On-Chain Stock Trading, Yet Retaining Reset Rights: Robinhood's Experiment in Progress and Retreat

比推Опубликовано 2026-02-12Обновлено 2026-02-12

Введение

Robinhood has launched the public testnet of Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum Layer 2 built on Arbitrum Orbit, aiming to tokenize real-world assets (RWA) like stocks, ETFs, and private equities. This move follows the company’s earlier experiments in Europe, where it offered tokenized stock derivatives—not actual equity ownership—with features like 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and dividend pass-through. The chain leverages Arbitrum for EVM compatibility and Ethereum for security, while allowing Robinhood to enforce compliance controls. Despite its vision for global accessibility and DeFi composability, challenges remain: the assets are legally structured as derivatives, Robinhood Europe acts as the sole counterparty, and the platform retains centralized control, including the ability to reset or restrict wallet access. The initiative represents Robinhood’s broader push to bridge traditional finance and crypto, though its success depends on navigating regulatory and operational hurdles.

Author: KarenZ, Foresight News

Original Title: Robinhood Ventures into L2, Focusing on RWA Tokenization

At the end of January 2026, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev revisited the "GameStop short squeeze" that shocked Wall Street five years ago on social media, stating bluntly: if blockchain technology's real-time settlement capability had been available at that time, the "pulling the plug" moment that angered countless retail investors could have been avoided.

Just two weeks later, Robinhood officially announced the launch of the Robinhood Chain public testnet based on Arbitrum, which will support tokenized real-world assets, including stocks, ETFs, private assets, and other financial instruments.

Architectural Choice: Why Arbitrum?

In terms of architectural choice, Robinhood chose to build the Ethereum Layer 2 network Robinhood Chain based on Arbitrum Orbit, using Ethereum Blobs to ensure data availability and ETH as the native Gas token.

Robinhood is well aware that it doesn't need to reinvent the wheel. Arbitrum provides EVM compatibility, allowing existing DeFi protocols and wallet infrastructure to migrate at near-zero cost. More importantly, Arbitrum Orbit allows Robinhood to build a "dedicated chain" that has both independent governance and custom logic (such as compliance review) while sharing the unbreakable security consensus of the Ethereum mainnet.

This is crucial for Robinhood, which needs to meet financial regulatory requirements. It can implement compliance rules on-chain, restrict access permissions for specific wallet addresses, all without leaving Ethereum, the largest pool of capital.

More critically, as early as mid-2025, Robinhood had already been trialing its tokenized stock business on Arbitrum. Launching its own chain on Arbitrum now is a natural progression.

Robinhood's Tokenized Stock Pilot

Prior to the Robinhood Chain testnet launch, Robinhood had been conducting an 8-month "tokenized stock" experiment in the European market.

At the Consensus 2026 conference, Robinhood Crypto General Manager Johann Kerbrat stated that Robinhood had launched about 2,000 tokenized stock and ETF products in the European market, covering mainstream U.S. stocks and ETF products. Future plans include tokenizing private equity, real estate, and artwork to enable 7*24 hour trading and instant settlement.

According to Dune data, as of February 9th, the total value of Robinhood's tokenized stocks is currently $15.1 million, with a cumulative trading volume of $74.43 million. Of course, this scale appears relatively small.

Operational Truth: How Does Robinhood's Tokenized Stock "Put" U.S. Stocks On-Chain?

Underlying Architecture: These tokenized stocks were initially issued on Arbitrum and will be fully migrated to Robinhood Chain in the future.
Essential Nature: These tokenized stocks are not actual ownership certificates but rather derivative contracts pegged to the price of the underlying stock or ETP. This means the tokens held by users track the performance of the U.S. stock, but the users do not have ownership of the corresponding shares.
Issuance and Destruction Mechanism: When a user buys a stock derivative contract on Robinhood, the platform immediately generates a corresponding fungible token on the blockchain. This token represents ownership of this contract, but this token cannot be transferred to others. Once the user closes this contract position, the platform will directly burn the corresponding token on the blockchain. The blockchain is updated immediately, and the token becomes completely invalid.
Dividend Pass-Through: Although users do not own the stock, Robinhood achieves dividend pass-through. When the underlying stock pays a dividend, the system automatically distributes the dividend in cash to the investor's account.
Compliance Armor: Robinhood's ability to legally launch tokenized stocks in Europe is thanks to its thorough regulatory preparation:
In June 2025, Robinhood acquired Bitstamp for $200 million in cash. The core value of this acquisition lies in Bitstamp's Slovenian MiFID Multilateral Trading Facility (MTF) license.
In mid-2025, Robinhood obtained the EU MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) license and a Lithuanian MiFID brokerage license.

Because of this, Robinhood's tokenized stocks are custodied by Bitstamp.

In terms of trading门槛 and fees, the barrier to entry for such tokenized stocks is extremely low, starting from just 1 euro; trading hours cover 5*24 (weekdays 24/5). Users can place advance orders during non-trading hours, which are automatically executed when the market opens. Regarding fees, Robinhood implements a policy of zero trading commissions and zero spreads, charging only a 0.1% foreign exchange fee during transactions, minimizing user trading costs.

The "Second Half" of Financial Democratization

If Robinhood's first half was famous for "zero commission," then the second half is about "eliminating the barriers of time and space."

The core narrative of Robinhood Chain lies in the comprehensive on-chain representation of RWA (Real World Assets). Its significance is reflected in three dimensions:

24/7 Market: Robinhood Chain brings U.S. stocks into Crypto's time dimension, allowing capital flow to no longer be restricted by Wall Street's schedule.
Instant Settlement: Faster trade confirmation speeds.
Asset Composability: This is the biggest area of imagination. Imagine, in the future, you could not only hold Tesla stock but also deposit it into Aave or Compound protocols as collateral to borrow USDC to buy coffee. The properties of assets are彻底释放 (thoroughly released). Of course, at this stage, stock tokens on Robinhood cannot be transferred to other digital wallets or trading platforms.
Permissionless: Robinhood Chain is designed to be permissionless and developer-friendly. Anyone can interact with the network, build applications, and deploy smart contracts.
Erosion of Global Investment Barriers: An investor in Southeast Asia can participate in the growth红利 (dividends) of top global companies through Robinhood Chain with extremely low friction costs.

Unavoidable Challenges and Variables

However, the voyage to the new world still faces several "high walls":

Legal Ambiguity of Asset Definition: It currently exists in the form of "derivatives" rather than direct tokenization of the underlying securities, leaving a layer of legal opacity.
Single Counterparty is Robinhood Europe: Robinhood Europe is the sole counterparty for this financial derivative, and counterparty concentration could pose potential liquidity and credit risks. However, Robinhood's official documents indicate that Robinhood will hedge the risk of its issued U.S. stock derivatives by purchasing U.S. stocks or ETFs on a 1:1 basis.
Ecosystem Closedness: Robinhood Chain currently exhibits strong centralized control attributes. Its terms of service clearly state that the platform can随时重置 (reset at any time), restrict, or revoke access permissions for specific wallets. While this design is necessary to meet compliance requirements, it also conflicts with the core spirit of Web3 decentralization, drawing it into the controversy of "imbalance between compliance and decentralization." However, decentralization and compliance are somewhat conflicting, which is understandable. Over the past few months, Robinhood's open-minded approach to tokenized stocks has also been continuously expanding.
Resistance from Third-Party Companies: OpenAI previously publicly stated that it "does not recognize" the legality of certain tokenized equities. This exposes the core矛盾 (contradiction) of RWA: the recognition of rights between third-party companies and the asset tokenizer (Robinhood).

Summary

The launch of the Robinhood Chain testnet did not trigger狂欢 (jubilation) in the Crypto industry, but this might also be a revolution of "still waters run deep."

When a giant like Robinhood, deeply entrenched in traditional retail finance, begins to seriously布局 (layout) blockchain and promote the on-chain representation and trading of real-world assets, the clear boundary between traditional finance and crypto finance is gradually being blurred and dissolved.

Whether Robinhood Chain will become a super gateway connecting traditional finance and Web3, or fall into a closed "island" due to excessive focus on compliance, still requires time to tell.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7611482

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main reason Robinhood chose Arbitrum as the infrastructure for its new blockchain, Robinhood Chain?

ARobinhood chose Arbitrum because it provides EVM compatibility, allowing for easy migration of existing DeFi protocols and wallet infrastructure. More importantly, Arbitrum Orbit enables Robinhood to build a 'dedicated chain' with independent governance and custom logic (like compliance checks) while still leveraging Ethereum's robust security consensus, which is crucial for meeting financial regulatory requirements.

QWhat is the nature of the tokenized stocks Robinhood has been testing in Europe?

AThe tokenized stocks are not actual ownership certificates of the underlying stocks. Instead, they are derivative contracts whose prices are pegged to the value of the target stocks or ETFs. This means users hold tokens that track the performance of the stocks but do not confer ownership rights.

