Russia Accounted for Up to 31% of Traffic on Major Cryptocurrency Exchanges in November

RBK-cryptoОпубликовано 2025-12-10Обновлено 2025-12-10

Введение

According to data from Similarweb cited by Wu Blockchain, Russia accounted for up to 31% of traffic on the cryptocurrency exchange Bybit in November, making it the largest source of visits to the platform. Although Bybit's overall traffic decreased by 10% month-over-month, the share of Russian users increased by 3 percentage points. Among 15 major crypto exchanges, total traffic fell by 11% in November, with no platforms showing growth. Spot trading volume on major exchanges dropped 27.8% to $1.7 trillion, while derivatives trading volume declined 15.8% to $7 trillion. Bybit ranked fourth in both spot and futures trading volumes. The Central Bank of Russia also reported an 18% decline in transaction volumes on foreign crypto exchanges in Q2 and Q3 of 2023, along with a 20% decrease in Russian users’ crypto holdings and a 28% drop in traffic from Russia to crypto platforms.

The share of Russian traffic on the cryptocurrency exchange Bybit reached 31% in October, reports Wu Blockchain, citing data from the analytical service Similarweb. Russia is the largest source of visits to the platform's website. Over the month, Bybit's overall traffic decreased by 10%, while the share of Russian users increased by 3 percentage points since October.

The analysis includes data on traffic to the 15 largest cryptocurrency exchanges. This refers not to the number of accounts or clients, but to the share of visits to their websites as estimated by the Similarweb service. It collects anonymized data from user applications, partners, providers, and its own website analytics. These are estimated figures, but they are usually relatively accurate for large sites.

In total, Bybit recorded 15.7 million visits in November (4.87 million from Russia; a month earlier it was 4.9 million). Russian traffic on the HTX exchange was 16% (4.8 thousand visits). On the Gate exchange, Russians ranked third in the previous reporting month with a 5% share of all traffic, but in November, Vietnam moved into third place with a 7% share.

The largest cryptocurrency exchange, Binance, had 49.1 million visits in October, mostly from South Korea (9%), Brazil (6%), and Vietnam (5%). On the American exchange Coinbase, 66% of traffic came from the US, 6% from the UK, and 3% from Germany.

In total, traffic to cryptocurrency exchanges fell by 11% over the month. The top three in terms of decline rates were Crypto.com (-26%), Gate (-23%), and Kucoin (-18%). No exchanges showed traffic growth.

Trading Volumes

The spot trading volume on major exchanges in November fell by 27.8% compared to October, to $1.7 trillion. The largest percentage losses were observed on Bitget (-62%), Gate (-44.1%), and MEXC (-34.3%). The smallest decline was on Coinbase (-7%). No growth was recorded.

The volume of derivatives trading in November decreased by 15.8%, to $7 trillion. The largest declines were seen at MEXC (-67.1%), Bitget (-49%), and Bybit (-29%).

Bybit, popular among Russians, ranked fourth among cryptocurrency exchanges in terms of spot trading volume, with a figure of $108 billion (a 31.7% decline). It was surpassed by Binance, MEXC, and KuCoin. In terms of futures trading volume ($760 billion), Bybit is in fourth place after Binance, MEXC, and OKX.

The Bank of Russia also reports a decline in the volume of operations on foreign cryptocurrency exchanges. According to their data, the figure fell by 18% in the second and third quarters of 2025 compared to the previous two periods.

The average monthly estimated balance of Russians' funds on cryptocurrency exchanges during the reporting period decreased by 20% in ruble terms, to 933 billion rubles. And the volume of traffic from Russia to the websites of crypto platforms fell by 28%, to 83.4 million visits.

"A Pause, Not a Reversal". When Will Bitcoin Break the Lull

Only 7 Native Tokens Remain in the Green Since the Start of the Year. And It's Not Bitcoin

A Weak Start to December. Top 5 Cryptocurrencies with Weekly Gains

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to the article, which country accounted for the largest share of traffic (31%) on the Bybit cryptocurrency exchange in November?

ARussia.

QWhat was the overall trend for traffic on the 15 largest crypto exchanges in November, and by how much did it decrease?

AThe overall traffic on crypto exchanges fell by 11% in November.

QWhich three exchanges saw the largest percentage declines in their traffic, as mentioned in the report?

ACrypto.com (-26%), Gate (-23%), and Kucoin (-18%).

QHow much did the volume of spot trading on major exchanges drop in November compared to October, and what was the total value?

AThe volume of spot trading fell by 27.8% to $1.7 trillion.

QDespite a 10% drop in its overall traffic, what happened to the share of Russian users on Bybit from October to November?

AThe share of Russian users on Bybit grew by 3 percentage points.

Похожее

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

**From Survival to Accelerated Growth: Zcash Founder Details the 3-Year Rise** Three years ago, Zcash (ZEC) was a struggling pioneer in privacy technology, with a price near $30, low shielded supply (11%), and a community mired in governance disputes. Today, ZEC trades around $600, with over 31% of its supply (~$3B) in user-controlled shielded pools. This transformation resulted from breaking key constraints. First, **governance shackles were removed**. The old model guaranteed funding to two entities (ECC and ZF) regardless of performance, creating a monopoly. In 2024, ECC rejected further direct funding, forcing a change. The NU6 upgrade ended direct funding, allocating 8% to community grants and 12% to a protocol-controlled treasury for retroactive rewards, expiring in 2028 unless renewed by overwhelming consensus. The entities also relinquished their trademark-based veto power, freeing community governance. Second, the **product focus shifted** from pure cryptography to user growth. Previously, engineering excelled at privacy tech but failed to attract users. In early 2024, the team (later ZODL) pivoted to building products users wanted, like the Zodl wallet (default privacy, hardware support, cross-asset swaps). This drove shielded supply to grow over 400% in ZEC terms, with 86.5% of recent transactions being shielded, representing real user adoption. Third, the **narrative evolved** from the limiting "privacy coin" label to "unstoppable private money." This clarified Zcash's value proposition: a Bitcoin-like monetary policy with verifiable private payments via advanced cryptography. This structural narrative—protocol (Zcash), asset (ZEC), gateway (Zodl)—enabled broader exchange listings, institutional interest, and ETF filings. Finally, **organizational constraints were broken**. In early 2026, the ECC team left its non-profit structure after disputes over control, forming Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL). ZODL raised $25M from top VCs (Paradigm, a16z, etc.), gaining the capital and agility of a startup to scale consumer products. Current metrics show strong momentum: social discussion volume for ZEC surged 15,245% in a year, with 81% positive sentiment. The focus is now on enhancing user experience (Zodl wallet), scalability (Tachyon project targeting Visa-level throughput with 25-second blocks), and post-quantum security (quantum-recoverable wallets coming soon). Zcash is positioned to become faster, more usable, scalable, and quantum-resistant.

marsbit3 мин. назад

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

marsbit3 мин. назад

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

**Summary:** This companion piece reframes the five TradFi-on-crypto exchange architectures, previously classified by "architectural fingerprint," through the lens of counterparty risk. The core question is: whose balance sheet bears the loss first in a stress scenario, and has it historically done so? Each of the five models corresponds to a distinct risk holder with its own documented failure modes. * **Model 1 (Stablecoin-Settled CEX Perpetuals):** Risk is held by the stablecoin issuer (e.g., reserve composition, bank connectivity) and the CEX's own book. History includes Tether's banking disconnections (2017) and reserve misrepresentations (CFTC 2021 Order). * **Model 2 (CFD Brokers):** Risk resides on the broker's balance sheet (B-book model). Regulatory differences (e.g., ESMA's mandatory negative balance protection vs. Mauritius FSC's lack thereof) define loss allocation rules, as seen in the 2015 SNB event (Alpari UK insolvency). * **Model 3 (Off-Chain Custody & Transfer Agent Chain):** Risk lies with the off-chain custodian/platform. User asset recovery depends on Terms of Use and corporate structure, exemplified by the Celsius bankruptcy ruling (2023) where Earn Account assets were deemed property of the estate. * **Model 4 (DEX Perpetual Protocols):** No single balance sheet bears risk. Loss absorption relies on a protocol's insurance fund and Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, as demonstrated in the GMX V1 (2022) and dYdX v3 YFI (2023) incidents. * **Model 5 (Regulated CCP - DCM-DCO-FCM):** The most institutionalized model concentrates risk in the Central Counterparty (CCP). However, history shows CCPs can employ non-standard tools under extreme stress, such as mass trade cancellation (LME Nickel, 2022) or enabling negative price settlements (CME WTI, 2020). The report argues that regulatory choices and counterparty risk structures are co-extensive, not in an upstream-downstream relationship. It concludes with five separate observation checklists (not predictions) for monitoring the structural vulnerabilities of each risk model.

marsbit20 мин. назад

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

marsbit20 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片