SEC Drops Civil Lawsuit Against Gemini Trust Company

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-24Обновлено 2026-01-24

Введение

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has dismissed its civil lawsuit against Gemini Trust Company with prejudice, meaning the case cannot be reopened. This decision follows the full repayment of crypto assets to all affected Gemini Earn users through the Genesis Global Capital bankruptcy process between May and June 2024. The SEC cited the complete return of investors' crypto and the resolution of harm as key reasons for dropping the lawsuit. The case originated from a 2020 partnership between Gemini and Genesis, which froze $900 million in user assets during the 2023 market downturn. Gemini contributed significant funds and penalties to help resolve the situation and settle with regulators.

The Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States has officially dismissed its civil lawsuit against Gemini Trust Company. This move indicates a major comfort for the crypto exchange founders Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss.

The decision is followed by Gemini Earn users getting all their crypto back, bringing an end to a long legal case that initiated in 2023. As per the filing of 23rd January 2026, the SEC and Gemini Trust Company came together to drop the case with prejudice, which means it can’t be opened in the future.

The Securities and Exchange Commission mentioned that the decision was made using its own judgement, with investor repayment playing a significant role. All Gemini Earn users who were affected got a complete return of their crypto assets. The repayment wasn’t done in cash, and it was completed via the Genesis Global Capital bankruptcy process between May and June 2024.

The SEC further mentioned that after returning users’ crypto completely, the harm to investors was prominently reduced. The regulator also highlighted that Gemini has so far settled associated issues with a lot of state regulators.

The Complete Closure

Amalgamated, these steps backed the decision to completely drop the lawsuit. The case traces back to December 2020, when Gemini collaborated with Genesis, a crypto lending firm associated with Digital Currency Group.

As per this arrangement, Gemini users could lend their crypto to Genesis and get interest payments. Problems initiated when Genesis broke at the time of the wider crypto market downturn.

Withdrawals got frozen, and $900 million in crypto assets were left, associated with around 340,000 users locked and inaccessible. For resolving the situation, Gemini contributed around $40 million in Bitcoin and $10 million in other assets.

It further contributed a $37 million penalty for a different settlement with New York regulators. Gradually, Gemini worked through various legal and regulatory processes at state as well as federal levels, having the complete repayment of users appearing as the prominent milestone in terminating the case.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

ARK Invest Enters Broader Crypto ETFs With CoinDesk 20

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhy did the SEC dismiss its civil lawsuit against Gemini Trust Company?

AThe SEC dismissed the lawsuit based on its own judgment, citing the complete repayment of crypto assets to Gemini Earn users as a significant factor that reduced investor harm.

QWhat does the dismissal 'with prejudice' mean for the case against Gemini?

AA dismissal 'with prejudice' means the case is permanently closed and cannot be reopened or refiled in the future.

QHow and when were the affected Gemini Earn users repaid their crypto assets?

AThe repayment was completed in-kind (not in cash) through the Genesis Global Capital bankruptcy process between May and June 2024.

QWhat was the initial problem that led to the SEC's lawsuit against Gemini?

AThe lawsuit stemmed from a program where Gemini users lent crypto to Genesis, which then froze withdrawals during a market downturn, locking up $900 million in assets belonging to 340,000 users.

QWhat other significant financial contributions did Gemini make to resolve this situation?

ABeyond facilitating user repayments, Gemini contributed $40 million in Bitcoin, $10 million in other assets, and paid a $37 million penalty in a separate settlement with New York regulators.

Похожее

Whale adds 1.5 mln PENDLE: Is the token reversing after a 65% dip?

Pendle (PENDLE) has declined over 65% since August 2025 but is showing signs of a potential reversal. A whale withdrew 1.5 million PENDLE tokens ($2.82 million) from Binance and time-locked them until 2028, indicating strong long-term conviction. Staking activity has also risen, surpassing 11 million tokens, reducing selling pressure. Currently trading at $1.96, PENDLE is up 4.95% in 24 hours with a 13% increase in volume. Historical patterns suggest a possible 22% rise to $2.38 if it holds above $1.70 support. Traders are leaning bullish with more long positions, though short-term sentiment remains cautious as price trades below the 50-day EMA.

ambcrypto5 мин. назад

Whale adds 1.5 mln PENDLE: Is the token reversing after a 65% dip?

