Assessing Useless Coin’s 12% price dip below KEY support

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-09Обновлено 2026-01-09

Введение

Memecoins are pausing their recent rally, with Useless Coin (USELESS) dropping over 12% in 24 hours. It broke a key ascending trendline support, and technical indicators like the Money Flow Index show capital outflow. On-chain data reveals institutions like Wintermute and Coinbase moved over $600K worth of tokens to hot wallets, likely for selling, though Kraken accumulated. Open Interest fell sharply from $40M to $33M, and trading volume dropped from $122M to $82M. If the decline continues, USELESS may retest $0.069. A short squeeze could occur at $0.1242, but breaking below $0.1020 may intensify losses. The rally could be over or just pausing.

Memecoins appear to be pausing their rally that began earlier this year.

For example, Useless Coin [USELESS] has dropped more than 12% in the past 24 hours, with its price still trending downward at the time of writing.

USELESS Coin breaks trendline support

The price action charts showed that USELESS broke an ascending trendline support that had been in place since the start of this month. The first week of January 2026 saw the memecoin reach $0.12, but bulls were unable to break past this level.

The MACD was bearish over the past two days, though its momentum was weak. Moreover, the Money Flow Index (MFI) had also declined from a peak of 77 to 35 at press time.

This indicated capital was flowing out of the token.

In case the decline continues, the price could retest the breakout level at $0.06958 of the range that ignited this rally. However, a resurgence of bulls could invalidate such an undertaking.

The decline was not only dependent on a technical breakdown; on-chain data also supported this trend.

Institutions offload the memecoin

As per on-chain data from Solscan, institutions were offloading their tokens. Wintermute and Coinbase were moving their USELESS coins to the hot wallet, potentially for selling.

Wintermute moved more than $131K worth of the tokens, while Coinbase moved over $500K in capital. In total, more than $600K in USELESS was ready for selling.

However, this was not the case for the Kraken exchange. The exchange moved more than $194K to their cold wallet, indicating accumulation.

As a result, the institutional activity showed mixed sentiments, though the selling activity was more impactful on price. In fact, the Long/Short Ratio was at 0.9 as of writing, suggesting more trades, even from retail, were being sold.

A look into volume, OI, and max pain levels!

More data showed why USELESS’s price was declining.

At press time, Open Interest (OI) dropped sharply from $40 million to $33 million within a single day. This decline followed a steady uptrend that had been in place since the 30th of December.

Trading volume mirrored the move, plunging from $122 million to $82 million over the same period.

Meanwhile, the maximum liquidation pain for the memecoin indicated that a short squeeze could occur if the price reached $0.1242 again.

On the other hand, the decline could be intensified if the price broke below $0.1020. This was the max pain level for bulls.

Altogether, the rally could be over, indicating a seasonal tendency where cryptos start the year with a surge.

Conversely, it could be a pause before the price rally continuation, especially now that memecoins have added over $8 billion to their capitalization.

Final Thoughts

USELESS crashes 12% amid a technical breakdown, but this could be a temporary pause.
Institutions offloading, volume and OI declining, and shorts contributed to the downside movement.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the percentage drop in Useless Coin's price in the past 24 hours and what key support level did it break?

AUseless Coin's price by more than 12% in the past 24 hours, breaking an ascending trendline support that had been in place since the start of the month.

QWhich two specific institutions were offloading their USELESS tokens according to on-chain data from Solscan?

AAccording to on-chain data from Solscan, Wintermute and Coinbase were offloading their USELESS tokens.

QWhat did the sharp decline in Open Interest (OI) and Trading Volume indicate for USELESS?

AThe sharp decline in Open Interest (OI) from $40 million to $33 million and the plunge in Trading Volume from $122 million to $82 million indicated a loss of market interest and participation, contributing to the price decline.

QAt what price level could a short squeeze occur for USELESS, and at what level could the decline intensify for bulls?

AA short squeeze could occur if the price reached $0.1242 again. The decline could be intensified if the price broke below $0.1020, which was the max pain level for bulls.

QWhat does the article suggest are the two possible scenarios for the future of the USELESS price rally?

AThe article suggests that the rally could be over, indicating a seasonal tendency, or it could just be a temporary pause before the price rally continuation.

Похожее

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit46 мин. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit46 мин. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit51 мин. назад

marsbit51 мин. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit56 мин. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit56 мин. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit57 мин. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit57 мин. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit1 ч. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion