2026-06-14 Воскресенье

Новостной центр - Страница 740

Получайте криптоновости и тенденции рынка в режиме реального времени с помощью Новостного центра HTX.

Hong Kong Inland Revenue Department's Latest FAQ: How to Determine Tax Residency for the "Dual-City Lifestyle"?

Hong Kong's Inland Revenue Department (IRD) has updated its Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) to clarify how the "tie-breaker rules" under the Mainland China-Hong Kong Comprehensive Double Taxation Arrangement (CDTA) determine the tax residency of individuals with dual residency claims. With increasing cross-border work and living between Hong Kong and Mainland China, many individuals may meet the residency criteria of both jurisdictions simultaneously. The CDTA’s tie-breaker rules are essential to resolve such conflicts and prevent double taxation. The FAQ emphasizes that residency is not determined by a single factor, such as holding a Mainland household registration (hukou) or the number of days spent in Hong Kong (over 180 days). Instead, a comprehensive analysis is applied based on the following hierarchical criteria: 1. Location of the individual's permanent home; 2. The jurisdiction with which their personal and economic relations are closer (centre of vital interests); 3. Their habitual abode; 4. Mutual agreement by the tax authorities of both sides if unresolved. Key factors considered include the residence of family members (spouse, children), location of employment and salary payment, social security contributions, and business investments. The update provides practical examples (e.g., individuals under talent schemes, "dual-city" lifestyles) to illustrate how these rules are applied in real-world scenarios, offering clearer guidance for frequent cross-border commuters. This clarification signifies a move towards more precise and sophisticated cross-border tax administration, reflecting enhanced regulatory capabilities and greater transparency in tax information exchange.

marsbit02/11 15:26

Hong Kong Inland Revenue Department's Latest FAQ: How to Determine Tax Residency for the "Dual-City Lifestyle"?

marsbit02/11 15:26

Trading Volume Hits New Highs Repeatedly, Why Is Kalshi's Pre-IPO Stock Price Experiencing a Tale of Extremes?

Amidst a declining broader market, the prediction market sector has shown remarkable resilience, with trading activity hitting record highs. Kalshi, the largest regulated prediction market platform in the U.S., reached over $9.5 billion in trading volume in January, ranking first in the sector and setting a new monthly record. This has sparked renewed discussions about the fair pre-IPO share price of Kalshi, which is poised to become the "first prediction market stock." Currently, significant price discrepancies exist on crypto-based pre-IPO trading platforms: PreStocks lists Kalshi shares between $364 and $369, while Jarsy shows a price of around $504. In traditional markets, Nasdaq Private Market prices shares at approximately $320, and Hiive at $358. Kalshi completed a Series E funding round last year at a $11 billion valuation. Based on this, the reasonable pre-IPO share price range is estimated to be between $320 and $358. However, considering Kalshi's dominant market share and January volume nearing the entire prediction market's size from October last year, its implied valuation could be at least $15 billion. This would adjust the reasonable share price range to approximately $320–$423. Thus, Jarsy's current pricing appears high, while PreStocks may present arbitrage opportunities. With 2026 being a major year for global sporting events, Kalshi's annual revenue potential is significant, likely exceeding earlier estimates for competitor Polymarket, which could further drive up its pre-IPO valuation in the future.

比推02/11 15:25

Trading Volume Hits New Highs Repeatedly, Why Is Kalshi's Pre-IPO Stock Price Experiencing a Tale of Extremes?

比推02/11 15:25

Stop Paying Attention to These Zombie Projects

The crypto market in 2025 is marked by extreme contradictions: while over 20 million tokens have been launched, more than 57% have failed. A new wave of "zombie projects"—backed by top VCs and listed on major exchanges—continues to operate with minimal product development or real-world utility. This analysis highlights several疑似僵尸化 projects: - **Sleepless AI**: Once a Binance Labs incubator star, its token fell 99% from its peak. It promises AI-driven emotional companions but shows no substantial technical updates or iOS/Android app launches, raising suspicions of being a repackaged Web2 product. - **Hooked Protocol**: Its Learn-to-Earn model initially attracted users through subsidies, but token value collapsed 99% after incentives faded. Its shift to "AI-powered education" appears more like marketing than tangible tech progress. - **Saga**: Positioned as a "one-click chain launch" solution, it pivoted repeatedly between gaming and AI narratives due to lack of adoption. A $7M security breach and 99% token drop further eroded trust. - **Dymension**: Despite claiming 10,000+ RollApps, most show no activity. TVL remains low at $1.3M, and the token price dropped 99%, reflecting a ghost ecosystem. Zombie projects persist due to: 1. Capital-driven listings prioritizing narrative over substance. 2. Opaque team backgrounds enabling low-exit accountability. 3. "Narrative parasitism"—rebranding to chase trends without real development. In 2026, investors must prioritize verifiable deliverables, organic user retention beyond subsidies, and teams with consistent focus—not frequent pivots. Real value comes from projects solving actual problems, not exploiting hype.

marsbit02/11 14:43

Stop Paying Attention to These Zombie Projects

marsbit02/11 14:43

Ending Zero-Sum Games: An In-Depth Research Report on Web3 Incentive Engineering and Odyssey Behavioral Dynamics

The report "Ending Zero-Sum Games: A Deep Dive into Web3 Incentive Engineering and Odyssey Behavioral Dynamics" analyzes the evolution of Web3 incentive mechanisms, arguing that traditional airdrop and points-based models have led to inefficiency, Sybil attacks, and low user retention. It proposes a shift from volume-based metrics to value-based unit economics, where user lifetime value (LTV) must exceed customer acquisition cost (CAC). The new paradigm defines incentives as a combination of Credit (e.g., SBTs), Privileges (e.g., governance rights), and Revenue Rights (e.g., real yield). A key framework classifies users into three behavioral archetypes: Gamma (profit-driven farmers), Beta (engaged explorers), and Alpha (long-term builders). Successful incentive design must encourage migration from Gamma to Alpha by making authentic contribution more profitable than farming. The report introduces technical solutions to ensure incentive compatibility (IC): - A Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment (DDA) mechanism to auto-calibrate task complexity. - A Proof of Value (PoV) model to measure "contribution density" (liquidity, time, governance activity). - A ZK-based behavioral attestation layer for private, Sybil-resistant user verification. Finally, the Odyssey model is envisioned to evolve from a marketing campaign into a native, embedded protocol (GaaS - Growth-as-a-Service) with interoperable credit across ecosystems, fostering a shift from speculative engagement to sustainable, value-aligned collaboration.

marsbit02/11 13:47

Ending Zero-Sum Games: An In-Depth Research Report on Web3 Incentive Engineering and Odyssey Behavioral Dynamics

marsbit02/11 13:47

活动图片