Tokenized RWAs grow 4x to $25B – Is $50B by 2030 next target?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-09Обновлено 2026-03-09

Введение

Tokenized Real World Assets (RWAs) experienced explosive growth, surging 4x to reach $24.9 billion in value over the past year, driven by institutional demand. U.S. Treasuries and commodities led this expansion, accounting for 58% of the growth. Major players like BlackRock and Ondo Finance saw their tokenized assets hit $2.2 billion and $2 billion, respectively. Concurrently, the number of RWA holders across major blockchains reached a record high, exceeding 663,000, with Ethereum and Solana leading in holder counts. If the current growth trajectory continues, the total value of tokenized RWAs is projected to exceed $50 billion by 2030, with represented assets potentially surpassing $1 trillion.

Real World Assets (RWAs) tokenization continued rapid acceleration in 2026, largely driven by institutional demand. In recent years, large entities have shown strong demand for private credit, on-chain treasury bills, and equities, significantly boosting asset values.

Tokenized RWAs hit $25 billion

Amid surging adoption of Blockchain among TradFi, asset managers, banks, and other entities, significant capital has been pumped into RWAs.

As a result, tokenized assets have skyrocketed, reaching record highs. According to Nexus data, the value of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) reached $24.9 billion, growing 4× over the past year.

This marked a 289% growth, adding over $18 billion Yoy, indicating massive demand in the past year.

The data showed that U.S. Treasuries and commodities dominated the space, accounting for 58% of the growth. These two have exceeded $16 billion in total value, according to RWA.xyz data.

At the same time, corporate bonds and institutional alternative funds also saw a massive jump, with BlackRock hitting $2.2 billion. Also, Ondo Finance saw its tokenized assets hit $2 billion.

Despite the continued rise in the three areas, the top concentration among them dropped 61%, indicating increased competition. However, treasuries defied the trend, with their market share declining from 59% to 43%, indicating increased diversification.

The number of RWA holders hits a record high.

In addition to the rising value of tokenized RWAs, the number of holders has also grown significantly across all major chains.

According to Token Terminal, RWA asset holder counts have climbed significantly across Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, and Celo. Ethereum RWA asset holder counts reached a new all-time high of 169k while Solana followed with 163k.

Celo and BNB chain also printed new highs, recording 77k and 42k, respectively. Other chains, such as Base and Arbitrum One, also recorded significant growth.

As such, total holders jumped 4%, exceeding 663k, while stablecoin holders surged 5% to 233.2 million, signaling increased adoption.

What’s next for RWA?

Tokenized RWAs have experienced exponential growth amid a scramble to accelerate blockchain adoption and continued acceptance in TradFi.

With this growth, the value of the represented assets exceeded $346 billion, despite a 6% decline over the past 30 days. At the same time, the total stablecoin value climbed to $301 billion.

At the current rates, and if market players continue to dive into RWA, the assets are likely to record significant growth in the mid to long term. Holding the current growth rate, the total value could exceed $50 billion by 2030, with assets represented exceeding $1 trillion.


Final Summary

  • Tokenized real-world assets [RWAs] surged to $25 billion, marking 4x growth over the past year.
  • The total number of RWA asset holders jumped 4% to 663k, reflecting increased adoption.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the total value of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) reached in 2026, and what was the growth rate?

AThe total value of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) reached $24.9 billion, marking a 289% growth (4x) over the past year.

QWhich two asset types dominated the RWA tokenization space and what percentage of the growth did they account for?

AU.S. Treasuries and commodities dominated the space, accounting for 58% of the growth.

QWhich two networks had the highest number of RWA asset holders, and what were their respective counts?

AEthereum had the highest number of RWA holders at 169,000, followed by Solana with 163,000 holders.

QWhat is the projected total value of tokenized RWAs by 2030 if the current growth rate continues?

AIf the current growth rate continues, the total value of tokenized RWAs is projected to exceed $50 billion by 2030.

QBesides the value of RWAs, what other metric also saw significant growth, increasing by 4% to 663k?

AThe total number of RWA asset holders also saw significant growth, jumping 4% to 663,000.

Похожее

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit41 мин. назад

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit41 мин. назад

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手1 ч. назад

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手1 ч. назад

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit1 ч. назад

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片