IOSG Founder: The Most Dangerous Prisoner's Dilemma in DeFi History

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-04-22Обновлено 2026-04-22

Введение

IOSG Founder: DeFi's Most Dangerous Prisoner's Dilemma A $230M bad debt remains unresolved, with Aave Collector holding over $200M in liquid assets and LayerZero recently raising $120M—both fully capable of covering the losses. Aave has lost $8.45B in TVL in under two days, while the entire DeFi ecosystem has bled $13.2B. The silence from all parties involved is exacerbating the crisis. The author recalls the DeFi spirit of 2020, when MakerDAO faced collapse during the March 12 crash but took responsibility by auctioning MKR to cover bad debt. Today, in contrast, there is only silence. Users are withdrawing funds not just from Aave but from Spark and other DeFi protocols, voting with their feet. This loss of trust threatens the entire ecosystem. This is not just Aave’s problem. Spark, MakerDAO, and all Ethereum DeFi protocols must coordinate. Trust, once broken, affects everyone. Time is critical—every hour of silence leads to more capital leaving permanently. The author urges Aave’s Stani Kulechov, Vitalik Buterin, AaveDAO, KelpDAO, LayerZero, and RuneKek to communicate publicly and reassure the market. Silence is the worst option.

Author: Jocy, IOSG Founder

$230 million USD bad debt remains unresolved. Aave Collector holds over $200 million in liquid assets, LayerZero just completed a $120 million funding round—both are fully capable of covering the losses. Aave has lost $8.45 billion in TVL in less than two days, while the entire DeFi space has evaporated $13.2 billion. With each passing day, these numbers continue to grow.

But no party has responded to who should be responsible for the stolen assets, and no one has made a statement. They are playing a game of mutual博弈, while the entire DeFi space is suffering.

Where has the DeFi spirit of 2020 gone?

On March 12, 2020, ETH dropped to $80, on-chain liquidation auctions failed due to no bids, and prices一度归零, pushing MakerDAO to the brink of systemic collapse. At that time, the MKR Foundation stepped forward, proposing to auction MKR to buy back ETH and cover the bad debt, with major community participants actively engaging in the bidding.

Back then, the Ethereum community and the DeFi spirit made everyone proud—in the face of crisis, someone took responsibility, someone acted. Today? Silence. Many of my friends are not just withdrawing funds from Aave—they are pulling out from Spark and even other DeFi protocols. They are not panicking; they are voting with their feet: if this ecosystem cannot even resolve a $260 million issue with anyone willing to solve it, why should we keep our money here?

Once these funds leave, they will never return.

Aave has faced many governance crises in the past, with many in the community holding different opinions and disagreements never ceasing. But today is not the time for debating governance philosophy. Looking back at the prosperity of DeFi Summer, looking back at the decentralized financial world we built together—we have come a long way. The future of DeFi should not be destroyed by silence.

This is not just Aave's problem. Spark, MakerDAO, and all DeFi protocols on Ethereum should participate in coordination. Trust collapse does not distinguish between protocols; if this is not handled well, the entire DeFi TVL will be repriced, and everyone will suffer.

Time is extremely precious.

Aave could first commit to covering the losses, then take time to coordinate specific solutions, which would stop the bank run. If the projects remain silent, @VitalikButerin should step in to coordinate—no need to掏钱, just a statement saying "this matter will be properly resolved" would suffice.

Every additional hour of silence means more funds permanently流失.

Calling on @StaniKulechov, @VitalikButerin, @AaveDAO, @KelpDAO, @LayerZero_Core, @RuneKek to communicate publicly and give the market a clear signal.

Silence is the worst option.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the core issue described in the article regarding the DeFi ecosystem?

AThe core issue is a $230 million bad debt situation resulting from an exploit, where major entities like Aave and LayerZero have the capacity to cover the losses but remain silent, creating a dangerous prisoner's dilemma that is causing massive capital outflows and eroding trust across the entire DeFi ecosystem.

QHow does the author contrast the current situation with the DeFi community's response during the March 12, 2020 (Black Thursday) crisis?