QHow does Robinhood handle dividends for holders of its tokenized stocks?

ADespite users not owning the actual stocks, Robinhood implements a dividend pass-through mechanism. When the underlying stock pays a dividend, the system automatically distributes the cash equivalent of the dividend to the investor's account.

QWhat regulatory preparations did Robinhood make to legally offer tokenized stocks in Europe?

ARobinhood acquired Bitstamp, which held a Slovenian MiFID Multilateral Trading Facility (MTF) license. Additionally, it secured an EU MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) license and a Lithuanian MiFID brokerage license in mid-2025, enabling it to offer these products compliantly.

QWhat is one of the major criticisms or challenges facing Robinhood Chain regarding its design philosophy?

AA major criticism is its centralized control attributes. The platform's terms of service allow it to reset, restrict, or revoke access to specific wallets at any time. This design, while necessary for compliance, conflicts with the core Web3 principle of decentralization, leading to debates about an imbalance between compliance and decentralization.

Похожее

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

South Korean stocks experienced their sharpest decline of the year, with the KOSPI index plunging nearly 9% on Monday, triggering a market circuit breaker. Leading semiconductor firms Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix were heavily sold off, raising questions about whether the AI-driven bull market has reached an inflection point. This sell-off was largely triggered by a significant drop in the U.S. semiconductor sector late last week. Concurrently, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang visited Seoul over the weekend, meeting with top executives from SK Group, Samsung, LG, and NAVER. He announced a new multi-year partnership with SK Hynix to co-develop next-generation memory products for AI data centers. Huang emphasized that AI infrastructure build-out remains in its early stages, creating a stark contrast between market panic and ongoing, strengthened industry collaboration. The article argues that South Korea has become one of the most sensitive markets for global AI-related capital flows, functioning like a large AI memory ETF due to the heavy weighting of its chipmakers. The current market turmoil reflects a shift in investor focus: from simply betting on overall AI growth to scrutinizing which companies will actually capture the profits from that growth. This "profit pool reassessment" phase is causing high volatility based on supply chain news and earnings guidance. Ultimately, the direction of the Korean market will be determined by external factors—NVIDIA's orders, HBM supply-demand dynamics, and capital expenditures from cloud service providers—rather than domestic conditions. The disconnect between sharp price corrections and continued strong signals from the industry core leaves the market at a crossroads, awaiting clearer data on the durability of AI infrastructure demand.

marsbit32 мин. назад

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

marsbit32 мин. назад

Trump in Talks with AI Companies Over Profit Sharing, A Narrative Pressure of Industrial Revolution Scale Begins

In recent AI market discussions, a new dimension beyond growth and profits has emerged: the question of how the immense wealth potentially generated by AI should be shared with the wider public. Triggered by reports of White House officials discussing "voluntary equity transfers" with top AI firms, similar to models like Alaska's Permanent Fund, the conversation focuses on public wealth funds. OpenAI's own whitepaper proposes such funds, allowing households without direct tech stock ownership to benefit from AI gains. More radical proposals, like Bernie Sanders' call for high public equity stakes and board seats, represent an extreme end of the spectrum. Currently, these are early-stage policy probes, not enacted laws. OpenAI's initiative is seen as an attempt to secure "social license" for its future expansion, mitigating risks of public backlash, stricter regulation, or anti-trust actions as AI's economic impact grows. The core market implication is the introduction of a "policy discount" to AI valuations, particularly for private model companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI. Investors must now consider not just future earnings but also what portion might be allocated to public mechanisms. The impact varies greatly based on the mechanism. A small, voluntary transfer of non-voting economic rights (e.g., 5%) acts as a quantifiable long-term cost. Government acquisition of economic rights via warrants tied to support differs from direct equity with governance power. The most disruptive scenario would be forced high-percentage public ownership affecting control and innovation incentives. Key signals to watch include whether other AI companies follow suit, if the White House formalizes proposals, related disclosures in future IPO documents, and any market price reactions. For now, this represents a shift from pricing pure AI growth to pricing its potential distribution. A manageable, voluntary economic share is akin to an insurance cost for societal acceptance, while a forced shift toward control and governance would fundamentally alter valuation logic.

marsbit36 мин. назад

Trump in Talks with AI Companies Over Profit Sharing, A Narrative Pressure of Industrial Revolution Scale Begins

marsbit36 мин. назад

From Record Highs to a Two-Week Low: Why Did AI Concept Stocks Suddenly Pull Back?

From Record Highs to Two-Week Lows: Why Did AI Stocks Suddenly Pull Back? U.S. stock indices, led by the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100, fell sharply to two-week lows. This marked a reversal from earlier in the week when AI infrastructure and semiconductor stocks had propelled major indices to record highs. Investors are rotating out of these previously high-flying tech sectors into other areas. The sell-off was driven by profit-taking and concerns that the AI rally had become overextended, exacerbated by chipmaker Broadcom's sales outlook falling short of lofty market expectations. The decline accelerated following a stronger-than-expected U.S. May nonfarm payrolls report, which showed 172,000 jobs added versus an estimated 88,000. This data sparked a jump in bond yields, with the 10-year Treasury yield rising to 4.553%, as it reinforced market speculation that the Federal Reserve's next move could be a rate hike rather than a cut. Globally, equities also declined, with European and Asian markets falling. Within the U.S. market, chip and AI-related stocks like Super Micro Computer and Arm Holdings led the losses, dropping over 7%. Cryptocurrency-linked stocks and mining shares also fell sharply amid drops in Bitcoin and commodity prices. While the overall Q1 earnings season remained solid, with 83% of S&P 500 companies beating estimates, the weakness was concentrated in tech. Excluding the tech sector, Q1 earnings growth was around 3%, the weakest in two years.

marsbit37 мин. назад

From Record Highs to a Two-Week Low: Why Did AI Concept Stocks Suddenly Pull Back?

marsbit37 мин. назад

Earning Bounty with a Forehead Tattoo? pump.fun Keeps Memes Alive Through 'Bounties'

The article discusses the launch of pump.fun's new bounty platform "Pump.fun GO," which allows meme coin holders to lock funds as rewards for completing specific, often outrageous, marketing tasks to promote their tokens. Examples include a $50,000 bounty to skydive into a World Cup match in a mascot costume and a bounty for getting a forehead tattoo (with a typo) of a token name. The platform has sparked controversy for its perceived copycat nature compared to existing Web3 bounty platforms and its "crazy" tasks, while also granting pump.fun unilateral authority to approve or reject submissions. The move is analyzed as a strategic effort by pump.fun to revive declining platform revenue and meme coin engagement, following a pattern from its earlier, chaotic live-streaming feature. The core logic is that meme coins, lacking fundamentals, rely on manufactured attention and events, with GO formalizing this by outsourcing promotional stunts to bounty hunters, all aimed at boosting token visibility and price.

Foresight News1 ч. назад

Earning Bounty with a Forehead Tattoo? pump.fun Keeps Memes Alive Through 'Bounties'

Foresight News1 ч. назад

JP Morgan Mid-Year Research Report Analysis: The AI Supercycle is Not Over, Reduce Cash Holdings + Allocate to Real Assets

JP Morgan's 2026 Mid-Year Outlook argues the AI supercycle is far from over, despite market pessimism. The report advises clients to reduce cash holdings, increase allocations to real assets as an inflation hedge, and focus on emerging markets. Key conclusions include: 1. **AI Supercycle Intact**: Hyperscalers' 2026 capex forecasts exceed $650B, with AI contributing to GDP growth. However, their financial profile is shifting toward heavy investment, compressing free cash flow. 2. **SaaS Disruption**: Traditional software companies are being negatively impacted by AI, with significant stock declines and pressure in credit markets. 3. **Persistent Inflation**: Core inflation is structurally higher post-pandemic. Holding excess cash and bonds leads to real wealth erosion. Recommendations include commodities, infrastructure, real estate, and gold. 4. **Geopolitical Shocks & Opportunities**: The Hormuz Strait blockade caused a major oil shock, but JP Morgan views the subsequent equity market pullback as a buying opportunity. "Fragmentation" is creating pockets of value, notably in resource-rich Latin America, AI-supply-chain-linked East Asia, and deeply discounted Chinese equities, where a policy shift could trigger a re-rating. 5. **Regional Views**: The firm is cautious on Europe due to high energy costs and lower innovation investment, preferring US and select EM exposures. In short, JP Morgan sees market volatility as an entry point but recommends a portfolio pivot: favor AI infrastructure, real assets, and EM, while avoiding excess cash, vulnerable software firms, and traditional 60/40 stock-bond allocations.

marsbit1 ч. назад

JP Morgan Mid-Year Research Report Analysis: The AI Supercycle is Not Over, Reduce Cash Holdings + Allocate to Real Assets