OpenClaw "Endorses" Venice: What Other Targets Are There in the Privacy AI Track?

Odaily星球日报Опубликовано 2026-03-05Обновлено 2026-03-05

Введение

OpenClaw's brief endorsement of Venice has drawn market attention to the growing intersection of privacy and AI in the crypto space, sparking discussions around several related projects. Venice (VVV) is positioned as a decentralized, privacy-first alternative to ChatGPT, emphasizing its no-logging and no-censorship policies. Its token has surged amid both growing demand and a reduction in token supply. NEAR Protocol is shifting its narrative toward becoming an infrastructure layer for AI agents, particularly through its Confidential Intents system, which adds optional privacy to cross-chain transactions to combat MEV and front-running. Sahara AI aims to build a decentralized AI ecosystem that addresses data ownership and fair value distribution. Its ClawGuard system provides safety mechanisms for AI agents, while its data service platform incentivizes users to contribute data. Phala Network offers privacy-preserving computation via TEE-based smart contracts, providing a secure execution environment for AI agents. It has partnered with projects like ai16z to integrate confidential computation into agent frameworks. Analysts note that interest in privacy-AI projects had been building even before recent hype, suggesting the trend may have longer-term potential beyond short-term speculation.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | DingDang (@XiaMiPP)

The hot topic OpenClaw has started endorsing Privacy AI, and the "desperate crypto retail investors" seem to have found a new direction for speculation.

It is precisely within this narrative context that a batch of projects related to privacy computing and AI Agent infrastructure have begun to re-enter the market's view. Odaily Planet Daily's review found that during this wave of heated discussion, several projects have already become potential beneficiaries.

VVV(#133)

Venice is an AI generation platform focused on censorship resistance + privacy, positioning itself as a decentralized version of ChatGPT. The starting point of the Privacy AI hype originated from Venice. This is because OpenClaw had once highlighted Venice in its official documentation, only to remove it hastily within 24 hours. Although the recommendation could be removed, this action drew more attention to Venice and its privacy-first features.

Unlike most AI projects, Venice's core narrative is not AI model capability, but privacy itself. Against the backdrop of mainstream AI platforms increasingly strengthening content censorship, and with ongoing controversies over AI data leaks and model training, this "no recording, no censorship" product positioning precisely hits the most sensitive values of the crypto community.

In an era where the AI Agent trend is rapidly fermenting, Venice has stepped into this "era dividend" quite aptly. More coincidentally, the Venice project is actively reducing the token supply of VVV, decreasing inflation. Increased demand meeting reduced supply further strengthens the positive feedback expectation for the VVV token.

Read reference: OpenClaw Endorses Venice.ai, VVV Token Surges Over 500% in a Month

NEAR(#43)

Near Protocol, this veteran high-performance public chain project, is also actively seeking self-reinvention under the impact of the AI wave. It is no longer just a "traditional L1" pursuing TPS and low gas, but is gradually shifting its narrative focus towards the execution layer and settlement infrastructure in the era of AI Agents, attempting to find a new growth narrative in this new technological cycle.

Since the beginning of 2025, it has been vigorously promoting the NEAR Intents (Intent System). This system allows users or AI agents to simply express the "final desired outcome," and the backend will automatically complete complex operations across 35+ chains without manual bridging, wallet switching, or routing management.

On February 25, 2026, NEAR officially upgraded this intent system and launched Confidential Intents. This version introduces privacy computing capabilities into the original intent execution framework. Through Near's privacy sharding mechanism combined with Trusted Execution Environments (TEE), cross-chain transactions can hide key details during execution, such as swap paths, trade size, or specific strategies. However, it does not enforce privacy on all transactions like Zcash or Monero, but rather adds an optional layer of privacy protection to intent execution. Its main goal is not to anonymize transactions, but to prevent MEV, front-running, and sandwich attacks and other on-chain arbitrage behaviors, thereby making transactions more secure during execution.

In the future, AI agents might become the main "users" of blockchain. They will autonomously hold assets, conduct cross-chain transactions, execute strategies, and even coordinate with each other. Under this vision, blockchain not only needs to handle high-frequency transactions but must also provide capabilities like verifiable execution, privacy computing, and cross-chain coordination.

Near's current layout is precisely built around this imagination. It attempts to build an open network that can both support AI agents in automatically executing complex tasks and ensure the process is verifiable and secure. Against the backdrop of the continuously impacting AI wave, this transformation can be seen both as an attempt to actively embrace the new narrative and as a self-reshaping of a veteran public chain in the new cycle.

SAHARA(#295)

Sahara AI's core goal is to build a decentralized, transparent, and secure AI ecosystem, making the development, training, deployment, and commercialization of AI fairer and more trustworthy. The project is committed to solving the problems currently faced by the AI industry, such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and unclear model ownership.

The rise of AI Agents is bringing forth a new question: Who exactly do the data, models, and capabilities used by these Agents belong to? In the current AI industry structure, this question hasn't been properly resolved. The data required to train models often comes from a large number of dispersed contributors, but the final profits are highly concentrated in the hands of a few AI companies; model developers, even with technical capabilities, often can only依附 on platform ecosystems; and as AI Agents begin to call models, data, and tools autonomously, the entire value chain will become more complex. Without a clear set of rights confirmation and profit-sharing mechanisms, the future AI economy will likely repeat the path of Web2: data owned by users, value captured by platforms.

Sahara AI is precisely trying to establish new rules in this环节. Its ClawGuard security system provides verifiable safety guardrails for AI agents, ensuring they operate safely within preset rules. The Data Service Platform (DSP) allows users to earn token incentives by labeling and contributing AI training data, gradually forming a decentralized data market. Under this mechanism, data contributors can not only participate in the AI model training process but also receive continuous收益 when the data is used, while the platform also ensures data quality and privacy protection through on-chain mechanisms.

PHA(#601)

Phala Network is a privacy-preserving smart contract platform built on Substrate, aiming to provide verifiable privacy-preserving computation services for Web3 applications. To understand why Phala benefits from the AI Agent热潮, one first needs to answer a more fundamental question: What infrastructure does the operation of AI Agents actually rely on?

If we break down the current Agent ecosystem, its tech stack can be roughly divided into several layers. The top layer is the model layer, which includes various large language models or reasoning models, such as OpenAI, Claude, and a series of open-source models; below that is the Agent framework layer, including tools like LangChain, AutoGPT, OpenClaw, etc., which are responsible for organizing tasks, scheduling models, and calling external tools; further down is the execution environment layer, where the Agent actually runs code, calls APIs, and executes automated tasks; additionally, there is the payment and identity layer, used to handle payments, identity, and reputation systems between Agents; and at the very bottom is the compute power and privacy layer, responsible for ensuring the computation process is trustworthy and data security is not compromised.

From this structure, Phala's position恰恰 spans the execution environment layer and the compute power & privacy layer. Its core technology—a confidential computing network based on TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)—enables AI Agents to run programs securely off-chain while ensuring the computation process is verifiable and data is not窥探 by external parties. This is particularly crucial in the Agent economy.

In terms of specific ecosystem implementation, Phala has already begun to integrate with AI Agent projects. For example, Phala collaborated with ai16z to build a TEE component for its Eliza multi-agent framework, integrating trusted execution technology directly into the Agent runtime environment; meanwhile, some AI Agent token issuance projects (like aiPool) have also adopted Phala's TEE technology to manage private keys and on-chain assets.

In the future, as AI Agents evolve from "chat tools" into digital entities capable of holding funds, executing transactions, and even operating protocols, secure execution environments will gradually become an indispensable infrastructure layer for the entire Agent ecosystem, and Phala is trying to occupy this position.

Conclusion

When reviewing these projects, an interesting finding is: The time when these tokens actually started rising was actually earlier than the recommendation event these past few days. That is to say, before Venice brought "Privacy AI" to the forefront, a portion of funds in the market had already noticed this direction in advance, it just lacked a clear enough narrative trigger point at the time. The OpenClaw recommendation event was just a fuse that ignited attention.

In fact, whether it's a16z or Delphi Digital, their annual investment research reports for 2025 listed privacy and AI as key focus areas for 2026. However, when these macro judgments真正落到 the market, they often need a specific event to trigger consensus. And in early 2026, privacy and AI have come before us in such a combined form.

As for whether this will become the next long-term trend or just another short-lived thematic speculation,恐怕 still requires time to provide the answer.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the core narrative of Venice (VVV) in the context of privacy AI?

AVenice's core narrative is not AI model capability but privacy itself. It positions as a decentralized ChatGPT alternative, emphasizing 'no recording, no censorship' to address data leakage and model training controversies in mainstream AI platforms.

QHow is NEAR Protocol adapting to the AI wave and what key feature did it introduce in February 2026?

ANEAR Protocol is shifting its focus to become an execution layer and settlement infrastructure for the AI Agent era. In February 2026, it upgraded its intent system to Confidential Intents, introducing privacy computing capabilities via TEE to hide transaction details and prevent MEV and front-running.

QWhat problem does Sahara AI aim to solve in the AI ecosystem, and what is its ClawGuard system?

ASahara AI aims to address data privacy, algorithmic bias, and unclear model ownership in AI. Its ClawGuard system provides verifiable safety guardrails for AI agents, ensuring they operate within preset rules securely.

QWhich technology does Phala Network (PHA) use to provide privacy for AI Agent operations, and why is it critical?

APhala Network uses TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)-based confidential computing to enable AI Agents to run programs off-chain with verifiable computation and data privacy. This is critical as Agents evolve to hold funds and execute transactions, requiring secure execution environments.

QAccording to the article, what was the role of OpenClaw's recommendation in the privacy AI trend?

AOpenClaw's recommendation of Venice acted as a catalyst that drew market attention to privacy AI, though the trend had already been noticed by some investors earlier. It served as a narrative trigger for broader consensus.

Похожее

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, is facing significant technical challenges as its growth outpaces its current infrastructure on Polygon. Users are experiencing laggy transactions, unresponsive orders, and delayed confirmations, severely impacting the trading experience. In response, DeFi Engineering VP Josh Stevens outlined a comprehensive engineering overhaul. The plan includes reducing on-chain data delays, fixing order cancellation issues, rebuilding the central limit order book (CLOB), improving website performance, and developing a unified SDK and API. A major revelation was the ongoing "chain migration," indicating a potential move away from Polygon. The core issue is that Polymarket has evolved from a simple prediction market into a high-frequency trading platform, making Polygon's limitations—such as block space, gas fees, and block time—a ceiling for further growth. The migration is not just a simple chain switch but a fundamental rebuild of its trading system to support more complex products like perpetual contracts (Perps). This announcement has sparked competition among chains like Solana, Sui, and Algorand, all vying to host Polymarket. For Polygon, losing this key application, which contributes significantly to its gas fee revenue, would be a major setback. The real test for Polymarket is no longer attracting users but proving it can provide a stable, reliable trading environment that retains them.

Odaily星球日报3 мин. назад

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Odaily星球日报3 мин. назад

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit41 мин. назад

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit41 мин. назад

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片