Chinese Tech Titans Retreat From Hong Kong Stablecoin Launch After Beijing Warning

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2025-10-21Обновлено 2025-10-21

Введение

Chinese tech giants Ant Group and JD.com have paused plans to issue stablecoins in Hong Kong after being told to...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Chinese tech giants Ant Group and JD.com have paused plans to issue stablecoins in Hong Kong after being told to stop by mainland regulators, according to reports. The move comes as Beijing reasserts control over who can issue money-like tokens, even as Hong Kong builds a legal path for licensed stablecoin firms.

Beijing Steps In

People’s Bank of China and the Cyberspace Administration of China asked the companies not to go ahead with their projects, people familiar with the matter told reporters.

Ant had said in June it planned to take part in Hong Kong’s pilot for fiat-referenced stablecoins, and JD.com had signalled similar interest.

Hong Kong’s legislature passed a stablecoin bill in May that created a licensing regime for issuers, aiming to bring rules and clarity to the market after years of uncertainty.

Under that law, anyone issuing stablecoins tied to Hong Kong dollars must hold a license from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.

Industry Reaction And Risk Concerns

Regulators in Beijing have warned that privately run stablecoins could threaten monetary control if large tech groups or brokerages were allowed to act like currency issuers.

Reports have disclosed that PBoC officials were particularly uneasy about letting non-state firms issue tokens that might operate like money.

Total crypto market cap at $3.72 trillion on the daily chart: TradingView

Stablecoins are usually pegged to a fiat currency such as the US dollar and are widely used by traders to move funds between crypto assets, which is why officials worry about the scale and reach such tokens could achieve.

The concern is less about the technology and more about who controls the payments and reserves that back these tokens.

Hong Kong’s Timeline And What Might Happen Next

Hong Kong has said it expects to begin issuing licenses under its stablecoin regime in the near term, with regulators signaling that only a limited number of licenses would be granted at first.

Market watchers see the city as a testing ground for regulated, fiat-backed tokens — but mainland guidance can change the plans of Chinese firms that want to participate.

The pause follows broader signals from Beijing about offshore digital asset activity. In recent months, regulators have also asked some brokerages to slow or stop tokenization and other real-world asset work tied to Hong Kong, reflecting wider caution about rapid growth of crypto-linked products across borders.

Featured image from Gemini, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Похожее

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

The article profiles two prominent figures, Serenity and Leopold Aschenbrenner, who are gaining attention for their unconventional investment strategies focused on the physical constraints of the AI boom, moving beyond mainstream software narratives. Serenity, an anonymous online trader, advocates a "shiso leaf" theory. He targets small-cap companies with monopolies on critical, overlooked components in the AI hardware supply chain, such as specific semiconductor materials. His deep, technical analysis of bottlenecks in areas like co-packaged optics (CPO) has reportedly yielded massive returns, though his anonymity and focus on illiquid micro-cap stocks pose significant risks for followers. Leopold Aschenbrenner, a former OpenAI researcher, founded a multi-billion dollar hedge fund. His macro thesis argues that physical infrastructure—power grids, land, data centers—is the true bottleneck for AI growth, lagging far behind chip production. Consequently, his fund employs an infrastructure arbitrage strategy: heavily investing in storage and compute infrastructure companies while placing massive bearish bets (put options) against major semiconductor stocks, betting their valuations will correct as physical constraints become apparent. While their methods differ—Serenity drills into microscopic supply chain details, while Leopold takes a macroscopic, infrastructure-focused view—both share a core belief: the real power and investment alpha in the AI era lie in controlling scarce physical resources, not just software. The article concludes by noting the inherent risks in both approaches, such as liquidity issues for micro-caps and timing risks for macro bets, but suggests they signal a broader market re-evaluation of AI's foundational assets.

marsbit5 ч. назад

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

marsbit5 ч. назад

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

In the Agents era of blockchain, traditional value capture theories face challenges. The "Fat Protocol" theory, dominant since 2016, suggested protocols capture most value as their tokens are essential for network use. However, the proliferation of interchangeable L1s, L2s, and modular layers has eroded protocol scarcity and pricing power. Conversely, the "Fat App" theory posits that applications capturing user relationships (like wallets and exchanges) become the primary value layer by controlling distribution and transaction flows. This aligns with the current "Great Repricing" cycle. Agents disrupt this logic. As software users, they lack brand loyalty, prioritize cost and efficiency, and switch between platforms seamlessly. This undermines the front-end UX moats that "Fat Apps" rely on. The article explores several potential futures: 1. **Headless Applications:** Current leading apps could strip their front-ends and become backend API infrastructure for Agents, preserving their role. 2. **Protocol Resurgence:** If integration becomes trivial, Agents might bypass aggregators and interact directly with protocols, reviving "Fat Protocol" dynamics. 3. **Pricing Power Collapse:** Agents' rational, frictionless routing could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward cost and leaving little profit for intermediaries. 4. **Unprecedented Activity:** Agents may enable new, high-frequency, machine-to-machine economic activities, expanding the total value pie even if margins are thin. 5. **A New, Unnamed Model:** Historically, major tech shifts (like the internet's attention economy) create unforeseen business models. The Agents era may spawn entirely new ways to capture value. The most likely outcome is a coexistence where "Fat Apps" continue to serve human users valuing UX, while a separate, Agent-driven economy emerges governed by different rules—where loyalty is based on factors like liquidity, latency, and settlement guarantees rather than brand.

marsbit6 ч. назад

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

marsbit6 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片