AThe author contrasts the current silence and inaction with the March 2020 crisis, where the MKR Foundation and community members proactively took responsibility by auctioning MKR to buy back ETH and cover bad debts, showcasing the 'DeFi spirit' of accountability and collective action that is now absent.

QWhat broader consequence does the article suggest if the current crisis is not resolved promptly and transparently?

AThe article suggests that if the crisis is not resolved, it will lead to a permanent loss of user trust and capital, causing a broader re-pricing of Total Value Locked (TVL) across all DeFi protocols, not just Aave, as investors withdraw funds due to a lack of confidence in the ecosystem's security and accountability.

QWhat specific action does the author propose to immediately stop the capital outflow and restore confidence?

AThe author proposes that Aave should immediately commit to covering the losses to halt the bank run, even if the specific reimbursement plan is coordinated later, and suggests that influential figures like Vitalik Buterin could help restore confidence by publicly stating that the situation will be resolved.

QWhich key entities and individuals does the author explicitly call upon to break their silence and communicate publicly?

AThe author explicitly calls upon StaniKulechov (Aave founder), Vitalik Buterin (Ethereum co-founder), AaveDAO, KelpDAO, LayerZero, and RuneKek (founder of MakerDAO) to provide public communication and a clear signal to the market.

Похожее

Dialogue with a Macro Analyst: AI Drains All Liquidity from U.S. Stocks, $40K Bitcoin is the True Bottom

In a recent discussion, macro strategist Luke Groman, founder of FFT LC, presented a sobering analysis of current markets. He argues that while the S&P 500 hits new highs, this is largely driven by just seven AI stocks, which are "sucking all the oxygen and liquidity out of the room." Bitcoin, which he calls the "last working smoke alarm for liquidity," is signaling trouble, having entered a difficult period. Groman explains that the AI boom is fueled by accounting practices that front-load revenue, creating an illusion of high profits while cash is being depleted. He warns this cycle could reverse sharply when construction slows. His base case is that stocks will rise in dollar terms but fall significantly when measured in gold or Bitcoin, highlighting that long-term US Treasury futures have already lost 90% of their value against gold over the past decade. He points to major structural risks, including China's dominance in rare earths—a small commodity market underpinning trillions in tech stock value—and the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which he calls a "Suez Moment" for the US. This, combined with a shift towards a "no ticky, no washy" proof-of-work system for settling trade (using gold, not trust), signals deeper systemic distrust. Regarding US debt, Groman notes that historically, all 58 countries that reached a 130% debt-to-GDP ratio defaulted, primarily through inflation. The US crossed this threshold in 2020. He also highlights a contradiction in the AI narrative: if it's as transformative as claimed, it must destroy white-collar jobs, threatening half of US tax revenue—a reality at odds with the "no job loss" messaging from tech leaders. On Bitcoin, Groman sold most of his position near the top and hasn't fully re-entered. Citing technical analysis from Northstar Bad Charts, he suggests a potential bottom around $40,000 could materialize in Q3 or Q4. He concludes that while he may be labeled a doomsayer, his view is simply realistic, grounded in historical precedents and current macro pressures.

marsbit15 мин. назад

Dialogue with a Macro Analyst: AI Drains All Liquidity from U.S. Stocks, $40K Bitcoin is the True Bottom

marsbit15 мин. назад

Broadcom vs AMD: Which is the Most Promising AI Chip Stock to Bet on After Nvidia?

Amidst Nvidia's dominance in the AI chip market, Broadcom and AMD are key contenders for the second-place spot. AMD competes directly in general-purpose GPUs, gaining some traction with clients like Meta but facing significant challenges overcoming Nvidia's entrenched CUDA software ecosystem. In contrast, Broadcom pursues a differentiated strategy by designing custom XPU chips tailored to specific AI workloads for major clients like Anthropic, Google, Meta, and OpenAI. This approach offers efficiency advantages and greater customer stickiness, particularly as AI compute shifts from training to inference. Despite a recent stock sell-off following a Q2 revenue guidance miss, Broadcom's CEO reaffirmed the long-term target of $100 billion in annual AI chip revenue by fiscal 2027. With Q2 AI revenue at $10.8 billion, significant growth potential remains as its custom chip projects ramp up. While Broadcom trades at a higher valuation multiple than AMD, analysts argue this premium is justified given its superior competitive positioning and expected faster growth trajectory, making it the more compelling investment choice following its recent pullback.

marsbit17 мин. назад

Broadcom vs AMD: Which is the Most Promising AI Chip Stock to Bet on After Nvidia?

marsbit17 мин. назад

The Higher Bitcoin Goes, The Less Institutions Want It? Coinbase Executive Weighs In

Coinbase Head of Institutional Strategy John D'Agostino states that institutions which previously bought Bitcoin at higher prices are showing increased interest as its price drops to around $60,000. He notes no signs of panic selling or major liquidation risks among large investors; instead, many, including family offices and sovereign wealth funds, see the correction as a buying opportunity. D'Agostino emphasizes that institutional interest often grows when prices fall, reflecting a long-term holding strategy. Despite recent market volatility and geopolitical tensions, exposure via spot Bitcoin ETFs remains high, exceeding $750 billion. He attributes price swings to normal commodity-like behavior and believes current market infrastructure is stronger than in past downturns. Bitcoin was trading near $63,800 at the time of reporting.

bitcoinist41 мин. назад

The Higher Bitcoin Goes, The Less Institutions Want It? Coinbase Executive Weighs In

bitcoinist41 мин. назад

Bitmine Continues Aggressive Ethereum Accumulation as Others Scale Back

Bitmine, an Ethereum treasury, accumulated 126,971 ETH last week, reinforcing its aggressive accumulation strategy amid a broader market downturn. Its holdings now total $9.6 billion in assets, including 5.54 million ETH—representing 4.59% of the total supply—203 Bitcoin, stakes in Beast Industries and Eightco Holdings, and cash. The company has staked approximately 4.72 million ETH, generating significant yields and potential annual income of around $230 million. Chairman Thomas 'Tom' Lee views the market decline as the beginning of a "crypto spring," driven by anticipated rising demand for decentralized networks like Ethereum from advancing AI systems. Unlike many other treasury firms that have halted or reversed accumulation, Bitmine continues to acquire. It recently announced plans to raise capital via a public stock offering, with proceeds potentially used for further ETH purchases, ecosystem investments, and infrastructure expansion. Bitmine now holds the world's second-largest corporate crypto treasury and the largest dedicated Ethereum treasury.

TheNewsCrypto1 ч. назад

Bitmine Continues Aggressive Ethereum Accumulation as Others Scale Back

TheNewsCrypto1 ч. назад

Apple's Desired On-Device AI Sees a Dark Horse Emerge: The First Cognitive Model is Born, 4B Matches GPT-5.4

A Chinese company, Tomorrow's Journey (Nextie), has introduced what it is calling the industry's first "cognitive model" for edge devices. Named New Journey Alpha, this 4-billion-parameter model reportedly matches the performance of trillion-parameter giants like GPT-5.4 in group intelligence tasks such as debate and collective decision-making. The development follows Andrej Karpathy's vision of stripping vast factual knowledge from large language models to retain only a smaller "cognitive core" capable of reasoning, planning, and knowing its own limits. This approach directly addresses the soaring computational costs and token expenses hindering AI's widespread deployment, as highlighted by incidents like Amazon shutting down an internal AI tool due to prohibitive costs. Trained via reinforcement learning on a corpus of academic papers from 1800-2020 to enhance generalization, the model enables three key advancements: 1) Improved decision quality in multi-agent systems, 2) Drastically reduced compute costs, allowing for cost-effective cloud or on-device (e.g., MacBook) deployment, and 3) The feasibility of "proactive" AI agents that act autonomously without user prompts, unlocking new commercial possibilities beyond today's reactive models. Built by the former Microsoft Xiaoice team—known for creating a 3.6B model that outperformed a 65B Llama model—the company is now focusing on the multi-agent systems sector, a field gaining significant investor interest. The model's economic impact is profound; by achieving high-level performance with minimal parameters, it fundamentally alters the cost structure of AI services, challenging the prevailing model of ever-larger parameter counts.

marsbit3 ч. назад

Apple's Desired On-Device AI Sees a Dark Horse Emerge: The First Cognitive Model is Born, 4B Matches GPT-5.4

marsbit3 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы