Evernorth Launches XRP Vehicle Ahead of Nasdaq Listing

TheCryptoTimesОпубликовано 2025-10-20Обновлено 2025-10-20

Evernorth Holdings, the new institutional platform backed by Ripple veterans and major crypto investors, is going public with a different playbook: building an active XRP treasury instead of simply tracking token prices. The Nevada-based company announced its merger with Armada Acquisition Corp II, securing over $1 billion in expected proceeds to fund open-market XRP purchases and ecosystem growth.

Unlike a traditional ETF, Evernorth aims to increase the amount of XRP per share by deploying its treasury into lending and liquidity operations. 

The model echoes traditional asset management strategies but applies them to blockchain markets, a sign that institutional finance is moving past passive exposure and into active participation.

CEO Asheesh Birla, a longtime Ripple executive, said Evernorth was created to “capitalize on institutional demand for compliant, yield-generating digital assets.” 

Evernorth’s strategy focuses on utility-driven growth through payments, lending, and DeFi participation. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said, “Asheesh and team are building something special with Evernorth”.

Active treasury model signals new institutional playbook

Evernorth’s launch reflects a institutional trend, with crypto increasingly viewed as part of emerging liquidity management frameworks rather than purely speculative markets. By positioning XRP as a yield-bearing treasury asset, Evernorth blends traditional finance with blockchain tools, echoing early Bitcoin treasury models but with an added yield focus.

Evernorth’s debut aligns with Ripple’s expansion, as XRP gains institutional traction. XRP futures on CME have surpassed $3 billion in volume, with regulated products now spreading across global markets.

If July’s XRP futures fed market frenzy, Evernorth’s treasury model seeks to channel that volatility into strategy, positioning XRP as capital, not just chatter.

Also read: XRP Futures ETFs Debut While Market Eyes Spot Approval


Mobile Only Image

Похожее

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

The article profiles two prominent figures, Serenity and Leopold Aschenbrenner, who are gaining attention for their unconventional investment strategies focused on the physical constraints of the AI boom, moving beyond mainstream software narratives. Serenity, an anonymous online trader, advocates a "shiso leaf" theory. He targets small-cap companies with monopolies on critical, overlooked components in the AI hardware supply chain, such as specific semiconductor materials. His deep, technical analysis of bottlenecks in areas like co-packaged optics (CPO) has reportedly yielded massive returns, though his anonymity and focus on illiquid micro-cap stocks pose significant risks for followers. Leopold Aschenbrenner, a former OpenAI researcher, founded a multi-billion dollar hedge fund. His macro thesis argues that physical infrastructure—power grids, land, data centers—is the true bottleneck for AI growth, lagging far behind chip production. Consequently, his fund employs an infrastructure arbitrage strategy: heavily investing in storage and compute infrastructure companies while placing massive bearish bets (put options) against major semiconductor stocks, betting their valuations will correct as physical constraints become apparent. While their methods differ—Serenity drills into microscopic supply chain details, while Leopold takes a macroscopic, infrastructure-focused view—both share a core belief: the real power and investment alpha in the AI era lie in controlling scarce physical resources, not just software. The article concludes by noting the inherent risks in both approaches, such as liquidity issues for micro-caps and timing risks for macro bets, but suggests they signal a broader market re-evaluation of AI's foundational assets.

marsbit5 ч. назад

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

marsbit5 ч. назад

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

In the Agents era of blockchain, traditional value capture theories face challenges. The "Fat Protocol" theory, dominant since 2016, suggested protocols capture most value as their tokens are essential for network use. However, the proliferation of interchangeable L1s, L2s, and modular layers has eroded protocol scarcity and pricing power. Conversely, the "Fat App" theory posits that applications capturing user relationships (like wallets and exchanges) become the primary value layer by controlling distribution and transaction flows. This aligns with the current "Great Repricing" cycle. Agents disrupt this logic. As software users, they lack brand loyalty, prioritize cost and efficiency, and switch between platforms seamlessly. This undermines the front-end UX moats that "Fat Apps" rely on. The article explores several potential futures: 1. **Headless Applications:** Current leading apps could strip their front-ends and become backend API infrastructure for Agents, preserving their role. 2. **Protocol Resurgence:** If integration becomes trivial, Agents might bypass aggregators and interact directly with protocols, reviving "Fat Protocol" dynamics. 3. **Pricing Power Collapse:** Agents' rational, frictionless routing could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward cost and leaving little profit for intermediaries. 4. **Unprecedented Activity:** Agents may enable new, high-frequency, machine-to-machine economic activities, expanding the total value pie even if margins are thin. 5. **A New, Unnamed Model:** Historically, major tech shifts (like the internet's attention economy) create unforeseen business models. The Agents era may spawn entirely new ways to capture value. The most likely outcome is a coexistence where "Fat Apps" continue to serve human users valuing UX, while a separate, Agent-driven economy emerges governed by different rules—where loyalty is based on factors like liquidity, latency, and settlement guarantees rather than brand.

marsbit6 ч. назад

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

marsbit6 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片