Interactive Brokers Enables Stablecoin Funding With USDC Deposits

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-16Обновлено 2026-01-16

Введение

Interactive Brokers now allows clients to fund brokerage accounts using USDC stablecoins, enabling faster settlements and 24/7 access to deposits. The service, launched in partnership with Zero Hash, supports transfers on Ethereum, Solana, and Base networks. Deposits are automatically converted to USD upon receipt, streamlining the process and reducing costs, particularly for international clients who face delays and fees with traditional wire transfers. The firm plans to expand support to include RLUSD and PYUSD next week. This move is part of Interactive Brokers' broader strategy to integrate cryptocurrency services, reflecting the growing adoption of stablecoins as financial infrastructure.

Interactive Brokers has further bolstered its services related to cryptocurrencies, with the company now allowing its clients to use stablecoins to fund their brokerage accounts, ensuring faster settlements and 24/7 access for account funding. As soon as the stablecoins are received, the transfer will be automatically settled in USD, allowing clients to fund their trading accounts.

Interactive Brokers announced on Thursday that it teamed up with cryptocurrency infrastructure company zerohash in a partnership that aims to enable the funding of stablecoin accounts on the Ethereum, Solana, and Base networks. The new system will enable clients to make their USDC deposits at any hour of the day, and such deposits will be credited in USD when they are received.

This upgrade will improve brokerage funding, especially in cases involving global clients, who often suffer from delays or high fees when transacting via fiat wires.

24/7 funding replaces wire-transfer friction

Interactive Brokers positioned stablecoins as a response to a historical bottleneck in access to the global capital markets. In conventional cross-border deposits, funding access is organized through bank processing windows or cut-off times that incur fees charged by third-party institutions.

Stablecoins upset the applecart. With USDC, the transaction settlement happens on-chain, so their customers can transmit their money at any given time with near-instant verification and start trading in minutes, not days.

“Stablecoin funding gives international investors the speed and flexibility necessary to thrive under today’s market conditions,” said CEO Milan Galik. He further added that it gives traders the benefit of being able to transfer their funds as well as trade as soon as possible, thereby lowering transaction costs compared to the usual wire route.

Since Interactive Brokers immediately converts USDC to USD when received, it prevents customers from maintaining balances of stablecoins within the brokerage. This ensures that the funding mechanism remains straightforward and that it is easier to align it with conventional account settlement systems.

More stablecoins incoming next week

Interactive Brokers also said it plans to expand beyond USDC shortly. Support for Ripple USD (RLUSD) and PayPal USD (PYUSD) is expected to roll out next week, giving clients more funding options depending on the networks and issuers they prefer.

The brokerage first introduced stablecoin funding for retail investors in December, when it allowed certain account types to deposit USDC. The new expansion broadens the stablecoin rails and strengthens the firm’s infrastructure by adding multi-chain support.

Interactive Brokers has also explored launching its own stablecoin in the past, according to earlier reporting, suggesting long-term interest in tokenized settlement as part of its financial product strategy.

Crypto trading expansion continues

Interactive Brokers ventured into cryptocurrency trading in the year 2021 by combining digital assets with its vast platforms. It started by supporting well-known cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Later, it added more cryptocurrencies to the list.

In 2025, the brokerage added other assets such as Solana (SOL) and XRP, reflecting growing client demands for broader exposure. The upgrade to its stablecoin funding now complements those services with better means for clients to get money onto the platform.

Stablecoin growth supports adoption

The timing also coincides with the wider trend. Throughout 2025, stablecoins increased sharply as governments, banks, fintech firms, and payment platforms began exploring tokenized dollars for faster settlement and cross-border transfers.

Stablecoin market capitalization surpassed $300 billion in October, driven by strong growth in major issues such as Tether (USDT) and Circle’s USDC, as well as newer products like Ethena’s yield-bearing USDe. As of Friday, the stablecoin sector sits above $310 billion, according to DeFi data aggregator DeFiLlama.

Now that Interactive Brokers offers stablecoin funding, the brokerage industry keeps chugging along toward these blockchain-based settlement rails, with the indication that more and more, stablecoins act as financial infrastructure, not just crypto-native tooling.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Cake Wallet Expands Privacy Stack With Default Zcash Shielding

TagsCryptoSolanaStablecoinTradFiUSDC

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main announcement made by Interactive Brokers regarding account funding?

AInteractive Brokers announced that it now allows clients to fund their brokerage accounts using stablecoins, specifically USDC deposits, which are automatically converted to USD upon receipt for faster settlements and 24/7 access.

QWhich cryptocurrency infrastructure company did Interactive Brokers partner with to enable stablecoin funding?

