SEC reaffirms tokenized stocks must follow existing securities laws

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-30Обновлено 2026-01-30

Введение

The U.S. SEC reaffirmed that tokenized stocks must comply with existing federal securities laws, regardless of whether they are issued on-chain or off-chain. The regulator emphasized that all securities must be registered unless an exemption applies. Tokenized stocks fall into two categories: issuer-sponsored and third-party sponsored, each offering different rights and protections. Wall Street firms, including Citadel and JPMorgan, opposed broad exemptions for DeFi platforms handling tokenized securities, warning that such exemptions could undermine investor protection and cause market disruptions. They called for DeFi platforms to be regulated similarly to traditional financial institutions. Despite opposition from traditional finance, the DeFi sector has seen significant growth, with nearly 300,000 holders and total traded value approaching $1 billion. The industry continues to advocate for certain exemptions, and the final regulatory framework may reflect a compromise between these opposing views.

The U.S. regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has reiterated that tokenized securities are still securities and fall under federal securities law.

In a recent statement, the regulator clarified that whether a stock is issued off-chain or on-chain, it must still comply with the relevant laws.

“Regardless of its format, the Securities Act requires that every offer and sale of a security must be registered with the Commission unless an exemption from registration is available.”

The guidance further reiterated,

“Similarly, stock is an ‘equity security’ under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act regardless of its format.”

According to the watchdog, tokenized stocks fall into two categories. The first is issuer-sponsored, which transfers rights and protections to the holder, while the second is third-party sponsored on-chain stocks that offer varied ownership rights and protections.

Securitize, one of the issuers of tokenized securities, welcomed the move, stating that it is crucial for ‘scaling’ the sector.

“Clear frameworks like this are key to responsibly scaling tokenization.”

Wall Street opposes DeFi exemptions

The statement followed the recent meeting between the regulator and Wall Street firms on how to treat tokenized securities under the current legal regime.

According to an SEC memo, representatives from Citadel, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Cahill Gordon & Reindel, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), pressed against broad exemptions for on-chain stocks.

Referencing the October flash crash and Stream Finance collapse, the TradFi group warned,

“Broad exemptions for tokenized trading activities could undermine investor protection and lead to market disruptions.”

In fact, in a December letter, Citadel Securities called for similar regulation of DeFi platforms handling tokenized securities like their traditional counterparts.

The DeFi complex has been pushing for legal exemptions, claiming their platforms are disintermediated to warrant the legal responsibility.

In a recent meeting, SIFMA and its TradFi members pushed for a new classification of tokenized securities to enable more effective regulation.

The latest SEC statement reflects some of the concerns they raised. However, it does not address broader DeFi operations. This omission may be because issues related to tokenized securities are still under discussion within the CLARITY Act.

Tokenized stocks eye $1 billion

Even so, the collective DeFi players called Citadel Securities’ push and argument ‘bassless’ and ‘flawed.’

The industry may likely advocate for DeFi exemptions of some sort in the bill. It remains to be seen whether the final framework for tokenized securities will be a compromise between these two camps.

The sector has gained strong traction, with tokenized securities holders edging close to 300K users, representing a 100% growth in January alone. Additionally, the total value of traded on-chain stocks is teetering toward the $1 billion mark.


Final Thoughts

  • The U.S. SEC clarified that tokenized securities still fall under the current federal securities law
  • Wall Street pressed against a broad DeFi exemption in tokenized securities trading.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat did the SEC reaffirm regarding tokenized stocks and existing securities laws?

AThe SEC reaffirmed that tokenized securities are still securities and must comply with existing federal securities laws, regardless of whether they are issued off-chain or on-chain.

QWhat are the two categories of tokenized stocks mentioned by the SEC?

AThe two categories are issuer-sponsored tokenized stocks, which transfer rights and protections to the holder, and third-party sponsored on-chain stocks, which offer varied ownership rights and protections.

QWhy did Wall Street firms oppose broad exemptions for tokenized securities trading?

AWall Street firms opposed broad exemptions because they believe it could undermine investor protection and lead to market disruptions, as evidenced by events like the October flash crash and Stream Finance collapse.

QWhat was the DeFi industry's response to Citadel Securities' call for similar regulation?

AThe DeFi industry called Citadel Securities' push and argument 'baseless' and 'flawed,' and they are likely to advocate for some form of DeFi exemptions in the bill.

QWhat growth metrics were highlighted for the tokenized securities sector in January?

AIn January alone, the number of tokenized securities holders grew by 100%, reaching nearly 300,000 users, and the total value of traded on-chain stocks is approaching the $1 billion mark.

Похожее

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit49 мин. назад

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit49 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片