Walmart Embraces XRP? OnePay Payment Service Ushers In A New Beginning

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2025-10-21Обновлено 2025-10-21

Введение

A post shared by Chad Steingraber on X claims that Walmart’s financial technology arm, OnePay, is preparing to add RLUSD...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

A post shared by Chad Steingraber on X claims that Walmart’s financial technology arm, OnePay, is preparing to add RLUSD payments on the XRP Ledger, through a partnership with ZeroHash, a licensed digital asset company based in Chicago that provides crypto infrastructure for payment platforms. The plan connects Walmart’s growing payment system with the XRP Ledger, where stablecoin Ripple USD (RLUSD) is now supported. The partnership points to Walmart’s growing link with Ripple as part of its future in digital finance and could help OnePay bring blockchain payments into everyday use. 

Walmart’s OnePay Expands Into Crypto With ZeroHash Partnership

According to the details shared by Chad Steingraber on X, OnePay, the fintech company majority-owned by Walmart, will soon add cryptocurrency trading and custody to its mobile app. Through this setup, OnePay users will be able to manage their digital assets securely inside the app, just as they do with regular banking tools.

Related Reading: Analyst Tells XRP Investors To Pay Attention To This Development That Impacts Them

OnePay, founded by Walmart and Ribbit Capital in 2021, already offers a range of financial tools, including savings accounts, credit and debit cards, buy-now-pay-later options, and mobile plans. OnePay has been gradually expanding its digital services to create what it calls an “everything app” for personal finance. Adding crypto capabilities now places OnePay closer to that goal and may connect Walmart customers to XRP-based payments in the near future.

By partnering with ZeroHash, OnePay is stepping into a wider financial network that includes direct links to the XRP ecosystem. It could help Walmart reach millions of users who want a simple way to use digital assets. 

ZeroHash Integrates Ripple USD (RLUSD) On XRP Ledger

Documents shared with Steingraber’s post on X show that ZeroHash has launched support for Ripple USD (RLUSD) on the XRP Ledger. The release, dated February 3, 2025, confirms that users can buy, sell, deposit, and withdraw RLUSD, including for users in New York. The same update lists RLUSD as a stablecoin available on both the XRP and Ethereum networks, though the focus is clearly on XRP for OnePay’s system.

Related Reading: Ripple CEO Blows The Whistle On Major Gap Between Traditional Finance And Crypto

Ripple USD (RLUSD) works as a stable digital dollar built on the XRP Ledger. It is suitable for regular financial use as it supports fast and low-cost payments and maintains a steady value. ZeroHash LLC and ZeroHash Liquidity Services LLC are licensed by the New York State Department of Financial Services to offer virtual currency services, allowing them to provide crypto transactions and custody for platforms like OnePay safely.

With OnePay powered by ZeroHash and RLUSD supported on XRP, the connection between Walmart and the Ripple ecosystem is now clear. The information shared by Chad Steingraber shows that Walmart is entering a new phase in digital finance, one where major retail companies begin applying blockchain technology to real payment systems. 

 

XRP price chart from Tradingview.com (RLUSD)
Price struggles to hold support | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image created with Dall.E, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.
Sandra White

Sandra White

Follow

I'm Sandra White, a writer at Bitcoinist, and I provide the latest updates on the world of cryptocurrencies. I believe crypto a gateway to a new order and I have made it my life's mission to help educate as much people as possible. When I'm not at work, I love listening to music, learning new things, and dream of traveling around the world.

Full Profile

Related Posts

XRP

What Every XRP Investor Needs To Hear: Why You Might Not Be Able To Sell At The Top

4 hours ago
Ripple XRP news David Schwartz

Ripple CTO David Schwartz Joins Another Company In New Leadership Role

10 hours ago
XRP

Market Expert Reveals Why The XRP Price Is Still Crashing Amid Good News Surrounding Ripple

1 day ago
XRP

Analyst Tells XRP Investors To Pay Attention To This Development That Impacts Them

1 day ago
XRP price $1,000

XRP Price Is Trapped Under A Bearish Structure, What Happens If It Doesn’t Break $2.5

1 day ago
XRP news

ZachXBT Exposes $3 Million XRP Heist After Hardware Wallet Breach

1 day ago

Похожее

Even the DAT Companies Included in the Russell Index Can't Save Ethereum

The FTSE Russell preliminary list for 2026 includes several crypto-related companies like CoreWeave, Iren, Galaxy Digital, and DAT firms BitMine and Sharplink. Inclusion in the Russell 3000 index means billions in passive fund inflows will automatically buy these stocks. While this is positive for the stock prices of these Digital Asset Technology (DAT) companies, the article argues it may not directly benefit the underlying cryptocurrencies like Ethereum. DAT firms can use stock price gains to buy more crypto, but the capital doesn't flow directly to the assets. Citing David Hoffman's recent exit from ETH, the piece notes a structural issue: Ethereum's value as a public good ("giver, not taker") and the profit capture by L2s and applications mean only a small portion of ecosystem success translates to ETH's price. Despite BitMine buying millions of ETH during its price decline, Ethereum's value has fallen significantly. The conclusion is that while index inclusion marks traditional finance acceptance, the "ETH as money" narrative is fading. New value narratives for native tokens are needed, as current mechanisms like chain revenue and buybacks may have inherent limits.

marsbit36 мин. назад

Even the DAT Companies Included in the Russell Index Can't Save Ethereum

marsbit36 мин. назад

Confirmed: GPT-5.5 "Brain Drain" Exposed, OpenAI's Own Documentation Admits It

Summary: Evidence emerges that OpenAI's GPT-5.5 may be "silently" switching to a less capable model during use. Users report that after roughly two hours, the GPT-5.5 Extended Thinking model begins responding instantly with significantly degraded output quality, while the interface continues to display the premium model's label. Complaints on developer forums describe a loss of instruction-following ability and poor code quality, with even the highest "xhigh" tier affected. This is corroborated by an OpenAI help document stating that after Plus users exceed 160 messages per 3 hours, the system "silently" switches to a "mini" model without any user notification. Pro users also report "heavy thinking" modes being throttled during high server loads. Trace commands from earlier incidents have shown users requesting GPT-5.3 Codex but receiving GPT-5.2 outputs. OpenAI acknowledged performance degradation in mid-May, marking it resolved, but user reports surged again in late May. The pattern mirrors past controversies with GPT-5, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 releases, where each update was followed by user complaints of reduced capability. The article suggests cost-cutting on compute may be a factor, noting that while GPT-5.5 users struggle, GPT-5.6 is already being tested internally.

marsbit36 мин. назад

Confirmed: GPT-5.5 "Brain Drain" Exposed, OpenAI's Own Documentation Admits It

marsbit36 мин. назад

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

The Agentic OS: Beyond AI, It's About the Foundational Stack In 2026, major operating systems like Android, iOS, HarmonyOS, and Windows are entering the "Agentic" era, integrating proactive AI assistants deeply into the system layer. However, the real competition lies not in the flashy AI features showcased at events, but in the three-layer foundational stack that enables them: the system-level AI Runtime, proprietary/controllable chips, and the on-device/cloud model matrix. The AI Runtime acts as the central scheduler, managing model inference, resource allocation, and exposing capabilities to apps. Controllable chips (e.g., Apple Silicon, Google Tensor, Huawei Kirin) are crucial for deep hardware-software co-optimization, determining the efficiency and experience limits of on-device Agents. The on-device/cloud model matrix provides the "intelligence," with proprietary, chip-optimized small models (like Gemini Nano, Apple's ~3B model) handling daily tasks locally for low latency, privacy, and reliability, while cloud models tackle complex requests. Deep synergy between these three layers enables key Agent differentiators: ultra-low latency and power efficiency, genuine "on-device first" privacy, access to system-level personal context across apps, and reliable performance as a system service even offline. OS vendors with strong integration across this stack (like Apple, Google, and Huawei) build a deeper moat. Beyond this core stack, long-term competitiveness depends on variables like structured App integration (e.g., App Intents/AppFunctions) for reliable multi-step workflows, and robust privacy frameworks that build user trust. This shift towards Agentic OS extends beyond phones and PCs to IoT, cars, and XR glasses via existing multi-device ecosystems. The race is won not in a keynote, but through generations of meticulously co-developed chips, models, and system software.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

marsbit1 ч. назад

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's recent statement that "intelligence will become a utility like electricity or water" has sparked significant controversy, primarily around copyright issues and the nature of AI development. While positioning AI as a utility serves as a compelling narrative for infrastructure investors, critics argue the analogy is flawed in three key areas. First, there's a fundamental "property gap." Traditional utilities like water and power create new, physical infrastructure from scratch. In contrast, major AI models are trained by reorganizing vast amounts of existing human-created content—books, articles, code, etc.—often scraped from the web without explicit permission or compensation to creators. This "free acquisition, paid resale" model is seen by many as ethically problematic. Second, there's a "pricing gap." True public utilities are typically regulated to ensure universal service with non-discriminatory, cost-plus pricing. AI's token-based pricing, however, involves significant price discrimination (e.g., output tokens costing much more than input tokens) and is designed for revenue maximization, not equitable access. Third, a "governance gap" exists. Utilities operate under public oversight, while AI pricing and development are currently controlled by a few private companies. Furthermore, the industry's own shift toward buying licensed training data (e.g., deals with Reddit or news publishers) undermines its previous legal reliance on "fair use" for freely scraped data. In conclusion, while AI is indeed becoming a foundational technology, calling it a public utility remains contentious. The title requires not just scale and a pay-per-use model, but also credible solutions for data provenance, equitable pricing, and public governance.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

marsbit1 ч. назад

Ethereum OG Sitting On 630,000% Gain Wakes Up After 10 Years

On-chain data reveals a long-dormant Ethereum wallet from 2015, containing 2,000 ETH, has been reactivated after 10.8 years. Classified as a "pre-mine address," it belonged to an early participant from Ethereum's 2014 presale. The wallet's initial $620 investment, untouched for over a decade, is now worth over $4.2 million—a gain of nearly 630,000%. The activity began with a small test transfer of 1 ETH, followed by a near-complete movement of the remaining 1,997.9 ETH. While the funds have not been sent to a centralized exchange, the sudden activity suggests the owner may have recently regained access to lost or forgotten keys.

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Ethereum OG Sitting On 630,000% Gain Wakes Up After 10 Years

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow