# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Custody

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Custody", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

How Does HashKey Build Institutional-Grade On-Chain Financial Infrastructure?

In a recent "Charting a New Institutional Strategy" event held ahead of Consensus, HashKey Cloud and HashKey CaaS introduced a comprehensive on-chain financial infrastructure solution tailored for institutional clients. The event highlighted the growing demand for secure, efficient, and regulatory-compliant services as institutions enter the crypto ecosystem. Leo, CEO of HashKey’s On-Chain Business Group, expressed optimism about the industry’s compliance-driven future, emphasizing Web3’s potential as transparent and secure financial infrastructure, particularly in regions with less developed financial systems. HashKey Cloud, represented by Product Lead Shen Jun, showcased its institutional-grade staking and yield services, operating under a non-custodial model to enable secure asset tokenization and yield generation. The platform supports multi-chain services and offers insurance-backed staking solutions. HashKey CaaS, introduced by Business Development Manager Yu Yi, provides end-to-end services including asset tokenization, staking for ETFs and digital assets, on-chain transactions, and risk management. It aims to bridge traditional finance with crypto through compliant, globally-trusted infrastructure. The event also featured roundtables with participants from firms like Victory Securities, Zodia Custody, WisdomTree, Ether.fi, Lido, and others, discussing the integration of traditional finance with on-chain yields, new earning opportunities with ETH and BTC, and the tokenization of precious metals as part of the expanding RWA (Real-World Asset) ecosystem. HashKey’s strategic shift from a compliant exchange to an institutional on-chain infrastructure provider underscores its commitment to driving the convergence of traditional and digital asset finance in Hong Kong and globally.

marsbit02/10 03:45

How Does HashKey Build Institutional-Grade On-Chain Financial Infrastructure?

marsbit02/10 03:45

Preferred Entry-Level License for Encrypted Payments: Australia's DCE

An Introduction to Crypto Payment Licenses: Australia's DCE Option In the evolving regulatory landscape for crypto payments and stablecoin projects, Australia Digital Currency Exchange (DCE) has often been viewed as a relatively accessible entry path. Under the current framework, it does not require a financial license but involves registration with AUSTRAC and establishing an anti-money laundering (AML) system to conduct exchanges between cryptocurrencies and fiat currencies. However, by 2026, this understanding requires significant revision. Australian regulators are restructuring the overall regulatory logic for virtual asset services, not just adjusting a single "license." The key question is no longer whether DCE is feasible, but rather its position in the new regulatory structure—what it can and cannot accomplish. Currently, DCE is not a financial services license under the Corporations Act but an AML regulatory status under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act (AML/CTF Act). It focuses on obligations like KYC, transaction monitoring, and suspicious activity reporting, operating on an ex-post supervision model. By March 2026, major changes will take effect under the AML/CTF Amendment Act 2024. The reforms expand regulatory scope beyond currency exchanges to include virtual asset transfers and payments, introduce a mandatory registration confirmation from AUSTRAC before operations begin, and emphasize sustainable compliance capabilities over mere formal registration. Concurrently, ASIC is introducing a digital asset platform and custody framework, targeting services that hold private keys or manage client assets. This requires an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL), shifting oversight from AUSTRAC to financial services regulation. The core of Australian virtual asset regulation hinges on a functional divide: pure value transfer services fall under AUSTRAC’s AML oversight, while asset custody and management trigger ASIC’s financial services regime. For businesses considering DCE registration now, it remains a strategic step for establishing compliance history and preparing for future requirements. However, it is only a transitional foundation, not a long-term solution. Post-2026, all entities must adapt to the new registration confirmation process and stricter oversight. Ultimately, Australia’s approach integrates virtual asset services into existing legal frameworks through functional layering. Understanding the regulatory logic—especially concerning exchange, transfer, custody, and control—is more critical than focusing solely on the DCE registration.

marsbit01/30 13:17

Preferred Entry-Level License for Encrypted Payments: Australia's DCE

marsbit01/30 13:17

活动图片