USDC and CCTP Are Coming to Morph, Advancing Settlement for Payments

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-26Обновлено 2026-02-26

Введение

USDC and the Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) are launching on Morph, a payments-first Ethereum-based settlement layer. This integration brings a canonical, dollar-denominated stablecoin and standardized cross-chain infrastructure to the network. USDC will be natively issued on Morph by Circle’s regulated affiliates, providing a transparent and reliable settlement asset for applications. CCTP enables secure cross-chain transfers of USDC via a burn-and-mint mechanism, preserving asset integrity. This infrastructure supports key use cases including crypto cards, cross-border remittance, payment gateways, and DeFi trading. To further accelerate adoption, Morph has launched a $150 million Payment Accelerator program, positioning the network as a scalable settlement layer for real-world financial activity.

Singapore, Singapore, February 26th, 2026, Chainwire

Stablecoins have become a foundational layer for settlement, moving value across payments, remittances, and treasury operations worldwide. As these flows grow, the infrastructure behind dollar-denominated stablecoins matters as much as the assets themselves.

USDC and Circle Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) will be launching on Morph, bringing payment stablecoins and standardized cross-chain settlement to infrastructure built for payments.

USDC on Morph

USDC will be issued on Morph by Circle’s regulated affiliates, establishing it as a settlement asset across the network.

Issuance provides a consistent foundation for dollar-denominated activity. USDC on Morph will be canonical, with uniform behavior across applications and clear provenance at the protocol level.

For developers building payment applications, this simplifies dollar settlement by eliminating the need to manage bridge risk or fragmented liquidity. For institutions operating treasury systems, merchant platforms, or cross-border payment rails, USDC will provide access to a transparent stablecoin supported by Circle’s established on- and off-ramp infrastructure.

“Morph has spent the last several months meaningfully investing in our network’s core offering. As we have engaged with global leaders in the payment space, it’s clear that they need a widely-used, dollar-denominated stablecoin to meet their needs. For us, working with Circle to bring USDC to Morph was a clear choice,” said Colin Goltra, CEO of Morph.

CCTP: Cross-Chain Infrastructure

CCTP will enable USDC to move between supported blockchains using a burn-and-mint process that preserves supply integrity.

When USDC is transferred to Morph via CCTP, it will be burned on the source chain and minted natively on Morph. The asset will remain fully backed and verifiable under the same reserve framework.

Applications will be able to use Standard Transfer or Fast Transfer depending on their security and latency requirements, while maintaining consistent settlement behavior across networks.

Use Cases Across Payments

USDC and CCTP will support a range of payment and financial applications that rely on dependable dollar settlement and cross-chain access.

Crypto Cards and Neobanks

Card programs and digital issuing platforms will be able to settle balances in USDC while enabling users to fund accounts from supported blockchains via CCTP.

Cross-Border Remittance

Money movement platforms will benefit from transparent, stablecoin-based settlement with near-instant cross-chain transfers across regions.

Payment Gateways

Checkout providers will be able to accept payments from users across multiple chains while settling in USDC, simplifying reconciliation and reducing FX delays for merchants.

DeFi and Trading

USDC will serve as collateral and a settlement asset across lending protocols and decentralized exchanges, with CCTP supporting liquidity movement between Morph and other supported blockchains, including connections to the Bitget ecosystem.

Building the Settlement Layer for Digital Dollars

To support teams bringing payment flows on-chain, Morph has launched the $150 million Payment Accelerator, providing funding, technical support, and access to payment partners and institutional onramps.

Together, USDC, standardized cross-chain settlement through CCTP, and direct ecosystem support position Morph as a settlement layer for real financial activity.

As stablecoins continue to underpin payments, treasury operations, and onchain commerce, Morph is building the execution environment at institutional scale.

Money at the speed of life.

About Morph

Morph is an Ethereum-based, payments-first settlement layer and the native on-chain home of BGB, focused on building the foundation for global consumer finance on-chain. Morph supports real-world financial activity across payments, savings, identity, and rewards, enabling scalable, on-chain settlement for consumer and business use. Guided by the Morph Foundation, the network connects more than 120 million users through the Bitget and Bitget Wallet ecosystems.

Contact

PR team
drew.azarias@morphl2.io

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat are the two main components that are being launched on Morph to advance settlement for payments?

AUSDC and the Circle Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) are being launched on Morph.

QHow does the Circle Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) work when transferring USDC to Morph?

ACCTP uses a burn-and-mint process; USDC is burned on the source chain and minted natively on Morph, preserving supply integrity and keeping the asset fully backed under the same reserve framework.

QAccording to the article, what are two specific payment use cases that will benefit from USDC and CCTP on Morph?

ATwo specific use cases are Crypto Cards/Neobanks, which can settle balances in USDC and enable users to fund accounts from other chains, and Cross-Border Remittance platforms, which benefit from transparent, stablecoin-based settlement with near-instant cross-chain transfers.

QWhat initiative has Morph launched to support teams building payment flows on-chain, and what is its value?

AMorph has launched the $150 million Payment Accelerator, which provides funding, technical support, and access to payment partners and institutional onramps.

QWhat is the role of Circle's regulated affiliates in relation to USDC on the Morph network?

ACircle's regulated affiliates will be responsible for issuing USDC on Morph, establishing it as a canonical settlement asset across the network.

Похожее

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbit9 мин. назад

marsbit9 мин. назад

Visualizing Musk's Wealth: $3.6 Million Per Hour, Average Person Needs 11 Million Years of Work

Elon Musk is on the verge of becoming the world's first trillionaire, with a current estimated net worth of $970 billion. This wealth, largely tied to equity in SpaceX and Tesla, translates to him accumulating roughly $992 per second or $3.6 million per hour on average over his 31-year career. His fortune surpasses the annual GDP of over 125 countries and represents about 3% of U.S. GDP, double the relative wealth of historical figures like John D. Rockefeller. For perspective, an average U.S. household earning the median income would need to work over 11 million years to amass a comparable sum. Musk's wealth could buy approximately 2.4 million average American homes, all 32 NFL teams plus every NBA team, or over 10,000 private jets with operating costs. The analysis highlights the staggering scale and concentration of modern wealth, driven by successes in electric vehicles, space exploration, and artificial intelligence.

marsbit12 мин. назад

Visualizing Musk's Wealth: $3.6 Million Per Hour, Average Person Needs 11 Million Years of Work

marsbit12 мин. назад

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbit16 мин. назад

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbit16 мин. назад

Both Suffer Losses Exceeding $9 Billion, Which Is More at Risk: Strategy or Bitmine?

As Bitcoin and Ethereum prices drop significantly, two major corporate treasury holders, Strategy and Bitmine, are facing massive unrealized losses—approximately $100 billion and $90 billion, respectively. The article compares their financial health and underlying risks. Bitmine, holding over 5.4 million ETH, relies primarily on equity financing (like ATM offerings) and has substantial cash reserves, alongside staking income from its ETH holdings. It plans a $300 million perpetual preferred stock offering. In contrast, Strategy, holding Bitcoin, is burdened by significant convertible debt and preferred stock dividends, with cash reserves covering only about six months of its annual dividend obligations. Strategy's leverage is higher, and it faces potential liquidity pressure if BTC prices fall further, possibly forcing asset sales. While both companies are under pressure, Bitmine’s financial structure appears more resilient, whereas Strategy’s high leverage makes it more vulnerable to continued market declines.

Odaily星球日报21 мин. назад

Both Suffer Losses Exceeding $9 Billion, Which Is More at Risk: Strategy or Bitmine?

Odaily星球日报21 мин. назад

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbit29 мин. назад

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked