Crypto Hacks Drop to $26.5M in February Amid Security Gains

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-02Обновлено 2026-03-02

Введение

Crypto hacks and scams plummeted to a multi-year low in February, totaling approximately $26.5 million across 15 incidents. This represents a significant 69.2% decrease from January's $86 million in losses. The two largest attacks accounted for the majority: a $10 million price manipulation hack on YieldBlox’s lending pool and an $8.9 million private key exploit on IoTeX. Security firm PeckShield attributed the sharp decline to a lack of "mega-hacks" and a shift in focus due to market volatility. Analysts suggest capital is becoming more selective, rewarding protocols with stronger security, and that improved risk controls, audits, and AI-powered tools are contributing to a broader trend of enhanced crypto security.

Last month recorded the lowest level of crypto hacks and scams since March 2025, having $26.5 million stolen since February, as reported by the blockchain security company PeckShield.

Around 15 cases were reported in the month, in which two accounted for the majority of the losses, with the biggest accounting for the $10 million theft from YieldBlox’s DAO-managed lending pool through a price manipulation hack on February 21, as reported by PeckShield at X on March 1.

The second-biggest hack targeted the decentralised identity protocol IoTeX, which lost around $8.9 million to a private key exploit on Feb 21. In total, February indicates a 69.2% month-on-month fall from January, which listed more than $86 million in losses.

What Did the Spokesperson Mention?

A spokesperson from PeckShield mentioned that mega-hacks, like the $1.5 billion Bybit hack in February last year, did not inflate last month’s statistics, and market volatility resulted in a significant cooling period in exploit activity.

The spokesperson further mentioned that a sharp market correction in early February, having Bitcoin slip below $70,000, moved the focus of the industry toward institutional deleveraging and math-based sell-offs.

At the time of high-volatility periods, the tactical aim mostly shifts away from protocol exploits toward navigating market liquidity. Dominick John, a Kronos Research analyst, mentioned that the shift could also show tighter risk controls, stronger counterparty standards and amplified real-time monitoring over major venues.

He further went on, mentioning that Capital is shifting to become more selective, rewarding protocols with mature security frameworks. John mentioned losses could carry on to slip by the year as audits, monitoring, and institutional risk frameworks mature.

AI might also intensify the shift, backing automated code reviews, anomaly detection, and pre-deployment attack simulations to catch vulnerabilities earlier in the lifecycle. Crypto security is intensifying, and protocols are doubling down on audits, formal verification, and real-time monitoring.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Will AAVE Reset Monthly Momentum or Lose Steam and Remain in the Red?

TagsBybitCrypto AttackHack

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the total amount stolen in crypto hacks and scams in February, as reported by PeckShield?

A$26.5 million.

QWhich two major hacks accounted for the majority of the losses in February, and what were the amounts?

AThe $10 million theft from YieldBlox’s DAO-managed lending pool and the $8.9 million hack targeting the IoTeX protocol.

QWhat was the month-on-month percentage decrease in crypto losses from January to February?

AA 69.2% decrease.

QAccording to the spokesperson, what factor contributed to a significant cooling period in exploit activity?

AMarket volatility.

QHow might AI contribute to improving crypto security, as mentioned in the article?

ABy backing automated code reviews, anomaly detection, and pre-deployment attack simulations to catch vulnerabilities earlier.

Похожее

Arthur Hayes' New Article: It's 'No-Trade Zone' Time

Arthur Hayes argues that the current market is in a "no-trade zone," a period of high uncertainty created by two converging forces: the deflationary shock from AI and the inflationary shock from geopolitics. AI agents are rapidly displacing knowledge workers, eroding their incomes and creditworthiness, which will eventually trigger a deflationary financial crisis in consumer credit-dependent Western economies. Simultaneously, the war in the Middle East, particularly the potential disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, threatens global energy supplies and could force nations to abandon the dollar system. Hayes outlines three main scenarios: 1) A return to normalcy, where the deflationary AI shock remains the primary concern; 2) The "Tehran Toll Booth," where Iran controls the Strait and demands payment in gold or yuan, accelerating the end of dollar hegemony; and 3) "Empire Strikes Back," where the US destroys Iran's capabilities but risks a catastrophic regional war that sends commodity prices soaring. In all but the most extreme scenarios, Hayes posits that the key driver for Bitcoin's price will be the *quantity* of money, not its price (interest rates). He expects that governments, forced to fund wars and stockpile resources, will have to print money, expanding the money supply. This would be bullish for fixed-supply assets like Bitcoin, even if it occurs alongside rising rates. However, he cautions that until this liquidity is explicitly unleashed (e.g., when bond market volatility spikes), the risk/reward for new long positions is poor. His current strategy is to wait for a clear signal of monetary expansion before deploying capital, preferring to hold gold and select crypto assets in the meantime.

marsbit57 мин. назад

Arthur Hayes' New Article: It's 'No-Trade Zone' Time

marsbit57 мин. назад

a16z Founder: In the Agent Era, What Truly Matters Has Changed

Marc Andreessen, co-founder of a16z, argues that the current AI boom is not an overnight success but the culmination of 80 years of research, now delivering practical results. He emphasizes that this era is defined by the convergence of four key capabilities: large language models (LLMs), reasoning, coding, and agents capable of recursive self-improvement. Andreessen describes the agent architecture—combining an LLM with a shell, file system, markdown, and cron/loop—as a fundamental shift beyond chatbots. This structure leverages existing software components, allowing agents to maintain state, introspect, and extend their own functionality. He predicts a move away from traditional GUI and browser-based interactions toward an "agent-first" world where software is primarily operated by bots, not humans, with people simply stating their goals. He draws parallels to the 2000 internet bubble but notes key differences: current AI infrastructure investments are led by cash-rich giants and quickly monetized. He highlights that scaling constraints involve not just GPUs but the entire chip ecosystem. Open source and edge inference are crucial for democratizing knowledge and enabling low-latency, cost-effective applications on local hardware. Finally, Andreessen identifies significant non-technical challenges: potential short-term cybersecurity crises, the need for "proof of human" identity solutions, financial infrastructure for agents, and institutional resistance from sectors like education and healthcare. He cautions that societal adoption will be slower than technological change.

marsbit1 ч. назад

a16z Founder: In the Agent Era, What Truly Matters Has Changed

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片