Solana Price Struggles Below $100, But This Level Changes Everything

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-06-04Обновлено 2026-06-04

Введение

Solana (SOL) has broken below a critical historical support level, which previously triggered its 2022-2023 bull run. With SOL struggling below $100, analyst Crypto Tice outlines two potential scenarios. If SOL reclaims the lost level, it could reignite bullish momentum toward $250. However, if the breakdown is sustained, the price risks falling to new lows. Another analyst, Crypto Patel, notes SOL has printed eight consecutive red monthly candles, a first in its history. He suggests a potential sharp rebound to the $500-$1,000 range could follow after a potential ninth red candle forms a bottom. SOL is currently trading near $75.

A crypto analyst has announced that the Solana price has just broken below a critical support level that had previously triggered an explosive bull run in the last market cycle. With SOL currently struggling below $100 and facing persistent bearish pressure, the analyst has outlined two possible scenarios that could determine the cryptocurrency’s next moves.

Analyst Predicts Two Possible Scenarios For The Solana Price

In a recent X post, market expert Crypto Tice said that the Solana price now has only two possible paths after slipping below a key support level that drove its 2022-2023 bull rally. At the time, SOL’s price had held onto the level before exploding to new all-time highs.

The analyst noted that the same pattern appeared to be forming again almost perfectly during this cycle. However, instead of holding the key level as it did in the past cycle, SOL deviated from the historic chart pattern by slipping below it. Against this backdrop, Crypto Tice has projected Solana’s next moves.

According to the analyst, if Solana manages to reclaim the broken historic level, it could reignite its bullish momentum and drive its price toward $250. Such a move would signal that buyers are stepping back in to regain control and that the market has resumed following the historic path seen during the 2022-2023 cycle. Based on Solana’s current price near $75, a rally to $250 would represent a gain of more than 233%, offering significant upside if the bullish scenario plays out as expected.

Source: Chart from Crypto Tice on X

On the flip side, Crypto Tice warns that if the recent breakdown is accepted and Solana fails to reclaim the support level, the cryptocurrency’s price could crash to new lows. In this case, bulls could be trapped for an extended period as a larger correction potentially unfolds. With SOL’s price already down 10% this past week and over 5% in the past 24 hours, a continued decline could intensify selling pressure and deepen its weakness.

At the same time, Crypto Tice has warned that the next candle will be critical in deciding SOL’s short-term direction. He said he is now closely watching price action for any signs of recovery or further weakness.

SOL Continues Heavy Bearish Streak

Despite many analysts keeping a positive outlook on Solana, the cryptocurrency remains in a strong bearish trend. Market analyst Crypto Patel noted that Solana has just printed eight consecutive red monthly candles, indicating a prolonged slump.

He called this move historical, noting it’s the first time Solana has faced such a long bearish streak since its launch. During the 2021 cycle, SOL had around nine red monthly candles, but they were not consecutive. Patel added that after the previous bearish phase ended and the price hit a bottom, Solana surged quickly to near its all-time high of $295.

Based on this pattern, Crypto Patel suggested that if history repeats, Solana could see a sharp rebound after the ninth red candle, potentially climbing to the $500 – $1,000 range once it prints a ninth red candle and it hits a bottom.

SOL trading at $75 on the 1D chart | Source: SOLUSDT on Tradingview.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to analyst Crypto Tice, what are the two possible scenarios for Solana's price after breaking below a key support level?

AThe two scenarios are: 1) If Solana reclaims the broken historic support level, it could reignite bullish momentum and potentially rally towards $250. 2) If the breakdown is accepted and Solana fails to reclaim the support level, the price could crash to new lows, trapping bulls in a larger correction.

QWhat is significant about Solana's current price action according to Crypto Patel's analysis?

ACrypto Patel noted that Solana has printed eight consecutive red monthly candles, which is a historical bearish streak it hasn't seen since its launch. This indicates a prolonged slump.

QWhat potential price target does analyst Crypto Patel suggest if Solana's historical pattern repeats after its current bearish streak?

ABased on the pattern observed after a similar bearish phase in 2021, Crypto Patel suggests that after printing a potential ninth red candle and hitting a bottom, Solana could see a sharp rebound potentially into the $500 – $1,000 range.

