一览当下四大生态的文字型 NFT 铸造平台

BanklessОпубликовано 2022-09-19Обновлено 2022-09-19

Введение

NFT 可以是任何东西 -- 艺术、数字土地、音乐、视频,只要你说得出来的都可以。

NFT 可以是任何东西 -- 艺术、数字土地、音乐、视频,只要你说得出来的都可以。

那么,文字型 NFT(Writing NFT)呢?

随着越来越多的人开始探索 NFT + 文本的可能性,这个数字事物领域正在快速增长。

在今天的 Metaversal 中,让我们谈谈文字型 NFT,快速浏览一下这个蓬勃发展的新领域!

文字型 NFT

文字型 NFT 的力量在于,它们允许你以传统媒体无法做到的方式创作和出版,并对文本进行实验。

例如,在 NFT 之前,通过一个简单的 DIY 过程,将文本数字化为收藏品是不可能的。而现在,只要了解一点 web3 知识,然后鼠标点击几下,用户就可以把文本 -- 如文章、博客、数字签名、小说、诗歌等 -- 变成 NFT,以新的、可组合的方式与他们的受众联系起来。

因此,文字型 NFT 有点像自我出版和 DIY 发行。有了这种唾手可得的媒介,你就有能力随时定制你的发布策略,轻松地向你的粉丝空投新内容,并利用许多开放的 Web3 资源,而这一切都在全球中立的基础设施之上,如以太坊,任何人都可以使用。

说到基础设施,我想到了我的下一个观点:文字型 NFT 也很有吸引力,因为它们可以将文本变成持久的数字工艺品、数字纪念品等等。一旦铸成,NFT 就永远活在链上。

当然,当涉及到保存/存储元数据时,NFT 不一定是一个万能的解决方案(尽管通过一些链上技术,它们可以是万能的),然而,尽管如此,它们提供了完全数字耐久性的可能性,而创作者们以前从来没有获得过这种机会。我曾经在 Instagram 上有一个诗歌账户,几年前关掉了,但现在我希望凭借我在此时此地铸造的文字型 NFT,回到那些早期的作品中去,我知道我可以让读者和我都能永远回到它们身边。

去哪铸造文字型 NFT?

♦️ 以太坊生态

目前,以太坊上没有明确迎合文字型 NFT 的铸造平台。对于较短的作品,现在的一个简单变通方法是拍一张你想要的文本照片,然后通过你选择的基础工具将其作为一个图像文件,例如 JPG、PNG、SVG,然后进行铸币。例如,我曾经使用这种基于图像的方法,通过 Zora 和 Foundation 铸造过诗歌。

🔴 Optimism 生态

Mirror

简介:Mirror 是一个面向写作者的 Web3 发布平台,它通过以太坊处理账户,通过 Arweave 处理数据存储,并通过 Optimism L2 扩展方案铸造文字型 NFT。这种铸币方式允许写作者免费创建文字型 NFT,因为 NFT 是在 L2 上的,所以交互费用也负担得起。

🟣 Polygon 生态

Cent

简介:2022 年 7 月,cent.co 发布了 Cent Pages,这是一个建立在 Polygon 上的 "高级 NFT - 出版平台"。该系统不仅仅是为写作者服务的,它还提供了免费的受众管理和内容发布工具,对用户非常友好。

Lenster

简介:Lenster 由 Polygon 上的 Lens Protocol 创建,是一个去中心化的社交媒体应用,人们可以以 NFT 的形式在其中创建和收集帖子。它就像是 Web3 原生版本的可收集的推文!

Zang

简介:Zang 是一个建立在 Polygon 上的链上文本 NFT 平台。该项目设计简约,但支持一些有趣的东西,如 HTML + CSS 创作。

🟣Tezos 生态

fx (text)

简介:fx (text)是 Tezos 上第一个 Web3 发布平台,由生成艺术平台 fx(hash) 背后的团队创建。这个近期推出的项目提供了自定义的文本编辑器,并支持 Markdown。

typed.art

简介:typed.art 也是 Tezos 上一个基于文本的 NFT 平台。

文字型 NFT 平台将不断发展

文字型 NFT 还处于非常早期,所以上面列出的项目,如果可以坚持下去,无疑将会发展得更远。

作为一个写作者和 NFT 铸造者,我是上述项目的忠实粉丝,但就我个人而言,我理想的文字型 NFT 平台将比目前市场上的平台更加广泛。我希望在未来的一站式文字型 NFT 平台中看到的一些功能,包括:

多链支持 -- 选择是否要在以太坊、Optimism、Arbitrum、Polygon 等链上铸币。

可定制的铸币参数 -- 单个铸币或铸造有版本的系列。

铸造特色图片 -- 允许文字型 NFT 有可能以文本 + 特色图片的形式进行铸币。

灵活的文本编辑器 -- 提供一个支持基本格式的文本编辑器,例如:段落分隔符。

链上和链下模式 -- 提供完全在链上铸造作品的文本元数据,或通过 Arweave、IPFS、Filecoin 等选择链下存储的能力。

简单铸币 -- 允许作者发布未铸币的文章草稿,然后人们可以根据自己的需要铸币。

原生市场 -- 提供一个内置的市场系统,以便人们可以直接在平台上列出他们的文字型 NFT 进行销售。

档案定制 -- 让创作者定制他们的档案,并将他们的创作分成系列,以便更好地发现。

Похожее

Autonomy or Compatibility: The Choice Facing China's AI Ecosystem Behind the Delay of DeepSeek V4

