2022上半年全球金融科技投融资报告

ForeChainОпубликовано 2022-07-21Обновлено 2022-07-21

Введение

全球金融科技股权融资1280笔,总额达3195.2亿元,最近3个季度持续下滑。

摘要

√ 全球金融科技股权融资1280笔,总额达3195.2亿元,最近3个季度持续下滑。

√ 金融科技股权融资数量及金额同比下降21.7%和10.7%。50亿元及以上超级融资均在一季度,二季度亿元级以上融资数量下降超36%;最近3个季度连续下跌,2022年二季度下滑加速,环比减少32.4%。

√ 135家金融科技公司被并购/合并,数量逐月下跌,或将延续至三季度。

√ 135家金融科技公司被并购/合并,公开披露的交易总额达1384.9亿元;并购交易数量已连续4个半年度上涨,但涨幅成下降趋势,由81.4%放缓至8.0%。2022上半年并购交易数量逐月下跌,影响或将持续到三季度。

√ 9家金融科技公司IPO,中科江南、格灵深瞳先后上市。

√ 独角兽企业贡献近半数融资总额,新晋独角兽达70家。

一、股权融资

上半年融资数量及金额均下跌,下半年不容乐观

据零壹智库不完全统计,2022年上半年全球1236个金融科技项目获得1280笔股权融资,同比下降21.7%;公开披露的融资总额达3195.2亿元,同比下降10.7%。从融资金额来看,全球金融科技股权融资在到达2021H1环比148.5%的高增长后,增速断崖式下跌至14.2%,直至2022H1已呈负增长状态,环比增幅为-21.8%;从融资数量来看,近3个半年度数据呈持续降低趋势。伴随新冠疫情及国际局势等不稳定因素影响, 2022下半年融资情况仍不容乐观。

全球金融科技融资金融TOP40(部分)

二、并购/合并

2022年1-6月,并购交易数量逐月下跌,6月跌幅达-26.3%,为上半年最高跌幅。虽半年度并购数据仍呈向好趋势,但季度情况已初现下降端倪,进一步结合2022年月度数量持续下跌趋势,或将持续到第三季度。

三、IPO上市

据零壹智库不完全统计,2022年上半年全球有9家金融科技公司上市,其中,中美各2家,澳大利亚、加拿大、英国和以色列各1家。

四、独角兽情况

据零壹智库不完全统计,2022年上半年新晋金融科技独角兽70家,企业估值较多分布在10-20亿美元区间,法国数字银行Qonto和数字货币交易平台KuCoin的估值分别超过50亿美元和100亿美元。美国独占鳌头,占据全球半数独角兽,英国、印度、中国等各收获3家新晋独角兽企业;中国的新晋独角兽企业分别为贝宝金融(20亿美元)、AMTD Digital(12+亿美元)、分贝通(10亿美元)。上半年107家金融科技独角兽获得117笔融资,公开披露的股权融资总额为1454.6亿元,在所有融资中贡献了45.5%。

新晋70家金融科技独角兽及其估值(部分)

统计说明

【1】本报告界定的金融科技公司是指,利用大数据、人工智能、云计算、区块链、移动互联网、生物识别等技术为银行、保险、证券、支付、贷款、众筹等金融、类金融、新金融机构提供产品、技术解决方案的公司。

【2】本报告所指的股权融资包括股权众筹、种子/天使、pre-A、A、A+到Pre-IPO之前的私募股权融资,不包括ICO、IEO、STO、可转债、并购、新三板、新三板定增、IPO、IPO+等。

【3】本报告所指的股权融资早中晚期处理方式为:早期融资包含股权众筹、天使轮/种子轮及A轮;中期融资包含B轮至C轮;后期融资包含D轮至Pre-IPO轮。

本报告对于未披露具体金额的融资处理方式为:未透露=0,数十万=50万,数/近百万=100万,数/近千万=1000万,数/近亿/亿元及以上=1亿,数十亿=10亿。

【4】为了方便统计,在进行货币换算时,本报告忽略汇率短期变化,约定不同货币之间换算方式为:1美元=7元,1欧元=8元,1英镑=8.8元,1卢比=0.09元,1韩元=0.006元,1加元=5元,1瑞士法郎=7元,1港元=0.8元,1瑞典克朗=0.8元,1日元=0.06元,1澳元=4.86元。

【5】本报告所有数据来自公开渠道披露,由于可能的遗漏或迟滞,我们会对往期统计数据进行追溯处理,对于已发布的报告不再单独更新。

公众号

Похожее

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

Analysis of Bitcoin Trading Strategies: Why Celebrity Forecasts and Classic Models Fail, Leaving Only These Four Reliable Indicators This analysis examines the failure of common Bitcoin prediction methods and identifies four reliable indicators for constructing a trading strategy. The author reviewed all major BTC prediction approaches from 2017-2025, categorizing them into three groups: celebrity price targets (consistently over-optimistic), analytical models like Stock-to-Flow (broken post-2022), and on-chain signals. The key finding is that more data often creates confusion, not clarity. The strategy discards unreliable elements: celebrity predictions (incentivized to be extreme), pure models (invalidated by post-ETF market changes), and the Fear & Greed Index used alone (too many false signals). Four reliable indicators were selected: 1. **MVRV Z-Score:** Accurately identifies cycle bottoms when entering its green zone (e.g., 2018, 2020, 2022). Note: Its ability to call tops is now ineffective post-2024. 2. **SOPR (28-day MA):** Consistently signals bottoms when below 1.0, indicating holders are selling at a loss. 3. **ETF Net Flow:** A crucial post-2024 metric showing institutional momentum (e.g., sustained inflows = buying). 4. **Macro Liquidity (Fed policy & M2):** Sets the overall directional bias (e.g., bullish during easing cycles). The core strategy involves waiting for a multi-signal共振 (resonance). For example, a bottom signal requires MVRV in the green zone + SOPR < 1.0. A top signal requires overheated on-chain data + sustained ETF outflows. Macro policy sets the overall direction. The Fear & Greed Index is only used as a weighted confirmatory signal, never alone. Action is only taken when three or more indicators align. The author automated this into a monitoring system that sends Telegram alerts only when signals trigger. As of the article's date (April 15, 2026), the system showed a strong bottom signal: extreme fear (F&G=12), MVRV in the buy zone, and SOPR < 1.0. The only contrary signal was weak ETF flows. Historically, such triple on-chain共振 has preceded 100%+ returns. The conclusion emphasizes building a personal framework over relying on external predictions, allowing for iterative improvement and customization based on individual risk tolerance.

marsbit11 мин. назад

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

marsbit11 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片