Amid Internal and External Challenges, Is Ethereum's Neutral Route Still Viable?

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-25Обновлено 2026-05-25

Введение

"Ethereum is facing a dual crisis of market pressure and internal challenges. Its native token ETH is in a mid-term downtrend, with negative sentiment prevailing, weak price action, and significant outflows from ETFs. The ETH/BTC ratio has hit a ten-month low, and institutional holdings have shrunk. Concurrently, the Ethereum Foundation has seen a major exodus of core personnel following its commitment to a neutral, non-commercial development roadmap focused on censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security (CROPS). This stance has sparked debate. Critics, including former members, argue that the ecosystem lacks a dedicated, well-funded entity to promote ETH's commercial value and compete with rival chains. Proposals suggest creating a new, independent body to drive adoption and token value, forming a dual-model with the Foundation. While some investors view the personnel changes as normal turnover and remain bullish on Ethereum's long-term fundamentals, the immediate path forward is unclear. Analysts believe Ethereum must execute its technical roadmap (like upcoming upgrades), clarify governance, and focus on high-value sectors like DeFi and tokenization to convert its technological edge into a compelling investment thesis. The current downturn tests whether its decentralized model can adapt to balance core principles with commercial competitiveness."

Author: Oluwapelumi Adejumo

Compiled by: Saoirse, Foresight News

As Ethereum's native token ETH enters a mid-term downtrend, overall market sentiment has significantly weakened. Data from blockchain analytics platform Santiment shows that discussions about ETH surged across networks in May, but the prevailing sentiment was overwhelmingly negative, with investors widely concerned about further price declines.

Ethereum Market Sentiment (Source: Santiment)

Analysts indicate that multiple bearish factors have converged, collectively dragging down the market: weak spot price performance, continuous outflows from ETFs, the departure of key personnel from the Ethereum Foundation, public questioning from veteran community supporters, and the growing competitiveness of peer public chains such as Hyperliquid, Zcash, and Solana.

Data from CryptoQuant also confirms a significant cooling in institutional investment interest. Currently, ETH price is approaching the critical $2,000 support level, with both spot market and fundamental indicators showing clear signs of weakness.

Ethereum's performance relative to the broader market appears particularly sluggish. The ETH/Bitcoin exchange rate has fallen to around 0.02758, hitting a ten-month low, indicating that Ethereum has significantly underperformed Bitcoin in this cycle. Spot investors continue to reduce their holdings, market liquidity keeps shrinking, and major institutions have largely ceased buying.

Persistent Spot Selling, Ethereum Lacks Effective Buying Support

Over the past two quarters, institutional holdings have consistently decreased. In October 2025, institutional holdings once exceeded 7 million ETH but have now retreated to around 5.5 million. During the prolonged price correction, large investment institutions have been scaling back their core positions.

The regulated ETF market is also under pressure. Current Ethereum ETF assets under management are approximately $12.14 billion, a 23% decrease from the peak in January. Data from SoSoValue shows severe market performance in May, with ETFs experiencing net outflows for two consecutive weeks, totaling around $470 million in cumulative outflows, marking one of the most concentrated periods of capital flight this year.

Weekly Ethereum ETF Fund Outflows (Source: SoSoValue)

The Coinbase Premium Index has remained in negative territory throughout, reflecting a lack of spot buying interest among U.S. institutional investors. As institutional holdings decrease, ETH market liquidity has tightened in tandem. Since February 2026, daily average institutional trading volume has continued to decline, falling well below the one-year average. Recent daily trading volume has only ranged between $17 million and $42 million.

Market bottom-fishing willingness has faded, and spot market activity is sluggish. Any negative news could easily trigger sharp price volatility.

Derivatives Market Hedging Heats Up, Contract Longs Remain Determined

As spot market selling pressure intensifies, the derivatives market shows significant divergence regarding future trends. Industry opinions are split on whether ETH is entering a long-term downtrend or is about to bottom out and rebound.

