stocks at a record pace, causing the crypto market and US stocks to shift from "rising and falling together" to a "seesaw" relationship. As crypto market volatility declines, the barriers to entry and exit lower, and AI grants retail investors an analytical edge in US stocks, cryptocurrency is no longer the preferred choice for retail speculation. Understanding this logic of capital rotation can help us readjust our multi-asset investment framework.

Full Text Below:

Retail activity has always driven the crypto market. Through speculation, reflexive buying-the-dip, and flexible capital rotation among various tokens, retail investors have defined every major cycle in crypto history. But the latest data suggests that the relationship between retail and the crypto market is changing.

For some time, we have been warning that the US stock market is capturing retail attention at the expense of altcoin liquidity. The latest data from J.P. Morgan's strategy desk, combined with our proprietary flow data, further indicates that US stocks and cryptocurrencies are becoming substitutable risk assets.

Correlation Reversal

By overlaying Wintermute's proprietary crypto retail flow data with J.P. Morgan's data on retail inflows into US stocks, we gain a new perspective on the relationship between retail activity in US stocks and the crypto market.

Historically, the two have typically moved in sync. Until late 2024, rising risk appetite usually meant buying on both sides, as, to some extent, they were both outlets for excess capital (referencing M2 data) and risk appetite. However, since late 2024, this correlation has broken down. Today we are seeing the most severe divergence in recent history: retail is pouring into US stocks at a record pace while choosing to hold and wait in the crypto market.

Looking at a longer time frame, we use the total market capitalization of altcoins as a long-term proxy for retail crypto activity. It aligns highly with our retail flow data and has a more objective, longer historical record. From 2022 to late 2024, cryptocurrencies and US stocks largely moved in tandem, with retail viewing both as part of a high-risk portfolio. But this decoupling in late 2024 is particularly pronounced, with retail trading behavior becoming more short-term driven, volatile, and lacking structure.

The rolling correlation between retail activity and altcoin market cap confirms this shift. The once volatile but generally positive relationship has now turned negative. Retail is now making an "either-or" capital allocation between these two, rather than buying both simultaneously.

Focusing on 2025, this dynamic becomes clearer when combined with key catalyst events. Several points are very evident:

  • When US market activity stalled, Memecoins and AI agents had their moment, as retail shifted speculative demand to these areas.
  • Retail continued to aggressively buy the dip in US stocks, both during the tariff policy period announced in April 2025 and more recently.
  • After October 10th, capital almost completely shifted to US stocks, and this trend continues to this day.

Causality

One point must be clear: we do not believe the retail cohort in crypto is large enough to pull capital *from* US stocks. Quite the opposite, it is the soaring retail enthusiasm in the US stock market that is draining liquidity *from* the crypto market.

New data also confirms this. US retail activity has become a new variable, and crypto investors should closely monitor this indicator to find windows of opportunity when retail capital can provide sustained buying support for the crypto market.

Volatility is the Product Itself

While there are many reasons, one core reason why retail has been so active in and attracted to the crypto market is the asset's volatility characteristics. Volatility *is* the product itself. This was the core driving force that initially pulled retail into crypto.

However, although crypto market volatility still far exceeds that of US stocks, its realized volatility has been undergoing structural compression, a trend that is difficult to reverse. The volatility ratio of BTC to the Nasdaq 100 Index (NDX) has been declining, compressed to below two times in the first half of 2025.

Some thoughts on key driving factors:

  • Market Maturation. Increasing participation from sophisticated investors, coupled with the emergence of new liquidity tools like ETFs and DATs, suppresses the typical, reflex-driven volatility spikes seen in earlier cycles.
  • Market Size. The total crypto market cap now stands at $2.3 trillion. Even with a 40% drawdown from the all-time high (ATH), the amount of capital required to move the market is far greater than it was five years ago.

As volatility compresses, the core selling point that attracted retail to cryptocurrency fades. The dramatic surges and crashes that defined the 21-22 bull cycle and attracted a whole cohort of retail investors are now a thing of the past. For volatility-seeking retail, US stocks are becoming increasingly attractive.

Technology-Driven Factors

Beyond the structural changes in the crypto market itself, technology-driven factors are also accelerating this capital rotation, a point not yet sufficiently discussed in the market.

  • Integration of Investment Channels. The integration of crypto trading into fintech and traditional brokerage platforms (or the integration of US stock trading into crypto-native platforms)确实降低了入场门槛,但其更深远的影响体现在「资金撤离」上. In previous cycles, complex deposit and withdrawal processes effectively locked capital inside the crypto ecosystem once it entered, fostering organic rotation among different tokens. Today, equally smooth on/off ramps mean capital can move freely and without friction between cryptocurrencies and US stocks.
  • The Edge. Retail seems increasingly drawn to US stocks, partly because they are gaining a new kind of advantage through AI. Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced retail analytical capabilities, creating an illusion of a level playing field with institutions.

But this feeling is absent in crypto. While you can also analyze crypto projects based on data, the crypto space lacks a consensus valuation framework and clear token value capture mechanisms, coupled with an ever-expanding universe of investable assets, making it difficult for retail to find that sense of "having an edge" here.

Conclusion

Retail was once the most reliable source of reflexive demand in the crypto market, but now their risk appetite is increasingly being satisfied elsewhere. US stocks offer highly competitive volatility, provide retail with a growing analytical edge, and allow seamless switching between crypto and stocks through the same app on their phones. Cryptocurrency still has a place in retail portfolios, but it is now just one of many gambling tools, no longer the preferred vehicle for speculation.

This shift should also reshape how investors view the market. Some tried-and-true indicators have become ineffective. For crypto investors seeking success, merely looking for leading indicators of risk appetite and combining them with crypto-native frameworks is no longer sufficient. Investors increasingly need to view cryptocurrency through the lens of a multi-asset portfolio, as has long been standard practice in US equity and fixed income markets.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to the article, what is the main reason for the shift of retail funds from crypto to US stocks?

AThe main reason is that US stocks are now offering competitive volatility, enhanced analytical advantages through AI tools, and seamless switching between crypto and stocks via the same apps, making them a more attractive speculative vehicle for retail investors.

QWhat key change in the correlation between crypto and US stock markets has been observed since late 2024?

ASince late 2024, the historically positive correlation between crypto and US stock markets has broken down, with retail funds now showing a negative correlation as they treat them as substitutable risk assets and allocate funds between them rather than buying both simultaneously.

QHow has the volatility of the crypto market changed structurally, and why is this significant?

AThe realized volatility of the crypto market has undergone structural compression, with the BTC vs. NDX volatility ratio falling below 2x in H1 2025. This is significant because volatility was a core product that drew retail investors to crypto, and its decline reduces crypto's appeal as a speculative asset.

QWhat technological factors are accelerating the capital rotation from crypto to US stocks?

AKey technological factors include the seamless integration of crypto and stock trading on fintech and brokerage platforms, which simplifies capital movement, and the perceived analytical edge retail investors gain in stocks through AI and large language models (LLMs), which is lacking in the crypto space due to its ambiguous valuation frameworks.

QHow should crypto investors adapt their perspective according to the article's conclusion?

ACrypto investors should adopt a multi-asset portfolio perspective, viewing cryptocurrency as just one of many gambling tools rather than the primary speculative vehicle, and increasingly monitor US retail activity as a key indicator for timing potential buying opportunities in crypto.

Похожее

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit21 мин. назад

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit21 мин. назад

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手27 мин. назад

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手27 мин. назад

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit1 ч. назад

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit1 ч. назад

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit1 ч. назад

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News1 ч. назад

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片