U.S. Treasury moves forward with GENIUS Act – New rules protect stablecoin issuers

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-04-09Обновлено 2026-04-09

Введение

The U.S. Treasury, through FinCEN and OFAC, has proposed a new rule under the GENIUS Act (signed into law in July 2025) that treats permitted payment stablecoin issuers similarly to banks under the Bank Secrecy Act. This aims to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and sanctions evasion by imposing anti-money laundering obligations on issuers. The rule is designed to protect national security without hindering innovation in the payment system. This action follows multiple cases of illicit stablecoin use, including seizures of millions of dollars linked to scams and criminal activities. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated the proposal strengthens U.S. leadership in digital finance while safeguarding the financial system.

As the crypto market braces for the passage of the CLARITY Act, a new rule under the GENIUS Act has come to the limelight.

In a joint proposal, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) brought a rule that treats payment stablecoin issuers similarly to banks.

Source: www.fincen.gov

This was in the context of money laundering, terrorist financing, and sanction evasion.

For perspective, this proposed rule is part of the GENIUS Act, which was signed into law by U.S. President Donald Trump in July 2025.

What prompted the Treasury to come up with such a proposal?

Regulators believe payment stablecoin issuers can evolve the payment system in the U.S. However, given the scale and size of the financial system of the country, illicit actors find it easy to “jeopardize U.S. national security.”

Therefore, to combat such illicit financial risks, the rule ensures that permitted payment stablecoin issuers (PPSIs) are treated like financial institutions for purposes of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).

Needless to say, this would automatically impose the anti-money laundering (AML) obligations, which were earlier just for BSA.

Additionally, the proposal is also designed to be “fit for purpose, assist law enforcement, and minimize unnecessary burden.” That being said, all this is a part of the broader plan to “modernize BSA requirements” with consistent efforts from FinCEN.

Treasury Scott Bessent weighs in

Applauding such changes made under the U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent noted,

President Trump is strengthening American leadership in digital financial technology.

He further added,

This proposal will protect the U.S. financial system from national security threats without hindering American companies’ ability to forge ahead in the payment stablecoin ecosystem.

Illicit activities that targeted stablecoin in 2025 and before

This comes as the stablecoins had already been a center of target for many years. For instance, in June 2025, U.S. federal authorities seized $225.3 million worth of Tether’s USDT linked to the aforementioned scams.

Additionally, in July 2025, approximately $2 million worth of digital assets was unsealed by the DOJ, linked to a Palestine-based money exchange business. In November 2024, too, $5.5 million in stablecoins were seized from a drug trafficking operation.

Chainalysis’s recent report further confirmed these metrics, highlighting how in 2025 stablecoins accounted for “84% of all illicit transaction volume.”

Source: Chainalysis

Final Summary

  • The joint efforts to bring in a proposed rule to address illicit activities in the stablecoin market underline the importance of the GENIUS Act passed in July 2025.
  • With millions being seized and confiscated by the DOJ, this was an alarming rule that should be passed for better crypto innovation in the U.S.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main purpose of the new rule proposed under the GENIUS Act?

AThe new rule treats payment stablecoin issuers similarly to banks for purposes of the Bank Secrecy Act, imposing anti-money laundering obligations to combat illicit financial risks like money laundering, terrorist financing, and sanction evasion.

QWhich U.S. government agencies jointly proposed the new rule for stablecoin issuers?

AThe Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) jointly proposed the rule.

QAccording to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, how will this proposal benefit the U.S. financial system?

AScott Bessent stated that the proposal will protect the U.S. financial system from national security threats without hindering American companies' ability to innovate in the payment stablecoin ecosystem.

QWhat percentage of illicit transaction volume did stablecoins account for in 2025 according to Chainalysis?

AStablecoins accounted for 84% of all illicit transaction volume in 2025 according to Chainalysis's report.

QWhen was the GENIUS Act signed into law and by whom?

AThe GENIUS Act was signed into law by U.S. President Donald Trump in July 2025.

Похожее

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbit7 мин. назад

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

marsbit7 мин. назад

Standing in the Light: A Comprehensive Guide to the Optical Module and CPO Supply Chain

"Standing in the Light: Understanding the Optical Module and CPO Industry Chain" This article analyzes the critical role of optical communication technology, specifically optical modules and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO), as the "nervous system" for modern AI data centers. With exponential growth in AI computational demands (e.g., NVIDIA's Vera Rubin architecture), traditional electrical interconnects using copper cables face severe bottlenecks in bandwidth, power consumption, and signal integrity over distance. The core function of an optical module is to act as a "translator," converting electrical signals from chips into optical signals for transmission over fiber (and vice-versa). Key internal components include lasers, modulators, photodetectors, drivers, and DSP chips. The industry is currently transitioning from 800G to 1.6T modules. However, the future lies in CPO. This next-generation technology integrates the optical engine directly with the switch ASIC/XPU on the same package substrate, drastically reducing power consumption (by ~3.5x according to NVIDIA), overcoming bandwidth density limits, and minimizing signal attenuation compared to traditional pluggable modules. Key challenges for CPO include advanced packaging capacity (dominated by TSMC), thermal management, repairability, and standardization. The article details the broader technology landscape, including Near-Packaged Optics (NPO, a pragmatic intermediate step), Linear-drive Pluggable Optics (LPO), Optical I/O (OIO for chip-level integration), and Optical Circuit Switches (OCS). A comprehensive CPO industry chain is mapped, highlighting shifting power dynamics: * **Architecture Definers:** NVIDIA, Broadcom, and Marvell now hold greater influence. * **Advanced Packaging & Manufacturing:** TSMC is central; Fabrinet is a key EMS player. * **Lasers ("The Heart"):** A strategic bottleneck. EML lasers are led by Lumentum and Coherent (both receiving major NVIDIA investments). CW lasers, favored for CPO/silicon photonics, see strong Chinese players like Source Photonics and Sicoya. * **Silicon Photonics Chips:** The mainstream path for CPO engines, with key players like Broadcom, Intel, Marvell, and China's Accelink. * **Fiber Connectivity Components:** A major new, high-growth market created by CPO, including Fiber Array Units (FAU), Polarization-Maintaining Fiber (PMF), and MPO connectors. Companies like Tianfu Communication and US Conec are leaders. * **Fiber & Cable:** Experiencing a super-cycle (e.g., Corning, Yangtze Optical Fiber). * **PCB/Substrates:** Requiring advanced materials (e.g., Shengyi Tech). * **DSP & SerDes:** Functions are integrated into switch ASICs in the CPO era (e.g., Broadcom, Astera Labs). * **Optical Module Makers:** Transitioning from standalone module suppliers to providers of optical engines and NPO/LPO solutions while riding the current pluggable boom (e.g., Zhongji Innolight, Eoptolink). The investment timeline is segmented: Short-term (2026-2027) features the "last feast" for pluggable modules and CPO's initial rollout. Medium-term (2027-2029) will see CPO expand and NPO peak. Long-term (2029-2032+) involves CPO/OIO penetration into intra-rack scaling. In conclusion, optical interconnects are fundamental to AI infrastructure. The competitive landscape sees US firms leading in architecture and high-end chips, TSMC in advanced packaging, and Chinese firms holding strong positions in modules, connectivity components, CW lasers, and fiber/cable. The future belongs to companies that can navigate the technological shift from "selling shovels" (modules) to "building highways" (CPO/OIO infrastructure).

marsbit17 мин. назад

Standing in the Light: A Comprehensive Guide to the Optical Module and CPO Supply Chain

marsbit17 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片