Stripe Rises, PayPal Falls: The New King of Payments Ascends the Throne

Odaily星球日报Опубликовано 2026-04-01Обновлено 2026-04-01

Введение

Stripe, the global payments infrastructure giant, has surged to a $159 billion valuation, marking a 74% increase, while announcing $1.9 trillion in annual transaction volume. Concurrently, legacy leader PayPal is exploring a potential sale after reporting stagnating growth, with Stripe considered a possible acquirer. Stripe’s success stems from strategic expansion beyond payment APIs into crypto and AI-driven finance. It acquired stablecoin infrastructure firm Bridge and wallet provider Privy, and co-developed the Tempo blockchain, capable of 100k TPS. Its partnership with OpenAI introduced machine payments for AI agents, positioning Stripe at the forefront of AI economy transactions. In contrast, PayPal faces declining growth in core checkout services and minimal traction with its PYUSD stablecoin. Its traditional fee-based model conflicts with emerging stablecoin economies, and slow innovation has left it vulnerable to competitors. The divergence highlights a fundamental shift: Stripe is building the next-generation financial infrastructure—on-chain payments, stablecoin settlement, and AI commerce—while PayPal struggles to adapt within its existing framework. The payment industry’s future lies in embracing crypto and AI, and Stripe’s early bets have given it a decisive advantage.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010)

On February 24, 2026, the global payments industry witnessed two landmark "turning point events":

First, Stripe announced a new round of tender offer financing at a valuation of $159 billion, with joint investment from institutions like Thrive Capital, Coatue, and a16z, a staggering 74% increase from its $91.5 billion valuation a year ago. On the same day, Stripe's co-founders Patrick and John Collison released their 2025 public letter, reviewing $1.9 trillion in annual transaction volume on the Stripe platform—a 34% year-over-year increase, accounting for approximately 1.6% of global GDP.

Second, was the latest news from the "former payments霸主 (overlord)" PayPal: According to Bloomberg, PayPal is contacting potential acquirers, with at least one major competitor evaluating a potential acquisition. The news sent PayPal's stock soaring intraday by 9.7%, closing up about 5.76%, making it the top gainer in the S&P 500 that day (Odaily Planet Daily Note: even as the three major indices fell across the board).

It's worth noting that, according to subsequent Bloomberg reports, Stripe is considering acquiring all or part of PayPal's business. Interesting, right? The former's positive news is its soaring valuation; the latter's positive news is that "finally, a big buyer is willing to take me."

This is not just an episode in the story of two payment giants, but more like a dividing line about "who saw the next era."

Stripe's Infinite Game: The Operating System for the "Financial Internet"

If your understanding of Stripe is still stuck at "a company that makes payment APIs," you're at least three years behind.

Looking back at Stripe's business performance in 2025, its achievements are evident: 90% of companies in the Dow Jones index and 80% of companies in the Nasdaq 100 index use Stripe; almost all top AI companies—OpenAI (ChatGPT), Anthropic (Claude), Cursor, Midjourney—use Stripe for their payment infrastructure; 25% of new companies registered in Delaware, known as the "heartland of American innovation, are created through Stripe Atlas (Odaily Planet Daily Note: a B2B company registration service platform). In 2025, 20% of Atlas startups completed their first charge within 30 days of incorporation, a figure that was only 8% five years ago.

An important driver behind these achievements is undoubtedly Stripe's deep strategic layout in the crypto payments and on-chain finance business line.

The Collison brothers wrote a line in their public letter that forces deep thought across the entire payments industry and even the crypto market: "It might be a crypto winter now, but it's definitely a stablecoin summer." Data confirms this judgment—in 2025, Bitcoin's price fell about 50% from its high, but stablecoin trading volume reached an unprecedented $34 trillion; payment volume doubled to approximately $400 billion, with about 60% coming from B2B payment scenarios.

The reality is that in 2025, the growth data for stablecoin adoption officially decoupled from the price volatility of crypto assets.

Stripe placed a heavy bet before this inflection point arrived:

In October 2024, it acquired stablecoin infrastructure company Bridge for approximately $1.1 billion, the company's largest single acquisition ever. Post-acquisition, Bridge's transaction volume grew by over 4 times; In July 2025, it acquired crypto wallet infrastructure company Privy, which supports over 110 million programmable wallets;

In September 2025, it co-incubated Tempo, a Layer 1 blockchain designed for payments, with Paradigm. The mainnet officially launched in March 2026, supporting over 100,000 TPS and sub-second settlement. Visa, Shopify, Mastercard, Anthropic, OpenAI, Revolut, and others have already integrated.

Thus, Stripe built its own stablecoin ecosystem—stablecoin backend infrastructure Bridge, wallet frontend application Privy, and underlying settlement system Tempo—intertwining vertically and horizontally, spanning a closed-loop ecosystem for stablecoin issuance, custody, and settlement.

Looking further ahead: Stripe also co-developed the Agent Commerce Protocol (ACP) with OpenAI, launching Machine Payments—allowing developers to charge AI Agents directly for API calls, settled via stablecoin micro-payments. This is a payment scenario that never existed before. Stripe's judgment is direct: When AI Agents start making purchasing decisions for humans, whoever controls the payment channel抢先 (seizes first) the core lifeline of the AI economy.

Stripe's Foresight: Letting the Entire Payments Industry Copy Its Homework

How far ahead Stripe's布局 (layout) is can be seen by the actions of its peers.

In March 2026, Mastercard announced the acquisition of stablecoin infrastructure company BVNK for up to $1.8 billion, Mastercard's largest acquisition ever in the digital assets space. Mastercard's Chief Product Officer Jorn Lambert was frank: "We expect that, over time, most financial institutions and fintech companies will offer digital currency services."

Note the phrase—"will offer." Stripe is already offering them, and has been for a full year and a half. The timeline for this battle over stablecoin infrastructure is laid out here:

October 2024: Stripe acquires Bridge;

May 2025: Visa makes a strategic investment in BVNK;

2025: Coinbase negotiates to acquire BVNK for about $2 billion, but the deal ultimately falls through;

March 2026: Mastercard acquires BVNK for $1.8 billion. The entire traditional payments industry is only scrambling to buy this ticket in 2026, which Stripe had already purchased in 2024.

Additionally, another industry anecdote: Airwallex founder Jack Zhang previously revealed that as early as 2018, Stripe made a $1.2 billion offer to acquire Airwallex—at that time, Airwallex's annual revenue was only about $2 million, corresponding to a valuation of approximately 600 times revenue. This means that in cross-border payments, Stripe saw something others hadn't as early as 2018.

Foresight is never just one correct judgment, but a sustained ability to perceive trends.

PayPal's Old Dilemma: When the Former Overlord Gets Lost in the New Age of Navigation

Now, let's look at PayPal.

To summarize the history of this former giant in one sentence: Born in 1998 in the golden age before the dot-com bubble burst, PayPal quickly became the default payment method for eBay e-commerce, an early pioneer of internet finance. But the more glorious the history, the more starkly it highlights the harsh present reality: PayPal is losing momentum across the board, and it's happening precisely in the areas where it was once most proud.

For the full year 2025, PayPal's net revenue was $33.2 billion, with growth of only 4.3%, lower than 2024's 6.8%, continuing to decline. Core direct checkout business grew only 4% for the year, dropping to 1% in Q4, a cliff-like fall from 7% a year ago—behind this number is the comprehensive erosion of PayPal's core territory by Apple Pay, Google Pay, Stripe, and Adyen. Q4 transactions per active account decreased by 5% year-over-year, and the total number of active accounts stagnated around 439 million.

In February 2026, after the Q4 earnings release, the stock price plummeted over 20% in a single day. CEO Alex Chriss subsequently stepped down, and new CEO Enrique Lores took over on March 1st. Management's statement on the earnings call was: "Our execution has not been at the level it should be."

The PYUSD card was once PayPal's biggest bet to enter the on-chain world, but reality dealt it a harsh slap: Launched in August 2023, its current market capitalization is less than $4 billion, with a market share of less than 0.5%, almost negligible compared to USDT and USDC, and even surpassed by the later entrant USD1.

Only recently, after nearly 3 years, has PayPal expanded PYUSD to about 70 markets globally—this move itself isn't wrong, but on a track where competitors have been racing ahead for nearly two years, the first-mover advantage is already meaningless.

More致命 (fatally), the "early bird catches the worm, but PayPal's late arrival" reflects a fundamental矛盾 (contradiction) hidden beneath its surface business: PayPal's business model relies on "revenue from funds flow fees," while the stablecoin business model relies on "earning interest on Treasury bonds from settled assets." There is a natural conflict between these two logics—every time PayPal promotes a PYUSD stablecoin payment, it is, to some extent, cannibalizing its own traditional fee revenue.

This is a problem that is difficult to solve within PayPal's existing business framework.

The Battle of the New and Old "Kings of Payment": Who is Building New Infrastructure, Who is Repairing Old Pipelines?

Looking at the two companies together, the node of their diverging fates lies not in a single product decision, but in the截然不同 (starkly different) answers they gave to the question: "What is the next step for payments?"

PayPal's answer was to make its existing payment services better. Venmo monetization, BNPL business, PYUSD expansion—these actions themselves are not problematic, but they are repairs within the existing framework, not bets on the next paradigm.

When stablecoins appeared, PayPal's reaction was "let's issue a stablecoin too"; and when the AI wave arrived, PayPal's reaction was "add a more convenient and quick function button on the checkout page."

A leaf obscures the sight of Mount Tai. PayPal's disappointment was perhaps destined when management and the entire company chose to defend their turf rather than pursue disruptive innovation.

In contrast, Stripe has never been confined to existing standard answers, instead constantly seeking better solutions.

Faced with the proposition of "the future state of payments," Stripe's answer is to redefine payment itself: Starting from seven lines of code for收款 (payment acceptance), it built all the way to stablecoin orchestration (Bridge), crypto wallets (Privy), a payment-specific blockchain (Tempo), and an AI Agent Commerce Protocol (ACP)—each step is not about grabbing market share in the existing payments market, but about building the foundation for the next era of finance and payments.

The Collison brothers wrote in their 2025 annual summary public letter: "Our best guess is that the acceleration in 2025 is the beginning of a larger inflection point in entrepreneurship and creativity driven by large language models."

Behind this sentence lies a clear judgment—they are not just operating a payment company, but laying the financial foundation for the next internet era.

In their view, the entire industry will eventually move towards on-chain payments, stablecoin settlement, and the AI Agent economy; there is not much dispute about this anymore. The difference lies only in: Who is building this road, and who is waiting for the road to be built before getting on it.

Stripe chose the former, and did so nearly two years ahead of its peers. PayPal's current situation is that of a company with massive scale, healthy cash flow, but one that is half a step behind the trend of the times—it doesn't lack the cards for a comeback, but the time window left for it is narrowing.

Of course, we must affirm that PayPal is not a "bad company." It has 439 million active accounts, Venmo's social payment基因 (genes), nearly $2 trillion in annual transaction volume, and a business model that still generates real cash flow. But in the new payments era, these assets are more like a底牌 (trump card) that needs to be reactivated, rather than an impregnable moat.

Every technological paradigm shift in history has swept a large number of "taken-for-granted giants" into the dustbin of history. PayPal now faces precisely such a question it must answer: Do you continue to be a seemingly better, yet实际上 (actually) complacent PayPal, or do you strive锐意进取 (with determination and enterprising spirit) to become the payment infrastructure of the next era?

The answer determines fate.

Recommended Reading:

Stripe 2025 Public Letter (Official Original Text)

Stripe Official Press Release: Tender Offer and Annual Update

Stripe is Building the Tempo Blockchain

Stripe Considers Acquiring PayPal

Mastercard Acquires BVNK for Up to $1.8 Billion

PayPal Q4 2025 Earnings, CEO Departure

In-Depth Analysis of PayPal's 2025 Performance

Airwallex Founder Discloses Rejecting $1.2 Billion Stripe Acquisition

Mastercard Plans to Acquire BVNK for Up to $1.8 Billion

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat were the two major milestone events in the global payments industry on February 24, 2026, as described in the article?