Professional traders are actively buying put options to hedge risks, while the perpetual contract market still retains substantial long positions, reflecting starkly opposing views. Block Scholes data shows that the seven-day ETH 25-delta risk reversal skew is close to -7%, indicating traders are willing to pay a premium for put options to hedge against downside risk.

Data from Deribit exchange shows that the total open interest for put options with strike prices of $2,000 and $2,100 exceeds $380 million, making these two price levels the core battleground for short-term institutional speculation.

Ethereum Options Trader Positions (Source: Deribit)

Market Interpretation: The large-scale deployment of put options suggests a widespread market expectation of continued weakness. The price has already broken below the $2,100 support level, and market risk appetite keeps declining. In the absence of spot capital to absorb selling pressure, the market can only rely on hedging operations to mitigate risks.

Signals from the perpetual contract market are more complex. According to CryptoQuant statistics, Ethereum's funding rate has remained stable in positive territory, reaching 0.0082 on May 21st. Even as market capitalization, institutional holdings, and spot trading volume decline across the board, speculative bullish sentiment has not completely dissipated.

Ethereum Funding Rate (Source: CryptoQuant)

The opposing long and short stances introduce significant uncertainty into the price action. If spot buying suddenly recovers, it is likely to trigger a short squeeze and rebound. Conversely, if the price breaks below the critical $2,000 support level, the massive open interest could trigger a cascade of liquidations, exacerbating market volatility.

Key Talent Departures, Ethereum's Value Debate Intensifies

Amid the poor price performance, the Swiss non-profit Ethereum Foundation, responsible for Ethereum's underlying R&D, is undergoing large-scale senior personnel changes.

Senior R&D personnel Carl Beek and Julian Ma have formally resigned, triggering internal personnel turbulence. Carl Beek, with seven years of experience, was primarily responsible for Beacon Chain design. Julian Ma led the development of the lab oversight incentive framework.

Since February, at least nine senior personnel have left or stepped back from core roles at the Foundation. In May alone, five individuals departed, including former Co-Executive Director Tomasz Stańczak, Board Co-Chair Josh Stark, protocol R&D contributor Trent Van Epps, protocol team lead Barnabé Monnot, and Tim Beiko. Senior researcher Alex Stokes has also begun a three-month leave. The reduction in core technical team members during a market downturn has created a leadership vacuum.

Industry analysis suggests the trigger for this personnel change was a foundational document released by the Foundation in mid-March. This 38-page document established the CROPS principles: Censorship Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security.

The document clearly defines the Foundation's role as an ecosystem guardian, not a commercial operator. Its core duty is to maintain network neutrality, not to pursue goals like raising token prices, boosting investor returns, or advancing commercial expansion.

Now, as other public chains continue to capture market share, the Foundation's adherence to a neutral development philosophy is increasingly difficult for the market to accept. Tommy Shaughnessy, co-founder of venture firm Delphi Ventures, stated that the negative impact of this talent drain far exceeds surface appearances. With reform-minded members gone, internal voices questioning the current development direction are unlikely to emerge again.

Calls for Reform Grow Louder, Neutral Development Model Faces Severe Test

Many departing core members believe the Foundation has been insufficiently proactive in commercialization and have called for adjustments to the governance structure. Prominent researcher Dankrad Feist, who left the Foundation last year to join a new public chain project, publicly proposed forming a new, independent institution to ensure the network's economic competitiveness.

He suggested the new institution should have initial capital of at least $1 billion, partially sourced from network staking rewards. This institution would be directly accountable to token holders, with the core mission of expanding ETH's commercial application scenarios and driving token market capitalization growth.

Dankrad Feist pointed out that the Ethereum Foundation currently holds less than 0.1% of the total circulating supply, cannot access underlying staking rewards or on-chain transaction fees, and the entire ecosystem lacks a professional body actively promoting the token in capital markets.

Ryan Sean Adams, co-founder of media outlet Bankless, expressed agreement with this view. He argued that Ethereum's development cannot rely solely on the Foundation. The ecosystem needs well-funded, competitive professional institutions focused on improving capital efficiency, communicating development value externally, and implementing commercial projects—tasks that fall outside the Foundation's mandate.

These reform proposals do not call for abolishing the original Foundation but advocate for a dual-agency collaborative model: one side remains true to its original purpose, safeguarding the underlying network's neutrality and building public infrastructure; the other focuses on token promotion and competing for institutional capital resources.

Bullish investors, however, believe the market is over-interpreting short-term volatility, viewing the personnel changes as a normal generational transition. Investor Ryan Berckmans stated that talent flow is a normal phenomenon for team renewal. Ethereum has successfully navigated regulatory storms and management changes in the past, completed major technical upgrades like The Merge and blobs transactions, and its on-chain application assets remain industry-leading. Global enterprises continue to deploy stablecoins and asset tokenization businesses, which can still support long-term network development.

Major institutional holders also maintain an optimistic outlook. Thomas Lee, Chairman of BitMine, the public company with the largest ETH holdings, believes the current market panic is just a normal correction within the cycle. The company holds 5.2 million ETH, with assets worth over $10 billion in staking.

BitMine Key Metrics (Source: BitMine Tracker)

Thomas Lee stated that blockchain serves as the underlying infrastructure for AI commercial systems and institutional financial settlements. With its mature security system, ample market liquidity, and broad institutional recognition, Ethereum still possesses irreplaceable industry advantages.

Shaking Off Negative Sentiment, How Can Ethereum Regain Its Upward Trajectory?

Industry insiders believe Ethereum's future trajectory depends on whether its technical roadmap and commercial moats can translate into an attractive investment thesis. Analysis from investment firm Galaxy Digital suggests that to stem the tide of capital outflows, Ethereum must steadily execute its various operational plans.

The short-term priority is to successfully launch the Glamsterdam upgrade, steadily advance subsequent Hegotá version iterations, clarify internal authority and responsibility divisions within the Foundation, and concentrate resources on core commercial sectors. Key focus areas include high-value decentralized finance (DeFi), institutional asset issuance, real-world asset tokenization, stablecoin settlement, and privacy financial infrastructure. Ethereum's neutrality and security capabilities will become core advantages in these sectors.

Simultaneously, Ethereum needs to accelerate its layout in the next wave of industry hotspots, including public chain scaling technology, on-chain privacy protection, post-quantum security, and AI-native economic systems. Relevant technical frameworks are already included in the open-source R&D roadmap. The current biggest challenge is coordinating synergistic development between commercial entities and institutional resources.

The Foundation's charter clearly outlines principles for underlying technology R&D but does not specify a token value growth logic or establish dedicated operational entities to address competitor challenges.

This price decline is no longer merely a simple market correction; it is a profound test: Can a decentralized system rationally allocate commercial functions and complete institutional division of labor adjustments while maintaining operational stability?

If the ecosystem can leverage this personnel transition to streamline authority and responsibility, transforming technical plans into clear investment value, this downturn may become an opportunity for governance model optimization. Conversely, if adjustments cannot be made, persistently weak spot market performance, frequent talent departures, and shifting competitive landscapes will lead the market to question whether Ethereum's network strength can no longer support stable token value.

Похожее

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbit35 мин. назад

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbit35 мин. назад

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbit41 мин. назад

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbit41 мин. назад

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbit41 мин. назад

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbit41 мин. назад

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报50 мин. назад

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报50 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить ROUTE

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Router Protocol (ROUTE) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Router Protocol (ROUTE).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Router Protocol (ROUTE)После приобретения вами Router Protocol (ROUTE) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Router Protocol (ROUTE)С легкостью торгуйте Router Protocol (ROUTE) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

427 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2024.04.01Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить ROUTE

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ROUTE (ROUTE) представлены ниже.

活动图片