ProShares’ stablecoin-ready ETF posts ‘insane’ $17B trading debut

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-21Обновлено 2026-02-21

Введение

ProShares' GENIUS Money Market ETF (IQMM) shattered records with an "insane" $17 billion in first-day trading volume, far surpassing the debut of major Bitcoin ETFs. The fund, designed to hold assets compliant with the proposed U.S. stablecoin (GENIUS Act) regulations, is intended for use as reserves by stablecoin issuers. While speculation suggested a major issuer like Circle could be behind the volume, it was clarified the initial funding came from internal ProShares funds for cash management. Separately, the stablecoin sector received a significant regulatory boost as the SEC reduced its capital "haircut" on stablecoin holdings from 100% to 2%, a move hailed by Circle's CEO as a major win that will foster greater adoption in capital markets.

A money market fund targeting issuers regulated under the U.S stablecoin law, GENIUS Act, has made a new record for debut trading volume.

The ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF (NYSE: IQMM) saw a whopping $17 billion in trading volume.

For context, BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) saw $1 billion in day-one volume, while its other product, the BlackRock ESG ETF, saw $2 billion.

This was eight times the previous record, noted Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas.

He added,

“Insane: That $17B is going to show up as flows/assets tonight. Where is $ coming from? Either way, I was wrong about this ETF.”

Is Circle behind the record debut?

Responding to Balchunas, another ETF expert, Nate Geraci, speculated,

“Would assume ProShares cut a deal with one of the major U.S.-based stablecoin issuers...Looking at assets, believe that would only leave Circle.”

But Ben Johnson, head of client solutions at Morningstar, clarified that the product was funded by other ProShares funds for easier cash management purposes.

So, why GENIUS Act-inspired? The U.S stablecoin law has several instruments that can be used as reserve assets for issued stablecoin tokens. Some of the permitted reserves include cash and cash equivalents, short-dated U.S. Treasury bills, and money market funds focused on cash management.

This makes it easier to redeem and to cater to rising demand if users cash out en masse from stablecoins into fiat without triggering a bank run or risking broader financial markets.

And that’s where the ProShares ETF falls: an MMF focused on stablecoin reserves, likely in the hope that issuers may opt for it for easier cash management, too. It’s unclear whether it will attract these potential issuers.

Why the SEC’s 2% ‘haircut’ is good for stablecoins

Meanwhile, the stablecoin sector got another win after a recent SEC guideline. The regulator said payment stablecoin will now have 2% haircut, similar to money market funds.

In the past, stablecoins had a 100% ‘haircut’, meaning holding them had no capital benefit. If you had $100 million, it would be seen as $0 for capital purposes. Now, it can be valued at $98 million.

The change means stablecoin holders can have more trading inventory, loan capacity, and overall financial activity.

For his part, Jeremy Allaire, CEO of Circle, hailed the move as positive for stablecoin adoption.

“This is a big win for USDC adoption in capital markets. Great progress.”


Final Summary

  • ProShares’ GENIUS Act-inspired ETF set a new record, hitting $17 billion in day-one trading volume.
  • Circle CEO hailed the SEC’s 2% haircut for stablecoin as a likely catalyst for USDC adoption.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the record-breaking first-day trading volume for the ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF (IQMM)?

AThe ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF (IQMM) saw a record-breaking $17 billion in first-day trading volume.

QAccording to Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas, how did the IQMM's debut volume compare to the previous record?

AAccording to Eric Balchunas, the IQMM's $17 billion debut was eight times the previous record.

QWhat was the speculated reason behind the massive trading volume, as suggested by ETF expert Nate Geraci?

AETF expert Nate Geraci speculated that ProShares may have cut a deal with a major U.S.-based stablecoin issuer, likely Circle, to generate the massive volume.

QWhat is the significance of the SEC's new 2% 'haircut' rule for payment stablecoins?