DeepSeek V4's repeated delay in early 2026 has sparked global discussions on "de-CUDA-ization" in AI. The highly anticipated trillion-parameter open-source model is undergoing deep adaptation to Huawei’s Ascend chips using the CANN framework, representing China’s first systematic attempt to run a core AI model outside the CUDA ecosystem. This shift, however, comes with significant engineering challenges. While the model uses a MoE architecture to reduce computational load, it places extreme demands on memory bandwidth, chip interconnects, and system scheduling—areas where NVIDIA’s mature CUDA ecosystem currently excels. Migrating to Ascend introduces complexities in hardware topology, communication latency, and software optimization due to CANN’s relative immaturity compared to CUDA. The move highlights a broader strategic dilemma: short-term compatibility with CUDA offers practical benefits and faster adoption, as seen in CANN’s efforts to emulate CUDA interfaces. Yet, long-term over-reliance on compatibility risks inheriting CUDA’s limitations and stifling native innovation. If global AI shifts away from transformer-based architectures, strict compatibility could lead to technological obsolescence. Despite these challenges, DeepSeek V4’s eventual release could demonstrate the viability of a full domestic AI stack and accelerate CANN’s ecosystem growth. However, true technological independence will require building an original software-hardware paradigm beyond compatibility—a critical task for China’s AI ambitions in the next 3-5 years.

marsbit12 мин. назад

Autonomy or Compatibility: The Choice Facing China's AI Ecosystem Behind the Delay of DeepSeek V4

marsbit12 мин. назад

How Blockchain Fills the Identity, Payment, and Trust Gaps for AI Agents?

AI Agents are rapidly evolving into autonomous economic participants, but they face critical gaps in identity, payment, and trust infrastructure. They currently lack standardized ways to prove who they are, what they are authorized to do, and how they should be compensated across different environments. Blockchain technology is emerging as a solution to these challenges by providing a neutral coordination layer. Public ledgers offer auditable credentials, wallets enable portable identities, and stablecoins serve as a programmable settlement layer. A key bottleneck is the absence of a universal identity standard for non-human entities—akin to "Know Your Agent" (KYA)—which would allow Agents to operate with verifiable, cryptographically signed credentials. Without this, Agents remain fragmented and face barriers to interoperability. Additionally, as AI systems take on governance roles, there is a risk that centralized control over models could undermine decentralized governance in practice. Cryptographic guarantees on training data, prompts, and behavior logs are essential to ensure Agents act in users' interests. Stablecoins and crypto-native payment rails are becoming the default for Agent-to-Agent commerce, enabling seamless, low-cost transactions for AI-native services. These systems support permissionless, programmable payments without traditional merchant onboarding. Finally, as AI scales, human oversight becomes impractical. Trust must be built into system architecture through verifiable provenance, on-chain attestations, and decentralized identity systems. The future of Agent economies depends on cryptographically enforced accountability, allowing users to delegate tasks with clearly defined constraints and transparent operation logs.

marsbit1 ч. назад

How Blockchain Fills the Identity, Payment, and Trust Gaps for AI Agents?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Six Years Since DeFi Summer, How Will the Decentralized Financial Revolution Continue?

In 2026, the DeFi sector faces a severe trust crisis following a series of high-profile security breaches, including a $292 million theft from KelpDAO’s rsETH, a $2.85 million exploit at Drift Protocol due to permission vulnerabilities, and a $14.9 million lending failure at Venus Protocol. These incidents triggered a withdrawal of approximately $10 billion from DeFi over a single weekend, highlighting systemic risks beyond smart contract flaws—such as governance, cross-chain complexity, and operational weaknesses. Despite these challenges, on-chain finance continues to grow, with capital shifting toward safer, regulated products. Stablecoins like USDT ($185B) and USDC ($78B) have reached a combined market cap of $263 billion, while tokenized U.S. Treasuries surged to $10.93 billion. Visa’s growing USDC settlement volume, now annualized at $3.5 billion, signals increasing institutional adoption of compliant blockchain-based financial infrastructure. The competition for the future of on-chain finance is intensifying. While native DeFi struggles with trust and capital outflows, regulated products—stablecoins, tokenized assets, and ETFs—are gaining dominance by offering programmable, 24/7 settlement without high DeFi risks. Over 80 crypto projects shut down in Q1 2026, reflecting dwindling patience for speculative ventures. The core challenge for open DeFi is to rebuild trust and demonstrate irreplaceable value—or risk ceding its role as the primary entry point to on-chain finance.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Six Years Since DeFi Summer, How Will the Decentralized Financial Revolution Continue?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片