Ethena team steps in with $12 mln buy – But ENA keeps sliding

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-08Обновлено 2026-01-08

Введение

After initially climbing from $0.19, ENA faced rejection at $0.26 and declined for two consecutive days, dropping to $0.22 before a slight rebound. At the time of writing, ENA was trading at $0.23, down 7.27%, indicating strong downward pressure. In response, the Ethena team intervened by purchasing 50 million ENA tokens worth $12.18 million within 24 hours, increasing their total holdings to 789.8 million ENA. Other major holders also increased their accumulations, with a net positive balance change of 88.36 million ENA. Despite these efforts, ENA continued to decline due to aggressive retail selling. On January 8th, sell volume significantly exceeded buy volume, resulting in a negative Buy Sell Delta of -6.85 million. ENA fell below the EMA50, and its Stochastic Momentum Index indicated strengthening bearish momentum. Current conditions suggest further losses toward the $0.20 support level. A reversal would require holding above $0.23 and reclaiming the EMA50 at $0.25 to potentially target $0.30.

After hiking from a low of $0.19, Ethena got rejected at $0.26 and has since declined for two consecutive days. As such, ENA dropped to a low of $0.22 before slightly rebounding.

At press time, ENA traded at $0.23, down 7.27% on the daily charts, indicating sharp downward pressure.

Interestingly, after the market retracement, the Ethena team jumped into the market and attempted to pump the altcoin through accumulation.

Team wallet scoops up $12 million ENA

According to Arkham data, the ENA team wallet scooped up 25 million ENA worth $5.93 million from Bybit.

The team’s move was a buildup to another purchase executed a day earlier, in which the team withdrew 25 million ENA for $6.25 million. In total, they withdrew 50 million ENA worth $12.18 million over a 24-hour period.

Even more importantly, these two activities were a return to an old pattern after offloading a significant amount of tokens a week ago.

A week ago, the team deposited 40 million ENA worth $8.16 million. Now, after closing the gap created with the sale, the wallet’s total holdings rose to 789.8 million ENA, worth $185 million.

Significantly, this team’s move was not an isolated case, as top holders jumped into the market after ENA retraced.

Over the past 24 hours, top holders increased their holdings by 171.65 million ENA, while they offloaded only 83.29 million.

In doing so, Holder’s Balance Change remained positive and settled at 88.36 million ENA, a clear sign of aggressive spot accumulation.

With the team accumulating, backed by other top holders, it signals strong conviction with the market, as they anticipate a market recovery from the current slip.

Historically, increased accumulation from major players has followed price appreciation as demand absorbs the arising selling pressure.

Why did ENA slip?

Despite the team’s continued effort, ENA recorded a sharp drop as other market participants, especially retail, rushed to cash out.

According to Coinalyze, sellers overpowered buyers on the 8th of January, with sell volume at 22.59 million compared to 15.75 million in buy volume.

As a result, the altcoin recorded a negative Buy Sell Delta of -6.85 million, a clear sign of aggressive spot selling. Often, seller dominance has accelerated an asset’s downward pressure, a prelude to lower

Can these purchases prop up ENA?

Ethena’s team to boost ENA’s price movement by absorbing the arising sell pressure failed for now. In fact, ENA fell below EMA50, signaling strengthening bearish pressure.

At the same time, its Stochastic Momentum Index (SMI) made a bearish crossover and dropped deeper into the bearish zone to 42.

This downward spiral suggested strengthened bearish momentum backed by strong seller pressure. Thus, sellers took control of the market, rendering recent purchases inadequate for a trend reversal.

Therefore, prevailing market conditions point to further losses for ENA. Thus, the altcoin could drop towards the $0.20 support level.

However, if the team’s effort is finally positively felt, ENA could reclaim EMA50 at $0.25 and target $0.30. For this outlook to hold, the altcoin must hold above $0.23.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the total amount of ENA tokens and their value that the Ethena team purchased over a 24-hour period?

AThe Ethena team purchased a total of 50 million ENA tokens worth $12.18 million over a 24-hour period.

QWhat was the price of ENA at press time and what was its daily percentage decline?

AAt press time, ENA traded at $0.23, down 7.27% on the daily charts.

QAccording to the article, what does a negative Buy Sell Delta of -6.85 million indicate for ENA?

AA negative Buy Sell Delta of -6.85 million is a clear sign of aggressive spot selling, indicating that sellers overpowered buyers.

QWhat key technical indicator did ENA fall below, signaling strengthening bearish pressure?

AENA fell below the EMA50 (Exponential Moving Average), signaling strengthening bearish pressure.

QWhat is the critical support level that ENA could drop towards if the prevailing market conditions continue?

AIf the prevailing market conditions continue, ENA could drop towards the $0.20 support level.

