# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Risk Management

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Risk Management", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

Why Retail Traders Struggle to Escape the High-Frequency Trading Loss Cycle Retail investors often fall into a trap of continuous losses in cryptocurrency markets due to high-frequency day trading, which is structurally skewed against them. The author, sharing from personal experience, explains that frequent trading without informational advantages—such as access to real order flow, liquidity maps, or market maker positions—inevitably leads to financial ruin over time. The key insight is that winning isn’t just about making profits but about preserving them. Most successful retail traders actually succeed by trading less: catching major market moves, then stepping back to avoid giving back gains. In contrast, constant trading—often driven by overconfidence and the false belief that discipline and risk management alone can beat the market—results in consistent losses. The article compares modern day trading to a "casino disguised as a café," where inexperienced traders, especially young ones, mistake gambling for a learnable skill. They rely on superficial tools like TradingView charts without understanding that institutional traders use advanced systems like Bloomberg terminals with exclusive data. Ultimately, the author advises retail traders to reduce trading frequency, avoid day trading, and focus on long-term strategies instead of chasing quick wins. The real tragedy is not losing money but believing that high-frequency trading is a sustainable strategy rather than a form of gambling.

比推2 дня назад 14:20

Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

比推2 дня назад 14:20

Bitcoin Reclaims $94,000: A New Bull Market Beginning or a Bull Trap?

Bitcoin has surged back to the $94,000 level, sparking debate over whether this marks the beginning of a new bull run or a short-term bullish trap. Despite the strong price performance, trading volume has not fully supported the upward move. Key resistance levels and the upcoming FOMC meeting have influenced market sentiment. After a brief period of consolidation, Bitcoin broke through $93,500, reestablishing a short-term bullish trend. Technical analysis indicates the formation of bullish patterns such as the "cup and handle" and "inverse head and shoulders," suggesting a potential rise to $104,000 if $96,000 is breached. However, failure to hold above $96,000 could trigger a pullback toward $88,000–$89,000 or even lower. Market liquidity presents mixed signals. The buy-sell ratio remains low, and retail participation—especially from South Korea—has cooled, though U.S. institutional demand appears stronger. On-chain data shows increased activity from large holders, indicating accumulation by "smart money." Macro factors include potential Fed rate cuts and supportive U.S. policy developments, such as proposed Bitcoin strategic reserves and stablecoin legislation. Bitcoin ETF approvals are also anticipated by mid-May, with traditional firms like Vanguard gradually opening access to crypto ETFs. Risks include overbought conditions, high leverage (with $120M in long liquidations possible below $87,000), and regulatory uncertainties outside the U.S. Investors should monitor the $96,000 level and Fed policy closely, prioritizing risk management in a volatile market driven by ETF flows, leverage cycles, and macro liquidity.

marsbitВчера 01:32

Bitcoin Reclaims $94,000: A New Bull Market Beginning or a Bull Trap?

marsbitВчера 01:32

Fed Rate Cut Tonight Almost Certain, This Meeting More Like a 'Political Pressure Test'!

This week's Federal Reserve policy meeting is set to be one of the most contentious in recent years. With key economic data missing due to a 43-day U.S. government shutdown, the meeting has evolved into a stress test of the Fed’s independence and decision-making process. Market expectations for a rate cut have surged from 30% to 97%, reflecting both data uncertainty and growing political influence. Internally, the Fed is deeply divided, with a 4-4 split among key officials between holding rates and cutting. The dot plot shows a rare "bimodal distribution," with 7 officials favoring no change and 8 supporting a 50-basis-point cut. Doves point to a weakening labor market—unemployment rose to 4.3% in August, a four-year high—while hawks emphasize persistent inflation, with core PCE at 2.7%, above the 2% target. Political pressure has intensified, notably through appointments like Stephen Milan, who voted for a deeper cut just one day into his role, aligning with former President Trump’s public demands. The upcoming Fed leadership transition adds further uncertainty, as officials may be positioning for future roles. Amid data gaps and political interference, the Fed faces a complex risk-management dilemma: balancing concerns over slowing employment against inflation risks and soaring government debt interest costs. Communication challenges are heightened by internal divisions, forcing the Fed to rely more on high-frequency and alternative data. This meeting may mark a shift toward a new monetary policy framework where data scarcity and political pressure become persistent challenges to the Fed’s independence.

marsbitВчера 02:29

Fed Rate Cut Tonight Almost Certain, This Meeting More Like a 'Political Pressure Test'!

marsbitВчера 02:29

活动图片