AFirst, Stripe announced a new tender offer round at a valuation of $159 billion, a 74% increase from its $91.5 billion valuation a year prior. Second, it was reported that PayPal was in talks with potential acquirers, with at least one major competitor evaluating a buyout.

QWhat key strategic acquisitions did Stripe make in 2024 and 2025 to build its stablecoin ecosystem?

AIn October 2024, Stripe acquired stablecoin infrastructure company Bridge for approximately $1.1 billion. In July 2025, it acquired crypto wallet infrastructure company Privy, which supports over 110 million programmable wallets.

QAccording to the article, what fundamental conflict exists within PayPal's business model regarding its stablecoin, PYUSD?

APayPal's traditional business model relies on earning revenue from transaction fees on the flow of funds. In contrast, a stablecoin business model typically profits from earning interest on the assets backing the stablecoin. Therefore, every PYUSD payment promoted by PayPal potentially cannibalizes its own core transaction fee revenue.

QWhat new payment concept did Stripe develop in collaboration with OpenAI, and what is its significance?

AStripe collaborated with OpenAI to develop the Agent Commerce Protocol (ACP), which enables Machine Payments. This allows developers to charge for API calls directly from AI Agents, settled via stablecoin micro-payments. It represents a novel payment scenario and positions Stripe to control a critical payment channel in the emerging AI agent economy.

QHow does the article characterize the fundamental difference in strategy between Stripe and PayPal regarding the future of payments?

AThe article states that PayPal's strategy focuses on improving existing payment services within its current framework (e.g., Venmo monetization, BNPL, PYUSD expansion). In contrast, Stripe's strategy is to redefine payment itself by building the foundational infrastructure for the next era, including stablecoin systems, a dedicated blockchain (Tempo), and protocols for AI commerce, rather than just competing for existing market share.

Похожее

Jensen Huang's Message to Graduates: AI Won't Replace You, But Those Who Excel at Using AI Will

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, addressing 2026 graduates at Carnegie Mellon University, emphasized that AI will not replace people, but those who leverage AI effectively will have an advantage. He delivered this message during a commencement speech where he also received an honorary doctorate, his seventh. Huang reflected on his personal journey as an immigrant, starting from humble beginnings as a dishwasher to co-founding NVIDIA. He shared early struggles, including a near-bankruptcy moment saved by honesty with Sega, highlighting resilience and learning from failure. He positioned the current era as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift as significant as past computing waves. Huang explained that AI is redefining computing from human-written software to machine learning, creating a new industry focused on manufacturing intelligence. While acknowledging fears about job displacement, he argued that AI amplifies human capabilities rather than replaces human purpose. Tasks may be automated, but the core meaning of professions remains. Huang urged graduates to embrace this transformative time with responsibility and optimism. He stated that AI should democratize technology, bridging gaps and enabling broader participation in creation and problem-solving. His final advice was to actively engage with the opportunity: "So run, don’t walk," and to put their hearts into their work.

marsbit2 мин. назад

Jensen Huang's Message to Graduates: AI Won't Replace You, But Those Who Excel at Using AI Will

marsbit2 мин. назад

Three Scenarios for BTC's Future Direction and a Duel Between Two Strong Forces | Special Invited Analysis

