Indepth Research

Provide in-depth research reports and independent analysis, leveraging data, technology, and economic insights to deliver a comprehensive examination of the blockchain ecosystem, project potential, and market trends.

The Fall of Crypto Actually Has Little to Do with Scamming Retail Investors

The decline of Crypto is not primarily due to "scamming retail investors," but stems from deeper structural issues, according to a seasoned Crypto OG. Key problems include: 1. **Misunderstanding of Bitcoin’s Whitepaper**: The core concept is not "decentralization" (a term absent in the whitepaper) but "distributed trust architecture" — eliminating the need for trusted third parties. Many projects fail to achieve even basic distributed systems while overusing decentralized rhetoric. 2. **Loss of Incremental Users**: Grand narratives (Web3, Metaverse, GameFi, etc.) have oversold the technology’s capabilities, leading to repeated user disappointment and eroded trust. The market now suffers from a lack of new participants. 3. **Erosion of Community Belief**: Many communities engage in "narrative engineering" — using complex jargon to attract new users while insiders anticipate selling at peaks. This creates a cycle of hype, pump, and dump, damaging overall market credibility. 4. **Premature Financialization**: Crypto prioritized token launches and financialization before establishing robust infrastructure or mature applications. This led to overvaluation and repeated failures when technology couldn’t support inflated prices. 5. **Shift in Attention**: Human attention is moving from social and community interactions (like Telegram and Discord) toward AI-driven engagement. As an attention-dependent market, Crypto is naturally declining as interest wanes. The OG concludes that while Crypto isn’t dead, its current narrative has ended. The real tragedy is exhausting two decades of storytelling in just three years, before the underlying technology was ready. Scams are inevitable in markets, but the absence of new believers is fatal.

比推03/12 18:31

The Fall of Crypto Actually Has Little to Do with Scamming Retail Investors

比推03/12 18:31

Dialogue with Bitwise CIO: Quantum Computing and AI Threats Overhyped, Bullish on the 'Big Four' of Crypto

Matt Hougan, CIO of Bitwise, which manages $15 billion in crypto assets, shares his market outlook in a recent podcast. He believes the market peak will occur around December 2024, not when Bitcoin hits $125k, and expects a slower, more grinding recovery from the bear market. The next bull run will likely be less volatile and more gradual. Hougan attributes Bitcoin’s recent sharp decline to long-term holders selling in anticipation of the four-year cycle, not derivatives. While derivatives can amplify short-term volatility, he argues they eventually translate into physical demand. He also notes that Bitcoin’s underperformance compared to gold is due to central banks buying gold aggressively post-2022, not a failure of Bitcoin’s value proposition. He remains long-term bullish, citing Bitcoin’s greater upside potential. According to Hougan, retail investors are largely tapped out, and the current market is driven by slower, steadier institutional inflows via ETFs. This may lead to a more stable but less dramatic bull market. He sees stablecoins and tokenization as major growth drivers, bringing billions into the crypto ecosystem. He dismisses quantum computing as an overblown risk, noting Bitcoin can adapt, and views AI as ultimately beneficial—whether it boosts productivity or triggers inflationary monetary responses. Hougan is optimistic about Ethereum, Solana, and Chainlink, dubbing BTC, ETH, SOL, and LINK the “big four” of crypto. He advises young investors to avoid meme coins, diversify into crypto index products, and focus on long-term horizons rather than short-term noise.

marsbit03/12 11:51

Dialogue with Bitwise CIO: Quantum Computing and AI Threats Overhyped, Bullish on the 'Big Four' of Crypto

marsbit03/12 11:51

Trading Everything, Never Closing: RWA Perpetual Contracts — The Final Piece of DeFi Devouring Wall Street (Part 2)