AThe SEC's new 2% 'haircut' rule means stablecoins are now valued at 98% of their face value for capital purposes, a significant improvement from the previous 100% haircut which valued them at $0. This allows holders to have more trading inventory, loan capacity, and overall financial activity.

QHow does the ProShares ETF relate to the proposed GENIUS Act for stablecoins?

AThe ProShares ETF is a money market fund focused on the types of reserve assets (like cash, short-dated Treasury bills, and other money market funds) that would be permitted under the proposed GENIUS Act for stablecoin issuers to use for easier cash management and redemption.

Похожее

Investors Are Now Hunting for AI Projects on Bilibili and Xiaohongshu

Investors Turn to Bilibili and Xiaohongshu to Source AI Projects The AI hardware boom is in full swing in 2025, with a surge in smart wearables like AI glasses, rings, toys, and companion robots. This frenzy has investors scrambling, not just sifting through business plans, but actively hunting for promising "under-the-radar" projects on youth and tech-enthusiast content platforms like Bilibili and Xiaohongshu. The logic is straightforward: for consumer-facing AI hardware, genuine user demand and potential pitfalls are often revealed earlier in public discussions, comments, and critiques on these communities than in formal pitches. As one industry insider notes, these products must ultimately be tested and understood by real people. This shift highlights a crucial challenge in the sector: user education. The success of AI hardware depends on moving beyond mere efficiency gains to fulfilling higher-order needs like "unleashing personal creativity." Products must convince users they are natural, unobtrusive additions to daily life. Early hype, as seen with devices like the Rabbit R1, often fades if the product fails to clearly solve real-world problems, leading to high return rates and market rejection. The market is now entering a shakeout phase. 2026 is seen as a year of commercial validation. Some projects have already stalled or been canceled due to market resistance, lack of differentiation, or financial woes. However, the long-term opportunity remains vast, with forecasts predicting a multi-trillion dollar global AI hardware market by 2030. The competition is intensifying. With giants like OpenAI and Meta preparing their own hardware, and Chinese companies launching diverse AI-powered products, the battle for user attention, product excellence, and market understanding is just beginning. The core principle endures: in the AI era, it remains a user-sovereign market.

marsbit10 мин. назад

Investors Are Now Hunting for AI Projects on Bilibili and Xiaohongshu

marsbit10 мин. назад

"Agents' Last Exam", Claude Fable 5 Actually Loses to GPT 5.5

Surprisingly, in the newly released "Agents' Last Exam" (ALE) benchmark from UC Berkeley, GPT-5.5 has outperformed the recently launched and highly-regarded Claude Fable 5. ALE tests AI agents on their ability to perform real-world tasks across 55 professional domains—such as 3D modeling in Siemens NX, creating game scenes in Unreal Engine, and visual effects work in Adobe After Effects—by granting them full GUI and command-line access. In the core task completion rate ranking, GPT-5.5 configurations secured the top two spots (24.0% and 23.0%), while Claude Fable 5 with Claude Code came in third (22.0%). Notably, the highest pass rate was only 24%, and the most difficult "Last-Exam" tier saw most top models, including GPT-5.5 and Fable 5, scoring zero. The benchmark also revealed significant cost and efficiency gaps: Fable 5 spent over four times more money than GPT-5.5's most expensive configuration for a slightly lower score, and was much slower. ALE differs from previous knowledge-based benchmarks by evaluating practical "ability to do" rather than static knowledge retrieval. Its tasks are derived from real expert projects, automatically scored, and designed to prevent cheating through a rotating pool of private challenges. The results suggest that high performance on traditional benchmarks does not necessarily translate to proficiency in complex, open-ended real-world work. The study also notes that agents often fail by prematurely declaring tasks complete without proper verification, and that no single model excels uniformly across all diverse domains.

marsbit16 мин. назад

"Agents' Last Exam", Claude Fable 5 Actually Loses to GPT 5.5

marsbit16 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片