Bankless: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Five Key Points in the U.S. Senate's Draft 'Crypto Market Structure Bill'

比推Опубликовано 2026-01-13Обновлено 2026-01-13

Введение

The U.S. Senate's proposed Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (DAMCA) introduces a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, jointly overseen by the SEC and CFTC. Key provisions include a ban on interest payments for stablecoin holders, clear criteria for classifying tokens as securities or commodities, and stringent regulations for DeFi protocols based on their level of decentralization. The bill also establishes a "Micro-Innovation Sandbox" for small startups to test innovations under regulatory exemptions and imposes strict rules on digital asset ATMs, requiring detailed reporting and consumer disclosures. The 278-page draft reflects bipartisan negotiations and aims to provide regulatory clarity while addressing industry and consumer protection concerns.

Source: Bankless

Original Title: 5 Highlights from the U.S. Senate's Much-Hyped Crypto Market Structure Draft Bill

Author: Jack Inabinet

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews

The crypto market may finally get what it has long desired—a written market structure law. This is thanks to the "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act" (DAMCA) released last night. Due to some noteworthy compromises on the future development of cryptocurrency in the United States, the bill has garnered bipartisan support.

This 278-page text is the result of months of arduous negotiations among Senate Republicans, Democrats, and industry lobbyists.

It establishes a regulatory framework that divides the authority over digital assets between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

The crypto community is likely to have mixed opinions on its provisions. Justin Slaughter, Policy Director at Paradigm, called the bill "a major victory for Democratic members of the Senate Banking Committee" and said it should have been passed during the Biden administration.

Today, we will delve into five key provisions of DAMCA to better understand the future evolution of transparency in the crypto market structure.

1. Strict Prohibition of Stablecoin Dividends

According to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, stablecoin issuers will be prohibited from distributing returns to passive holders.

Chapter 4 of DAMCA outlines the guidelines for regulated banking institutions to interact with digital assets. This chapter will prohibit stablecoin issuers (as defined in the GENIUS Act) from paying interest to holders.

Although DAMCA allows stablecoin issuers to distribute "rewards" tied to specific actions (such as account-opening incentives or cashback on spending), the fact is that protecting stablecoin returns has long been a firm red line for the crypto industry. Strict restrictions on stablecoins may put crypto-native issuers at a long-term disadvantage compared to the banking sector.

Nonetheless, many key crypto giants, including Coinbase, continue to support the wording of the bill regarding the prohibition of stablecoin returns. They see it as the worst provision they can tolerate without derailing the bill's momentum.

2. Clarity on Commodity Status

The 2026 Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act (Chapter 1 of DAMCA) will amend the 1933 Securities Act to clarify when crypto network tokens transition from "securities" to "commodities."

According to this chapter, the SEC will, within 360 days of the bill's enactment, issue formal guidelines specifying when individuals involved in the initial offering, sale, or distribution of tokens, as well as the largest recipients of tokens, are considered "joint and several" issuers of those tokens.

Chapter 1 establishes broad oversight over anyone selling, controlling, or facilitating the initial distribution, raising concerns that even those who do not receive the largest share of tokens could be held liable. Additionally, it expands the SEC's jurisdiction to include tokens issued by foreign governments, tokens without a corporate structure, and tokens where Americans hold a majority stake.

This chapter provides some exemptions: if a network token does not attach any financial rights (such as profit-sharing or implied ownership interests), it can be considered a non-security (i.e., a commodity).

To obtain non-security status, the responsibility will fall on the network token project itself; asset issuers must submit a written certification to the SEC proving that their token is not a security. The SEC will have 60 days to reject this certification.

If a project does not or cannot certify its non-security status to the SEC, the law will require it to publish disclosure reports every six months—an obligation that alone occupies 12 pages in DAMCA. Projects with gross revenue exceeding $25 million must also publish financial statements audited by an independent public accountant.

Thankfully, Chapter 1 of DAMCA will not be retroactive. This means individuals who offered, sold, or distributed relevant tokens before the bill's enactment need not worry about retrospective legal liability.

3. DeFi Regulation

Chapter 3 of DAMCA explores the "decentralized" aspect of decentralized finance, outlining the circumstances under which crypto projects are considered—and not considered—truly "decentralized."

According to this chapter, a decentralized protocol should allow users to conduct financial transactions based on "predetermined, non-discretionary automated rules or algorithms" and, apart from the users themselves, not rely on any other party to maintain custody or control of their digital assets.

The label of "non-decentralized financial transaction protocol" will apply to any protocol where:

An individual or group has the ability to control or alter the application's functionality;
The application does not operate solely based on code;
An individual or group can restrict, censor, or prohibit user activities.

Non-decentralized protocols must comply with the 1934 Securities Exchange Act and the Bank Secrecy Act, and fulfill new registration, conduct, disclosure, record-keeping, and regulatory requirements.

While this chapter may harmonize the application of securities laws across different technologies and protect the public interest, it could also sweep up protocols with minimal operational control that are not immutable smart contract protocols (including those designed based on multi-signature technology or trusted execution environments).

Fortunately, Chapter 3 does contain a significant exemption: it allows a protocol's "security committee" to take "predefined, temporary, rule-based network emergency measures" in response to incidents like hacking attacks without jeopardizing its decentralized status.

Worryingly, Chapter 3 imposes requirements on "web-hosted" crypto wallets that allow users to interact with blockchain technology, mandating that such intermediaries comply with sanctions and anti-money laundering regulations. Confusingly, this regulation does not apply to "any software or hardware wallet that facilitates self-custody of digital assets by individuals."

4. "Micro-Innovation" Regulatory Sandbox

DAMCA requires the CFTC and SEC to establish a "Micro-Innovation Sandbox" within 360 days of the bill's enactment. This sandbox aims to "allow up to 10 eligible companies to test innovative activities within the United States" while still being subject to federal and state securities and commodities laws.

To participate in the sandbox, eligible entities must intend to engage in legitimate innovative activities within the U.S., have no more than 25 employees in any given fiscal year, and have gross revenue not exceeding $10 million.

All applications to enter the sandbox must be jointly approved by the CFTC and SEC. Program participants will receive regulatory exemptions, but the committees retain the discretion to revoke these exemptions at any time.

Sandbox participants must meet the disclosure requirements of both committees regarding matters within their jurisdiction. Any regulatory exemptions granted through this program will preempt any state securities or commodities registration requirements.

The program is limited to 20 projects per year, and the total funds controlled by participating companies from customers, investors, or counterparties must not exceed $20 million.

5. Crackdown on Digital Asset ATMs

Perhaps most surprisingly, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act devotes significant effort to regulating digital asset kiosks—commonly known as Bitcoin ATMs.

According to Section 205 of DAMCA, digital asset kiosks will be designated as "money transmission businesses," imposing heavy regulatory burdens on operators of such "cash-for-crypto" machines.

Operators must submit a detailed inventory of their kiosks to the Secretary of the Treasury every 90 days, including the operator's legal name, trade name, physical address of each machine, and the types of digital assets supported for transactions.

Before conducting a transaction with a customer, operators must disclose the terms of the transaction in an easily readable manner, along with a series of government-mandated consumer risk warnings.

Additionally, digital asset kiosks must provide customers with receipts detailing transaction information and implement anti-fraud controls to prevent digital assets from being transferred to wallets known to be associated with fraudulent activities.

The Secretary of the Treasury will also have the discretionary authority to set daily deposit and withdrawal limits for digital asset kiosks. Until such limits are set, kiosk operators cannot conduct transactions exceeding $3,500 with a "new customer" within a 24-hour period.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7602504

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (DAMCA) and what is its primary purpose?

AThe Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (DAMCA) is a proposed 278-page bill that aims to establish a regulatory framework for the crypto market in the United States. Its primary purpose is to divide regulatory authority over digital assets between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), providing clarity on market structure and offering some compromises that have garnered bipartisan support.

QAccording to the DAMCA, what are stablecoin issuers explicitly prohibited from doing?

AThe DAMCA explicitly prohibits stablecoin issuers from distributing yields or interest payments to passive holders of their tokens. While it allows for the distribution of 'rewards' tied to specific actions like sign-up incentives or cash-back rewards, paying interest on stablecoin holdings is banned.

QHow does the DAMCA's first chapter attempt to clarify the classification of a crypto network token as a security or a commodity?

AThe first chapter of the DAMCA amends the 1933 Securities Act to clarify when a crypto network token transitions from being a 'security' to a 'commodity.' It requires the SEC to issue formal guidance within 360 days of the bill's enactment. A token can be considered a non-security (i.e., a commodity) if it has no attached financial rights (like profit-sharing). The burden of proof is on the project, which must submit a written certification to the SEC asserting its token is not a security; the SEC then has 60 days to reject this certification.

QWhat criteria does the DAMCA use to define a 'decentralized' protocol, and what are the consequences for a protocol deemed 'non-decentralized'?

AThe DAMCA defines a decentralized protocol as one that allows users to conduct financial transactions based on 'predetermined, non-discretionary automated rules or algorithms' and does not rely on anyone other than the user to maintain custody or control of their digital assets. A protocol is labeled 'non-decentralized' if an individual or group can control/alter its functionality, if it does not operate solely based on code, or if an individual or group can restrict, censor, or prohibit user activity. Non-decentralized protocols must comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Bank Secrecy Act, and new registration, conduct, disclosure, record-keeping, and regulatory requirements.

