OpenClaw Imposes Strict No-Crypto Rule on Discord

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-23Обновлено 2026-02-23

Введение

OpenClaw has implemented a strict no-cryptocurrency policy on its Discord server, banning any mentions of Bitcoin or other digital assets. This decision follows a high-profile scam involving a fraudulent Solana-based token, $CLAWD, which was promoted using abandoned social media handles during OpenClaw's rebrand. The token reached a $16 million market cap before crashing over 90% after creator Peter Steinberger denied any involvement. Although a user was temporarily banned for referencing Bitcoin block height in a technical discussion, the zero-tolerance policy remains. OpenClaw aims to prevent brand misuse and protect users from scams, prioritizing security over open discussion of blockchain topics.

OpenClaw has introduced a strict no-crypto policy across its Discord channels following a high-profile token scam linked to its recent rebrand. Peter Steinberger, the creator of OpenClaw, has confirmed that any mention of Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies will lead to a ban from the server.

The policy came into the spotlight after a user was banned for mentioning the block height of Bitcoin as a timing reference in a technical conversation. The user posted about the incident on a public forum, and Steinberger was forced to clarify the server policy.

Blanket Ban Covers All Crypto Mentions

Steinberger has justified the harsh policy by saying that all users agree to abide by the server rules when they register. The policy applies to all forms of cryptocurrency references, whether in technical conversations or otherwise.

The banned user has explained that they made the reference to Bitcoin block height only for the sake of benchmarking. Steinberger has since agreed to unban the user and asked them to send their username to be let back in.

The policy still stands despite the user being unbanned. Steinberger has said that OpenClaw will enforce a zero-tolerance policy on any cryptocurrency-related conversation to avoid confusion and exploitation.

$CLAWD Scam Sparks Crackdown

The security measure follows a scam involving a Solana-based token named $CLAWD. The incident occurred during OpenClaw’s rebranding process after Steinberger received a trademark notice that required a name change.

Scammers exploited the transition period. They seized abandoned social media handles before the project claimed new ones. The attackers used those accounts to promote the $CLAWD token, suggesting it represented an official launch of OpenClaw.

The token quickly rose to a market capitalization of around $16 million. This was due to the assumption of legitimacy by the traders. However, when Steinberger denied involvement in the project, the token crashed by over 90%.

Steinberger was accused by early buyers of being behind a pump-and-dump scam. However, he denied the allegations and stated that he would never create a cryptocurrency.

You can check the trends in crypto scam reporting on Chainalysis, and the guidelines for the Discord community can be found on the official Discord policy page.

Security Risks Extend Beyond Tokens

Later, security experts found that there were hundreds of vulnerable OpenClaw instances available online. They also found dozens of malicious plugins, many of which were intended for crypto traders.

The $CLAWD scandal brought the crypto-related communities under greater scrutiny. OpenClaw has since decided to remove all crypto-related discussions to ensure there is no risk of brand misuse.

Steinberger’s position also indicates the increasing conflict between open-source projects and crypto trading. Although some communities are open to token economies, OpenClaw has decided to distance itself.

The policy may be frustrating for users who participate in blockchain-related technical discussions. However, the OpenClaw team feels that it is more important to be clear than flexible.

By ensuring that all cryptocurrency discussions are banned, the project hopes to protect its brand and prevent misuse in the future. With the constant emergence of crypto-related scams on social media platforms, communities are increasingly turning to hard-line moderation policies.

OpenClaw’s policy also indicates that it is taking a defensive position. The project prioritizes brand protection and user safety over open communication about blockchain technology. Whether this policy will stick in the long run will depend on the reaction of the community and the reduction of security threats.

Highlighted Crypto News:

SBI Holdings Launches Tokenized Bonds with XRP Rewards to Investors

TagsBitcoinChainalysisCrypto ScamDiscordSolana

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the new policy that OpenClaw has implemented on its Discord server?

AOpenClaw has implemented a strict no-crypto policy, banning any mention of Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies on its Discord channels.

QWhy did OpenClaw decide to enforce this strict no-cryptocurrency rule?

AThe policy was enacted following a high-profile scam involving a Solana-based token named $CLAWD, which fraudulently used the OpenClaw brand, and to prevent future brand misuse and exploitation.

QWhat incident brought the new policy into the spotlight after a user was banned?

AThe policy gained attention when a user was banned for mentioning the Bitcoin block height as a timing reference in a technical discussion, which they claimed was for benchmarking purposes.

QWhat was the result of the $CLAWD token scam after Steinberger denied involvement?

AAfter Peter Steinberger denied any involvement with the $CLAWD token, its value crashed by over 90% from its peak market capitalization of around $16 million.

QBeyond token scams, what other security risks were discovered related to OpenClaw?

ASecurity experts found hundreds of vulnerable OpenClaw instances online and dozens of malicious plugins, many of which were targeted at crypto traders.

Похожее

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit1 ч. назад

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

DeepSeek-V4 has been released as a preview open-source model, featuring 1 million tokens of context length as a baseline capability—previously a premium feature locked behind enterprise paywalls by major overseas AI firms. The official announcement, however, openly acknowledges computational constraints, particularly limited service throughput for the high-end DeepSeek-V4-Pro version due to restricted high-end computing power. Rather than competing on pure scale, DeepSeek adopts a pragmatic approach that balances algorithmic innovation with hardware realities in China’s AI ecosystem. The V4-Pro model uses a highly sparse architecture with 1.6T total parameters but only activates 49B during inference. It performs strongly in agentic coding, knowledge-intensive tasks, and STEM reasoning, competing closely with top-tier closed models like Gemini Pro 3.1 and Claude Opus 4.6 in certain scenarios. A key strategic product is the Flash edition, with 284B total parameters but only 13B activated—making it cost-effective and accessible for mid- and low-tier hardware, including domestic AI chips from Huawei (Ascend), Cambricon, and Hygon. This design supports broader adoption across developers and SMEs while stimulating China's domestic semiconductor ecosystem. Despite facing talent outflow and intense competition in user traffic—with rivals like Doubao and Qianwen leading in monthly active users—DeepSeek has maintained technical momentum. The release also comes amid reports of a new funding round targeting a valuation exceeding $10 billion, potentially setting a new record in China’s LLM sector. Ultimately, DeepSeek-V4 represents a shift toward open yet realistic infrastructure development in the constrained compute landscape of Chinese AI, emphasizing engineering efficiency and domestic hardware compatibility over pure model scale.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片