China Bans Unauthorised Yuan-Pegged Stablecoins Overseas

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-07Обновлено 2026-02-07

Введение

China's regulators, led by the People's Bank of China (PBOC), have prohibited the unauthorized issuance of yuan-pegged stablecoins overseas and expanded the ban to include real-world assets linked to the currency. The joint statement, issued with seven government agencies, forbids both domestic and foreign entities from issuing such stablecoins without official approval. Authorities warn that these tokens mimic monetary functions and threaten monetary sovereignty, while unregulated circulation could undermine the yuan's stability. The ban also targets services related to tokenized financial assets, such as blockchain-based bonds or equities. This move reinforces China's 2021 crypto trading ban and aligns with its strategy to suppress private digital currencies while promoting the state-backed digital yuan (e-CNY).

The regulators of China have now tightened control for digital assets and have prohibited the unauthorised issuance of yuan-pegged stablecoins overseas and widened the prohibition to real-world assets associated with the currency of the country.

On February 6, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), with seven government agencies, released a joint statement stating that individuals and companies, domestic or foreign, may not issue renminbi-linked stablecoins without having official approval.

The regulators said that such tokens imitate prominent functions of money and could intimidate monetary sovereignty. Stablecoins attached to fiat currencies do some of the functions of fiat currencies, as per the notice.

The notice also warned that circulation outside regulatory oversight could reduce the stability of the yuan. The rules also aim at services associated with tokenised financial assets, comprising blockchain-based representations of bonds or equities.

What Does the Ban Further Comprise?

Overseas bodies are not allowed to offer associated products to users inside China if they lack permission from regulators. Beijing acknowledged its established position on crypto payments, confirming that assets like Bitcoin and ETH do not have legal tender status and that easing transactions or associated services includes illegal activity.

The policy created a sweeping ban rolled out by the central bank in 2021 that successfully eliminated crypto trading and payments from the domestic financial system. A legal polymath and ex-sovereign wealth fund official, Winston Ma, stated that the prohibition is applied to both onshore and offshore versions of the renminbi.

The offshore yuan, called CNH, is made for foreign exchange flexibility along with keeping capital controls. The steps seem to suit a broader strategy of prohibiting privately issued digital currencies while boosting the state-backed digital yuan.

China has spent many years developing an e-CNY central bank digital currency, and not long ago, it permitted commercial banks to share interest with users holding digital yuan wallets to boost adoption.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Binance Adds BTC to SAFU Fund, Gets Praise from Founder CZ

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main action taken by Chinese regulators regarding yuan-pegged stablecoins?

AChinese regulators have prohibited the unauthorized issuance of yuan-pegged stablecoins overseas.

QWhich central bank led the joint statement with seven government agencies on February 6?

AThe People's Bank of China (PBOC) led the joint statement.

QAccording to the notice, why are such stablecoins considered a threat?

AThey imitate prominent functions of money and could intimidate monetary sovereignty.

QWhat broader strategy does this prohibition seem to suit?

AIt suits a strategy of prohibiting privately issued digital currencies while boosting the state-backed digital yuan (e-CNY).

QAre overseas bodies allowed to offer related products to users inside China without permission?

ANo, overseas bodies are not allowed to offer associated products to users inside China without regulatory permission.

Похожее

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, is facing significant technical challenges as its growth outpaces its current infrastructure on Polygon. Users are experiencing laggy transactions, unresponsive orders, and delayed confirmations, severely impacting the trading experience. In response, DeFi Engineering VP Josh Stevens outlined a comprehensive engineering overhaul. The plan includes reducing on-chain data delays, fixing order cancellation issues, rebuilding the central limit order book (CLOB), improving website performance, and developing a unified SDK and API. A major revelation was the ongoing "chain migration," indicating a potential move away from Polygon. The core issue is that Polymarket has evolved from a simple prediction market into a high-frequency trading platform, making Polygon's limitations—such as block space, gas fees, and block time—a ceiling for further growth. The migration is not just a simple chain switch but a fundamental rebuild of its trading system to support more complex products like perpetual contracts (Perps). This announcement has sparked competition among chains like Solana, Sui, and Algorand, all vying to host Polymarket. For Polygon, losing this key application, which contributes significantly to its gas fee revenue, would be a major setback. The real test for Polymarket is no longer attracting users but proving it can provide a stable, reliable trading environment that retains them.

Odaily星球日报20 мин. назад

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Odaily星球日报20 мин. назад

Key Lawmaker 'Relents', Wash's Biggest Obstacle to Assuming Fed Chair on May 15 Cleared

Key political opposition to Kevin Warsh's nomination as Federal Reserve Chair has been removed after Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) withdrew his objection, clearing the way for a committee vote on April 29. Tillis had previously blocked the nomination due to a criminal investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell, which he viewed as a threat to Fed independence. The Justice Department has since dropped the investigation. Warsh, who has broad Republican support, is expected to be confirmed by the Senate in time for Powell’s term expiration on May 15. If confirmed, Warsh has signaled significant policy changes, including abolishing the "dot plot" of interest rate projections and reevaluating the Fed’s forward guidance framework. These changes could fundamentally alter the market’s pricing mechanisms for stocks, bonds, and currencies. Although the criminal case against Powell is closed, uncertainty remains as he retains his board seat until 2028. President Trump has not fully endorsed Powell, citing an ongoing review of Fed renovation spending. Warsh’s potential reforms target the communication tools developed post-2008, which have become foundational to global asset pricing.

marsbit44 мин. назад

Key Lawmaker 'Relents', Wash's Biggest Obstacle to Assuming Fed Chair on May 15 Cleared

marsbit44 мин. назад

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit59 мин. назад

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit59 мин. назад

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

Prediction markets face a fundamental contradiction: they rely on insider trading to generate accurate prices, yet this same activity erodes public trust and threatens their survival. Recent scandals, such as a U.S. special forces member making $400,000 on Polymarket using classified information about a raid, highlight the severity of the issue. While platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi market themselves as venues where "everyone is an expert" and encourage informed trading, they also enforce policies against illegal insider trading. The core dilemma is that these markets depend on informed insiders for price efficiency but require uninformed retail participants to provide liquidity. If insider trading is too rampant, retail traders leave, perceiving the market as unfair. If restrictions are too strict, valuable information flow dries up, reducing the market’s predictive utility. The challenge is finding a balance that maintains both accuracy and perceived fairness—a task complicated by regulatory pressures and recurring scandals.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

marsbit1 ч. назад

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?