Vitalik Buterin Condemns Criminalization of Code, Speaks Out for Tornado Cash Developer

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-12Обновлено 2026-01-12

Введение

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has publicly defended Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm, who was convicted in August on charges of conspiracy to commit unlawful money transmission and faces up to five years in prison. Buterin argued that the case criminalizes software development itself rather than addressing direct financial harm, emphasizing the importance of privacy tools as essential defenses against systemic data exploitation. He disclosed personal use of Storm’s software for charitable and technical purposes, praising its reliability compared to commercial alternatives. Storm’s legal defense has received substantial support, with over $6.39 million raised in 2025, including donations from Buterin, the Ethereum Foundation, and other crypto entities. This case is part of a broader global crackdown on privacy-focused developers. Tornado Cash co-founder Alexey Pertsev was sentenced to 64 months in prison in the Netherlands, while Samourai Wallet founders received multi-year sentences in the U.S. for similar charges. Advocacy groups are pushing for legislative protections for software developers, amid high-level political attention, including a potential case review by former President Donald Trump.

Original Author: Brian Danga

Original Compilation: Block Unicorn

Summary

  • Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin issued an open letter on Friday in support of Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm. Storm was convicted in August on charges of conspiracy to commit unlawful money transmission and faces up to five years in prison.
  • Storm's defense fund has received support from backers including Vitalik and the Ethereum Foundation, totaling over $6.3 million (as of 2025). Meanwhile, global enforcement against privacy-focused crypto tools is intensifying.

Vitalik's Open Letter

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin issued an open letter on Friday in support of Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm. Storm was convicted in August on charges of conspiracy to commit unlawful money transmission and is currently awaiting sentencing in a U.S. court.

Storm was indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice in August 2023 and remains on bail, with the judge ruling he poses no flight risk, though he still faces up to five years in prison.

Vitalik positioned the core of this prosecution as targeting software development itself, rather than direct economic harm. Storm is a co-founder of Tornado Cash, a non-custodial cryptocurrency mixer that U.S. authorities say was used to launder over $1 billion in illicit funds. In August of this year, a jury found Storm guilty of unlawfully transferring funds but failed to reach a consensus on other money laundering and sanctions charges.

Vitalik positioned privacy tools like Tornado Cash as necessary defenses against systemic data exploitation, noting that he had used Roman's software to purchase technical tools and support human rights charities, with this data not being recorded in corporate or government databases.

"I have supported Roman Storm's work from the beginning because I firmly believe in the importance of privacy, and I am an active user of privacy tools, including those developed by Roman," Vitalik wrote. "Unlike some, who use these causes as a pretext for profit, developing software with flashy advertisements but fundamentally flawed underlying code, Roman's applications remain functional years after he stopped development—this alone, in my view, makes him more respectable than many so-called 'consumer tech' products in the world today."

As Privacy Tools Face Increasing Legal Pressure, Industry Support Is Growing

Vitalik's letter places Storm's case within a broader argument that data protection should be seen as fundamental infrastructure, not a niche political issue. He wrote that in recent decades, the ability to control personal information was a default state, describing modern privacy tools as attempts to preserve protections that existed before the emergence of widespread digital surveillance.

In the letter, Vitalik stated that these protections are neither novel nor extreme, describing them as safeguards historically applied to personal communication, physical movement, and financial activities.

Vitalik's support extends beyond testimony. In December 2024, he donated 50 Ethereum (ETH) to Storm's legal defense fund, worth approximately $170,000 at the time. The non-profit Ethereum Foundation donated $500,000 to the fund in June of last year and pledged to match $750,000 in community donations. In October 2025, the Ethereum Foundation and Keyring jointly launched a legal defense fund specifically for Tornado Cash developers.

The scope of support has extended beyond the Ethereum ecosystem. According to the fund's official website, in 2025 alone, Storm's defense fund raised over $6.39 million. Blockchain privacy researcher Federico Carrone stated that he donated $500,000 to Storm's defense fund, adding to the $50,000 previously pledged by his venture studio LambdaClass, further increasing the total. The Solana Policy Institute stated in August 2025 that it had donated $500,000 to support Storm and Tornado Cash co-founder Alexey Pertsev.

This wave of support comes as crackdowns on privacy tool developers intensify globally. Storm's co-founder Alexey Pertsev was sentenced to 64 months in prison by a Dutch court in 2024 for money laundering, related to $1.2 billion in transactions between July 2019 and August 2022.

In the U.S., the co-founders of Samourai Wallet were arrested in April 2024 on money laundering charges. Prosecutors alleged that the wallet's mixer processed over $2 billion in illicit funds between 2015 and 2024. Co-founder Keonne Rodriguez was sentenced to five years in prison in November 2025, while William Lonergan Hill was sentenced to four years.

Meanwhile, advocacy groups are pushing for legislative safeguards. In August 2025, over 110 cryptocurrency organizations jointly sent a letter to Senate committee leaders, stating that they could not support key market structure legislation without clear protections for software developers. This followed a statement from a senior Department of Justice official that "writing code" is not a crime.

As previously reported, U.S. President Donald Trump, when asked in an Oval Office meeting in December 2025 whether he would pardon Samourai Wallet's Keonne Rodriguez, indicated he might review such cases, saying, "I've heard about it, and I will look into it."

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the core argument that Vitalik Buterin makes in his public letter regarding the prosecution of Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm?

AVitalik Buterin argues that the prosecution targets the act of software development itself rather than any direct financial harm caused. He positions privacy tools like Tornado Cash as essential defenses against systemic exploitation of data and necessary for protecting fundamental rights.

QWhat specific legal outcome does Roman Storm face following his conviction?

ARoman Storm was convicted of conspiracy to commit unlawful money transmission in August and faces a maximum sentence of five years in prison. He is currently out on bail, with the judge determining he is not a flight risk.

QHow much financial support has been raised for Roman Storm's legal defense fund as of 2025, and which major organizations have contributed?

AAs of 2025, over $6.39 million has been raised for Roman Storm's legal defense fund. Major contributors include the Ethereum Foundation, which donated $500,000 and pledged to match $750,000 in community donations, Vitalik Buterin (50 ETH, ~$170,000 at the time), the Solana Policy Institute ($500,000), and Federico Carrone's LambdaClass ($50,000).

QBesides the case against Roman Storm in the US, what other legal actions have been taken against developers of privacy tools globally?

AGlobally, Tornado Cash co-founder Alexey Pertsev was sentenced to 64 months in prison by a Dutch court in 2024 for money laundering. In the US, the co-founders of Samourai Wallet were arrested in April 2024; Keonne Rodriguez was sentenced to five years in prison and William Lonergan Hill to four years in November 2025.

QWhat broader movement in the cryptocurrency industry is mentioned in relation to the legal pressures on software developers?

AThe article mentions an advocacy movement where over 110 crypto organizations sent a letter to Senate committee leaders in August 2025, stating they could not support key market structure legislation without clear protections for software developers. This followed a statement from a senior DOJ official that 'writing code' is not a crime.

Похожее

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

When launching a crypto payment business, obtaining the necessary licenses is the crucial first step. However, the second, and arguably more critical, step is designing a comprehensive operational framework that forms a coherent business loop. This loop must be clearly understood and executable by all stakeholders: banks, payment partners, exchanges, on-chain analytics providers, regulators, and your internal team. Many projects mistakenly believe a single license permits all operations. Licenses merely grant entry; they don't define how the specific business functions. The real challenge lies in detailing every aspect of the workflow. This involves clarifying the customer base, the flow of fiat and crypto assets, the settlement process, and establishing clear lines of responsibility for risks like AML compliance, sanctions screening, chargebacks, and regulatory inquiries. A robust framework must answer seven core questions: Who are the clients and merchants? Who collects fiat and crypto? Who handles conversion and custody? And who is ultimately accountable for compliance and risk management? Projects often fail not from a lack of licensing, but during due diligence when they cannot convincingly explain these operational details. Therefore, beyond securing licenses, the priority must be constructing a closed-loop system. This system ensures the business model is transparent, risks are managed, responsibilities are delineated, contracts are aligned, and the entire process is comprehensible to partners and regulators. The true competitive edge in crypto payments lies not in acquiring a license quickly, but in integrating licensing, banking, compliance, and operations into a sustainable and executable whole.

marsbit22 мин. назад

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

marsbit22 мин. назад

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Arthur Hayes argues that the current AI market is a bubble poised to burst, which will exert downward pressure on the crypto market in the near term. The core trigger is rising oil prices due to the US-Iran conflict and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher energy costs directly increase the operational expenses of AI data centers, squeezing profit margins for companies like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Hayes predicts that persistent inflation from high oil prices will force Trump, in a bid to win the November election, to turn public sentiment against the AI industry. He may propose regulations and taxes on data centers and AI companies to appeal to voters concerned about costs and job displacement. Such political rhetoric could shatter market confidence. Furthermore, the market is unlikely to healthily absorb the massive concurrent IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, which together seek valuations in the trillions. The combination of soaring energy costs, overwhelming equity supply, and negative political pressure will puncture the AI bubble. Hayes notes that nearly all new USD liquidity since 2022 has flowed into AI, leaving crypto like Bitcoin behind. When the AI bubble bursts, liquidity will contract sharply, pulling down all risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. In response, Hayes's fund, Maelstrom, has sold all AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. It maintains core positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum while increasing exposure to energy sector equities, betting on rising oil and gas prices. He expects Bitcoin to bottom after the AI-led market decline, before rallying again with future monetary easing.

Foresight News36 мин. назад

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Foresight News36 мин. назад

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbit45 мин. назад

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbit45 мин. назад

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

As humanoid robots become increasingly lifelike, they confront a significant psychological barrier known as the "Uncanny Valley Effect," a concept proposed by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. This phenomenon describes a dip in human comfort and acceptance when robots appear almost, but not perfectly, human. Minor imperfections in facial expressions, eye movements, or skin texture trigger a subconscious sense of unease, as the brain detects something trying, yet failing, to mimic a person. Examples range from the controversial human-like robot Sophia to animated characters in films like *The Polar Express*. The effect poses a key design challenge for robotics companies. Some, like Boston Dynamics, avoid it entirely by creating highly capable but visibly mechanical robots. Others, like Hanson Robotics, push for greater human likeness despite the risk. For consumer robots, especially in homes, most manufacturers opt for stylized or clearly mechanical designs to ensure broader acceptance. While the Uncanny Valley remains a powerful force, its impact may diminish over time through technological advancements that achieve near-perfect realism or through generational familiarity as people grow accustomed to interacting with humanoid machines. Ultimately, navigating this psychological frontier requires as much understanding of human perception as of robotics technology itself.

marsbit46 мин. назад

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

marsbit46 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片