**Title: Three Scenarios for BTC's Future Trajectory and a Key Duel | Invited Analysis** The market remains at a critical juncture. Over the past week, Bitcoin (BTC) consolidated broadly between $79,500 and $80,600, validating previous technical analysis. The current focus is on whether this marks the start of a new uptrend or a pause within a larger correction. **BTC Multi-Cycle Analysis & Three Possible Scenarios** BTC's daily chart structure, following its peak at $126,200 in October 2025, presents three primary technical scenarios based on Elliott Wave theory: 1. **Bullish Scenario (End of Correction):** The corrective A-B-C wave from $126,200 ended at the $60,000 low in February 2026. The current price action is the start of a major Wave I uptrend. A subsequent Wave II pullback would not break below $60,000. 2. **Bearish Scenario 1 (Complex Correction):** The correction is unfolding as an A-B-C-D-E pattern. The current move from $60,000 is a D-wave rally. After its completion, a final E-wave decline could potentially breach the $60,000 level. 3. **Bearish Scenario 2 (Larger Correction):** The entire move down from $126,200 to $60,000 was a large A-wave. The current rally is a B-wave correction within a larger A-B-C structure, to be followed by a C-wave decline below $60,000. *Analysis suggests Scenario 2 is less probable due to time disproportions between waves. The battle is effectively between the Bullish Scenario (1) and Bearish Scenario (3).* **Key BTC Levels & Weekly Strategy** On the 4-hour chart, BTC trades above a crucial consolidation zone ("Central Pivot C"). * **Key Resistance:** $83,500-$84,500; $89,000-$90,500. * **Key Support:** $78,500-$79,500 (pivot upper bound); $73,500-$75,000; $69,500-$70,500. **Weekly Outlook:** The market direction hinges on BTC's ability to hold above or break below the $78,500-$79,500 support zone. * **Mid-term Strategy:** Neutral/Wait-and-see stance due to unclear direction. * **Short-term Tactics:** Two contingency plans using 30% max capital: * **Plan A (Bullish):** Look for long entries if price holds above $78,500-$79,500 with confirming signals. Initial stop-loss below $78,500. * **Plan B (Bearish):** Consider short positions if price breaks below $73,500-$75,000 with confirming signals. Initial stop-loss above $76,500. **HYPE Analysis & Strategy** HYPE's daily chart shows a seven-segment structure from its January low of $20.46, forming a "rising pivot" zone. * **Key Level to Watch:** $45.76 (previous high). A break above would confirm the bullish structure remains intact. * **Short-term Strategy:** Focus on pivot zone boundaries ($38.41 upper, $34.44 lower). * **Long:** Consider on support near $38.41 with bullish confirmation signals. * **Short:** Consider on a break below $34.44 with bearish confirmation signals. * Position size must be below 30% with strict stop-loss discipline. **Risk Management Reminder:** Always set an initial stop-loss upon entry. Move stop-loss to breakeven at +1% profit, then trail it upwards to lock in profits dynamically. All views are based on technical analysis for informational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. The market is inherently risky.

Odaily星球日报10 мин. назад

Three Scenarios for BTC's Future Direction and a Duel Between Two Strong Forces | Special Invited Analysis

Odaily星球日报10 мин. назад

Sequoia Interview with Hassabis: Information is the Essence of the Universe, AI Will Open Up Entirely New Scientific Branches

Demis Hassabis, co-founder and CEO of Google DeepMind and Nobel laureate, discusses the path to AGI and its profound implications in a Sequoia Capital interview. He outlines his lifelong dedication to AI, tracing his journey from game development (e.g., *Theme Park*)—a perfect AI testing ground—to neuroscience and finally founding DeepMind in 2009. He emphasizes the critical lesson of being "5 years, not 50 years, ahead of time" for successful entrepreneurship. Hassabis reiterates DeepMind's two-step mission: first, solve intelligence by building AGI; second, use AGI to tackle other complex problems. He highlights the transformative potential of "AI for Science," particularly in biology where tools like AlphaFold have revolutionized protein folding. He envisions AI-powered simulations drastically shortening drug discovery from years to weeks and enabling personalized medicine. Furthermore, he predicts AI will spawn new scientific disciplines, such as an engineering science for understanding complex AI systems (mechanistic interpretability) and novel fields enabled by high-fidelity simulators for complex systems like economics. He posits a fundamental worldview where information, not just matter or energy, is the essence of the universe, making AI's information-processing core uniquely suited to understanding reality. He defends classical Turing machines as potentially sufficient for modeling complex phenomena, including quantum systems, as demonstrated by AlphaFold. On consciousness, Hassabis suggests first building AGI as a powerful tool, then using it to explore deep philosophical questions. He believes components like self-awareness and temporal continuity are necessary for consciousness but that defining it fully remains an open challenge. He predicts AGI could arrive around 2030 and, once achieved, would be used to probe the deepest questions of science and reality, much as envisioned in David Deutsch's *The Fabric of Reality*.