AInteractive Brokers partnered with the cryptocurrency infrastructure company Zero Hash to enable stablecoin funding on the Ethereum, Solana, and Base networks.

QWhat are the benefits of using stablecoins for funding according to Interactive Brokers' CEO?

AAccording to CEO Milan Galik, stablecoin funding provides international investors with the speed and flexibility needed to thrive in today's market conditions, allowing near-instant transfers and lower transaction costs compared to traditional wire transfers.

QWhich additional stablecoins will Interactive Brokers support starting next week?

AInteractive Brokers plans to expand support to include Ripple USD (RLUSD) and PayPal USD (PYUSD) starting next week, offering clients more funding options based on their preferred networks and issuers.

QHow has the stablecoin market performed recently according to the article?

AThe stablecoin market capitalization surpassed $300 billion in October and has grown to over $310 billion, driven by strong growth in major issuers like Tether (USDT) and Circle's USDC, as well as newer products such as Ethena's yield-bearing USDe.

Похожее

Different Choices After the Plunge: Institutions Buy the Dip, Traders Shift to US Stocks

Title: Diverging Strategies After the Crash: Institutions Buying the Dip, Traders Shifting to US Stocks Following a sharp decline where Bitcoin briefly fell below $60,000 on June 6th, market sentiment remains "extreme fear" despite a partial recovery. This has led to varied responses from major market participants. Several institutional figures and analysts present a cautiously optimistic long-term view for Bitcoin. Glassnode's co-founder identifies $46k-$54k as a probable key bottom range based on historical on-chain models, while a Standard Chartered executive suggests the bottom is nearly formed. Strive's CEO points to Bitcoin touching its 200-week moving average as a historically reliable buy signal. Analysts highlight metrics like MVRV ratio and the "Power Law" model indicating Bitcoin is in an extremely undervalued zone. Conversely, some traders are exiting the crypto space. One trader cited a more attractive risk/reward profile and deeper research opportunities in US stocks, particularly with AI-related equities outperforming and capital rotating away from crypto. This shift is partly attributed to perceived ongoing risks, including those related to Strategy's Bitcoin sales. Market prediction data suggests a high probability (72%) of Bitcoin falling below $55,000, but lower odds for a deeper crash below $35k-$40k. The overall picture is one of division: institutions and long-term analysts see a accumulating opportunity, while some active traders are seeking alpha elsewhere amidst the volatility and shifting capital flows.

marsbit6 мин. назад

Different Choices After the Plunge: Institutions Buy the Dip, Traders Shift to US Stocks

marsbit6 мин. назад

Tech Stocks in the Midst of Deleveraging: Rather Than Rushing to Buy the Dip, Wait for the Macro Environment to Stabilize First

"Technology Stocks in Deleveraging Phase: Wait for Macro Stability Before Buying the Dip" The current sell-off in tech/AI stocks is primarily driven by macro headwinds, not a breakdown in AI fundamentals. After a parabolic rise, the market faced a perfect storm: an overcrowded trade, a massive SpaceX IPO draining liquidity, pre-CPI/PPI/FOMC hedging, and strong jobs data renewing "higher-for-longer" rate fears. This triggered a concentrated deleveraging in hot tech names. Key historical context: Unlike the December 2023 sell-off focused on AI capex returns, the current correction centers on the "denominator" – rising concerns over rates, inflation, the Fed, geopolitics, and liquidity. Leading memory stocks like Micron have seen ~20% pullbacks, significant but not yet at panic levels seen in March. The intense selling wave may be largely over, but a quick V-shaped recovery is unlikely. The market will likely churn in high volatility, awaiting clarity. The immediate catalyst needed for a sustainable reversal is a "stop-bleeding" signal from macro conditions. This doesn't require a major positive shock (like the April Iran ceasefire), but simply a halt to further deterioration: CPI not surprising hotter, Treasury yields stabilizing, the Fed not turning more hawkish, and post-SpaceX IPO liquidity easing. Once macro pressure plateaus, the intact AI investment thesis – centered on persistent compute/memory shortages and accelerating commercialization – can quickly regain market focus. The strategy is clear: prioritize monitoring macro stabilization over rushing to bottom-fish individual AI stories. Patience is key.

marsbit13 мин. назад

Tech Stocks in the Midst of Deleveraging: Rather Than Rushing to Buy the Dip, Wait for the Macro Environment to Stabilize First

marsbit13 мин. назад

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

South Korean stocks experienced their sharpest decline of the year, with the KOSPI index plunging nearly 9% on Monday, triggering a market circuit breaker. Leading semiconductor firms Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix were heavily sold off, raising questions about whether the AI-driven bull market has reached an inflection point. This sell-off was largely triggered by a significant drop in the U.S. semiconductor sector late last week. Concurrently, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang visited Seoul over the weekend, meeting with top executives from SK Group, Samsung, LG, and NAVER. He announced a new multi-year partnership with SK Hynix to co-develop next-generation memory products for AI data centers. Huang emphasized that AI infrastructure build-out remains in its early stages, creating a stark contrast between market panic and ongoing, strengthened industry collaboration. The article argues that South Korea has become one of the most sensitive markets for global AI-related capital flows, functioning like a large AI memory ETF due to the heavy weighting of its chipmakers. The current market turmoil reflects a shift in investor focus: from simply betting on overall AI growth to scrutinizing which companies will actually capture the profits from that growth. This "profit pool reassessment" phase is causing high volatility based on supply chain news and earnings guidance. Ultimately, the direction of the Korean market will be determined by external factors—NVIDIA's orders, HBM supply-demand dynamics, and capital expenditures from cloud service providers—rather than domestic conditions. The disconnect between sharp price corrections and continued strong signals from the industry core leaves the market at a crossroads, awaiting clearer data on the durability of AI infrastructure demand.

marsbit51 мин. назад

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

marsbit51 мин. назад

Trump in Talks with AI Companies Over Profit Sharing, A Narrative Pressure of Industrial Revolution Scale Begins

In recent AI market discussions, a new dimension beyond growth and profits has emerged: the question of how the immense wealth potentially generated by AI should be shared with the wider public. Triggered by reports of White House officials discussing "voluntary equity transfers" with top AI firms, similar to models like Alaska's Permanent Fund, the conversation focuses on public wealth funds. OpenAI's own whitepaper proposes such funds, allowing households without direct tech stock ownership to benefit from AI gains. More radical proposals, like Bernie Sanders' call for high public equity stakes and board seats, represent an extreme end of the spectrum. Currently, these are early-stage policy probes, not enacted laws. OpenAI's initiative is seen as an attempt to secure "social license" for its future expansion, mitigating risks of public backlash, stricter regulation, or anti-trust actions as AI's economic impact grows. The core market implication is the introduction of a "policy discount" to AI valuations, particularly for private model companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI. Investors must now consider not just future earnings but also what portion might be allocated to public mechanisms. The impact varies greatly based on the mechanism. A small, voluntary transfer of non-voting economic rights (e.g., 5%) acts as a quantifiable long-term cost. Government acquisition of economic rights via warrants tied to support differs from direct equity with governance power. The most disruptive scenario would be forced high-percentage public ownership affecting control and innovation incentives. Key signals to watch include whether other AI companies follow suit, if the White House formalizes proposals, related disclosures in future IPO documents, and any market price reactions. For now, this represents a shift from pricing pure AI growth to pricing its potential distribution. A manageable, voluntary economic share is akin to an insurance cost for societal acceptance, while a forced shift toward control and governance would fundamentally alter valuation logic.

marsbit55 мин. назад

Trump in Talks with AI Companies Over Profit Sharing, A Narrative Pressure of Industrial Revolution Scale Begins

marsbit55 мин. назад

From Record Highs to a Two-Week Low: Why Did AI Concept Stocks Suddenly Pull Back?

From Record Highs to Two-Week Lows: Why Did AI Stocks Suddenly Pull Back? U.S. stock indices, led by the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100, fell sharply to two-week lows. This marked a reversal from earlier in the week when AI infrastructure and semiconductor stocks had propelled major indices to record highs. Investors are rotating out of these previously high-flying tech sectors into other areas. The sell-off was driven by profit-taking and concerns that the AI rally had become overextended, exacerbated by chipmaker Broadcom's sales outlook falling short of lofty market expectations. The decline accelerated following a stronger-than-expected U.S. May nonfarm payrolls report, which showed 172,000 jobs added versus an estimated 88,000. This data sparked a jump in bond yields, with the 10-year Treasury yield rising to 4.553%, as it reinforced market speculation that the Federal Reserve's next move could be a rate hike rather than a cut. Globally, equities also declined, with European and Asian markets falling. Within the U.S. market, chip and AI-related stocks like Super Micro Computer and Arm Holdings led the losses, dropping over 7%. Cryptocurrency-linked stocks and mining shares also fell sharply amid drops in Bitcoin and commodity prices. While the overall Q1 earnings season remained solid, with 83% of S&P 500 companies beating estimates, the weakness was concentrated in tech. Excluding the tech sector, Q1 earnings growth was around 3%, the weakest in two years.

marsbit55 мин. назад

From Record Highs to a Two-Week Low: Why Did AI Concept Stocks Suddenly Pull Back?

marsbit55 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片