This article explores the emergence and implications of Real World Asset (RWA) Perpetual Contracts (Perps) in DeFi, focusing on their potential to bridge traditional and decentralized finance. It analyzes key projects, contrasting two primary architectural models: the order book-based system, exemplified by Hyperliquid's HIP-3 ecosystem (e.g., Trade.xyz), and the oracle-priced liquidity pool model used by protocols like Ostium. The former prioritizes 24/7 market-driven pricing with oracles for risk management, while the latter favors accuracy and safety by pausing trading during market closures. A significant portion is dedicated to the regulatory landscape, particularly in the US. The analysis highlights the legal barrier of the "Shad-Johnson agreement," which subjects equity-based derivatives to dual SEC and CFTC jurisdiction, effectively blocking compliant retail single-stock perps. This creates a window of opportunity for offshore markets operating under Regulation S exemptions. The article proposes a symbiotic "CFD Broker + RWA Perps Dex" model for growth, where DeFi protocols act as back-end clearing engines for traditional brokers handling front-end compliance and user acquisition. Finally, it examines the external variable of traditional exchanges like NYSE planning their own 24/7 trading platforms. While this could erode DeFi's current monopoly on continuous trading and provide better underlying price feeds, it also forces DeFi to compete on different strengths like higher leverage, permissionless access, and superior capital efficiency. The conclusion posits that RWA Perps represent a fundamental restructuring of global leverage markets, evolving into a high-speed execution layer atop regulated traditional finance.

marsbit03/12 03:41

Trading Everything, Never Closing: RWA Perpetual Contracts — The Final Piece of DeFi Devouring Wall Street (Part 2)

marsbit03/12 03:41

Circle Doubles in a Month: What Is the Market Betting On?

Circle's stock (CRCL) has experienced significant volatility, doubling in February 2025 after a sharp post-IPO decline. This surge occurred while Bitcoin fell 40%, indicating a decoupling from the broader crypto market. The key driver is a fundamental shift in how the market values Circle and its USDC stablecoin. Previously viewed as a cyclical crypto play, USDC's growth accelerated during the bear market, with its circulating supply rising 72% to a record $753 billion. This growth is increasingly driven by traditional finance and global payments, not speculative crypto trading. Major partnerships with Visa, Mastercard, JPMorgan, and Intuit are embedding USDC into mainstream payment infrastructure. The passage of the GENIUS Act in July 2025 provided a federal regulatory framework, creating a moat for compliant issuers like Circle and helping USDC gain market share against USDT. USDC also surpassed Tether in on-chain transaction volume. A major future growth narrative centers on AI Agent payments. Circle and others are developing infrastructure for machine-to-machine transactions, offering 24/7 settlement at a fraction of the cost of traditional systems. While current non-interest revenue from these new use cases remains under 5% of total revenue, the potential market is vast, with predictions of a multi-trillion-dollar stablecoin and AI Agent economy by 2030. Circle's $23 billion valuation largely bets on this future narrative becoming reality.

marsbit03/12 01:09

Circle Doubles in a Month: What Is the Market Betting On?

marsbit03/12 01:09

Why We No Longer Love Crypto

The article "Why We No Longer Passionate About Crypto" explores the growing sense of disillusionment among crypto veterans. Many who once found excitement in the space now feel stuck, particularly those not working on stablecoins, financial infrastructure, or DeFi. The author notes that the previous era—where developer-focused products thrived on vibes rather than revenue—ended about 18 months ago. The crypto market for non-financial applications is now seen as limited, with an estimated annual addressable market of only $200–300 million, leading many builders to feel they have few viable paths forward. The rise of AI has intensified this frustration, as it offers faster innovation and more tangible product development compared to crypto’s current constraints. The author outlines several unappealing options for those exploring crypto-AI intersections: tokenizing traditional AI products without real utility, building decentralized AI infrastructure (which lacks immediate feedback), or competing with giants in AI-focused stablecoin infrastructure. Despite this pessimism, the author concludes with a note of optimism: Crypto’s unique value lies in its ability to serve as "capital superconductor" for growth. The convergence of AI-driven product innovation and crypto’s programmable capital mechanisms could fuel a new generation of "agent-based companies," creating a renewed sense of purpose for those who remain.

比推03/11 20:29

Why We No Longer Love Crypto

比推03/11 20:29

活动图片