链捕手28 мин. назад

Sequoia Interview with Hassabis: Information is the Essence of the Universe, AI Will Open Up Entirely New Scientific Branches

链捕手28 мин. назад

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy China Chips, Avoid Traditional Tracks

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy Chinese Chips; Avoid Traditional Segments. The core theme is the shift in AI compute supply from NVIDIA dominance to a three-track system of GPU + ASIC + China-local chips. The key opportunity is capturing share in this expansion, while non-AI semiconductors face marginalization due to resource reallocation to AI. Key investment conclusions, in order of priority: 1. **Advanced Packaging (CoWoS/SoIC) - Highest Conviction**: TSMC is the primary beneficiary of explosive demand, driven by massive cloud capex. Its pricing power and AI revenue share are rising significantly. 2. **Test Equipment - Undervalued & High-Growth Certainty**: Chip complexity is causing test times to double generationally, structurally driving handler/socket/probe card demand. Companies like Hon Hai Precision (Foxconn), WinWay, and MPI offer compelling value. 3. **China AI Chips (GPU/ASIC) - Long-Term Irreversible Trend**: Export controls are accelerating domestic substitution. Companies like Cambricon, with firm customer orders and SMIC's 7nm capacity support, are positioned to benefit from lower TCO (30-60% vs NVIDIA) and growing local cloud demand. 4. **Avoid Non-AI Semiconductors (Consumer/Auto/Industrial)**: These segments face a weak, structurally hindered recovery due to AI's resource "crowding-out" effect on capacity and supply chains. 5. **Memory - Severe Internal Divergence**: Strongly favor HBM (Hynix primary beneficiary) and NOR Flash (Macronix). Be cautious on interpreting price rises in DDR4/NAND as true demand recovery. The report emphasizes a 2026-2027 time window, stating the AI capital expenditure cycle is far from over. Key macro variables include persistent export controls and AI's systemic "crowding-out" effect on traditional semiconductor supply chains.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy China Chips, Avoid Traditional Tracks

marsbit1 ч. назад

Circle:Sluggish Market? The Top Stablecoin Stock Continues to Expand

Circle, the issuer of the stablecoin USDC, reported its Q1 2026 earnings on May 11th, Eastern Time. Against a backdrop of weak crypto market sentiment, USDC's average circulation in Q1 was $752 billion, with a modest 2% sequential increase to $770 billion by quarter-end. New minting volumes declined due to the poor crypto market, but remained high, indicating demand expansion beyond crypto trading. USDC's market share remained stable at 28% of the total stablecoin market, while competition from Tether's USDT persists. A key highlight was "Other Revenue," which reached $42 million, more than doubling year-over-year, though sequential growth slowed to 13%. This revenue stream, including fees from services like Web3 software, the Cipher payment network (CPN), and the Arc blockchain, is critical for diversifying away from interest income. Circle's internally held USDC share increased to 18%, helping to improve gross margin by 130 basis points to 41.4% by reducing external sharing costs. However, profitability was pressured as total revenue growth slowed, primarily due to the significant weight of interest income, which is tied to USDC规模 and Treasury rates. Adjusted EBITDA was $133 million with a 19.2% margin. Management maintained its full-year 2026 guidance for adjusted operating expenses ($570-$585 million) and other revenue ($150-$170 million). The long-term target for USDC's CAGR remains 40%, though near-term volatility is expected. The article concludes that while Circle's current valuation of $28 billion appears reasonable after a recent recovery, further upside depends on the pace of stable币 adoption and potential positive sentiment from the advancement of regulatory clarity acts like CLARITY.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Circle:Sluggish Market? The Top Stablecoin Stock Continues to Expand

链捕手1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片