The AI Era: When the 'Gap Between Human and Dog' Shrinks to the 'Gap Between Humans'

深潮Опубликовано 2025-12-24Обновлено 2025-12-24

Введение

The article discusses how AI era is narrowing the cognitive gap between humans, using a hypothetical scoring system to illustrate the idea. Originally, the difference between individuals (e.g., a elementary student at 10 points vs. Einstein at 100) could be as vast as the difference between humans and dogs. However, with the advent of AI, which is estimated to contribute significantly to human capability (e.g., 80 points in the near term), even a less knowledgeable person equipped with AI can approach the performance of an expert. While some argue that skilled AI users (e.g., prompt engineers) may widen the gap initially, the author believes this is temporary. As AI becomes more intelligent and user-friendly, the barrier to leveraging its full potential will lower. Eventually, AI could reach a point where it contributes so much (e.g., 1000 points) that individual human differences become negligible—like two fighters using rocket launchers, where their original martial arts skills matter little. In the long run, AI will reduce relative disparities between people, even if absolute gaps persist, making expertise more accessible and diminishing the advantage of innate or highly trained human intelligence.

Author: 0xTodd

I didn't expect my last post to spark so much discussion. Essentially, we're all talking about the same thing, just with slightly different descriptions of the numbers.

We've all heard the saying: sometimes the gap between two people is bigger than the gap between a person and a dog. But this saying was born before the current wave of AI.

Today, I'll try to quantify this. The numbers are all rough estimates, just for fun—don't take them too seriously.

Let's say a primary school student's cognitive ability is 10 points, a PhD is 60 points, a university professor is 75 points, and Einstein is 100 points.

The difference between 10 and 100 points is indeed huge—a full 10x difference. It's not wrong to call it the difference between a person and a dog.

However, the AI of 2025 is worth at least 40 points. Considering AI is a generalist, while PhDs and professors are usually specialists, AI's actual value could be at least doubled to 80 points.

So we have:

- Primary student + AI = 90 points

- PhD + AI = 140 points

- Professor + AI = 155 points

- Einstein + AI = 180 points

With AI, the absolute gap between the primary student and Einstein is still 90 points, but the relative gap has shrunk from 10x to 2x.

This is my point: AI is narrowing the gap between humans.

Some might object: That's not right. A primary student certainly can't develop AI like a professor can.

It's like in One Piece, where characters develop their Devil Fruit abilities differently. The same Gomu Gomu no Mi, Luffy in first gear definitely can't beat Luffy years later in fourth gear (a novice vs. a seasoned expert).

Indeed, if AI is worth 80 points:

- Someone who doesn't know how to use it well (e.g., only asks an occasional question) might only get 20 points out of it;

- Someone very skilled at using AI (e.g., high-intensity vibe coding) might overclock it to get even 100 points.

So:

- Primary student + AI novice = 30 points

- Einstein + AI expert = 200 points

The gap has widened from 90 points to 170 points! So with AI, the gap between people has actually increased!

This is the view held by teachers Lao Bai and Alvin, and they are not wrong.

However, I must add a 'but'. While my view seems to conflict with theirs, the core idea is actually similar. Why?

Because I assume AI will continue to evolve:

First, it will become smarter;

Second, it will become easier to use.

The year 2025 is just a transitional period. The further we go, the easier it will become to be a Prompt engineer. The barrier will get lower and lower, to the point where 'having a mouth is enough'. Learning how to use AI will definitely become easier, not harder.

Let's assume that as AI gets smarter, it might reach 240 points. Then the level of utilization could range from low to high: 200, 240, 280 points.

Then:

- Primary student: 10 + 200 = 210 points

- Einstein: 100 + 280 = 380 points

The gap is 170 points, but it's not even 2x anymore—it's only 1.8x. The absolute gap has increased, but the relative gap has shrunk.

What about in 10 years? Let's be super optimistic and assume AI's cognitive ability evolves to around 1000 points.

Then:

- Primary student: 1010 points

- Einstein: 1100 points

(If this day ever comes) Even Einstein won't be able to pull far ahead of the primary student.

People think that the birth of AI has widened the gap between humans. I believe this is only a *temporary state* because AI is just emerging, and currently, people's ability to utilize it varies greatly.

But AI has replaced writers, replaced illustrators, replaced dancers, replaced artists... As these professions fall one by one, are you still worried that AI won't replace the training teachers who 'teach people how to 100% unlock AI's potential'?

Come on, that's its specialty.

In the future, it will be the norm, not the exception, for humans to utilize 80%-120% of AI's potential on average.

The smarter AI gets, the smaller the human role becomes, and the smaller the gap between humans becomes.

It's like two martial arts masters suddenly finding out they are allowed to use rocket launchers. What difference does it make if one has practiced fists and feet for 10 years and the other has practiced sword fighting for 15 years?

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main argument of the article regarding the impact of AI on human intelligence gaps?

AThe article argues that while AI initially seems to widen the absolute gap between individuals (e.g., a novice and an expert user), its long-term effect is to reduce the *relative* gap. As AI becomes smarter and easier to use, the cognitive advantage of highly intelligent individuals (like Einstein) over less intelligent ones (like a elementary student) will diminish, making the difference between humans smaller.

QHow does the author use a numerical example to illustrate the initial effect of AI on a student and a professor?

AThe author assigns a cognitive score of 10 to an elementary student and 75 to a university professor. A 2025 AI is valued at 80 points. When combined, the student scores 90 (10+80) and the professor scores 155 (75+80). The absolute gap is large (65 points), but the relative gap is smaller than the original 'human vs. dog' difference.

QAccording to the author, why do some people believe AI increases the gap, and how does he respond to this view?

ASome believe AI increases the gap because a skilled user (an 'AI expert') can get more value (e.g., 100 points) from an AI than a novice (20 points), thus widening the absolute difference between them. The author agrees this is a temporary state but argues that as AI evolves, it will become easier to use, and the skill of maximizing its potential will be commoditized, reducing the relative gap long-term.

QWhat is the author's prediction about the future development of AI and its usability?

AThe author predicts AI will continue to evolve in two key ways: it will become significantly smarter (e.g., reaching a cognitive score of 1000), and it will become much easier to use, lowering the barrier to entry. Using AI will become as simple as 'having a mouth' (i.e., just speaking to it), and the need for specialized training to unlock its potential will be largely eliminated.

QWhat analogy does the author use to summarize the effect of advanced AI on human competition?

AThe author uses the analogy of two martial arts masters who are suddenly allowed to use rocket launchers. In this scenario, the difference between 10 years of fist-fighting training and 15 years of sword mastery becomes irrelevant because the new technology (the rocket launcher) is the dominant factor, drastically reducing the competitive advantage of individual skill.

Похожее

While Everyone Is Selling Software Stocks, HSBC Says You're Wrong

Amid a severe selloff in software stocks dubbed the "SaaSpocalypse" in early 2026, HSBC’s U.S. tech research head Stephen Bersey published a contrarian report titled "Software Will Eat AI." He argues that the market’s fear—that AI agents will replace traditional enterprise software—is a misjudgment. Instead, Bersey contends that AI will be absorbed into existing software platforms, becoming an embedded capability rather than a disruptor. Key points from the report include: - AI lacks the depth to replace complex enterprise systems due to training data limitations and inability to replicate decades of proprietary business logic. - "Vibe coding" and AI-native approaches overestimate the ability to rebuild reliable, large-scale enterprise software from scratch. - High switching costs and trust in incumbent software providers create durable barriers. Bersey believes software companies with deep data moats and AI integration capabilities—such as Oracle, Microsoft, Salesforce, and ServiceNow—are well-positioned to monetize AI through task-based agents operating within software-defined boundaries. He sees 2026 as the year AI monetization scales within software, driven by inference demand, not training. HSBC recommends buying select software stocks while downgrading others like IBM and Palo Alto Networks, emphasizing that not all will benefit equally. The core thesis: software is the vehicle through which AI delivers scalable, governed enterprise value—not its replacement.

marsbit16 мин. назад

While Everyone Is Selling Software Stocks, HSBC Says You're Wrong

marsbit16 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить ERA

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Caldera (ERA) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Caldera (ERA).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Caldera (ERA)После приобретения вами Caldera (ERA) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Caldera (ERA)С легкостью торгуйте Caldera (ERA) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

354 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.07.17Обновлено 2025.07.17

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ERA (ERA) представлены ниже.

活动图片