Phantom Secures CFTC Exemption Letter, Enabling Crypto Wallets to Directly Connect to Compliant Derivatives Markets for the First Time

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-03-18Обновлено 2026-03-18

Введение

Phantom has secured a no-action relief letter from the CFTC, allowing its non-custodial crypto wallet to directly connect users to regulated derivatives and event contract markets—without requiring Phantom to register as an introducing broker. This marks the first global exemption of its kind. The approval enables Phantom to serve as a direct interface for users to submit orders to CFTC-registered exchanges, such as Designated Contract Markets (DCMs), while ensuring user funds are never held by Phantom. The exemption includes specific conditions to protect users and align with CFTC policy priorities. Phantom adopted a proactive compliance approach—engaging with regulators early and seeking clarity before launch, rather than building first and seeking forgiveness later. The company believes this sets a new precedent for constructive regulatory collaboration in crypto. The CFTC indicated it may develop future rules or guidance that could replace this exemption. Phantom hopes its efforts help establish a lasting framework benefiting the broader industry. The move reinforces Phantom’s commitment to offering secure, compliant, and user-centric financial access in crypto.

Author: Phantom

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide TechFlow Introduction: Phantom has obtained a profoundly significant exemption letter from the CFTC—crypto wallets no longer need to register as "introducing brokers" to directly connect users with compliant derivatives and event contract exchanges.

This is the world's first case of this model, and Phantom's approach itself is noteworthy:

Proactively engaging with regulators, ensuring compliance before launch, rather than building first and seeking forgiveness later—this approach may set a new precedent for the crypto industry's interactions with regulatory agencies.

Full Text Below:

We are thrilled to announce that the CFTC has confirmed via a no-action relief letter: Phantom, in collaboration with CFTC-registered partners, can directly provide users with access to regulated markets within the Phantom application without registering as an introducing broker.

This is a significant milestone and an achievement we are honored to have advanced together with the CFTC.

Content of the Exemption Letter

As a software provider, Phantom can now serve as a non-custodial interface to connect users to registered exchanges (e.g., Designated Contract Markets, DCMs) without assuming the regulatory obligations of an introducing broker.

The letter includes several conditions designed to ensure the CFTC's policy priorities are met while protecting user rights.

Under this model, users can submit orders directly to registered exchanges, with Phantom never handling customer funds. This provision specifically applies to custodial models with registered exchange partners and does not cover DeFi derivatives or tokenized prediction markets.

Our Approach

The entire process that led to Phantom securing this exemption letter exemplifies how regulatory procedures should ideally function.

We are grateful to the CFTC for keeping its doors open to support progress. We proactively engaged with the CFTC to seek clear guidance on how to provide users with access to regulated markets through registered partners as a non-custodial interface without having to register as an intermediary ourselves.

Instead of choosing to build first and seek forgiveness later, we took a different path to provide users with a safe and reliable way to access traditional financial markets. This letter is the result of that process.

Implications Beyond Phantom

This is the world's first exemption of its kind for this specific model. The CFTC's letter acknowledges that they are working on rules or guidance that may replace this letter in the future. We hope our involvement will contribute to forming a lasting framework that benefits the entire industry.

We also extend our thanks to the CFTC for collaborating with us seriously and in good faith. Addressing truly groundbreaking legal issues requires effort from both sides, and this outcome reflects a mutual willingness to do the work rather than defaulting to rejection.

Phantom was founded on the belief that crypto should be safe and easy to use. We are committed to continuing to lead the development of innovative, compliant, and user-first products.

"The key to making crypto safe and easy to use lies in creating financial products governed by clear, reasonable regulations. Engaging with regulators early and finding compliant pathways, when necessary, leads to better outcomes for users, the industry, and regulators themselves. This letter is proof of that.

We appreciate the CFTC's collaboration in addressing this truly groundbreaking issue and look forward to launching more innovative products in a way that instills user confidence and sets the right precedents."

—Brandon Millman, CEO

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the significance of Phantom receiving a no-action relief letter from the CFTC?

