This Bitcoin long-term holder metric is nearing the BTC price 'bottom zone'

CointelegraphОпубликовано 2022-09-22Обновлено 2022-09-22

Введение

Bitcoin accumulation is in full swing during the downtrend despite BTC price having more room to drop.

A Bitcoin (BTC) on-chain indicator, which tracks the amount of coin supply held by long-term holders (LTH) in losses, is signaling that a market bottom could be close.

Eerily accurate Bitcoin bottom pundit

As of Sep. 22, approximately 30% of Bitcoin's LTHs were facing losses due to BTC's decline from $69,000 in November 2021 to around $19,000 now. That is about 3%-5% below the level that previously coincided with Bitcoin's market bottoms.

For instance, in March 2020, Bitcoin price declined below $4,000 amid the Covid-19-led market crash, which happened when the amount of BTC supply held by LTH in loss climbed toward 35%, as shown below.

Bitcoin long-term holder supply in losses. Source: Glassnode

Similarly, Bitcoin's December 2018 bottom of around $3,200 concurred alongside the LTH loss metric rising above 32%. In both cases, BTC/USD followed up by entering a long bullish cycle.

Hence, the number of LTHs in loss during a typical bear market tends to peak in the 30%-40% range. In other words, Bitcoin's price still has room to drop — likely into the $10,000-$14,000 range —for "LTHs in loss" to reach the historic bottom zone.

Coupled with the LTH supply metric, which tracks the BTC supply held by long-term holders, it appears that these investors accumulate and hold during market downturns and distribute during BTC price uptrends, as illustrated below.

Bitcoin total supply held by LTH. Source: Glassnode

Therefore, the next bull market may begin when total supply held by LTHs begins to decline.

Bitcoin accumulation is strong

Meanwhile, the number of accumulation addresses has been increasing consistently during the current bear market, data shows. The metric tracks addresses that have "at least two incoming non-dust transfers and have never spent funds."

Bitcoin number of accumulation addresses. Source: Glassnode

Interestingly, this is different from the previous bear cycles that saw the number of accumulation addresses drop or remain flat, as shown in the chart above, suggesting that "hodlers" are unfazed by current price levels.

In addition, the number of addresses with a non-zero balance stands around 42.7 million versus 39.6 million at the beginning of this year, showing consistent user growth in a bear market.

Bitcoin number of addresses with a non-zero balance. Source: TradingView

BTC price technicals hint at more downside

Bitcoin is nevertheless struggling to reclaim $20,000 as support in a higher interest rate environment. Its correlation with U.S. equities also hints at more downside in 2022.

From technical perspective, Bitcoin could drop further toward $14,000 in 2022 if its cup-and-handle breakdown pans out, as shown below.

BTC/USD three-day price chart featuring cup-and-handle pattern. Source: TradingView

Such a move should push the aforementioned "LTH in loss" metric toward the 32%-35% capitulation region, which could ultimately coincide with the bottom in the current bear market.

Похожее

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

Analysis of Bitcoin Trading Strategies: Why Celebrity Forecasts and Classic Models Fail, Leaving Only These Four Reliable Indicators This analysis examines the failure of common Bitcoin prediction methods and identifies four reliable indicators for constructing a trading strategy. The author reviewed all major BTC prediction approaches from 2017-2025, categorizing them into three groups: celebrity price targets (consistently over-optimistic), analytical models like Stock-to-Flow (broken post-2022), and on-chain signals. The key finding is that more data often creates confusion, not clarity. The strategy discards unreliable elements: celebrity predictions (incentivized to be extreme), pure models (invalidated by post-ETF market changes), and the Fear & Greed Index used alone (too many false signals). Four reliable indicators were selected: 1. **MVRV Z-Score:** Accurately identifies cycle bottoms when entering its green zone (e.g., 2018, 2020, 2022). Note: Its ability to call tops is now ineffective post-2024. 2. **SOPR (28-day MA):** Consistently signals bottoms when below 1.0, indicating holders are selling at a loss. 3. **ETF Net Flow:** A crucial post-2024 metric showing institutional momentum (e.g., sustained inflows = buying). 4. **Macro Liquidity (Fed policy & M2):** Sets the overall directional bias (e.g., bullish during easing cycles). The core strategy involves waiting for a multi-signal共振 (resonance). For example, a bottom signal requires MVRV in the green zone + SOPR < 1.0. A top signal requires overheated on-chain data + sustained ETF outflows. Macro policy sets the overall direction. The Fear & Greed Index is only used as a weighted confirmatory signal, never alone. Action is only taken when three or more indicators align. The author automated this into a monitoring system that sends Telegram alerts only when signals trigger. As of the article's date (April 15, 2026), the system showed a strong bottom signal: extreme fear (F&G=12), MVRV in the buy zone, and SOPR < 1.0. The only contrary signal was weak ETF flows. Historically, such triple on-chain共振 has preceded 100%+ returns. The conclusion emphasizes building a personal framework over relying on external predictions, allowing for iterative improvement and customization based on individual risk tolerance.

marsbit49 мин. назад

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

marsbit49 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片