Elizabeth Warren Urges Fed and Treasury to Reject Crypto Bailouts

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-19Обновлено 2026-02-19

Введение

Senator Elizabeth Warren has urged the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department to avoid using taxpayer funds to bail out cryptocurrency firms and billionaires, warning that such actions would be highly unpopular. In a letter addressed to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Warren argued that government intervention—such as direct Bitcoin purchases or liquidity support—would primarily benefit wealthy crypto investors. She criticized a recent response from Bessent as evasive when questioned about potential crypto bailouts. Warren's stance highlights ongoing political and regulatory debates around cryptocurrency, emphasizing that digital assets lack clear federal oversight and should not receive public rescue packages akin to traditional financial bailouts. The letter also noted concerns that bailouts could indirectly assist entities like World Liberty Financial, linked to the Trump family.

Senator Elizabeth Warren has written a letter to the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department, advising them not to use taxpayer dollars to bail out billionaires involved in the cryptocurrency market. It was stated in the letter that the bailout would be very unpopular with American taxpayers. The bailout may also help the Trump family’s cryptocurrency company, World Liberty Financial.

Warren’s Comments and Letter

The price of Bitcoin was down by more than 50% from its record high when Warren released her warning. According to CNBC, the letter was written to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. Warren referred to the hearing of the annual report of the Financial Stability Oversight Council in her letter. Congressman Brad Sherman had asked Bessent about the ability of the Treasury to bail out Bitcoins or other cryptocurrencies. Bessent clarified that the seized Bitcoins that are currently being held by the government do not involve any taxpayer funds. Warren called this a deflection of the question rather than an answer.

The remarks by Warren were in line with her argument that the intervention by the government in the form of Bitcoin stabilization would benefit crypto billionaires. The letter by Warren argued that the regulators should not participate in the direct purchase of Bitcoin on behalf of the taxpayers. The senator also opposed the provision of guarantees and liquidity facilities for crypto firms using public funds. The stand by Warren on the matter occurred at a time when the political debate on the regulation and regulation of crypto continues. World Liberty Financial hosted a forum for crypto firm executives on the same day as the letter. The forum took place at the President’s private club in Florida. The remarks by the commissioner are part of the political considerations in U.S. financial policies.

Political and Regulatory Environment

Bailouts have conventionally been employed by the government as a tool for stabilizing the financial sector in a state of extreme crisis. The 2008 banking crisis was a major occurrence that needed intensive intervention to avert an economic meltdown. However, digital currencies do not have federal frameworks for regulation by the government. Warren pointed out that a lack of clarity and poor regulation could pose bailout risks.

The topic of crypto bailouts is relevant to the financial stability of the U.S. There are no plans from the regulators to carry out rescue measures in the crypto market. The letter from Warren is in support of drawing a clear distinction between crypto bailouts and government bailouts.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong Points to Significant Progress on Clarity Act

TagsBitcoinBitcoin (BTC)Bitcoin BTCElizabeth WarrenFederal ReserveFederalReserveJerome PowellUS FederalUS TreasuryWorld Liberty Financial

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main purpose of Elizabeth Warren's letter to the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department?

ATo advise them not to use taxpayer dollars to bail out billionaires involved in the cryptocurrency market.

QWhich specific officials did Senator Warren address her letter to?

ATreasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell.

QWhat was Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's response regarding government-held Bitcoin?

AHe clarified that the seized Bitcoins currently held by the government do not involve any taxpayer funds.

QAccording to Warren, what would be the consequence of government intervention in Bitcoin stabilization?

AIt would benefit crypto billionaires at the expense of American taxpayers.

QWhat historical financial crisis was mentioned as an example of government bailouts?

AThe 2008 banking crisis which required intensive government intervention to avert an economic meltdown.

Похожее

Wall Street's Most Mysterious Money Machine: Dumping Bitcoin at 10 AM Sharp Every Day

A mysterious pattern dubbed the "Jane 10 AM Dump" has been observed in Bitcoin markets, where prices drop sharply each day at 10 AM EST, coinciding with the US stock market open. Traders and media, including ZeroHedge, point to Jane Street, a major market maker and large holder of BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF (IBIT), as the likely orchestrator—selling at 10 AM to then buy back at lower prices. This theory gained traction amid a lawsuit from Terraform Labs' bankruptcy estate. The suit alleges Jane Street used insider information to exit TerraUSD (UST) positions just before its May 2022 collapse, avoiding $40 billion in losses. Key to the case is a former Terra intern, Bryce Pratt, who joined Jane Street and allegedly ran a secret chat group ("Bryce's Secret") to funnel non-public information from Terraform insiders. The complaint details that Jane Street, which had a prior trading relationship with Terraform, withdrew 85 million UST from a liquidity pool minutes after Terraform secretly pulled 150 million UST—before public panic began. Chain analysis suggests Jane Street systematically reduced exposure pre-collapse. Further supporting the pattern of misconduct, India's regulator SEBI fined Jane Street a record $570 million for a "pump-and-dump" scheme manipulating banking index options, exploiting retail investors. While unproven, the cases depict Jane Street as a powerful, secretive firm adept at leveraging information advantages, now under scrutiny for practices that blur ethical and legal lines. The "10 AM dump" pattern reportedly stopped after the Terra lawsuit, adding circumstantial weight to the allegations.

marsbit4 мин. назад

Wall Street's Most Mysterious Money Machine: Dumping Bitcoin at 10 AM Sharp Every Day

marsbit4 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片