AThe CFTC's no-action relief letter allows Phantom to directly connect users to regulated markets, such as designated contract markets (DCMs), within its non-custodial wallet application without requiring Phantom to register as an introducing broker. This is a global first for this specific model and represents a major milestone in regulatory compliance for crypto wallets.

QHow does Phantom's approach to regulatory compliance differ from the 'build first, ask for forgiveness later' method?

APhantom proactively engaged with the CFTC to seek clear guidance on how to provide access to regulated markets through registered partners without registering as an intermediary itself. This approach of 'compliance first, then launch' contrasts with the common industry practice of building products first and addressing regulatory issues afterward.

QWhat are the key conditions outlined in the CFTC's no-action relief letter for Phantom?

AThe letter includes several conditions to ensure CFTC policy priorities are met and user rights are protected. A key condition is that users submit orders directly to registered exchanges, and Phantom never handles customer funds. This model specifically applies to custodial arrangements with registered exchange partners and does not cover DeFi derivatives or tokenized prediction markets.

QWhy is this exemption considered a potential new template for the crypto industry's interaction with regulators?

AThe process of Phantom actively communicating with the CFTC, seeking guidance, and obtaining formal approval before launching the service demonstrates a collaborative approach to regulation. This path of engaging regulators early to find a compliant solution could serve as a new model for the industry, leading to better outcomes for users, the industry, and regulators themselves.

QWhat does Phantom's CEO, Brandon Millman, say is key to making crypto safe and easy to use?

ABrandon Millman states that the key to making crypto safe and easy to use is 'building financial products that are constrained by clear, sensible regulation.' He emphasizes that engaging with regulators early to find a compliant path, when necessary, leads to better results for everyone involved, as evidenced by this no-action letter.

Похожее

From 'Global Computer/Settlement Layer' to 'Bulletin Board': What Are Ethereum and Vitalik Trying to Achieve?

In a significant shift of perspective, Vitalik Buterin recently proposed that Ethereum's core value may not lie in its function as a "world computer" or "global settlement layer," but rather as a simple yet powerful primitive: a cryptographically secure, globally shared "public bulletin board." This concept emphasizes data availability—a neutral, uncensorable, and permanent data layer where anyone can read and write information, but no single entity (including governments or developers) can alter or erase it. This "global shared memory" supports applications like secure voting systems, certificate revocation lists, and decentralized coordination—scenarios that require verifiable and tamper-proof data publishing rather than complex on-chain execution. The emergence of AI further validates this direction. As AI agents and services grow, so does the need for privacy-preserving and trustless interactions. Proposals like ZK API Usage Credits illustrate how Ethereum can enable anonymous AI model access and agent-to-agent economic coordination, relying precisely on the blockchain’s transparent and immutable data layer. Rather than a step back, this reframing represents a maturation of Ethereum’s vision—from defining what it can do to serving as essential infrastructure for what the world truly needs: a foundational layer of truth in an increasingly automated and opaque digital era.

marsbit13 мин. назад

From 'Global Computer/Settlement Layer' to 'Bulletin Board': What Are Ethereum and Vitalik Trying to Achieve?

marsbit13 мин. назад

When Wall Street's ETH Starts to 'Earn': From BlackRock's ETHB to Ethereum's Asset Attribute Shift