QWhat is the price of Solana (SOL) mentioned in the article as its current struggling point?

AThe article states that Solana is struggling below $100, and its current price is specifically mentioned to be near $75.

QAccording to Crypto Tice, why is the next candle critical for Solana's price action?

ACrypto Tice states that the next candle will be critical in deciding SOL's short-term direction, as he is closely watching for any signs of recovery or further weakness.

Похожее

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit9 мин. назад

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit9 мин. назад

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn12 мин. назад

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn12 мин. назад

Blocked Its Own Treasure, WeChat AI Steps Up

Tencent's stock surged over 10% on June 2nd amid reports that WeChat, with 1.43 billion monthly users, is finalizing tests for a native AI Agent. The reported feature, accessible by swiping right from the main interface, allows users to issue commands in natural language. The AI then decomposes tasks and automatically calls upon relevant Mini Programs within WeChat to complete actions like ordering food, booking tickets, or making payments, creating a closed-loop service execution system. This strategic shift follows the internal conflict and subsequent "blocking" of Tencent's standalone AI app, Yuanbao, by WeChat for violating sharing rules during a 2026 Spring Festival promotion. The incident highlighted a lack of internal consensus and exposed the weakness of competing in the standalone AI assistant arena against rivals like ByteDance's Doubao (345M MAU) and Alibaba's Qianwen. The new WeChat AI Agent aims to leverage WeChat's unique assets—its massive user base, standardized Mini Program APIs, WeChat Pay, and identity system—to move from simple content generation to actual task execution. Analysts note this changes the competitive landscape from model benchmarks to which AI can connect to more real-world services. However, success depends on key variables: the capability of Tencent's underlying Hunyuan model, managing massive inference costs, and redesigning incentives for Mini Program developers whose traffic might be bypassed. The move is seen as an attempt to keep user service intent within WeChat's ecosystem as AI begins to redefine how users access services.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Blocked Its Own Treasure, WeChat AI Steps Up

marsbit1 ч. назад

ByteDance Adopts Arm CPUs, Jensen Huang: So Sad I Didn't Buy Arm

**Summary:** At Computex 2026, Arm CEO Rene Haas announced that ByteDance and Oracle have adopted Arm's self-designed Arm AGI data center CPU. The company expects significant revenue growth from this product, projecting $20 billion in demand for the 2027/2028 fiscal years. Haas noted that restricting AI-capable CPUs from the US to China is nearly impossible due to their widespread applications. Arm's stock has surged dramatically this year, notably rising 16% after NVIDIA's Arm-based Vera CPU and RTX Spark announcements. A highlight was the informal, humorous on-stage conversation between Haas and NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang. Huang joked about NVIDIA's failed attempt to acquire Arm and playfully lamented selling his Arm shares. Both executives showed a clear sense of camaraderie and shared regret over the missed merger. Key technical topics were discussed: 1. **AI PC Design:** Huang explained NVIDIA's RTX Spark superchip (with a 20-core Arm CPU) is designed for future AI agents that will autonomously run and use tools on PCs, blending local and cloud processing. 2. **Agent vs. OS:** Huang emphasized the operating system remains crucial, as AI agents rely on its APIs and tools to function. 3. **Growth Constraints:** He identified the shift to "useful AI" that generates profitable tokens as a primary driver for immense, almost limitless, computational demand. Haas outlined Arm's strategy across PC and data centers. For PCs, Arm collaborates with partners like NVIDIA and MediaTek, offering its compute subsystem (CSS) for custom SoCs. In data centers, its Arm AGI CPU (built on TSMC's 3nm process) has gained major partners including OpenAI, Meta, and now ByteDance and Oracle. Arm presented a multi-year roadmap for its in-house CPU line. The article concludes that while GPUs dominated the AI training race, the explosion of AI agents is shifting significant focus to CPUs for inference, state management, and tool orchestration. The industry is trending towards vertical integration, with companies like cloud providers designing chips and chip/IP firms offering full solutions, all competing to deliver more efficient computing per watt.

marsbit1 ч. назад

ByteDance Adopts Arm CPUs, Jensen Huang: So Sad I Didn't Buy Arm

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片