Stronger US Dollar and Weakening Cryptocurrencies, Also Extends to Gold

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-24Обновлено 2026-02-24

Введение

The US dollar has gained strength, with the US Dollar Index rising 0.11% in a single day. This has coincided with a downturn in cryptocurrencies, with the total market cap falling 3.06% to $2.19 trillion and Bitcoin dropping below $64,000. The precious metal gold also declined, slipping over 1% in value. Major US stock indexes, including the Nasdaq and Dow, fell as well. Analysts attribute these market movements to factors such as geopolitical tensions, macroeconomic shifts, and investor uncertainty. However, these effects are believed to be short-term and may reverse as conditions stabilize.

The US Dollar has gotten stronger, but there are signs for simultaneous downtrend for cryptocurrencies. A similar trend moves a bit forward to also affect Gold, given that the precious metal has slipped by over 1%. Effects, in the long-term, are estimated to be reversed with uncertainty pulling back as one of the factors.

US Dollar on the Index

Reports that surfaced earlier underlined a growth of 0.02% for the US Dollar. It has now strengthened by 0.11% in a single day. The basket carries a benchmark of 97.810 when the article is being drafted, also reflecting a jump of 0.08% in the last 5 days.

America’s currency noted a previous close of 97.696 and an open of 97.698 with a day’s range of 97.695 and 97.957.

A stronger Dollar has attracted spotlight because it often signals a tighter liquidity for investors, especially those who are contemplating allocations to risky segments. However, such a phase is believed to persist for a short term.

Decline for Cryptocurrencies

A decline for cryptocurrencies coincides with the US Dollar getting stronger. The collective market cap is down by 3.06% to $2.19 trillion, with BTC exchanging hands way below the $64k mark. It is currently trading at $63,180.63, down by 4.78% over the last 24 hours.

A report by Business Standard has highlighted volatility across the crypto market due to geopolitical tensions and a shift in macroeconomics conditions. Additionally, it has pointed out that BTC briefly traded at $62,700 and ETH at $1,850.

Investors are now reportedly reassessing their positions as it is not just the US Dollar in the picture but also the evolving situation between the US and Iran, which could potentially cause severe oil disruptions. Thereby affecting investment sentiments once again.

Gold and Wall Street Too?

Yes, Gold and Wall Street were also seen affected by the US Dollar Index. Gold dipped by around 1.1% to $5,172.11 per ounce. It has now dropped further to $5,169.99 per ounce to mark a decline of 1.09% in a single day.

All three major US stock indexes fell as well. Nasdaq and Dow declined by 1.13% and 1.66%, respectively. S&P 500 plunged by 1.04%. Another factor that has possibly caused these disruptions is uncertainty since the announcement of a 15% tariff rate by US President Donald Trump.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Pi Network Marks One Year of Open Network Growth

TagsCryptocurrencyGoldUS Dollar Index

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the current trend of the US Dollar and how much has it strengthened in a single day?

AThe US Dollar is getting stronger, having strengthened by 0.11% in a single day.

QWhat is the primary reason cited for the decline in the cryptocurrency market?

AThe decline is attributed to the stronger US Dollar, geopolitical tensions, and a shift in macroeconomic conditions.

QWhat was the price of Bitcoin (BTC) and by what percentage did it decline in 24 hours?

ABitcoin was trading at $63,180.63, down by 4.78% over the last 24 hours.

QBesides cryptocurrencies, which other major asset class was negatively affected by the stronger US Dollar?

AGold was also negatively affected, dipping by around 1.1% to $5,172.11 per ounce.

QWhat are the two main factors mentioned as contributing to the overall market uncertainty and affecting investment sentiments?

AThe two main factors are the stronger US Dollar and the evolving geopolitical situation between the US and Iran, which could cause severe oil disruptions.

Похожее

Prediction Markets Under Bias

The article "Prediction Markets Under Bias" by Jeff Park of Bitwise argues against the common media portrayal of prediction markets as mere gambling or a social ill. It distinguishes between gambling and investment based on whether a participant's strategy has a positive expected value (+EV), not the market's structure. The author contends that prediction markets, like poker, are skill-based and can be a legitimate form of investment, offering individuals autonomy, truth discovery, and decentralized value. The piece critiques the common conflation of prediction markets with casino gambling, highlighting their role in risk hedging and capital efficiency, similar to insurance and securitization. A key differentiator is their precision and finite expiration, which makes prices directly anchor to factual outcomes, rewarding deep research and information advantage rather than punishing the uninformed. The author concludes that media opposition often stems from a structural bias, as these markets challenge traditional information gatekeepers and promote a more democratic, transparent system for pricing truth. The real debate is not about information having a price, but about who controls and profits from it.

marsbit6 мин. назад

Prediction Markets Under Bias

marsbit6 мин. назад

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit17 мин. назад

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit17 мин. назад

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit55 мин. назад

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit55 мин. назад

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

Kevin Warsh, a nominee for the Federal Reserve chair, faces a challenging confirmation hearing amid political pressure from former President Donald Trump to implement immediate and significant interest rate cuts. Warsh has proposed reforms including reducing the Fed’s communication frequency and shrinking its $6.7 trillion balance sheet. However, market expectations for rate cuts remain limited, creating tension with Trump’s demands. Warsh’s stance has shifted over time, from hawkish during the financial crisis to more dovish recently, citing AI-driven productivity gains. His confirmation is further complicated by Republican Senator Thom Tillis’s threat to block the nomination unless an investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell is dropped. Trump has warned of firing Powell if he doesn’t leave on time. Observers note that Warsh risks becoming a "scapegoat"—either by yielding to political pressure and fueling inflation, or by resisting and facing Trump’s backlash. His ties to Trump’s circle and Wall Street support may aid his nomination, but his ability to balance political demands with the Fed’s credibility remains uncertain. Historical precedents, like Arthur Burns’s compliance with Nixon, highlight the risks of political interference in monetary policy.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Plunging 10% Then Surging: Weekend Crude Oil Market Watch

Following a 10% plunge, oil prices surged over the weekend as geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz escalated dramatically. The initial market optimism, driven by the strait’s brief reopening on Friday, quickly reversed on Saturday when Iran reinstated restrictions and fired on vessels, halting nearly all traffic. In response, oil contracts rose approximately 4.52%, while S&P futures fell nearly 0.8%. U.S. President Trump alternated between diplomatic gestures—sending an envoy for talks—and threats to destroy Iranian infrastructure if no deal was reached. Iran rejected further negotiations, fearing a U.S. attack before the midweek ceasefire deadline. This triggered another spike in oil, surpassing Saturday’s highs, and further pressured equity markets. Crypto-related stocks underperformed significantly. Market optimism is expected to be punished, and the week ahead hinges on whether Iran maintains its refusal to negotiate.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Plunging 10% Then Surging: Weekend Crude Oil Market Watch

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow