Ethena team steps in with $12 mln buy – But ENA keeps sliding

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-08Обновлено 2026-01-08

Введение

After initially climbing from $0.19, ENA faced rejection at $0.26 and declined for two consecutive days, dropping to $0.22 before a slight rebound. At the time of writing, ENA was trading at $0.23, down 7.27%, indicating strong downward pressure. In response, the Ethena team intervened by purchasing 50 million ENA tokens worth $12.18 million within 24 hours, increasing their total holdings to 789.8 million ENA. Other major holders also increased their accumulations, with a net positive balance change of 88.36 million ENA. Despite these efforts, ENA continued to decline due to aggressive retail selling. On January 8th, sell volume significantly exceeded buy volume, resulting in a negative Buy Sell Delta of -6.85 million. ENA fell below the EMA50, and its Stochastic Momentum Index indicated strengthening bearish momentum. Current conditions suggest further losses toward the $0.20 support level. A reversal would require holding above $0.23 and reclaiming the EMA50 at $0.25 to potentially target $0.30.

After hiking from a low of $0.19, Ethena got rejected at $0.26 and has since declined for two consecutive days. As such, ENA dropped to a low of $0.22 before slightly rebounding.

At press time, ENA traded at $0.23, down 7.27% on the daily charts, indicating sharp downward pressure.

Interestingly, after the market retracement, the Ethena team jumped into the market and attempted to pump the altcoin through accumulation.

Team wallet scoops up $12 million ENA

According to Arkham data, the ENA team wallet scooped up 25 million ENA worth $5.93 million from Bybit.

The team’s move was a buildup to another purchase executed a day earlier, in which the team withdrew 25 million ENA for $6.25 million. In total, they withdrew 50 million ENA worth $12.18 million over a 24-hour period.

Even more importantly, these two activities were a return to an old pattern after offloading a significant amount of tokens a week ago.

A week ago, the team deposited 40 million ENA worth $8.16 million. Now, after closing the gap created with the sale, the wallet’s total holdings rose to 789.8 million ENA, worth $185 million.

Significantly, this team’s move was not an isolated case, as top holders jumped into the market after ENA retraced.

Over the past 24 hours, top holders increased their holdings by 171.65 million ENA, while they offloaded only 83.29 million.

In doing so, Holder’s Balance Change remained positive and settled at 88.36 million ENA, a clear sign of aggressive spot accumulation.

With the team accumulating, backed by other top holders, it signals strong conviction with the market, as they anticipate a market recovery from the current slip.

Historically, increased accumulation from major players has followed price appreciation as demand absorbs the arising selling pressure.

Why did ENA slip?

Despite the team’s continued effort, ENA recorded a sharp drop as other market participants, especially retail, rushed to cash out.

According to Coinalyze, sellers overpowered buyers on the 8th of January, with sell volume at 22.59 million compared to 15.75 million in buy volume.

As a result, the altcoin recorded a negative Buy Sell Delta of -6.85 million, a clear sign of aggressive spot selling. Often, seller dominance has accelerated an asset’s downward pressure, a prelude to lower

Can these purchases prop up ENA?

Ethena’s team to boost ENA’s price movement by absorbing the arising sell pressure failed for now. In fact, ENA fell below EMA50, signaling strengthening bearish pressure.

At the same time, its Stochastic Momentum Index (SMI) made a bearish crossover and dropped deeper into the bearish zone to 42.

This downward spiral suggested strengthened bearish momentum backed by strong seller pressure. Thus, sellers took control of the market, rendering recent purchases inadequate for a trend reversal.

Therefore, prevailing market conditions point to further losses for ENA. Thus, the altcoin could drop towards the $0.20 support level.

However, if the team’s effort is finally positively felt, ENA could reclaim EMA50 at $0.25 and target $0.30. For this outlook to hold, the altcoin must hold above $0.23.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the total amount of ENA tokens and their value that the Ethena team purchased over a 24-hour period?

AThe Ethena team purchased a total of 50 million ENA tokens worth $12.18 million over a 24-hour period.

QWhat was the price of ENA at press time and what was its daily percentage decline?