ambcrypto5 мин. назад

Cathie Wood's Remarks Spark Rare Reputation Crisis for Binance and CZ

Wood's comments on a recent program, where she linked Bitcoin's decline to a $28 billion deleveraging event caused by a Binance software glitch on October 10, have sparked widespread criticism against Binance and its founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) on social media platform X. Many KOLs are labeling CZ a "scammer," accusing him of a "collapsed public image" and facing a "backlash of influence." The criticism primarily focuses on the "1011 event," where Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies crashed, resulting in over $500 billion wiped from the global crypto market cap and more than $19 billion in leveraged positions liquidated. Mainstream opinion holds that Binance's abnormal liquidation mechanism was closely related to the incident, and the exchange later modified the price charts for some tokens. Due to Wood's significant influence in both traditional finance and crypto, her remarks reignited painful memories of the 1011 event among investors, further aggravating sentiment in the already sluggish market. Early critics, including Leonidas, co-founder of Zap/Ord.io, and trader Anglio, sharply condemned CZ, calling him the "biggest fraud in human history" and blaming him for the massive liquidations. The backlash, initially concentrated in English-language circles, eventually spread to Chinese communities on X, where influential figures also began criticizing Binance. OKX founder Star Xu commented that the incident caused real and lasting damage to the industry, urging leading companies to focus on strengthening infrastructure and building trust. In response, CZ and Binance co-founder He Yi dismissed the criticisms as organized attacks and competitive smear campaigns. CZ pointed to coordinated negative posts, while He Yi framed the discussions as part of broader structural changes and industry conflicts. Some KOLs supported this view, suggesting Wood’s statements might reflect Western capital interests. However, deflecting blame entirely onto competitors and "water army" attacks has further damaged user sentiment. In a bear market, investors often seek outlets for frustration, and as the industry's largest beneficiary, CZ has become a target for accumulated discontent over issues like token listing quality and ecosystem development. Yet, reducing him to the "industry's biggest scammer" overlooks market cycles, investor responsibility, and platform scale, which may not be entirely fair. In the end, in this still-wild industry marked by high volatility and strong cycles, there is no pure "savior" nor perpetual "demon."

marsbit56 мин. назад

Cathie Wood's Remarks Spark Rare Reputation Crisis for Binance and CZ

marsbit56 мин. назад

WLFI Price Holds Around $0.1686 After Recent Sideways Movement

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) is trading around $0.1686, maintaining a sideways trend after recent volatility. The token saw a 6.4% gain in the past 24 hours, reaching an intraday high of $0.1723, while its market cap stands at $4.5 billion. Technically, WLFI is consolidating near key moving averages, with the RSI at 56 indicating neutral momentum. The MACD shows flattening movement, suggesting a pause in trend strength. Support is near $0.16, with resistance around $0.18–$0.19. Recent developments include the launch of the World Liberty Markets web app, though governance issues have sparked debates over transparency due to insider-influenced voting.

TheNewsCrypto1 ч. назад

WLFI Price Holds Around $0.1686 After Recent Sideways Movement

TheNewsCrypto1 ч. назад

Coinbase UK Ads Crossed A Line—Here’s What Regulators Said

Coinbase's advertising campaign in the UK has been banned by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for trivializing investment risks and failing to provide adequate risk warnings. The campaign, which included a satirical musical-style video and posters, linked crypto investment to solving real-world financial pressures like the cost of living crisis. The ASA ruled that this approach misleadingly presented a complex, high-risk product as a simple solution. Clearcast, the UK’s TV ad vetting body, had already refused to approve the video due to missing risk disclaimers. Coinbase defended the ads as social commentary, but regulators upheld the decision, reflecting broader efforts to tighten rules on financial promotions—especially in crypto, where ads must clearly communicate volatility and potential risks.

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Coinbase UK Ads Crossed A Line—Here’s What Regulators Said

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

‘No deposit flight’: Galaxy disputes Standard Chartered’s $500B stablecoin risk

Standard Chartered Bank warns that U.S. banks, particularly regional ones, could lose $500 billion in deposits by 2028 due to growing adoption of stablecoins, which they see as a structural risk. The bank also projects the stablecoin market could grow to $2 trillion in the same period. However, Galaxy’s head of research, Alex Thorn, disputes the idea of "deposit flight," arguing that funds would merely "migrate" rather than leave the banking system entirely. He compares it to money market funds, where cash ultimately returns to banks through treasury purchases. The debate highlights ongoing tensions between the crypto and banking industries.

ambcrypto1 ч. назад

‘No deposit flight’: Galaxy disputes Standard Chartered’s $500B stablecoin risk