QWhat new regulatory burdens does the DAMCA impose on operators of digital asset kiosks, commonly known as Bitcoin ATMs?

AThe DAMCA designates digital asset kiosks (Bitcoin ATMs) as 'money transmitting businesses,' imposing significant regulatory burdens. Operators must submit a detailed inventory of their kiosks to the Treasury Secretary every 90 days, including their legal name, business name, each machine's physical address, and the types of digital assets supported. They must also disclose transaction terms and government-mandated consumer risk warnings clearly, provide customers with detailed transaction receipts, implement anti-fraud controls, and adhere to a $3,500 transaction limit with a 'new customer' within a 24-hour period. The Treasury Secretary is also granted the authority to set daily deposit and withdrawal limits.

Похожее

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit37 мин. назад

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

In a candid interview, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang challenged competitors like Google and Amazon, admitted past strategic errors, and criticized U.S. export controls on AI chips. He framed Nvidia’s role as turning “electricity in, tokens out,” emphasizing the complexity and value of AI inference. Huang dismissed rival custom chips like Google’s TPU and Amazon’s Trainium as inflexible and niche, claiming their growth relies heavily on clients like Anthropic. He also acknowledged missing early investment opportunities in OpenAI and Anthropic. On China, Huang warned that export restrictions risk pushing the country toward self-sufficiency and could cost U.S. leadership in AI. Finally, he explained Nvidia’s acquisition of Groq as a move to serve premium, low-latency token markets. Throughout, Huang emphasized ecosystem trust and Nvidia’s central role in global AI infrastructure.

marsbit42 мин. назад

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

marsbit42 мин. назад

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

ARK Invest, a major investor in SpaceX, provides an analysis following SpaceX's confidential IPO filing on April 1, 2026, targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation and up to $75 billion in funding for a Nasdaq listing around June 2026. This would be the largest IPO in history. The valuation implies a price-to-sales ratio of ~95x based on ~$18.5B in projected 2025 revenue. ARK argues this reflects future potential, not current reality. Key drivers include Starlink, with over 10M users and $20B+ in 2026 revenue, launch services which have reduced costs by ~95% since 2008, and the strategic merger with xAI in February 2026, enabling vertically integrated AI and orbital computing. ARK’s investment thesis is based on SpaceX's proven execution of ambitious goals, like reusable rockets and global satellite internet. The firm notes that significant value creation often occurs pre-IPO, and its Venture Fund offers exposure to SpaceX’s earlier private stages. Post-IPO, the fund will manage the position per standard lock-up and rebalancing processes, maintaining flexibility to reinvest in other private innovations. The analysis is based on public estimates and ARK research; the S-1 filing is not yet public. This is not investment advice.

marsbit43 мин. назад

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

marsbit43 мин. назад

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

The article discusses the legislative stalemate in the US over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act), which aims to regulate crypto assets. A key point of contention is whether stablecoins should be allowed to pay interest, with crypto companies opposing a ban and banks supporting it. Moody's analyst Abhi Srivastava states that, for now, stablecoins do not pose a significant threat to traditional banks due to existing efficient payment systems and the current prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins. This limits their appeal for pulling deposits from banks at scale. However, with the stablecoin market cap exceeding $300 billion and growth in tokenized assets, banks could face future pressure from deposit outflows. The crypto industry warns that failure to pass the bill could lead to stricter regulatory crackdowns. Negotiations continue with little progress, despite both sides desiring a resolution.

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

The global oil market has passed a critical point, shifting the focus from price increases to potential physical supply shortages. The core issue is a time mismatch: even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens, shipping disruptions have already caused significant delays, which will continue to deplete onshore crude inventories for weeks. Refinery behavior acts as an amplifier. Reduced runs in Asia and Europe don’t reflect weaker demand but instead shrink product inventories, raising fuel prices and refining margins, which in turn encourages higher runs—creating a self-reinforcing cycle. If the Strait remains closed beyond April, traditional pricing models may fail. The market could face an unprecedented physical shortfall of 11-13 million barrels per day—roughly four times historical disruption levels. In such a scenario, price becomes an inadequate balancing tool. The only way to rebalance the market would be policy-driven demand destruction, similar to COVID-era lockdowns. Current prices around $95/barrel are insufficient to balance the market. Key signals to watch include inventory levels, policy announcements, and the pace of involuntary demand contraction. Geopolitically, the situation appears likely to worsen before improving, with little room for compromise between the US and Iran.

marsbit3 ч. назад

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

marsbit3 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.