Похожее

20 Billion Valuation, Alibaba and Tencent Competing to Invest, Whose Money Will Liang Wenfeng Take?

DeepSeek, an AI startup founded by Liang Wenfeng, is reportedly in talks with Alibaba and Tencent for an external funding round that could value the company at over $20 billion. This marks a significant shift, as DeepSeek had previously relied solely on funding from its parent company,幻方量化 (Huanfang Quantitative), and had resisted external investment. The potential valuation would place DeepSeek among the top-tier AI model companies in China, comparable to competitors like MoonDark (valued at ~$18 billion) and ahead of recently listed firms like MiniMax and Zhipu. The funding—which could range from $600 million (for a 3% stake) to $2 billion (for 10%)—is seen as a move to secure resources for model development, retain talent, and support infrastructure needs, particularly as competition in inference models and AI agents intensifies. Both Alibaba and Tencent are eager to invest, not only for financial returns but also to integrate DeepSeek into their broader AI ecosystems. However, DeepSeek’s leadership is cautious about maintaining independence and may prefer financial investors over strategic ones to avoid being locked into a specific tech ecosystem. Alternative options, such as state-backed funds, offer longer-term capital and policy support but may come with slower decision-making and potential constraints on global expansion. With competing AI firms accelerating their IPO plans, DeepSeek’s window for securing optimal terms may be narrowing. The final decision will reflect a trade-off between capital, resources, and strategic independence.

marsbit43 мин. назад

20 Billion Valuation, Alibaba and Tencent Competing to Invest, Whose Money Will Liang Wenfeng Take?

marsbit43 мин. назад

After Losing 97% of Its Market Value, iQiyi Attempts to Use AI to Forcefully Extend Its Lifespan

After losing 97% of its market value since its 2018 peak, iQiyi is aggressively pivoting to AI in a desperate attempt to survive. At its 2026 World Conference, CEO Gong Yu announced an "AI Artist Library" with over 100 virtual performers and a new AIGC platform, "NaDou Pro," promising faster production and lower costs. This shift comes as the company faces severe financial distress: its market cap sits near delisting thresholds at $1.36 billion, with significant losses, declining membership revenue, and depleted cash flow. The AI strategy has sparked controversy. Top actors have issued legal threats against unauthorized digital replicas, while in Hengdian, over 134,000 background actors are seeing their already scarce job opportunities vanish as AI replaces them for background roles. iQiyi's move represents a fundamental shift from being a high-cost content buyer to a landlord" to becoming a "platform capitalist" that transfers production risk to creators. This contrasts with competitors like Douyin (TikTok's Chinese counterpart), which is investing heavily in *real* actor-led short dramas, betting that authentic human connection retains users better than AI-generated content. The article draws a parallel to the 1920s transition to "talkies," which made cinema musicians obsolete but ultimately enriched the art form. In contrast, iQiyi's AI drive is framed not as an artistic evolution but as a cost-cutting measure that could degrade storytelling, replacing genuine human emotion with algorithmically calculated stimulation and potentially numbing audiences' capacity for empathy. The core question remains: can a company focused solely on financial survival preserve the art of storytelling?

marsbit47 мин. назад

After Losing 97% of Its Market Value, iQiyi Attempts to Use AI to Forcefully Extend Its Lifespan

marsbit47 мин. назад

Only a 50% Chance of Passing This Year, Can the CLARITY Bill Succeed Before the Midterm Elections?

The CLARITY Act, which passed the House in July 2025 with strong bipartisan support (294-134), faces a critical juncture in the Senate. The Senate Banking Committee is expected to hold a markup soon, but key issues remain unresolved, including stablecoin yield provisions, DeFi regulations, and securing full Republican committee support. Other contentious points involve the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), ethics amendments for government officials, and SEC-related matters. The legislative calendar is tight, with limited time before the midterm elections. If the committee markup is delayed beyond mid-May, the chances of passage in 2026 drop significantly. Senator Cynthia Lummis has warned that failure this year could delay comprehensive crypto market structure legislation until 2030 or later. Galaxy estimates the probability of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026 is only about 50%. The bill provides crucial regulatory clarity by defining jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC, establishing a path for decentralization, and bringing digital commodity intermediaries under federal regulation. Its passage is seen as vital before potential power shifts in the next Congress, which could bring less favorable leadership to key committees. The timeline is compressed, and the bill must compete for floor time with other priorities like Iran authorization and DHS appropriations. Key hurdles include finalizing the stablecoin yield compromise text, addressing law enforcement concerns about BRCA, and navigating political dynamics around SEC nominations. The outcome of the Banking Committee markup and the level of bipartisan support will be critical indicators of its future success.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Only a 50% Chance of Passing This Year, Can the CLARITY Bill Succeed Before the Midterm Elections?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片