ARK Invest Enters Broader Crypto ETFs With CoinDesk 20

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-24Обновлено 2026-01-24

Введение

ARK Invest has filed with U.S. regulators to launch two crypto index ETFs linked to the CoinDesk 20 index, marking its first major expansion beyond Bitcoin-focused products. One ETF will track the index—which includes Bitcoin, Ether, Solana, XRP, and Cardano—using regulated futures contracts rather than holding cryptocurrencies directly. The second will exclude Bitcoin entirely by pairing long index futures with short Bitcoin futures. Both are expected to list on NYSE Arca. This move places ARK among other firms like WisdomTree, ProShares, and VanEck, which have also filed for or updated proposals for crypto ETFs tracking a range of digital assets. The growing number of filings reflects increasing institutional interest in diversified crypto exposure through regulated derivatives, aiming to reduce risks associated with single-asset investments.

The American investment management firm ARK Invest has filed with U.S. regulators to roll out two crypto index exchange-traded funds associated with the CoinDesk 20 index, highlighting the first push of the company into wider crypto exposure after Bitcoin.

As per the regulatory filing, the given ETFs would trace down the daily performance of the CoinDesk 20 index, leveraging regulated futures contracts instead of holding crypto directly. A single fund would consist of Bitcoin with other prominent altcoins like Ether, Solana, XRP and Cardano.

Meanwhile, the second product will keep out Bitcoin completely by pairing long index futures with short Bitcoin futures. Both funds are anticipated for NYSE Arca listing, placing ARK along with other companies as competition escalates for diversified crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) offerings.

Other Firm’s Filings

On September 22 last year, WisdomTree filed its registration for a CoinDesk 20 Fund in Delaware, marking an initial step toward a U.S. ETF associated with the CoinDesk 20 index that covers the biggest cryptocurrencies by market cap.

At the same time, ProShares also gave its SEC filing for the ProShares CoinDesk Crypto 20 ETF on October 22, 2025, looking for an approval for a diversified crypto ETF that would trace the same index through derivatives instead of direct holdings.

Apart from these, VanEck also revised its Solana ETF proposal, cutting fees to surge its appeal. Now, it is listed on the Cboe BZX Exchange, highlighting a major step in taking Solana-based investment.

Other companies, such as 21Shares, have also updated filings for funds associated with various crypto assets. REX-Osprey is also a part of the competition, having filings for ETFs tracking altcoins like ADA, XLM and SUI.

The filing numbers are continuously increasing, showing a surged interest of institutional investors. In July, Cboe BZX filed to list a Solana ETF that would offer direct exposure to SOL. The objectives of these products are to provide greater exposure and restrict the risks associated with individual asset investments.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Kansas Bill Aims to Establish Bitcoin and Digital Asset Reserve Fund

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main focus of ARK Invest's recent regulatory filing regarding crypto ETFs?

AARK Invest has filed to launch two crypto index exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track the CoinDesk 20 index, marking the company's first major expansion into broader crypto exposure beyond Bitcoin.

QHow will the two proposed ARK Invest ETFs gain exposure to cryptocurrencies, and what is a key difference between them?

ABoth ETFs will use regulated futures contracts to track the daily performance of the CoinDesk 20 index rather than holding cryptocurrencies directly. One fund includes Bitcoin along with other altcoins, while the second fund excludes Bitcoin entirely by pairing long index futures with short Bitcoin futures.

QWhich other investment firms have recently filed for ETFs linked to the CoinDesk 20 index?

AWisdomTree filed for a CoinDesk 20 Fund in September of last year, and ProShares submitted an SEC filing for the ProShares CoinDesk Crypto 20 ETF in October 2025, both aiming to track the same index using derivatives.

QWhat recent action did VanEck take regarding its Solana ETF proposal, and where is it listed?

AVanEck revised its Solana ETF proposal by reducing fees to increase its appeal, and it is now listed on the Cboe BZX Exchange, representing a significant step for Solana-based investment products.

QWhat broader trend do the increasing number of crypto ETF filings indicate, according to the article?

AThe growing number of filings reflects a surge in interest from institutional investors seeking to provide greater crypto exposure while mitigating the risks associated with individual asset investments through diversified ETF offerings.

Похожее

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

Tencent's Hunyuan AI team has released its latest language model, Hy3 preview, marking a significant step forward for the company's AI capabilities. With 295B total parameters and support for 256K context length, the model employs a mixture-of-experts architecture. It shows improvements in complex logic, instruction following, contextual learning, code generation, and agent task execution. In testing, Hy3 preview demonstrated strong performance in multi-step logical reasoning but showed occasional instability in identifying traps in trick questions. It performed well in extracting key information from disordered meeting transcripts and accurately followed new linguistic rules. As an AI agent, it successfully built functional applications like a Snake game and generated data analysis dashboards, though it sometimes fell short in fully completing complex open-ended tasks. In natural language use, it produced coherent and stylistically appropriate narratives with reduced “AI-like” tone. Priced competitively, Hy3 preview is already integrated into Tencent’s key products, including Tencent Cloud and WorkBuddy. While not leading in every benchmark, it represents a solid, practical model that signals Tencent’s renewed momentum in AI development.

marsbit4 мин. назад

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

marsbit4 мин. назад

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit9 мин. назад

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit9 мин. назад

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

China's AI landscape is witnessing a strategic divergence from Silicon Valley’s closed-source competition to a collaborative open-source ecosystem. On April 24, DeepSeek released V4, a top-ranked open-source model on Hugging Face, featuring breakthroughs like million-token context length with minimal KV cache and native support for domestic chips like Huawei’s Ascend. Similarly, Kimi’s K2.6, released days earlier, also adopted open-source principles. Unlike U.S. giants such as OpenAI and Anthropic—locked in revenue disputes and tactical product clashes—Chinese firms embrace shared innovation. DeepSeek and Kimi openly build on each other’s advances, like the MLA architecture and Muon optimizer, avoiding redundant R&D and driving down costs. DeepSeek V4 focused on pushing base model capabilities, while Kimi specialized in Agent-based applications. Although U.S. firms lead in revenue and valuation, China’s open-source models achieve comparable performance at a fraction of the cost (e.g., DeepSeek V3 trained for $5.58M vs. GPT-5’s $500M+). With token usage growing exponentially, China’s collaborative model promises scalable, affordable AI built on domestic hardware, shaping a more accessible path to AGI.

marsbit18 мин. назад

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

marsbit18 мин. назад

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

Two leading AI agent projects, OpenClaw and Hermes, represent a fundamental divergence in design philosophy rather than just a feature competition. OpenClaw, a GitHub phenomenon, prioritizes user control and customization, offering a powerful, flexible platform for building and orchestrating agents. It boasts a massive ecosystem with over 44,000 skills, extensive model flexibility (supporting Anthropic, OpenAI, and others), and deep integrations across multiple messaging platforms. In contrast, Hermes Agent, developed by Nous Research, champions automation and efficiency. It is designed for lower cost and a lower barrier to entry, learning and improving automatically from user workflows. It runs tasks in isolated environments for security and offers significantly lower token costs out-of-the-box. The choice between them mirrors historical tech divides like Windows vs. Mac. OpenClaw is for users who want maximum control, customization, and don't mind a complex setup. Hermes is the smarter default for those seeking an affordable, easy-to-use agent that learns autonomously. The real competition is not about which is better, but which philosophy—a programmable personal OS or a self-evolving work proxy—better suits the user's needs for control, cost, and ease of use.

marsbit39 мин. назад

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

marsbit39 мин. назад

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit6 ч. назад

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality