Solana network usage jumps 56% – Is $147 zone next for SOL?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-18Обновлено 2026-01-18

Введение

Solana's on-chain activity surged, with active addresses increasing 56% to 27.1 million and weekly transactions reaching 515 million, indicating strong underlying demand. The price broke out of a multi-month downtrend, reclaiming the $135.5–$147.1 zone as support and stabilizing near $142. Momentum improved as the MACD turned positive, signaling reduced selling pressure. Derivatives data showed traders leaning long with a balanced long/short ratio of 3.17, reflecting growing confidence. Liquidation maps reveal significant short liquidity above current prices near $153 and $201, which could fuel upward momentum if price advances. The rebound is supported by measurable network usage and improving structure. Holding above $135.5 is crucial for continued upside; a break below may lead to consolidation.

Solana’s on-chain metrics expanded sharply, signaling renewed demand beneath the recent rebound.

Active Addresses surged 56% week-over-week to 27.1 million, while Weekly Transactions climbed to 515 million, therefore confirming sustained usage. This scale matters because price strength often follows persistent network engagement.

However, activity alone rarely drives rallies. In this case, usage growth aligned with price stabilization near $119.8–$135.5 demand.

Consequently, the recovery gained structural backing.

Moreover, such transaction volume highlighted capital rotation into Solana’s [SOL] ecosystem.

Still, activity must remain elevated. A drop below recent averages could weaken conviction. For now, usage metrics support the view that buyers regained control beneath price.

Solana breaks free from its regression downtrend

Price action confirmed a structural shift as SOL exited its multi-month regression downtrend. Buyers defended the $119.8 low before pushing the price above descending resistance.

The breakout reclaimed the $135.5–$147.1 zone, flipping it into support. Previously, rallies stalled below this region. However, this move held.

Consequently, downside pressure weakened. Moreover, the price traded near $142, maintaining higher lows.

This structure favored continuation if $135.5 holds. Still, failure to defend this zone could reopen downside risk toward $119.8.

For now, price structure supports a transition from correction into recovery, therefore favoring upside attempts.

Momentum indicators reinforced the improving structure as MACD crossed higher from negative territory. The MACD line rose to 3.60, overtaking the signal line near 2.92, while the histogram turned positive at 0.68.

This shift reflected fading sell pressure rather than overextension. Earlier bounces failed without momentum confirmation.

However, this crossover aligned with reclaimed support.

Moreover, expanding histogram bars suggested a strengthening trend force. Still, momentum requires continuation. A flattening histogram could signal consolidation.

Traders lean long as confidence quietly rebuilds

Derivatives data showed traders positioning increasingly on the long side. Binance top trader accounts held 76% long exposure, leaving shorts at 24%, pushing the Long/Short Ratio to 3.17.

This bias reflected growing confidence without extreme crowding. Overleveraged conditions often emerge above ratios of 4.0.

However, current levels remain balanced.

Moreover, long positioning followed the technical breakout rather than anticipation. Therefore, Derivatives flow aligned with the structure. Still, leverage remains sensitive to support holds.

A breakdown below $135.5 could unwind longs quickly. For now, positioning supports continuation rather than distribution.

Solana Hyperliquid data reveals upside liquidity magnet

The Hyperliquid Liquidation Map highlighted dense short-side liquidity above current price near $153, $201, and extending toward $300+. In contrast, cumulative long liquidations below $135 remained thin.

This imbalance reduced downside cascade risk while creating upside fuel. If price pushes higher, forced short liquidations could accelerate momentum.

However, liquidity requires price initiation.

In this setup, structure and momentum align with liquidation incentives. Therefore, upside liquidity remains the dominant attraction.

Failure to advance could instead trigger consolidation.

Still, current liquidation dynamics favor continuation rather than sharp pullbacks.

Conclusively, Solana’s rebound now reflects measurable demand rather than speculative enthusiasm.

Rising network activity, a confirmed trendline breakout, improving MACD momentum, and long-leaning derivatives positioning all align with upside-biased liquidation dynamics.

As long as price holds above the $135.5 support zone, overhead short liquidity remains a valid upside driver.

However, failure to defend this level could stall momentum and force consolidation before any further advance.


Final Thoughts

  • Solana’s rebound now appears anchored in participation rather than speculative flow, with structure and positioning reinforcing each other.
  • How price behaves around $135.5 could determine whether momentum extends or pauses into consolidation.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the percentage increase in Solana's active addresses week-over-week, and what was the new total?

ASolana's active addresses surged 56% week-over-week to 27.1 million.

QWhat key price level must SOL hold to maintain its current upside structure, according to the article?

ASOL must hold above the $135.5 support zone to maintain its current upside structure.

QWhat does the positive MACD histogram reading of 0.68 indicate about the market momentum?

AThe positive MACD histogram reading of 0.68 indicates fading sell pressure and a strengthening trend force.

QWhat does the Binance top trader Long/Short Ratio of 3.17 suggest about market sentiment?

AA Long/Short Ratio of 3.17 suggests traders are leaning long with growing confidence, but the positioning is not yet considered overleveraged or extremely crowded.

QAccording to the Hyperliquid Liquidation Map, where is a significant concentration of short-side liquidity located that could act as a magnet for the price?

AThe Hyperliquid Liquidation Map shows a dense concentration of short-side liquidity above the current price near $153, $201, and extending toward $300+.

Похожее

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit47 мин. назад

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit47 мин. назад

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit57 мин. назад

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit57 мин. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на SOL (SOL) представлены ниже.

活动图片