Axie Infinity up 14% – AXS faces decisive $2 test next

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-20Обновлено 2026-01-20

Введение

Axie Infinity (AXS) leads gaming tokens with a 14% daily gain, continuing the bullish momentum from the previous week. However, the broader gaming sector shows mixed performance, with only SAND and MANA also posting gains among the top 10 tokens. AXS faces a critical resistance test at the $2 level after breaking out from a consolidation phase below $1. Technical indicators like the MACD show weakening bearish pressure, while the On Balance Volume suggests strong buying interest. On-chain data reveals mixed sentiment, with some addresses depositing (potentially profit-taking) and others withdrawing (indicating bullish belief). A sharp decline in holders could challenge further upside, but a break above $2 remains possible if bullish momentum continues.

Gaming tokens were still maintaining the bullish momentum that started as the previous week came to a close. However, most of them have not sustained this trend in the past 24 hours.

Axie Infinity is leading all the top-capped tokens with double-digit gains of 14%. This rally was within the 113% range of last week.

Only three of them have managed positive returns among the top 10 in terms of capitalization. The Sandbox [SAND] and Decentraland [MANA] recorded 6% and 5%, respectively, while the others were in red.

The rally follows capital rotation into gaming tokens. They have been the strongest sector among all altcoins over the past week. Will AXS bulls sustain the trend?

AXS bears testing bulls’ strength

The chart showed that AXS was in an uptrend after breaking out of the sideways consolidation below $1. The breakout was followed by a surge that was paused around the higher high of $2.

The pause came as bears kicked in. As such, the MACD was red, though the strength was diminishing after bulls countered the pullback.

This signal showed sellers were being taken out gradually after recovery was initiated at $1.6.

Meanwhile, the On Balance Volume (OBV) of over $90 million explained what drove the recovery. However, bulls needed to beat bears at the $2 zone, which was the decision area for the next move.

Transactions show mixed signals

The network activity on Etherscan showed that there were over 2,600 transactions on the day. This indicated why AXS had outperformed its peers during the day.

However, this on-chain activity was mixed in sentiment despite the gauge being 84% bullish and 16% bearish. There were addresses that were withdrawing from exchanges, and at the same time, there were those depositing.

For instance, a wallet deposited over $40K AXS to Bybit. Another wallet withdrew $16.9K worth of AXS from Binance.

Furthermore, there was inter-exchange token movement. For instance, Coinbase moved $5K to Binance, while OKX moved $1.3K to the Gate.io exchange.

The withdrawing addresses showed belief in a continued uptrend, while those depositing were potentially taking profit. The balance in the two activities showed there was no consensus in direction bias.

Axie Infinity holders dip sharply

The number of Axie Infinity holders dropped sharply, with over 1.5K lost in a week, at 166.72K at press time. This meant that they were taking profit from the aforementioned rally.

Such an outcome could derail Axie Infinity’s potential to break past $2. However, if bulls beat bears and gaming tokens continue thriving, AXS may breach $2.

Final Thoughts

  • AXS rallies 14%, leading all the gaming tokens in terms of daily gains.
  • AXS price faces a key test at $2, with holders declining sharply.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the current price movement of Axie Infinity (AXS) and what key level is it testing?

AAxie Infinity (AXS) is up 14% and is currently testing the key resistance level of $2.

QWhich other gaming tokens, besides AXS, recorded positive returns among the top 10 by market cap?

ABesides AXS, The Sandbox (SAND) recorded a 6% gain and Decentraland (MANA) recorded a 5% gain.

QWhat on-chain metric, with a value of over $90 million, is cited as a driver for the AXS price recovery?

AThe On Balance Volume (OBV) of over $90 million is cited as a driver for the AXS price recovery.

QWhat does the sharp decline in the number of Axie Infinity holders suggest about investor behavior?

AThe sharp decline of over 1,500 holders suggests that investors are taking profits from the recent price rally.

QAccording to the network activity on Etherscan, what was the mixed sentiment among AXS traders?

AThe mixed sentiment was shown by some addresses depositing AXS to exchanges to take profits, while others were withdrawing AXS from exchanges, indicating a belief in a continued uptrend.

Похожее

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

Tencent's Hunyuan AI team has released its latest language model, Hy3 preview, marking a significant step forward for the company's AI capabilities. With 295B total parameters and support for 256K context length, the model employs a mixture-of-experts architecture. It shows improvements in complex logic, instruction following, contextual learning, code generation, and agent task execution. In testing, Hy3 preview demonstrated strong performance in multi-step logical reasoning but showed occasional instability in identifying traps in trick questions. It performed well in extracting key information from disordered meeting transcripts and accurately followed new linguistic rules. As an AI agent, it successfully built functional applications like a Snake game and generated data analysis dashboards, though it sometimes fell short in fully completing complex open-ended tasks. In natural language use, it produced coherent and stylistically appropriate narratives with reduced “AI-like” tone. Priced competitively, Hy3 preview is already integrated into Tencent’s key products, including Tencent Cloud and WorkBuddy. While not leading in every benchmark, it represents a solid, practical model that signals Tencent’s renewed momentum in AI development.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

marsbit1 ч. назад

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit1 ч. назад

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

China's AI landscape is witnessing a strategic divergence from Silicon Valley’s closed-source competition to a collaborative open-source ecosystem. On April 24, DeepSeek released V4, a top-ranked open-source model on Hugging Face, featuring breakthroughs like million-token context length with minimal KV cache and native support for domestic chips like Huawei’s Ascend. Similarly, Kimi’s K2.6, released days earlier, also adopted open-source principles. Unlike U.S. giants such as OpenAI and Anthropic—locked in revenue disputes and tactical product clashes—Chinese firms embrace shared innovation. DeepSeek and Kimi openly build on each other’s advances, like the MLA architecture and Muon optimizer, avoiding redundant R&D and driving down costs. DeepSeek V4 focused on pushing base model capabilities, while Kimi specialized in Agent-based applications. Although U.S. firms lead in revenue and valuation, China’s open-source models achieve comparable performance at a fraction of the cost (e.g., DeepSeek V3 trained for $5.58M vs. GPT-5’s $500M+). With token usage growing exponentially, China’s collaborative model promises scalable, affordable AI built on domestic hardware, shaping a more accessible path to AGI.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

marsbit1 ч. назад

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

Two leading AI agent projects, OpenClaw and Hermes, represent a fundamental divergence in design philosophy rather than just a feature competition. OpenClaw, a GitHub phenomenon, prioritizes user control and customization, offering a powerful, flexible platform for building and orchestrating agents. It boasts a massive ecosystem with over 44,000 skills, extensive model flexibility (supporting Anthropic, OpenAI, and others), and deep integrations across multiple messaging platforms. In contrast, Hermes Agent, developed by Nous Research, champions automation and efficiency. It is designed for lower cost and a lower barrier to entry, learning and improving automatically from user workflows. It runs tasks in isolated environments for security and offers significantly lower token costs out-of-the-box. The choice between them mirrors historical tech divides like Windows vs. Mac. OpenClaw is for users who want maximum control, customization, and don't mind a complex setup. Hermes is the smarter default for those seeking an affordable, easy-to-use agent that learns autonomously. The real competition is not about which is better, but which philosophy—a programmable personal OS or a self-evolving work proxy—better suits the user's needs for control, cost, and ease of use.

marsbit1 ч. назад

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit7 ч. назад

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit7 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow