30-Year Treasury Yield Breaks 5% Again: The Era of 'Everything Is Cheap' Is Over

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-06-01Обновлено 2026-06-01

Введение

The yield on the 30-year U.S. Treasury bond has again surpassed 5%, signaling a fundamental shift as markets begin to accept that high interest rates are here to stay. This reflects the simultaneous breakdown of three pillars that underpinned half a century of low inflation and low rates: cheap capital, cheap labor, and cheap energy. Global capital flows are shifting, energy security is strained, and labor costs are rising due to shortages and unionization, though partly offset by AI's impact. Long-term pressures like soaring government debt, geopolitical friction, and populism are also pushing up long-term borrowing costs. The role of AI remains the biggest uncertainty—it could boost productivity and lower debt or become a new source of inflation if it merely automates jobs while consuming vast resources. The core challenge for investors is adapting their models and expectations, calibrated during decades of cheap money, to this new, more persistent high-rate environment.

The yield on the 30-year Treasury bond has once again broken through 5%. This time, the market's reaction is markedly different from that in 2023—investors are beginning to truly accept the reality that high interest rates will persist for a long time.

Analysis points out that behind this lies a deeper structural shift: the three pillars supporting low inflation and low interest rates in the U.S. over the past 50 years—cheap capital, cheap labor, and cheap energy—are simultaneously eroding. And the direction of AI will be the biggest unknown determining future inflation trends.

The yield on the 30-year U.S. Treasury bond recently broke through 5% again. Writing in the Financial Times, columnist Rana Foroohar points out that, unlike the brief breach of 5% in 2023 followed by a rapid decline, this time the market's reaction is distinctly different—investors finally seem to be truly accepting the reality that the U.S. is bidding farewell to the era of low interest rates and entering a new phase with more persistent and diverse inflationary pressures.

The article cites a recent report to clients by Apollo chief economist Torsten Sløk, which states, "Investors should position their portfolios for a persistent high interest rate environment in the short, medium, and long term."

Behind this lies a larger structural story: the three cheap factors that drove U.S. economic growth over the past 50 years—cheap capital, cheap labor, and cheap energy—are simultaneously reversing.

How Did Half a Century of "Cheap Dividends" Come About?

The nearly half-century-long downward trend in the 30-year Treasury yield, falling from around double-digit percentages in the early 1980s to about 1% during the pandemic, was not an accident.

It was underpinned by a complete macro logic:

Cheap Capital: Decades of globalization and manufacturing technology advancements kept goods prices low; oil-exporting countries recycling massive petrodollars into the U.S. provided ample cheap funding; pension privatization reforms spurred enormous demand for various financial products; global investors vied to buy U.S. Treasuries, as no country was safer than America.

Cheap Labor: Outsourcing of industries, weakening of unions, automation waves, and the "shareholder primacy" corporate culture (emphasizing financial engineering over employee investment) collectively suppressed wages, especially for non-college-educated workers, persistently supporting corporate profit margins.

Cheap Energy: The petrodollar system helped curb inflation to some extent, and the global energy trade being settled in dollars also reinforced the dollar's global dominance.

These three pillars jointly supported half a century of low-inflation, low-interest-rate prosperity in the U.S.

The Three Pillars Are Simultaneously Loosening

In her article, Rana Foroohar notes that each of these supporting factors is now changing.

On the Capital Front: With each U.S. Treasury auction, international buyers are decreasing, not increasing. Deglobalization and supply chain reshoring will push up goods and services prices in the short term. Meanwhile, the foundation of the petrodollar system is being eroded.

On the Energy Front: Continued tensions in the Middle East directly impact Asian energy-importing countries. But in the longer term, this may accelerate the deployment of clean energy in major Asian nations—while the U.S. is retreating from climate commitments. This means long-term capital flows may shift from the U.S. to major Asian countries.

On the Labor Front: In recent years, labor shortages, large-scale strikes (including successful union action in the auto industry), tighter immigration restrictions, and growth in union membership in some sectors (especially white-collar industries) have all pushed wages higher. However, this trend is being partly offset by two factors: one is rising corporate healthcare insurance costs, leading companies to hedge by suppressing wages; the other is the impact of artificial intelligence.

And Then There Are the Slow Variables: Debt, Geopolitics, and Populism

In addition to the explicit factors above, there are several "slow variables": rising government debt, intensifying geopolitical friction, and the spread of populism.

The combined effect of these risks is that lenders demand a higher risk premium to lend money out—especially for terms of several years.

This directly pushes up long-term interest rates, i.e., the yield on the 30-year Treasury bond.

AI: Savior or New Source of Inflation?

Of all the variables, the direction of artificial intelligence is the most difficult to judge, yet its impact could be the most far-reaching.

Rana Foroohar outlines two starkly different scenarios:

The Optimistic Scenario: The productivity benefits of AI diffuse widely across industries and individuals, creating new jobs and income sources. Models from Yale's Budget Lab show that in this scenario, U.S. national debt would fall significantly, and inflation would also recede.

The Pessimistic Scenario: AI serves merely as a tool for corporate layoffs, cost compression, and profit expansion, while the infrastructure construction of AI itself (consuming vast amounts of chips, land, water, and electricity) creates new inflationary pressures. The net effect is to raise, not lower, costs. Governments would also be forced to bail out displaced workers, increasing debt instead.

Currently, AI giants are voraciously consuming real estate, chips, water resources, and electricity, already pushing up the prices of these resources in the overall economy. The final outcome will likely take years to become clear.

The Real Challenge Facing Investors

The article's conclusion is direct and sobering: Most market participants have spent their entire careers in the "cheap era." Their intuition, models, and expectations were calibrated in a low-interest-rate environment.

And now, that environment is changing.

"Expectational inertia" is a powerful force—when the 30-year yield broke 5% in 2023, many thought it was just a brief anomaly that would soon recede. But this time, the market's reaction is already different.

Adjusting means abandoning old expectations. For investors accustomed to low interest rates, that is no easy task.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main reason behind the recent sustained rise in the 30-year US Treasury yield above 5%, according to the article?

AThe main reason is a deeper structural shift where the three pillars supporting low inflation and low interest rates in the US for the past 50 years—cheap capital, cheap labor, and cheap energy—are simultaneously eroding, leading investors to accept that a high-rate environment is here to stay.

QWhat were the three 'cheap pillars' that drove US economic growth for half a century?

AThe three pillars were cheap capital (from globalization, petrodollar recycling, and high demand for safe US debt), cheap labor (due to outsourcing, weaker unions, automation, and a 'shareholder-first' culture), and cheap energy (supported by the petrodollar system).

QHow might Artificial Intelligence (AI) contribute to future inflation, based on the pessimistic scenario described in the article?

AIn the pessimistic scenario, AI does not boost broad productivity but is used mainly for cost-cutting and layoffs. Meanwhile, AI infrastructure itself (consuming chips, real estate, water, and electricity) creates new inflationary pressures. Governments may also need to bail out displaced workers, increasing debt.

QBesides the three main pillars, what other 'slow-moving' factors are contributing to higher long-term interest rates?

AOther factors include rising government debt, increasing geopolitical friction, and the spread of populism. These factors increase risk premiums, meaning lenders demand higher yields for long-term loans, which pushes up long-end rates like the 30-year Treasury yield.

QWhy is adjusting to the new high-rate environment particularly challenging for investors, as stated in the article's conclusion?

AAdjusting is challenging because most market participants have spent their entire careers in the 'cheap era' of low interest rates. Their instincts, models, and expectations are calibrated for that environment, creating a powerful 'expectational inertia' that makes it difficult to abandon old assumptions.

Похожее

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Charlie Munger's Calculated "Loss-Making Account" Many traders, drawn to speculative tools like futures contracts, often face repeated failures. As the article notes, unless one is a genius, such instruments should be avoided for long-term profit-seeking. Similarly, the practice of short selling is viewed with caution. The author firmly states a policy of not shorting, even when bearish, preferring to simply wait. The core reason? Successful short selling requires exceptionally difficult conditions to profit. Legendary investors Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger have themselves reflected on painful short-selling experiences. Munger highlights two critical flaws in the mathematical logic of shorting: 1. Asymmetrical Risk/Reward: A long position has a maximum loss of 100% but unlimited upside. A short position caps profit at 100% (if a stock falls to zero) but carries theoretically unlimited loss potential. 2. The "Promoter" Problem: Fraudulent or struggling companies can prolong their decline. As Munger said, "You can run out of money before the promoter runs out of ideas," meaning short sellers may be forced to cover positions at a loss before the company's true fate unfolds. The article cites Stanley Druckenmiller, a famed hedge fund manager. He once shorted 12 companies that all eventually went bankrupt. However, intense market rallies forced him to cover his positions within three weeks, resulting in massive losses—$200 million of his capital plus an additional $600 million. He concluded he likely never made money shorting in his career. His experience perfectly illustrates Munger's points: facing unlimited losses and being wiped out before being proven right. The conclusion is clear: for most investors, complex instruments like short selling and derivatives are not viable paths to stable, long-term gains. Self-reflection is advised before repeatedly wasting time and capital on such speculative strategies.

marsbit10 мин. назад

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

marsbit10 мин. назад

For Hedging, Buy Gold and Oil; For Explosive Growth, Buy AI; Bitcoin, the 'Outdated' Asset, Enters a Bear Market

Bitcoin’s price has recently fallen sharply, hitting a two-month low near $66,000, with Ethereum also dropping to a three-month low. While surface explanations point to ETF outflows, geopolitical tensions, and corporate selling, a deeper issue is emerging: Bitcoin is losing a crucial asset competition. For years, Bitcoin thrived in a low-rate environment where investors sought alternatives amid inflation fears and dissatisfaction with traditional options. Now, the market landscape has shifted, leaving Bitcoin stuck in an "awkward middle ground," facing challenges on three fronts: 1. **As an inflation hedge, gold is winning.** Investors worried about persistent inflation are turning to tangible assets like gold, energy stocks, and commodity producers, which offer more direct pricing power and physical backing. 2. **For growth exposure, AI is winning.** Those seeking high growth now favor AI-related companies with actual revenues and profits, an area where Bitcoin's lack of cash flow puts it at a disadvantage. 3. **Within crypto, infrastructure and stablecoins are winning.** Even investors wanting crypto exposure have alternatives like exchanges, stablecoin issuers, and tokenization firms, whose performance is directly tied to real-world adoption and offers clearer operational leverage. The recent market reaction to inflation warnings highlights this shift. Instead of boosting Bitcoin as "digital gold," such news now drives flows toward traditional inflation-sensitive assets. Therefore, recent events like ETF outflows and corporate selling are seen not as causes, but as symptoms of this new reality. Capital has more compelling options, and investors are becoming more selective. The emerging bear case for Bitcoin is no longer about it being a fraud or failed technology, but rather that **scarcity alone is no longer enough**. It is no longer seen as the best hedge, the best growth asset, or the only crypto play.

marsbit26 мин. назад

For Hedging, Buy Gold and Oil; For Explosive Growth, Buy AI; Bitcoin, the 'Outdated' Asset, Enters a Bear Market

marsbit26 мин. назад

SaaS Battle Royale: The Survivors Who Win All Share One Common Trait

**Summary** The AI revolution has triggered a "SaaS apocalypse," forcing a brutal market shakeout. The key dividing line is the pricing model. Companies like Snowflake and Datadog, which charge based on consumption (e.g., data processed or compute used), are thriving. AI workloads actively *generate* more demand for their services, fueling growth. Datadog's accelerating revenue is a prime example. Microsoft and Palantir, as platform/ecosystem players, also benefit by acting as essential channels for AI deployment. In contrast, traditional SaaS firms built on per-seat or per-task licensing (e.g., Intuit, Adobe) face direct pressure, as AI threatens to automate the very human tasks their software supports. Companies like Salesforce, a per-seat giant, are caught in the middle. While showing strong AI monetization (e.g., its Agentforce platform) and experimenting with consumption-based "Flex Credits," its stock remains under pressure, illustrating that the market rewards *completed* transitions, not just the intent. The recent Microsoft Build conference underscored key trends: AI is evolving from an assistant to an autonomous "agent," and platform providers like Microsoft are consolidating their control. The market's recovery is highly selective, focused on identifying which companies are "fed by AI" versus "eaten by AI." Future focus will be on the diffusion of this recovery to transforming companies and the real-world adoption data of AI agents like Microsoft Copilot.

marsbit43 мин. назад

SaaS Battle Royale: The Survivors Who Win All Share One Common Trait

marsbit43 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить ERA

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Caldera (ERA) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Caldera (ERA).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Caldera (ERA)После приобретения вами Caldera (ERA) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Caldera (ERA)С легкостью торгуйте Caldera (ERA) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

723 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.07.17Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить ERA

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ERA (ERA) представлены ниже.

活动图片