AAt press time, ENA traded at $0.23, down 7.27% on the daily charts.

QAccording to the article, what does a negative Buy Sell Delta of -6.85 million indicate for ENA?

AA negative Buy Sell Delta of -6.85 million is a clear sign of aggressive spot selling, indicating that sellers overpowered buyers.

QWhat key technical indicator did ENA fall below, signaling strengthening bearish pressure?

AENA fell below the EMA50 (Exponential Moving Average), signaling strengthening bearish pressure.

QWhat is the critical support level that ENA could drop towards if the prevailing market conditions continue?

AIf the prevailing market conditions continue, ENA could drop towards the $0.20 support level.

Похожее

Polymarket's "2028 Presidential Election" Volume King Is... LeBron James???

An article from Odaily Planet Daily, authored by Azuma, discusses a peculiar phenomenon observed on the prediction market platform Polymarket regarding the "2028 US Presidential Election" event. Despite having a real-time probability of less than 1%, unlikely candidates such as NBA star LeBron James (with $48.41 million in trading volume), celebrity Kim Kardashian ($33.84 million), and even ineligible figures like Elon Musk ($23.14 million) and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani ($18.39 million) account for approximately 70% of the total trading volume. In contrast, high-probability candidates like Vice President JD Vance ($10.58 million), California Governor Gavin Newsom ($15.71 million), and Secretary of State Marco Rubio ($9.32 million) have significantly lower trading activity. The article explains that this counterintuitive trend is not driven by irrational speculation but by rational strategies. Polymarket offers a 4% annualized holding reward for certain markets, including the 2028 election, to maintain long-term pricing accuracy. This yield exceeds the current 5-year US Treasury rate (3.98%), attracting large investors ("whales") to hold "NO" shares on low-probability candidates for risk-free returns. Additionally, some users utilize a platform feature that allows converting a set of "NO" shares into corresponding "YES" shares for better liquidity or pricing efficiency, rather than directly buying "YES" shares for their preferred candidates. Thus, the seemingly absurd trading activity is strategically motivated.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Polymarket's "2028 Presidential Election" Volume King Is... LeBron James???

marsbit1 ч. назад

Dialogue with ViaBTC CEO Yang Haipo: Is the Essence of Blockchain a Libertarian Experiment?

"ViaBTC CEO Yang Haipo: Blockchain as a Hardcore Libertarian Experiment" In a deep-dive interview, ViaBTC CEO Yang Haipo reframes the essence of blockchain, arguing it is not merely a new technology or infrastructure but a hardcore libertarian experiment. This experiment, born from the 2008 financial crisis and decades of cypherpunk ideology, tests a fundamental question: to what extent can freedom and self-organization exist without centralized trust? The discussion highlights the experiment's verified outcomes. On one hand, it has proven its core value of censorship resistance, providing critical financial lifelines for entities like WikiLeaks and individuals in hyperinflationary or sanctioned countries via tools like stablecoins. However, Yang points out a key paradox: the most successful product, USDT, is itself a centralized compromise, showing users prioritize a less-controlled pipeline over pure decentralization. On the other hand, the experiment has exposed the severe costs of this freedom—a "dark forest" without safeguards. Events like the collapses of LUNA, Celsius, and FTX, resulting in massive wealth destruction and prison sentences for founders, underscore the system's fragility and the inherent risks of an unregulated environment. Yang observes that despite decentralized protocols, human nature inevitably recreates centralized power structures, speculative frenzies, and narrative-driven cycles (from ICOs to Meme coins), where emotion and belonging often trump technological substance. Looking forward, he believes blockchain's future is significant but niche. Its real value lies in serving specific, real-world needs for financial sovereignty and bypassing traditional controls, not as a universal infrastructure replacing all centralized systems. For the average participant, Yang's crucial advice is to cultivate independent judgment. True freedom is not holding a crypto wallet, but possessing a mind resilient to groupthink and narrative hype in a high-risk, often irrational market.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Dialogue with ViaBTC CEO Yang Haipo: Is the Essence of Blockchain a Libertarian Experiment?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片