Fed conference hears stablecoins may boost USD as global reserve currency

CointelegraphОпубликовано 2022-07-06Обновлено 2022-07-06

Введение

The underlying tech of a central bank digital currency wasn’t enough to convince some panelists at a Fed conference that it could change the international currency system.

A note published by the United States Federal Reserve on a recently held conference found a majority of exports believe a U.S. dollar central bank digital currency (CBDC) would not drastically change the global currency ecosystem.

Panelists at the conference also agreed CBDC development outside of the U.S. doesn’t threaten the status of the dollar, but th development of cryptocurrencies could alter the role of the dollar globally, with some saying stablecoins could even boost the U.S. dollar's role as the global dominant reserve currency.

The assessments came from expert panelists at a June 16 and 17 conference hosted by the Federal Reserve on the “International Roles of the U.S. dollar” collated into a note and published by The Fed on July 5. The conference was used to gain insight from policymakers, researchers, and market experts to understand “potential factors that may alter the dominance of the U.S. dollar in the future” including new technologies and payment systems.

A discussion on a panel addressing digital assets and if CBDCs would provide advantages for the dollar had panelists agree that the underpinning technology alone wouldn’t “lead to drastic changes in the global currency ecosystem”.

Speakers on the panel included digital currency initiative director at MIT, Neha Narula, head of research at the Bank of International Settlements, Hyun Song Shin, chief investment strategist at asset management firm Bridgewater, Rebecca Patterson and HSBC bank’s head of FX research Paul Mackel.

The panelists agreed that factors such as market and political stability, along with market depth, are more crucial for dominant reserve currencies like the U.S. dollar that the development of a Fed issued digital dollar.

The development of CBDCs by other countries was also generally agreed by the panel to have a tendency to focus more heavily on that country’s own domestic retail market, and therefore was considered “not a threat to the U.S. dollar's international status”.

The Federal Reserve noted the amount and scope of CBDC’s for making cross-border payments is “still quite limited”, suggesting that these systems don’t yet pose a threat to the dollar, which accounts for a majority of international financial transactions according to an October 2021 note.

Focusing on cryptocurrencies, panelists said further development of digital assets could change the international role of the dollar, but adoption by institutional investors was throttled by a lacking regulatory framework, leaving the current crypto market to be dominated by speculative retail investors.

Another panel including Fed financial research advisor Asani Sarkar and finance professor Jiakai Chen, concluded that part of the demand for crypto, especially Bitcoin (BTC), was driven by a desire to evade domestic capital controls, citing BTC prices in China trading at a premium in comparison to other countries.

Despite this, the Fed says panelists didn’t see crypto as a threat to the global role of the dollar in the short term. Some even suggested in the “medium run” that crypto could reinforce the dollars' role if “new sets of services structured around these assets are linked to the dollar”, a likely reference to stablecoins, cryptocurrencies pegged to the value of a fiat currency (usually USD.)

The advice by panelists may help put a new spin on things for members of the Federal Reserve.

Previously, the Federal Reserve Board of governors said in June that stablecoins not sufficiently backed by liquid assets and proper regulatory standards “create risks to investors and potentially to the financial system” likely referencing the collapse of TerraUSD Classic (USTC).

The comment by the Board came before Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell stated a CBDC could “potentially help maintain the dollar’s international standing”.

Похожее

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

Analysis of Bitcoin Trading Strategies: Why Celebrity Forecasts and Classic Models Fail, Leaving Only These Four Reliable Indicators This analysis examines the failure of common Bitcoin prediction methods and identifies four reliable indicators for constructing a trading strategy. The author reviewed all major BTC prediction approaches from 2017-2025, categorizing them into three groups: celebrity price targets (consistently over-optimistic), analytical models like Stock-to-Flow (broken post-2022), and on-chain signals. The key finding is that more data often creates confusion, not clarity. The strategy discards unreliable elements: celebrity predictions (incentivized to be extreme), pure models (invalidated by post-ETF market changes), and the Fear & Greed Index used alone (too many false signals). Four reliable indicators were selected: 1. **MVRV Z-Score:** Accurately identifies cycle bottoms when entering its green zone (e.g., 2018, 2020, 2022). Note: Its ability to call tops is now ineffective post-2024. 2. **SOPR (28-day MA):** Consistently signals bottoms when below 1.0, indicating holders are selling at a loss. 3. **ETF Net Flow:** A crucial post-2024 metric showing institutional momentum (e.g., sustained inflows = buying). 4. **Macro Liquidity (Fed policy & M2):** Sets the overall directional bias (e.g., bullish during easing cycles). The core strategy involves waiting for a multi-signal共振 (resonance). For example, a bottom signal requires MVRV in the green zone + SOPR < 1.0. A top signal requires overheated on-chain data + sustained ETF outflows. Macro policy sets the overall direction. The Fear & Greed Index is only used as a weighted confirmatory signal, never alone. Action is only taken when three or more indicators align. The author automated this into a monitoring system that sends Telegram alerts only when signals trigger. As of the article's date (April 15, 2026), the system showed a strong bottom signal: extreme fear (F&G=12), MVRV in the buy zone, and SOPR < 1.0. The only contrary signal was weak ETF flows. Historically, such triple on-chain共振 has preceded 100%+ returns. The conclusion emphasizes building a personal framework over relying on external predictions, allowing for iterative improvement and customization based on individual risk tolerance.

marsbit49 мин. назад

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

marsbit49 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片