Outsmarting Algorithmic Manipulation on Twitter: How to Grow Your Account with Dignity?

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-19Обновлено 2026-01-19

Введение

This article analyzes the significant decline in engagement and reach experienced by many Twitter (X) content creators, attributing it to two major platform changes. First, the platform has weakened the "Following" tab, defaulting users to the algorithmic "For You" feed. Second, it has shifted from a chronological timeline to algorithmically recommended content, heavily influenced by its AI model, Grok. This results in a polarized content performance: deep, analytical posts receive minimal views and zero interaction, while sensationalist, controversial, or low-quality content (e.g., clickbait, politics, or adult material) often goes viral. The author argues this strategy, designed to increase ad revenue by keeping users in a recommendation loop, ultimately degrades the platform's community and commercial value. It incentivizes "farming" engagement through divisive or shallow content, driving away high-quality vertical creators who are increasingly migrating to platforms like Substack. The piece concludes with a three-part strategy for creators: 1) adapt by mixing deep content with high-engagement hooks and subscribing to Premium for better reach, 2) build direct audience connections through newsletters or private groups, and 3) wait for potential platform improvements. The core message is a call to maintain integrity while navigating the algorithmic challenges.

If you are a Twitter blogger, you have been experiencing abnormal phenomena for nearly half a year.

Specifically, your traffic and interaction data suddenly plummeted at a certain point, and the nature of viral content has become strange—deep analyses get dozens of views with zero interaction, while posting provocative or sensational content leads to a surge in followers.

The main content of this article is about why this phenomenon occurs. In other words, how did the clever design of the X platform ruin the vertical audience you worked so hard to build?

Platform Weakens the Following Page, Defaults to the Recommendation Page

This is caused by two measures from the platform:

· Weakening the "Following" page and defaulting users to the "For You" recommendation page; this has become so severe that some bloggers have to write custom scripts to force a switch back to the Following page.

· Phasing out the chronological display of followers' content in favor of algorithmic recommendations.

The reason is that last year, the platform introduced Grok as a weighting factor in algorithmic judgments. Without delving into the complexities, the result is: This makes posts either completely silent or suddenly blessed by the algorithm, going viral with no middle ground.

The motivation behind this is easy to understand: if users only see content from accounts they follow, platform ad insertion would be very awkward. For example, it would have to insert ads abruptly, like on WeChat, and then fabricate comments and likes from friends below the ad.

This seems to enhance the platform's commercial value in the short term, but in practice, it doesn't work out that way, especially in the casino-like atmosphere of the crypto circle.

@supermao has an incisive discussion on this in an article: Everyone says CT content is declining? What is the root cause? Have you been to Las Vegas? Have you seen high rollers in casinos needing to read newspapers or books? What they need are presidential suites, luxury, and beautiful women. The crypto circle is essentially too heavily narrative-driven around gambling, with everything revolving around gains, losses, and bets. More and more smart people realize that if your entire life is tied directly to market trends, it's hard to maintain long-term physical and mental health and clear thinking.

The result of these two measures is that a large amount of paid promotional content, such as AI-spun articles, suggestive images, borderline content, and political sensationalism, dominates users' recommended timeline. Rogue matrix accounts have become mainstream.

You probably understand how algorithms work better than I do: the more users click on this type of content, the system automatically judges it as your interest, and you get more of it. Eventually, the recommendation feed is full of this stuff.

The Destruction of Deep Content

The result: Many niche bloggers find their tweet traffic incredibly strange. They spend a long time writing deep content that gets dozens of views and zero interaction, but posting a sexy picture or some anti-social rant suddenly gains them hundreds of followers.

In reality, the attention channel for their vertical content distribution has been hijacked by the recommendation mechanism. Their followers haven't seen what they've been posting for a long time.

The following image depicts a common scenario:

In the end, vertical bloggers are forced to post content that pleases the base audience to survive, or else they should leave the platform and find a new one.

This leads to a massive loss of high-quality creators. Social platforms rely heavily on atmosphere. Weibo, Zhihu, and Bilibili have at times turned into public toilets, filled with misogyny, misandry, political sensationalism, and various anti-social, hostile content, all stemming from a loss of control over community atmosphere. After all, content that creates conflict and suggestive images are the most attention-grabbing. While this increases interaction in the short term, it leads to a dual loss of quality content and commercial value in the long run.

Many bloggers, like @nic_carter and @notboringco, are gradually moving towards Substack.

Rebuilding Your Influence with a Network Value Strategy

All week, Dan Koe's "One Day to Reset" long-form article became a viral hit.

This article had over 150 million reads. For a non-celebrity, non-president, non-billionaire to have traffic at this level, it must be officially boosted. Elon Musk's retweet and the million-dollar new concept essay contest are telling, and it also somewhat supports Nikita Bier's product-driven growth strategy.

I wrote about his thinking in a profile of Nikita Bier. It essentially revolves around one point: network value.

· Increase interaction between nodes in the network—content that stirs controversy, recommendation feeds.

· What kind of content increases network value?—Deep articles, preferably professional鸡汤 (chicken soup for the soul with expertise).

· Increased network value—Subscriptions + ad revenue up.

Increasing network value is necessary. Although major advertisers like Apple and Disney have returned, and subscription numbers have grown, Twitter still reported a net loss of $577 million in the third quarter of last year. This effort needs to be intensified.

Thinking about it this way, our action guide can be divided into three parts:

1. If you can't beat them, join them:

· First, buy a Premium subscription. You need the article writing function, right? Traffic now revolves around Blue V checks. At the very least, it allows paid promotions to reach more users.

· Wait for the algorithm's blessing. Mix deep articles with high-engagement hooks (like questions, hot takes).

2. Customized Service: Once traffic comes, build WeChat/Twitter/Telegram small groups or a Newsletter to ensure point-to-point reach. I have already developed the habit of reading deep content in my email.

3. Wait: Do nothing, just keep posting content diligently. I have a feeling that @nikitabier will probably start solving this problem soon.

I can't write any further here. In short, it's that slogan:

Let's grow our accounts with dignity!

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat are the two main platform changes that have led to a decline in traffic for vertical content creators on X (Twitter)?

AThe two main changes are: 1. The weakening of the 'Following' tab, with users being defaulted to the 'For You' recommendation page. 2. The shift away from a chronological feed of followed accounts toward an algorithm-driven recommendation system.

QAccording to the article, what type of content tends to go viral under the new algorithm, and what type suffers?

AContent featuring clickbait, sensationalism, borderline (risqué) material, and politically charged hot takes tends to go viral and gain followers. In contrast, deep, analytical, and vertical-specific content suffers, often receiving few views and zero interaction.

QWhat is the stated business motive for the platform (X) implementing these algorithmic changes?

AThe primary business reason is to better integrate and monetize advertising. If users only see content from accounts they follow, inserting ads is more abrupt and less native. The algorithmic feed allows for smoother ad integration and increases the potential for ads to go viral, thereby boosting the platform's commercial value.

QWhat long-term negative consequence for the platform's health does the article predict due to these changes?

AThe article predicts a mass exodus of high-quality, vertical content creators. This will lead to a degradation of the community atmosphere, filling it with more divisive, sensational, and low-quality content. While this may boost short-term engagement, it will cause a long-term loss of both quality content and commercial value.

QWhat are the three suggested strategies for creators to 'stand up and grow their account' despite the algorithm?

AThe three suggested strategies are: 1. 'If you can't beat them, join them': Subscribe to X Premium for better reach, and mix deep content with high-engagement hooks (like questions or hot takes) to attract the algorithm's favor. 2. 'Customized Service': Direct traffic to private channels like WeChat groups, Telegram groups, or a Newsletter to ensure direct reach to an audience. 3. 'Wait': Do nothing but continue posting quality content, with the hope that the platform will eventually address the issue.

Похожее

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, is facing significant technical challenges as its growth outpaces its current infrastructure on Polygon. Users are experiencing laggy transactions, unresponsive orders, and delayed confirmations, severely impacting the trading experience. In response, DeFi Engineering VP Josh Stevens outlined a comprehensive engineering overhaul. The plan includes reducing on-chain data delays, fixing order cancellation issues, rebuilding the central limit order book (CLOB), improving website performance, and developing a unified SDK and API. A major revelation was the ongoing "chain migration," indicating a potential move away from Polygon. The core issue is that Polymarket has evolved from a simple prediction market into a high-frequency trading platform, making Polygon's limitations—such as block space, gas fees, and block time—a ceiling for further growth. The migration is not just a simple chain switch but a fundamental rebuild of its trading system to support more complex products like perpetual contracts (Perps). This announcement has sparked competition among chains like Solana, Sui, and Algorand, all vying to host Polymarket. For Polygon, losing this key application, which contributes significantly to its gas fee revenue, would be a major setback. The real test for Polymarket is no longer attracting users but proving it can provide a stable, reliable trading environment that retains them.

Odaily星球日报10 мин. назад

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Odaily星球日报10 мин. назад

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit49 мин. назад

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit49 мин. назад

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片