Wall Street Embraces Staking: BlackRock's ETHB and Ethereum's Shift to a Yield-Generating Asset On March 12, 2026, BlackRock launched the iShares Staked Ethereum Trust (ETHB) on Nasdaq, a groundbreaking Ethereum ETF that not only holds spot ETH but also stakes a significant portion (70-95%) of its assets to generate and distribute yield to investors. This move effectively answers a long-debated question: whether ETH can be accepted by mainstream finance as a yield-bearing asset. ETHB operates by delegating staking to professional validators like Figment via Coinbase Prime. It distributes approximately 82% of the staking rewards (estimated at 2.3%-2.5% APY after fees) to shareholders monthly, while retaining 18% as service fees and charging a 0.25% annual management fee. This provides a predictable, automated cash flow, though it lacks the compounding effect of native on-chain staking unless investors manually reinvest distributions. This development is significant as it marks the formal entry of staking—a core crypto-native activity—into Wall Street's asset framework. Under new SEC leadership, regulatory barriers have eased, allowing BlackRock to legitimize staking rewards as a viable investment return. This paves the way for other PoS-based ETFs (e.g., Solana, Cardano) and may shift substantial capital from traditional spot ETFs to yield-generating products. While on-chain staking options remain popular (e.g., native staking, liquid staking via Lido/Rocket Pool, or wallet-based staking), ETHB’s introduction signals a broader shift: ETH is increasingly viewed not just as a speculative asset, but as a productive, cash-flow-generating machine. The trend of making assets "work" is now irreversible, whether through traditional financial products or decentralized protocols.

marsbit1 ч. назад

When Wall Street's ETH Starts to 'Earn': From BlackRock's ETHB to Ethereum's Asset Attribute Shift

marsbit1 ч. назад

The 4 Truths and Fee Traps Behind Polymarket's LP Market Making Incentives

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, has recently shifted its focus to incentivizing liquidity providers (LPs) to address its core issue of low liquidity. While most markets remain free, it now charges a taker fee on specific markets like crypto price movements and select sports events. This fee, highest near 50% probability, funds new LP reward programs. There are two primary reward systems: one pays LPs when their limit orders are executed (maker rewards), and another rewards simply for placing orders within a set spread to provide liquidity, even if they don't get filled. A third mechanism allows anyone to sponsor additional incentives for specific markets. A positive view argues this structure values genuine liquidity over mere trading volume, making fees earned and rewards received a potential key, anti-sybil metric for a future POLY token airdrop. It rewards users who improve market depth and stability. A contrasting, negative view claims the LP program is a "trap." Critics argue that professional market makers avoid it due to insider trading risks and that most LPs are actually losing money due to hidden "LP wear and tear" (impermanent loss), only participating based on speculation of a valuable airdrop. They warn that if Polymarket expands fees to fund these unsustainable rewards, it could lose its competitive edge of zero fees and better odds compared to traditional sportsbooks. Proposed solutions include a fixed fee only on profits, using a native POLY pool for liquidity, or charging for premium products like parlays instead of core markets.

marsbit3 ч. назад

The 4 Truths and Fee Traps Behind Polymarket's LP Market Making Incentives

marsbit3 ч. назад

The 4 Truths Behind Polymarket's LP Market-Making Incentives and the Fee Trap

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, has recently shifted its incentive structure towards rewarding Liquidity Providers (LPs) to solve its core problem of low market depth. While most markets remain free, it now charges a taker fee on specific markets (all Crypto markets, NCAAB basketball, and Serie A football) to fund new LP reward programs. The fee is calculated on a symmetric curve, highest near 50% probability. The platform has introduced two main incentive systems: one rewards LPs whose limit orders are executed (Maker Incentives), and another rewards LPs simply for providing resting liquidity, even if orders aren't filled (Liquidity Incentives). A third system allows anyone to sponsor additional rewards for specific markets. A key argument is that the fees paid and rewards earned could be a strong anti-sybil metric for a potential POLY token airdrop, valuing genuine liquidity provision over mere trading volume. However, a counter viewpoint argues the LP program is a potential trap. Critics claim that the displayed ROI for LPs is misleading as it doesn't account for "LP wear and tear"—losses from filled orders that can't be easily exited. They state professional market makers avoid it due to insider trading risks and that the model of subsidizing liquidity with massive daily rewards is unsustainable. The concern is that widespread fee implementation could erase Polymarket's competitive edge over traditional betting platforms. Proposed solutions include a fixed fee on profits only, using a POLY token for native liquidity, and charging for premium products like parlays instead of core markets.

Odaily星球日报3 ч. назад

The 4 Truths Behind Polymarket's LP Market-Making Incentives and the Fee Trap

Odaily星球日报3 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片