Crypto hack counts fall but supply chain attacks reshape threat landscape

cointelegraphОпубликовано 2025-12-23Обновлено 2025-12-23

Введение

New data from CertiK reveals that while crypto hackers stole $3.3 billion in 2025, the number of attacks fell sharply. Losses were concentrated in fewer, more damaging supply-chain attacks, which accounted for $1.45 billion across just two incidents, including the $1.4 billion Bybit hack. This shift indicates attackers are moving away from simple code vulnerabilities toward more sophisticated infrastructure-level exploits. The number of security incidents decreased by 162 year-over-year, suggesting improved protocol-level security. The median loss per hack fell 35.75% to $103,966, though the average loss rose to $5.3 million due to high-value outliers. Phishing scams were the second-largest threat, costing $722 million across 248 incidents. A significant subset was "pig butchering" romance scams, which used prolonged emotional manipulation and cost the industry $5.5 billion in 2024.

Crypto hackers stole $3.3 billion in 2025, but the number of attacks fell sharply as losses became concentrated in fewer, more sophisticated supply-chain exploits, according to new data from blockchain security firm CertiK shared with Cointelegraph.

While total losses remained elevated, the decline in incident counts and a drop in median theft sizes suggest that protocol-level security is improving, pushing attackers away from simple code vulnerabilities and toward phishing and infrastructure-level attacks.

CertiK said supply-chain breaches emerged as the most damaging threat, accounting for $1.45 billion in losses across just two incidents, including the $1.4 billion Bybit hack in February.

"The Bybit exploit signals that well-capitalized, well-coordinated threat actors are becoming more active across the ecosystem," the report said, predicting a rise in the “sophistication” of supply chain attacks as attackers target more infrastructure providers.

Crypto hacks by amount and incident, yearly chart. Source: CertiK

Related: Soulja Boy token sparks backlash after Base co-founder posts purchase receipt

The number of security incidents decreased by 162 counts year-over-year, indicating that blockchain cybersecurity measures are improving despite hackers aiming for larger targets.

The average amount lost per hack stood at $5.3 million, a 66% increase from the previous year. However, the median loss — a measure less influenced by outlier incidents — fell to $103,966, down 35.75% over the same period.

Cryptop hacks by incident type and amount of losses, one-year chart. Source: CertiK

Related: Solana AI token Ava hit by launch sniping tied to deployer: Bubblemaps

Code vulnerabilities fade as “pig butchering” scams threaten crypto savings

Phishing scams became the second-largest threat, costing crypto investors a cumulative $722 million across 248 incidents.

Recently, an investor lost their entire Bitcoin (BTC) retirement fund in an artificial intelligence-fueled romance scam, also known as a "pig butchering" scam, where the con artists used prolonged emotional manipulation to convince the investors to transfer their funds.

Pig butchering victim stats, grooming time. Source: Cyvers

Pig butchering scams are a subset of phishing scams that cost the industry a collective $5.5 billion in 2024, across 200,000 individual cases.

Notably, the average grooming period for victims is between one and two weeks in 35% of cases, while 10% of scams involve grooming periods of up to three months, according to blockchain security platform Cyvers.

In June, the US Department of Justice announced the seizure of over $225 million in crypto linked to pig butchering scams.

Magazine: Coinbase hack shows the law probably won’t protect you — Here’s why

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to CertiK's data, what was the total amount stolen by crypto hackers in 2025 and what was the most damaging type of attack?

ACrypto hackers stole a total of $3.3 billion in 2025. The most damaging type of attack was supply-chain breaches, which accounted for $1.45 billion in losses.

QWhat does the report suggest about the trend in protocol-level security based on the decline in incident counts and median theft sizes?

AThe decline in incident counts and the drop in median theft sizes suggest that protocol-level security is improving. This is pushing attackers away from simple code vulnerabilities and toward more sophisticated methods like phishing and infrastructure-level attacks.

QWhat was the average amount lost per hack and how much did it change from the previous year?

AThe average amount lost per hack stood at $5.3 million, which was a 66% increase from the previous year.

QWhat are 'pig butchering' scams and how much did they cost the industry in 2024?

A'Pig butchering' scams are a subset of phishing scams that involve prolonged emotional manipulation to convince victims to transfer their funds. They cost the industry a collective $5.5 billion in 2024 across 200,000 individual cases.

QWhat significant action did the US Department of Justice take regarding pig butchering scams in June?

AIn June, the US Department of Justice announced the seizure of over $225 million in cryptocurrency that was linked to pig butchering scams.

Похожее

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit49 мин. назад

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit49 мин. назад

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit6 ч. назад

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit6 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片